tiistai 26. helmikuuta 2019

DNA Damage at below safe Cell Phone Radiation Levels



Readers are probably familiar with the idea of electrophoresis, although they may not know the term. The technique is used for DNA fingerprinting to determine paternity.
In television documentaries we often see forensic scientists holding a small X-ray film with lines of bar-codes. These bars are the physical locations of the genetic material after the DNA strands have been chemically separated, broken up and dragged through a viscous gel towards an anode. The bars mark the cumulative lodging place of many identical DNA pieces from many different cells.
We have the same DNA in every cell of our bodies, and DNA molecules are negatively charged. Each piece has a different physical resistance, so these bars mark the cumulative lodging place of many identical DNA genetic parts.
During the years of childhood and growth cells are constantly dividing and duplicating by a process called ‘mitosis’, so it is especially important that the DNA replicates accurately and that the gene sequences remain in order; these two-metre helical strands of paired molecules contain the basic blueprint for constructing and maintaining viable life.
There are 50,000 billion cells in the body, and even in older people the body is still actively creating another billion new cells every hour, so the incorruptibility of DNA is all-important in our health and survival.
Despite this constant manufacture of new cells, we don’t keep growing in size after adulthood. A few die from normal wear and tear (‘necrosis’) but, to maintain the balance, mis-copied or unwanted cells are instructed to suicide (‘apoptosis’) by the cells nearby.
Programmed cell death is an essential part of life, and, if this euthanasic message fails to trigger suicide and the cell goes into a phase of uncontrolled division, tumors and cancers result.
The cells of the heart muscle, and those of the nerves and brain neurones don’t replicate, but all others are reproducing regularly over your lifetime. So at the molecular-cell level there’s a new you about every five years.
This raises the question: Why do we get cancer?
Cancer is slow in onset; it generally takes between ten and twenty years to incubate. Why do we get it at all if most cells are only five years old?
Obviously the defects which cause uncontrolled cell growth are often (but not always) transmitted from mother-cells to daughter-cells during mitosis. Defects like these are called ‘mutations’ Ñ however, not all mutations are disruptive or dangerous to our health. DNA in our cells constantly comes under attack from many sources, and the normal body processes ignore or handle most of the defects.
External messages are also transmitted across cell boundaries and between cells to initiate apoptosis (programmed cell death), but these may similarly be short-circuited or distorted in some way. These messages are carried by electrically-oriented flows of ions and by more complex protein and enzyme molecules.
The point is, that at the molecular level, humans cell functions are very dynamic, very regenerative, constantly being disrupted and repaired, highly tolerant of defects, and very much affected by electrical influences.
Recently the biomedical researchers have begun using a technique similar to DNA fingerprinting to investigate damage to DNA. This is called single-cell gel (SCG) electrophoresis or ‘comet assay’, and it is capable of finding defects in single cell exposed to toxic chemicals or ionizing radiation.
Our interest here is in whether this technique can detect damage to cell functions or DNA viability from low level radio waves. Classical radio theory says radio waves can’t damage molecules, because their energy is not sufficient to break chemical bonds.
The technique gets its name from the comet-and-tail appearance which results from broken genetic material being dragged through the gel by electrical attraction ahead of the more-resistant DNA bundles.
Think of this as towing a very old car through a few miles of deep mud, then counting the bits and pieces that fall off in the process. But here the car (the DNA ball) drags behind and the broken bits move out ahead.

dna_fu1
Fig.1 Unexposed control. The bundle is simply DNA.

caldna
Fig.3 X-ray calibration: After 25.6 rads.
DNA strand breaks are now very obvious.

Figure 2 and 3 shows the comets from immune cells which were subject to various levels of X-rays exposure for calibration purposes. This sequence establishes the fact that the breaks in the DNA are dose-related: higher exposures produce more and therefore longer and more complex comet tails.
Comet assay techniques were developed by Swedish scientists Östling and Johannson in 1984, and then later refined by Narendra Pal (‘NP’) Singh in 1988 (with other improvements later). At that time Dr Singh was a research scientist at the US National Institute on Aging.
Chemical processes are employed to digest and remove all the lipids and proteins from the cell to express the DNA breaks, and Singh’s alkaline separation techniques are now widely recognized for their sensitivity and reliability. Alternative ‘neutral’ approaches are applied also in some research laboratories.
Comet assays reveal damage to DNA from air and water pollution, food additives, diet and smoking, etc. and they always require very highly developed laboratory skills and strict attention to detail. Unfortunately they lack a recognized form of objective measurement.
Back in 1994, Singh joined biomedical scientist Dr Henry Lai at the Bioelectromagnetics Research Laboratory, University of Washington in Seattle. The work originally conducted at this university was funded by the US Navy and Air Force, but that source of funding has long evaporated. Under Henry Lai, the US government’s National Institutes of Health has been responsible for most of the funding.
In a ground-breaking series of experiments between 1994 and 1998 they demonstrated convincingly that moderate levels of microwave (2.45GHz) radiation, ( Below that of cell phone radiation levels)for exposures of only two hours, could increase the frequency of single-strand DNA breaks in the brain cells of live rats.  
dnamw
Fig.4  Assay showing effect of 2 hrs of microwave exposure (2.45GHz) at a SAR (absorption) level of 0.6 W/kg [about cell phone radiation levels] DNA strand breaks are also obvious.

These images result from fluorescent molecules attached to the end of each DNA strand at a break point, and so are best seen in the negative.
Figure 4 was captured by Dr Lai and Singh, and it shows the results of a comet assay at power densities about one-fifth those previously thought to cause adverse biological effects. These exposures were only for a short time, and they used radio power-densities well below those said to be ‘ionizing’ (having the power to break chemical/material bonds).
In this research, Dr Lai and Singh have used microwave frequencies which are higher than cellphones (at 0.9GHz), but not much above those used by the cellphone cousins, the new handheld PCS phones (1.9GHz).
DNA strands tend to break all the time, but they repair themselves constantly, so these comet-tail images need to be compared with the unexposed control DNA bundle in Figure 1. The cell bundles in Figure 4 have the classic comet tail of particles indicating extensive DNA damage, well above the spontaneous DNA damage levels of the controls.
Spontaneous breaks in the DNA are relatively common in all cells (6.00-radical attacks seem to be responsible) and most are quickly repaired by normal cell processes — generally within minutes or hours. But any form of increased disruption to the DNA is worrying. Nerve cells in particular have a low capability for DNA repair and so the effects of additional breaks could accumulate.
The DNA strands form a spiral-staircase-like helix, and so breaks on only one side of the ladder are much easier to repair than those where both sides are broken. But in later experiments Lai and Singh found double-strand DNA breaks after similar exposures times and levels.
It is possible for the cell to make mistakes when repairing single-strand breaks, but the likelihood of serious mistakes (mutations) increases substantially with double-strand breaks.
Fortunately, only certain genes are ‘expressed’ (activated) within each organ, so less than one percent of the DNA is essential in any one cell. Most mutations will cause no harm, and those that are very disruptive will probably lead to programmed cell death.
This introduces a paradox; small problems accumulating over time may be more dangerous than large defects. Cells that suffer gross disturbances to their critical genes are also more likely be programmed to suicide; therefore the larger DNA disruptions may be self-annihilating.
Over the years the DNA in human cells constantly suffer attack, some of which is never repaired. Given enough time, the accumulation of minor (but jointly critical) problems can cause cancer to develop. There is rarely a single cause of cancer.
This is also why cancer is a mostly a condition of age. It’s probably that older people have many per-cancerous cells, even though only a few suffer the critical mutations that lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation. These are just the straws that finally broke the camel’s back.
This raises the distinct possibility that cumulative low level RF exposures could be more harmful than higher critical exposures.
And since nerve cells don’t divide and proliferate, this damage could equally contribute to degenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. Cancers and age-associated degenerative conditions may be closely related.
Another aspect of the Lai-Singh research (with pulsed microwave similar to GSM cellphones and radar) was also disturbing. Rat brains which were excised and prepared quickly for the assay showed fewer breaks, while those which were checked four hours after exposure revealed much higher levels. This suggests that both the damage and the repair-initiation are not simple and immediate processes, and supports the thesis that DNA damage from repeated uses of a cellphone could be cumulative.
Dr Jerry Phillips, working in a research facility outside Los Angeles, made a similar finding. His research showed that DNA breaks actually decreased in some RF exposure conditions, sometimes with different wave-forms, suggesting that there’s a more complex causal link than expected, and a delicate balance between the break and repair-rates.
Phillips work also suggests that there may be some type of rough feedback control mechanism — something like a sticky fly-wheel governor on a steam boiler which makes the engine-rate hunt between slow and fast. The DNA-repair feedback might lead to mistakes and mutation and increase the chance of destructive cancer.
This work is highly controversial, as you’d imagine. Lai and Singh have reported finding of DNA strand breaks at levels of only one-fifth the American RF safety limits — but they’ve since also found that they can use the pineal hormone melatonin and other anti-oxidants to countering the RF effect. So the research is not only producing negative results.
This points to the importance of free-radicals as the intermediary which actually damages the DNA, which doesn’t come as a surprise to most researchers. free-radicals have often been implicated in DNA problems.
Although the Lai-Singh research hasn’t been faithfully replicated, other scientists have found similar DNA strand breaks in parallel radio research projects, and a number of live-animal tests have confirmed increased tumor rates resulting from long exposures over the life of the animals. There is also evidence that radio-wave exposures can influence the short term memory.
Currently, the Lai-Singh research has been stymied for lack of funding from the US government which has its attention focused on other matters, while the cellular phone industry has preferred to invest in less disturbing projects.

__

Conversion Chart, World Exposure Limits, Exposures EMR/EMF


Updated 2/23/19

www.MDSafeTech.org


PST logo color vF horiz

Conversion Chart Microwave Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) = (EMF)


Exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation is classified as a Group 2B Possible Human Carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer at the WHO as of 2011. Many scientists who work in the field of EMR feel there is clear evidence of harm from long term, low level exposure to this pulsating and penetrating non-ionizing radiation which warrants an IARC upgrade to a Group 1 Known Carcinogen. Hardell and Carlsberg (2018). Reading the scientific literature can be confusing as there are different units of measurements (μW/cm2  μW/m2  W/m2,). In addition, harm from radio frequency exposure varies with power, distance, device, modulation (pulsations and wave design) and length of exposure. The peak power, not the averaged power, is what is key to injury.
It is important to keep in mind not only the current thermal (heat) RF exposure standards in different countries, but also the biologically toxic (oxidative/membrane) RF exposure levels shown to produce harm at non-thermal levels which are far below current RF guidelines. More lenient current U.S. FCC standards put large populations at risk for a diverse array of long term health issues.  We list several exposure standards and limits along with the short conversion chart to enable easier reading of the scientific literature.  The Austrian Medical Association Guidelines of 2016  are also posted below. Scientific references on exposure measurements are listed at the end (Ambient, Children, Skin and Body Exposures, Occupational)
See Also: Safe Living Technology EMF/RF/Magnetic Field full conversion charts here
Scroll down for link : *Worldwide Exposure Limits *Current Heat-Based Guidelines and *Scientific References on Measured Human and Children’s Exposures

Wireless Exposure Limits in Different Countries
The limits are for frequencies between 300Mhz-300GHz in microwatts/cm2 
Limit guidelines in U.S. are from 200 uW/cm2 to 1000 uW/cm2 (2 W/m2 to 10 W/m2) for RF radiation depending on frequency.  Countries developed different standards based on either  *Thermal Effects *Non-Thermal Effects or *Precautionary Considerations
U.S.                                   200 microwatts/cm2  to 1,000 microwatts/cm2

Canada                           1,000 microwatts/cm2
China                                               10 microwatts/cm2
Russia                                              10 microwatts/cm2
Italy                                                 10 microwatts/cm2
France                                             10 microwatts/cm2
Poland                                             10 microwatts/cm2
Hungary                                          10 microwatts/cm2
Switzerland General                         9.5 microwatts/cm2
Switzerland Schools and Hospitals   4.25 microwatts/cm2
Belgium                                                        2.4 microwatts/cm2
Bulgaria                                                        2.4 microwatts/cm2
Luxembourg                                                2.4 microwatts/cm2
Ukraine                                                         2.4 microwatts/cm2
Lichtenstein                                                         0.1 microwatts/cm2
Austria  Outdoor                                                        0.001 microwatts/cm2
Austria  Indoor                                                                 0.0001 microwatts/cm2

Cosmic EMR background we evolved from                         <0.00000000001 μW/cm2


BioInitiative Report recommendation

– ‘No Observable Effect’  with factor of 10 added for safety = 0.0003 μW/cm
2.   http://www.bioinitiative.org/conclusions/

lauantai 23. helmikuuta 2019

NASA Satellite Imagery Reveals Shocking Proof Of Climate Engineering

January 16, 2019


In regard to difficult to accept and unpleasant truths, a picture is worth a thousand words.
The photo images shown were captured from NASA satellite sources, they are truly alarming. 
These images provide shocking and undeniable proof of the ongoing global climate engineering/geoengineering/solar radiation management assault on our planet and its life support systems.
Highly toxic heavy metals and chemicals that are systematically sprayed into our atmosphere from jet aircraft as part of the geoengineering / solar radiation management (SRM) programs, are manipulated with extremely powerful radio frequency signals.


These signals are transmitted from countless locations around the globe from various types of transmission platforms (ionosphere heater installations like HAARP, SBX radar, NEXRAD, etc.). The impact of the microwave transmissions on cloud formations is profound and highly visible (square cloud formations are created under some scenarios). 
In the series of NASA satellite images below, many variances of radio frequency cloud impacts can be observed. The degree to which the ongoing climate engineering/climate/intervention/weather warfare is disrupting Earth's atmosphere and life support systems is already beyond catastrophic and rapidly escalating all over the globe.

LIVE SATELLITE IMAGES LINK - Watch the live satellite activity.

Click to enlarge any of the images below
geoengineeringwatch-org-103
Off of east coast of Australia

geoengineeringwatch-org-104
West coast of Africa

geoengineeringwatch-org-106
California coast

geoengineeringwatch-org-115
Off of Africa's west coast

geoengineeringwatch-org-119
Off of Africa's west coast

geoengineeringwatch-org-116
Off of Africa's west coast

geoengineeringwatch-org-105
South of Spain in the Alboran Sea

geoengineeringwatch-org-108
Off of Africa's west coast

geoengineeringwatch-org-117
Off of Africa's west coast

geoengineeringwatch-org-112
The northwest coast of Australia

geoengineeringwatch-org-109
Off of Africa's west coast

geoengineeringwatch-org-110
Off of Africa's west coast

geoengineeringwatch-org-111
Eastern Pacific ocean west of Baja California

geoengineeringwatch-org-123
The Southern Ocean near Antarctica

Hurricane suppression/manipulation is one aspect/agenda of the climate engineers.
85% of the hurricanes that impact the US originate from Africa. Low pressure systems migrate toward the west, off of Africa's coast. A great deal of climate engineering/intervention takes place in this region, thus a number of the satellite images shown in this post were captured there. In the attempt to mask the climate intervention activity, the cyclone suppression occurring off the coast of Africa is officially blamed on "dust".
Of course there is no acknowledgement of the ongoing climate engineering atrocities.


The quote below is an excerpt from a FOX news article.
Right now, much of the Gulf of Mexico and parts of the Caribbean have slightly warmer than normal ocean temperatures which would normally aid in tropical development. But there is so much dust and dry air in the atmosphere that storms are getting choked off before they even get started.
geoengineeringwatch-org-120

Though some may feel that cyclone suppression is beneficial, such interference with Earth's natural rhythms and systems has a long list of catastrophic downstream effects. Available data indicates that in other scenarios the climate engineers are actually augmenting and steering cyclones to serve their own agenda.
"Hurricane Matthew" may be an example of weather warfare on an unimaginable scale. Is hurricane Matthew being heavily manipulated and steered by the climate engineers?

The evidence continues to stack up.
Below is a satellite photo clearly showing atmospheric "waves" surrounding hurricane Matthew. SpaceWeather.com has labeled these as "gravity waves", but is that what these visible "waves" actually are? No.
The satellite photos already shown in this post inarguably reveal heavy atmospheric manipulation from extremely powerful radio frequency/microwave transmissions and atmospheric aerosols. These transmissions leave a signature pattern on high level cloud formations that are saturated with electrically conductive heavy metal nanoparticles which are dispersed from jet aircraft as part of the ongoing climate engineering insanity.
78k
Does the photo above really show "gravity waves" surrounding hurricane Matthew?
Or does it show the signature pattern of extremely powerful radio frequency / microwave transmissions interacting with aircraft dispersed atmospheric aerosols?
The latter is the case, both of these elements / factors are a core part of climate and storm manipulation and steering.

Photo: SpaceWeather.com
For those that want to examine the most complete climate engineering presentation from Geoengineering Watch, view the video below.

The global power structure long ago made the choice to subject our planet (and the entire web of life that it supports, including the human race) to an unimaginably massive and destructive climate intervention/weather warfare assault.
This decision was made without the knowledge or consent of global populations. If we stand by and allow the decimation from the climate engineering insanity to continue, very soon Earth's life support systems will be beyond any recovery. This is not speculation, but a mathematical certainty.

Help us with the most critical battle to expose and halt the climate intervention/weather warfare assault, all of us are needed in this fight. Sharing credible data from a credible source is key, make your voice heard.
DW
May be freely reprinted, so long as the text is unaltered, all hyperlinks are left intact, and credit for the article is prominently given to geoengineeringwatch.org and the article’s author with a hyperlink back to the original story.

236 Responses to NASA Satellite Imagery Reveals Shocking Proof Of Climate 

Engineering


https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/nasa-satellite-imagery-reveals-shocking-proof-of-climate-engineering/

__


Geoengineering Watch:
Our Most Comprehensive Climate Engineering Presentation


Climate engineering and weather warfare are ultimately one in the same.
The ongoing atmospheric experiments taking place in our skies have a long history with many objectives and agendas being carried out, the equation is complex. If we are to have any chance of exposing and halting catastrophic global climate engineering operations, we must first have a clear understanding of the issue itself.
The video below is by far the most complete and comprehensive presentation ever produced by GeoengineeringWatch.org. The presentation was given live at Northern California public awareness raising event. It is our hope that this video will provide a useful tool for increasing desperately needed public awareness and understanding of the critically important climate engineering issue.

It is imperative to reach a critical mass of public awareness as quickly as possible.
The effort to expose and halt geoengineering operations can only be waged with an 
awakened population, time is not on our side.
Sharing 
credible data from a credible source is the most effective and efficient way to wake others who are not yet aware of the issue. 
Make your voice heard, make every day count.
DW


49 Responses to Geoengineering Watch: Our Most Comprehensive Climate Engineering Presentation

So What Are Those Lines in the Sky?


  1. You can link to this page using this short URL

    Translations: German

    This article explains why the trails being left in the sky by large aircraft cannot possibly be condensation trails ("contrails"). Once this is understood, then we are left with the ominous question: "What do these trails consist of?"

    You can see the video version of this article here.

NOTE: This article has been opposed on the internet by government-paid disinformation employees. These intentionally-deceptive disinformation programs are using fabricated science to claim that high-bypass turbofans create trails.

In one example, a false study is being used to convince the public that high-bypass turbofans create trails. This study is not only based on false science and fabricated numbers, it was published after widespread spraying began and is an obvious attempt to fool the public into accepting geoengineering: The largest crime against humanity in human history by convincing the public that jet trails are a "normal result of fuel combustion", which is simply not true as will be demonstrated below.

Those in the very highest positions who are responsible for this spraying campaign will do anything to conceal it, even going as far as rewriting jet engine training manuals and courses to teach new mechanics that these engines produce trails. There is no better way to convince the public than to have "expert mechanics" believing trails are normal and relaying this disinformation directly to the public. We see examples of this type of disinformation in the education system right now with the rewriting of the second amendment in school textbooks.

We have also received first-hand accounts of military tankers and drones painted to look like passenger jetson several occasions. This causes the public to believe that normal passenger jets are producing trails further enhancing the lie that trails are normal. Remember, a crime this enormous will be concealed by lies and coverups just as enormous.

The fact that high-bypass turbofan engines cannot produce trails is the reason life-long skywatchers and pilots have never seen trails come from these engines until widespread geoengineering began (with very few special exceptions including rare water injection engines which are outlined in the article below).  This is the reason professional and recreational pilots alike have contacted me expressing their disgust at the lies being thrust on the public by our governments and educations systems.

The newest tactic to conceal spraying programs from the public is to use shorter trails and to fly at higher altitudes to make these trails harder to see.

Furthermore, school textbooks and jet mechanic training manuals have now been rewritten to include the claim that contrails are common and normal. The disinformation campaign is very thorough.

See the following links to learn how false science - called "scientism" - is being used to thrust lies and disinformation upon the public:




The Global Depopulation Agenda Excellent lecture showing the use of false science to promote a specific agenda.


Despite media failure to disclose, and “government” disinformation to the contrary, there is and has been a weather modification program in full operation for many years.
...
The high –thin cirrus that jets have been spreading across the sky that the public has clearly seen as long trails of jet exhaust and spray turning into clouds and haze can and is changing the weather. There are clouds now that have never existed before.
...
The cloud nuclei being used are composed of metallic salts in nano form, all potentially toxic to life as we know it. We have documented accumulations of aluminum, strontium, barium and many others in the soil, the rainwater, snow, and plants at levels thousands of times higher than any normal condition, and many should not be present at all.

Testimony: Allan Buckmann, US Air Force Meteorologist
Wildlife Biologist Retired, California Department Fish & Wildlife

August 07, 2014

I started seeing barium, aluminum oxide, and strontium come on the (Air Force) base.
...
In my background as an Industrial Hygienist and an Environmental Specialist,
I conducted...sampling...and saw (contamination) limits in my community that would make your head spin. And I started to realize that those peers within my professional community that were trying to wake those of us in the military up, were right!


Sargent Kristen Edwards (Meghan), Industrial Hygienist, Environmental Specialist
Government Whistleblower


High-bypass turbofan engines do not create condensation trails.
The ratio of air-to-exhaust is much too high to facilitate the formation of condensation because the majority of air expelled from the back of the engine 
is not combusted. It is passed through the "fan" and simply blown out the back without mixing with any fuel at all.

Turbine engines are the power plant for high-bypass turbofans. Turbine engines are used in other applications besides powering jets. They are also used to power helicopters and many prop driven planes, yet we never see trails coming from these types of vehicles, and the reason is simple. 

Turbine engines virtually never produce condensation trails.



Jet Trail Bifurcation: Definitive Evidence of Intentional Aerosol Injection via Bypass Air

Once we understand that the plumes we see coming out of jets are not condensation trails, we must ask the question:

"What is coming out of jet engines today?"

Link to this page using this short URL:
http://gsw.bz/injection



Airflow Through A High-Bypass Turbofan Engine

Below is a popular animation showing the operation of a high-bypass turbofan engine.

The air passing through the outer shroud is called "bypass air" (the purple arrows below). This air is simply blown though the engine duct without being combusted. Much like historic propeller planes, air is simply pushed out the back of the engine by the "fan", which is a large circular series of blades that spin at the front of the engine. This bypass air provides about 85% of total thrust.

The air passing through the inner core (the red arrows below) feeds the turbine engine and becomes about 15% of the total thrust. This flow of air becomes the exhaust from the combustion of jet fuel (essentially kerosene) within the turbine.


Below is a cutaway of the high-bypass turbofan engine which powers Boeing's new 787 Dreamliner commercial aircraft: A Rolls Royce Trent 1000. Note the tremendous size of the fan in the front of the engine.

The Rolls Royce Trent 1000 high-bypass turbofan engine which powers the new Boeing 787 Dreamliner.


When viewing the two separate air streams from the back of the engine, we see a doughnut-shaped outer ring which emits bypass-air (light blue) and an inner core of air which is the exhaust of the turbine engine (red).

Viewed from the back of the engine, the light-blue outer ring shows the area where bypass air is emitted from the turbofan engine. The red inner circle shows the area where combusted exhaust exists.
Base Photo Credit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtJ02DRyomI


Aerosol Injection

Numerous investigators have discovered something extremely significant. The massive plumes emitted from high-bypass turbofans are often emitted only from the bypass-air stream, not from the turbine exhaust. Telescopic photography (below) shows the difference in appearance between the bypass air and the clear exhaust stream.





These observations have profound implications.

Since the outer ring of bypass air which is not combusted is filled with particulates dense enough to see with the naked eye, we have to ask ourselves:

How can uncombusted air passing though a fan form massive plumes of condensation?

Simply put, it cannot.

The only reasonable explanation is that chemical aerosols are being injected into the bypass air stream within the engine, and of course, we have the lab tests on the ground to show the resulting rainwater contamination.

In this video, carefully view how the outer ring of high-bypass air contains visible aerosols while the combusted inner core of the air is clear. This is definitive evidence that these plumes are not condensation trails, and this leads us to the only logical conclusion we can come to based on these observations:

Chemical aerosols are being injected into the outer high-bypass air of the engine.

In this video the plumes are so well divided that it's possible to estimate the position of the chemical injectors in the bypass-air.




These images show clear indications that an aerosol is being injected into the bypass air of these engines. These plumes are clearly divided as they exit the engines.





This photo points out the clear demarcation that remains from bypass air injectors.



Source: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1437292669655794&set=pcb.10158510098385302&type=3&theater

https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/jet-trail-bifurcation-definitive.html

__



Chemtrails Exposed by Edward Snowden

IPCC, UN, Obama´s Scientific Adviser, The Royal Society, Germany, Russia. Mind/Population Control. Extreme Weather?

Posted by Anders under English, Eurome

Abstract: More and more “more extreme weather” is unfoundedly being  trumpeted by the globalists  a result of CO2 emissions,  as it is clear that there is no global warming.
But this term, “more extreme weather”, is an absurdity, since by 1996 there were already 45,000 un-manipulated thunderstorms with heavy rain, hail, microbursts, wind shear, and lightning, the U.S. Air Force reports in its “Owning the Weather 2025″.
Nevertheless, probably some unusually large weather disasters seem to be man made.

Weather modification is an act of war as confessed by the U.S. Air Force
.



Chemtrails have nothing to do with the jet engine combustion process.
They are often laid in a grid-like pattern by multiple planes (even drones) where they disperse slowly taking on the appearance of odd, at first narrow, but widening, smoky clouds until merging together to form, if sufficiently numerous, an aerosol bank that obscures the blue sky and gives the appearance of a dirty white overcast.

Unlike normal contrails which quickly dissipate, chemtrails (“fake clouds” as my children call them) sometimes take hours to dissipate and eventually fan out to a “spider web” type of milky haze that covers the entire sky.
As these are formed from minute reflective metallic particulates they eventually reach the earth.


Still having doubts?
Please download this PDF file called HR 2977 “The Space & Preservation Act of 2001.”
In this document the United States Government openly admits the existence of chemtrails."

http://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/what-are-chemtrails-how-are-they.html



Chemtrails are a reality , as stated by the German Federal Government, The Royal Society of London, Russia, Obama ’s science advisor, John Holdren (who stubbornly asserted 30 years ago, that an ice age were imminent!) , The IPCC AR5, the UN and now Edward Snowden.
Even some climatists admit that there has been was no  extreme weather due to the non-existing warming - but we will see it soon!! (guesswork based on a lie).
The U.S. Air Force describes in its report ” Owning the Weather 2025″ experiments with changing not only the weather, but also the climate with storms and hurricanes. A number of methods have been investigated and proposed to modify the ionosphere, including spraying in of chemical vapors and heat or electric charges by means of electromagnetic radiation or particle beams (such as ions, neutral particles, X-rays, MeV particles and energetic electrons). It is important to note that many techniques to change the upper atmosphere have been successfully demonstrated by experiment.
Edward Snowden, who has read  U.S. documents,  writes that since the 1960s, a geo-engineering lab named Muad’Dib exists. It wants to protect North America’s climate at all costs - even if it means the acceleration of desertification in sub-Saharan Africa or carcinogens in sparsely populated areas. Other side effects include severe storms along the (U.S.) East Coast.
The Guardian wrote on 13 October 2013 about a geo-engineering accident: “A high pressure system stalled, winds circled and pushed air south over the Midwest. What resulted was a drought and heat wave which …cost $40 billion in damages and 5,000 to 10,000 deaths.
They admit they don’t know the side effects of climate control, involving chemtrails, physically as well as socio-politically.”
The chemtrails contain toxins such as, i.a., aluminum, barium, radioactive strontium and  thorium, bacteria, blood.
In the last century, Americans sprayed their unsuspecting populations with bacteria and viruses - even with radioactivity ( USA). It is of course all hazardous to health - not least nano-aluminum, which causes heavy neuro- degenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson ’s diseases - and they occur with rapidly increasing  frequency - which is also true of cancer frequency. “Are Chemtrails worth more than people who are sick with cancer, Alzheimer’s, etc.,” asks The Guardian.
Many believe this poisoning is part of a global HAARP-mind-control program: toxins such as aluminum and barium increase the mental HAARP-control effect.
Others think that it is about the  population reduction planned by the elite (Georgia Guidestones, Rockefeller Foundation). The arch-Illuminatus, Henry Kissinger, has said: “In 10 years there is no more Israel” Since he is also affected by the poisons, perhaps he is prone to “the syndrome of self-hatred”, which is now so fashionable in the Jewish elite. (”World Tribune, 22 Oct . , 2012). They may be depressed and suicidal after all their wickedness and hatred?

The demise f Israel was predicted in Ezekiel 38-39, Matth. 24, etc. , as well as by the Masonic guru, Albert Pike. They hardly have something good in mind.

Microburstnasa
Within a few weeks, I have experienced 2 hurricanes, spoiling my greenhouse twice. “Global warming” say the ideologists. “Nonsense”, say the wise. CBN News 27 March 2012:
A new Syracuse University (US) study indicates climate change is natural and not caused by man.
Microbursts (right) are inverted tornados pulling aircraft downwsrds. They create side winds on the grown which break trees. Wind Shear is a difference in wind speed and direction over a relatively short distance in the atmosphere. They prolong thunderstorms which can then generate tornados,
When the globalists speak of increasing extreme weather - do they then compare with the reports of the The US Air Force´s “Owning the Weather 2025“: At any instant there are approximately 2,000 thunderstorms taking place. In fact 45,000 thunderstorms, which contain heavy rain, hail, microbursts, wind shear, and lightning form daily.
The very words “increasing extreme weather” therefore seems preposterous. Nevertheless, as we shall see: The very big weather disasters (Yolanda and here as well as Sandy) are probably man made - an act of war as confessed by the US Air Force. The means are chemtrails and here and here and hereand here and HAARP.


Edward Snowden testifies to the reality of chemtrails

DSCF0073
The Internet Chronicle 11 July 2013:
“Edward Snowden, the NSA-hacker, says that chemtrails are part of a benevolent program aimed at countering global warming.
By cooperating in secret with jet fuel manufacturers, government agents have carefully kept the massive chemtrail efforts completely under wraps.

“There is no oversight in the scientific community, no public discussion, and little concern for the 
side-effects which are well known only to a few privileged people interested in continuing the decades-long chemtrail program in secret.”



With the influence and cooperation of  Monsanto, which has launched an aluminium-resistant GMO!!,  a secret Geoengineering lab dubbed Muad’Dib has been operating since the late 1960s, and the chemtrail program is often referred to by insiders as its “crown jewel.” Muad’Dib has aimed to protect North America’s climate at all costs – even if that means accelerating desertification in Sub-Saharan Africa or spreading trace amounts of carcinogens over lightly populated areas. Other side effects are powerful windstorms along the East Coast.


This is in concordance with The US Air Force´s “Owning the Weather 2025″, which describes experiments with changing not only the weather but also climate with storms and gales by modifying an unstable atmosphere. The focus of the weather-modification effort would be to provide additional “conditions” that would make the atmosphere unstable.
Monsanto-chetrails
The chemicals which are released by passenger airplanes have been covertly introduced as ‘additives.’ (Taxpayer money)
International Business Times 14 Aug. 2013:  Extreme weather such as droughts, heatwaves, storms and heavy rain have not become more frequent as a result of climate change but experts say they will in the near future (!?).
(Study led by Markus Reichstein, director of the Max Planck Institute)record. Nevertheless, more and more people suspect extreme weather to be caused by  chemtrails.

The Guardian 17 Oct. 2013 “The reasons given by the government for the need for chemtrails are to control the weather and  for global warming. The Environmental Defense Fund (US), The Royal Society (UK) and the Third World Academy of Sciences further promoted chemtrails, calling it Solar Radiation Management (SRM). There was an incident in 1988 as a result of weather control – a high pressure system stalled, winds circled and pushed air south over the Midwest. What resulted was a drought and heat wave which …cost $40 billion in damages and 5,000 to 10,000 deaths. They admit they don’t know what the side effects of climate control, involving chemtrails, physically as well as socio-politically.”
Forces behind the chemtrails tell you they are mulling risky geo-engineering - although they have been practising it for decades. The highest ranking Philippine scientist Lagmay falsely told Pilippine TV that  chemtrails stopped years ago.
The chemtrails are preventing natural climate development - possibly bringing us into another little ice age. Chemtrail particles reinforce HAARP.
So far, Chemtrail activity (SRM) has been admitted by
3. The IPCC AR5 as of September (SPM21): Speaking of Geo-engineering it wrote: “If Solar  Radiation Management  were terminated for any reason, there is high confidence that global surface temperatures would rise very rapidly to values consistent with the greenhouse gas forcing.” 
4. The UN Convention on Biological Diversity demanded a moratorium on SRM - after ocean fertilization experiments failed.
5. 
Bill Gates is Experimenting with clouding, by spraying water into the Atmosphere (BBC 22 May 2010)
6. in Russia, they are also injecting SO2-injection into the atmosphere. Purpose: To stand as a climate saint, while increasing oil extraction in the Arctis! (The Guardian 24 Sept. 2013):
7John Holdren, Obama´s science adviser, sees geo-engineering as a perfectly viable way to cool the planet’s temperature. In an Council on Foreign Relations article, he fully supports the process of releasing particles of barium, magnesium, aluminum, nano-fibers, bacillus blood spores and other chemicals to reflect sunlight away from the Earth. (In the 1970es, this population reductionist claimed that a new ice age was imminent.
8. The Aurora (purveyor of space services to the US government) in its final report to the University of Calgary in 2010 gives a detailed description of its Chemtrails spreading sulphuric dioxide (telling us they have heavier things to spray) into the atmosphere with large fleets of Boeing planes - and emphasizes that these new planes, when equipped properly, aree very fit for cheap engineering.



Temp.increase_since_1850

Right: Natural global temperature increase of 0.7 C  1850 - 1998 on our way out of little ice age.
The stop thereafter is unnatural, if nature tried to recover to medieval values 2 C above today´s temperature.

Chemtrails interfere with natural temperature cycles.

Chemtrailing threat to human health
The US Air Force´s “Owning the Weather 2025″,
A number of methods have been explored or proposed to modify the ionosphere, including injection of chemical vapors and heating or charging via electromagnetic radiation or particle beams (such as ions, neutral particles, x-rays, MeV particles, and energetic electrons). It is important to note that many techniques to modify the upper atmosphere have been successfully demonstrated experimentally.”
Citizens are bombarded every day with an invisible rain of carbon-laden molecules (and bacteria, as well as molds, desiccated blood, radioactive thorium, and strontium etc), and the effect on health is totally unknown.”Between 1977 and 1998 the US DoD sprayed viruses and bacteria over unknowing Americans and here.
Also the UK sprayed unknowing citizens in Dorsetshire with bacteria - and the government would not promise that such a crime would not happen again.

The Guardian 17 Oct. 2013:
“The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) cited data indicating that in 2010, 223,000 deaths from lung cancer worldwide resulted from air pollution, and said there was also convincing evidence it increases the risk of bladder cancer.
How could it not name chemtrails, even as a possibility needing further research? They’re awfully visible in the sky. How do chemtrails  stack up against getting sick with cancer, Alzheimer’s, etc?”
Nanoparticle
Neurosurgeon Russell L. Blaylock, National Health Federation 18 Apr. 2012: 

There is evidence that they are spraying tons of nanosized aluminum compounds which have been demonstrated in the scientific and medical literature induce intense inflammation in a number of tissues and organs (lungs, i.a.).

They  affect brain and spinal cord, as a growing list of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s dementia, Parkinson’s disease and Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS) are strongly related to exposure to environmental aluminum.

In addition, such spraying will saturate the ground, water and vegetation with high levels of aluminum. Nanoaluminum is easily absorbed. (See Nanoparticles, too)
if this project is not stopped immediately we will see an explosive increase in neurodegenerative diseases. We are already seeing a dramatic increase in these neurological disorders and it is occurring in younger people than ever before.
Comment
Why do the Illuminati spray all these poisons, since they hit themselves as well?
Do they want to commit suicide?
Maybe, that´s what bitter old Illuminati Satanists feel: 
Cindy Adams from New York Post insisted: “Reported to me, Henry Kissinger stated to The New York Post: “In 10 years, there will be no more Israel”. He perhaps, inclines to the “syndrome of self-hatred” so fashionable nowadays in the Jewish elite.
(The World Tribune 22 Oct. 2012).
Is he thinking of Albert Pike? Maybe Kissinger just meant to say that in 10 years all national states have ceased to exist in the NWO!
Georgia_Guidestones-e1289416857266
Right: The Georgia Guidestones commands the elite to keep mankind below 500 mio. people.
Some think the spraying is part of the ongoing population control and here - others think it is part of the elitists´century-old striving for their  global mind control program .  The energetic side of man is very sensitive to electro magnetic and scalar magnetic signals reaching into the terahertz band. Saturating humans with metallic compounds makes them more sensitive to man made signals in these ranges (HAARP). Much research has been conducted and many patents have been awarded relating to remote influence, electromagnetic telepathy and mind control.
These barefaced fraudsters invent the planet´s situation - on the basis of sheer imagination. Then they go on with their lucrative but harmful  taxpayer industry, serving chemtrails to a gullible mankind as necessity:
Morgellons-scalp
The Guardian 27 Sept. 2013
“The heat is on. We must act,” said Ban Ki-moon, as he invited world leaders to a special summit next year to forge a global agreement on emissions.

To avoid dangerous levels of climate change, beyond 2C, the world can only emit a total of between 800 and 880 gigatonnes of carbon. Of this, about 530 gigatonnes had already been emitted by 2011.
Global temperatures are likely to rise by 0.3C to 4.8C, by the end of the century depending on how much governments control carbon emissions.
And all based on faked models, blatant political lies and banksters´greed for profits paid by taxpayers whom they make ill. See e.g. Morgellons (above). Criticism of the chemtrails themselves and  anything else the NWO doesn´t want us to know is very effectively called “conspiracy theory”.


https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/chemtrails-exposed-by-edward-snowden.html

__


Google:
"HAARP´s electromagnetic rays are being reflected by chemtrail metal particles in the ionosphere"