tiistai 19. helmikuuta 2019

Tampereelle avattiin maailman ensimmäinen kaupallinen 5G-verkko

Suomalainen teleoperaattoriyhtiö Elisa on avannut maailman ensimmäisen kaupallisen 5G-verkon Suomessa Tampereella ja Virossa Tallinnassa. Verkko otettiin käyttöön keskiviikkona.
27.6.2018


Tampereelta soitettiin keskiviikkoiltapäivänä "maailman ensimmäinen" puhelu 5G-verkon välityksellä. 
Puhelun soitti Suomen liikenne- ja viestintäministeri Anne Berner ja siihen vastasi Tallinnassa Viron talous- ja rakenneministeri Kadri Simson.
Tällainen oli maailman ensimmäinen kaupallisesta 5G-verkosta soitettu puhelu, katso video:

 "Kadri, how are you in Tallinn?"  27.6.2018



Tampereelle 5G-verkon rakentaneen Elisan mobiiliteknologiajohtaja Eetu Prieur sanoo, että verkko kattaa tällä hetkellä vasta Tampereen ydinkeskustan. Tukiasemat on pystytetty Keskusvirastotalon katolle, Elisan konttorin katolle Näsilinnankadulla ja Tampereen rautatieasemalle.
Ensimmäinen 5G-puhelu soitettiin Frenckellinaukiolta. Aukiolle pystytetylle lavalle oli tuotu reititin, jonka muodostamaan wifi-verkkoon kytkettiin matkapuhelin. Tallinnassa järjestetyssä tilaisuudessa puhelun otti vastaan samanlainen valkoinen pömpeli. Käytännössä puhelu siis kulki 5G-verkossa vain reitittimien välillä. Puhelimesta reitittimeen ja toisinpäin se kulki edelleen hitaampaa yhteyttä pitkin, koska harvat puhelimet toimivat vielä 5G-verkossa.

Tällä hetkellä 5G-verkko kattaa vain Tampereen keskustan.
Tällä hetkellä 5G-verkko kattaa vain Tampereen keskustan.
JUKKA-PETTERI ERONEN
Elisa on Suomessa ensimmäinen teleoperaattori, joka on avannut 5G-verkkonsa. Telia ja Nokia puolestaan ilmoittivat vuonna 2016, että ne aikovat avata 5G-verkon Helsingissä vuonna 2018.
5G-verkko ei kuitenkaan vielä mullista tavallisen internetin käyttäjän elämää. 5G-reitittimiä tai -puhelimia ei vielä ole myynnissä. Kauppoihin saapuessaan ne ovat myös edeltäjiään moninkertaisesti kalliimpia. Prieur sanoo, että Elisa testaa vielä yhteyksiä Tampereella. Hän arvioi, että verkkoon sopivia tuotteita saattaisi tulla myyntiin vuoden 2019 alusta.
Elisalla on tällä hetkellä käytössään väliaikaiset taajuudet Tampereella. Viestintävirasto järjestää 5G-taajuuksista syksyllä huutokaupan.
Tapahtumaa todistamassa olivat Tampereella myös pormestari Lauri Lyly (sd.) sekä Elisan toimitusjohtaja Veli-Matti Mattila.
3G-, 4G ja 5G-tukiasemat Keskusvirastotalon katolla.
3G-, 4G ja 5G-tukiasemat Keskusvirastotalon katolla.
LAURA TALVITIE / AAMULEHTI
Kullekin verkolle on erikseen oma tukiasema.
Kullekin verkolle on erikseen oma tukiasema.
SATUMAARI VENTELÄ
Korjaus 27.6.2018 kello 18.26: Korjattu jutusta väärä vuosiluku. 5G-verkkoon sopivia tuotteita saattaisi tulla myyntiin vuoden 2019 alusta.
Korjaus 27.6.2018 kello 18.59: Helsinkiin 5g verkon avaavat Telia ja Nokia, ei Sonera.

__


Wireless Companies Warn Investors Before Customers About Cell Phone Radiation Health Risk

Corporate Wireless Investor Warnings contained in Annual Reports filed on Form 10-K (or Form 20-F or 40-F for foreign companies) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
“We may incur significant expenses defending such suits or government charges and may be required to pay amounts or otherwise change our operations in ways that could materially adversely affect our operations or financial results.”
Cell phone manufacturers and providers of their infrastructure are aware that the radiation from their products could be risky and warn their shareholders. See below excerpts from statements in their annual reports that indicate these companies are informing their shareholders that they may incur significant financial losses related to electromagnetic fields and health effects such as brain tumors and among several other reported health effects.
You won’t see an infographic like this is a cell phone store!  In a 2017 report for wireless investors, the EMF health risk issue was ranked as having the “highest” impact over several other potential loss of profit.  The graphic states, “EMF health-related risks EMF found to pose health risks causing a reduction in mobile usage and litigation.”
The report states that: “What is the risk? Electromagnetic signals emitted by mobile devices and base stations may be found to pose health risks, with potential impacts including changes to national legislation, a reduction in mobile phone usage or litigation.”
Wireless companies now put health effects from cell phone radiation above all other potential corporate losses #11Vodaphone-Principal-Risk-EMF-cell phone radiation cancer cost

Nokia Corporation 2017 Annual Report

*** Important changes made from 2014 report
“An unfavorable outcome of litigation, arbitrations, agreement-related disputes or product liability-related allegations against our business could have a material adverse effect on us.
We are a party to lawsuits, arbitrations, agreement-related disputes and product liability-related allegations in the normal course of our business. 

Litigation, arbitration or agreement-related disputes can be expensive, lengthy and disruptive to normal business operations and divert the efforts of our management. Moreover, the outcomes of complex legal proceedings or agreement-related disputes are difficult to predict. An unfavorable resolution of a particular lawsuit, arbitration or agreement-related dispute could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and reputation. The investment or acquisition decisions we make may subject us to litigation arising from minority shareholders’ actions and investor dissatisfaction with the activities of our business. Shareholder disputes, if resolved against us, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations as well as expose us to disputes or litigation.
We record provisions for pending claims when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is likely and the loss can reasonably be estimated. Due to the inherent uncertain nature of legal proceedings, the ultimate outcome or actual cost of settlement may materially differ from estimates. We believe our provisions for pending claims are appropriate. The ultimate outcome, however, may differ from the provided estimate, which could have either a positive or an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Although our products are designed to meet all relevant safety standards and other recommendations and regulatory requirements globally, we cannot guarantee we will not become subject to product liability claims or be held liable for such claims or be required to comply with future regulatory changes in this area, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. We have been involved in several lawsuits alleging adverse health effects associated with our products, including those caused by electromagnetic fields, and the outcome of such procedures is difficult to predict, including potentially significant fines or settlements. Even a perceived risk of adverse health effects of mobile devices or base stations could have a material adverse effect on us through a reduction in the demand for mobile devices having an adverse effect, for instance, through a decreased demand for mobile networks or increased difficulty in obtaining sites for base stations.
For a more detailed discussion of litigation to which we are a party, refer to Note 29, Provisions, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F.”
*** Important changes made from 2014 report
“Regulations about health risks associated with electromagnetic waves.
There have been some research results that have indicated the possibility that electromagnetic waves emitted from mobile devices and base stations have adverse health effects, such as increasing the risk of cancer.

The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has prescribed guidelines relating to the amplitudes of these electromagnetic waves. The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued an opinion that there is no convincing evidence that electromagnetic waves have adverse effects on health when their amplitude is within the reference values in the ICNIRP’s guidelines, and recommends that all countries adopt them. The Group complies with a policy for protection from electromagnetic waves based on the ICNIRP guidelines in Japan, and complies with the requirements of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the U.S. However, the WHO and other organizations continue to conduct research and investigations, the results of which may lead to regulations being revised in the future, or new regulations being introduced. Complying with such revision or introduction of regulations may incur costs, or may restrict the Group’s business operations, which could impact the Group’s results of operations. Moreover, regardless of the presence of such regulations, concerns over the adverse effects on health associated with use of mobile devices could make it difficult for the Group to acquire and retain customers, which could impact the Group’s results of operations.” – pg. 71
“An unfavorable outcome of litigation…allegations of health hazards associated with our businesses could have a material adverse effect on us.
Although NOKIA products are designed to meet all relevant safety standard and recommendations globally, we cannot guarantee we will not become subject to product liability claims or be held liable for such claims or be required to comply with future regulatory changes in this area, and these could have a material adverse effect on our business. ‘

“We have been involved in several lawsuits alleging adverse health effects associated with our products, including those caused by electromagnetic fields and the outcome of such procedures is difficult to predict, including the potentially significant fines or settlements.”

“Even a perceived risk of adverse health effects of mobile devices or base stations could have a material adverse affect on us through reduction in the demand for mobile devices having an adverse effect, for instance through decreased demand for mobile networks or increased difficulty in obtaining sites for base stations.”

https://www.rfsafe.com/wireless-companies-warn-investors-before-their-consumers-about-cell-phone-radiation-health-risk/
___


FCC abandons safety, pushes untested 5G network on public



(Natural News) The scientific dictatorship marches on.
And there’s no stopping it, according to Tom Wheeler, the former FCC Chairman under the Obama administration, who eagerly gave unction to a new spectrum of dangerous and potentially deadly frequencies under the moniker of the 5G network.
His press conference in June 2016 stressed the billions of dollars to be made by building a massive infrastructure, as well as the overarching need for processing power to connect the Internet of things (IoT) to the cloud. He also proudly proclaimed that there is no need for research, tests, studies or any rules whatsoever with respect to these new electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) soon to cover our nation.

https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/09/fcc-abandons-safety-pushes-untested-5g.html

__

Scientists and doctors call for a moratorium on the roll-out of 5G. 



5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields RF-EMF, that has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.
The appeal

Scientists and doctors warn of potential serious health effects of 5G

We the undersigned scientists and doctors  recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry.
5G will substantially increase exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) on top of the 2G, 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, etc. for telecommunications already in place. 
RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.    
Appeal translated to: / DE / EFI / FR / IT / SV

5G leads to massive increase of mandatory exposure to wireless radiation

5G technology is effective only over short distance. It is poorly transmitted through solid material. Many new antennas will be required and full-scale implementation will result in antennas every 10 to 12 houses in urban areas, thus massively increasing mandatory exposure.
With ”the ever more extensive use of wireless technologies,” nobody can avoid to be exposed. Because on top of the increased number of 5G-transmitters (even within housing, shops and in hospitals) according to estimates, ”10 to 20 billion connections” (to refrigerators, washing machines, surveillance cameras, self-driving cars and buses, etc.) will be parts of the Internet of Things. All these together can cause a substantial increase in the total, long term RF-EMF exposure to all EU citizens.
Harmful effects of RF-EMF exposure are already proven
Over 230 scientists from more than 40 countries have expressed their “serious concerns” regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices already before the additional 5G roll-out. They refer to the fact that ”numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines”. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plants and animals.
After the scientists’ appeal was written in 2015 additional research has convincingly confirmed serious health risks from RF-EMF fields from wireless technology.  The world’s largest study (25 million US dollar) National Toxicology Program (NTP), shows statistically significant increase in the incidence of brain and heart cancer in animals exposed to EMF below the ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) guidelines followed by most countries. These results support results in human epidemiological studies on RF radiation and brain tumour risk.  A large number of peer-reviewed scientific reportsdemonstrate harm to human health from EMFs.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the cancer agency of the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2011 concluded that EMFs of frequencies 30 KHz – 300 GHz are possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).

However, new studies like the NTP study mentioned above and several epidemiological investigations including the latest studies on mobile phone use and brain cancer risks confirm that RF-EMF radiation is carcinogenic to humans.
The EUROPA EM-EMF Guideline 2016 states that ”there is strong evidence thatlong-term exposure to certain EMFs is a risk factor for diseases such as certain cancers, Alzheimer’s disease, and male infertility…Common EHS (electromagnetic hypersensitivity) symptoms include headaches, concentration difficulties, sleep problems, depression, lack of energy, fatigue, and flu-like symptoms.”
An increasing part of the European population is affected by ill health symptoms that have for many years been linked to exposure to EMF and wireless radiation in the scientific literature. The International Scientific Declaration on EHS & multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), Brussels 2015, declares that: “In view of our present scientific knowledge, we thereby stress all national and international bodies and institutions…to recognize EHS and MCS as true medical conditions which acting as sentinel diseases may create a major public health concern in years to come worldwide i.e. in all the countries implementing unrestricted use of electromagnetic field-based wireless technologies and marketed chemical substances… Inaction is a cost to society and is not an option anymore… we unanimously acknowledge this serious hazard to public health…that major primary prevention measures are adopted and prioritized, to face this worldwide pan-epidemic in perspective.” 
Precautions
The Precautionary Principle (UNESCO) was adopted by EU 2005: ”When human activities may lead to morally unacceptable harm that is scientifically plausible but uncertain, actions shall be taken  to avoid or diminish that harm. 

More...
https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/10/scientists-and-doctors-call-for.html
__

5G is already linked to rising health problems… concerns about “health calamity” on the rise
Tuesday, July 31, 2018 by: 



(Natural News) Fifth generation technology for mobile networks, known as 5G, is set to make its big debut in Sacremento, CA this summer — but faster internet speeds aren’t all this new technology is known for. Concerns about the effects of the new cell service are mounting, especially with the growing body of research tying cell phone radiation to cancer and other adverse health outcomes. Outside the lab, firefighters and others exposed to 5G devices say that they are already experiencing negative cognitive effects, including confusion and memory issues.

Radiation from cell phones and cell towers has already been linked to brain cancer. With the advent of 5G, there will be more towers that are closer together — a recipe for disaster, according to health advocates. Multiple cell service providers have announced that they will be rolling out 5G for faster speeds, but the impact of the new network is poorly understood at best. More, concerns about what the long-term effects of the near-constant radiation bath provided by 5G networks are continuing to grow — and for good reason.

https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/5g-is-already-linked-to-rising-health.html
__

Top 20 Facts On 5G: What You Need To Know About 5G Wireless And “Small” Cells
What You Need To Know About 5G Wireless And “Small” Cells


Download a PDF of this information on a two page  EHT Factsheet on 5G and Health. The factsheet is hyperlinked (blue text) to research and sources. It is a great resource for policymakers. Read the research on 5G and health here.  
What is the alternative? A safe wired solution is the future. Read “Re-Inventing Wires: The Future of Landlines and Networks”. 
Read also two publications in the  Santa Clara Medical Association Magazine, “Wireless Silent Spring” and  “A 5G Wireless Future: Will it give us a Smart Future of Contribute to an Unhealthy One?” 
Nationwide, communities are being told by wireless companies that it is necessary to build “small cell” wireless facilities in neighborhoods ons street lights and utility poles in order to offer 5G, a new technology that will connect the Internet of Things (IoT).
At the local, state, and federal level, new legislation and new zoning aim to streamline the installation of these 5G “small cell” antennas in public rights-of-way.

__


Cities of the future that use 5G technology will increase public exposure to EMF pollution


(Natural News) Verizon recently reiterated plans to launch 5G internet service in the United States by the end of 2018, equipping so-called “Smart Cities” with the latest and greatest data speeds to date. But the dangers associated with 5G electromagnetic frequency (EMF) pollution continue to be ignored, despite growing evidence to suggest that many people will incur serious harm from exposure to it.
5G, short for “fifth generation,” will greatly expand the range of microwave radiation used by consumer devices, including higher-end gigahertz range frequencies that have never before been publicly deployed. These frequencies travel much shorter distances than current 3G and 4G technologies and don’t penetrate buildings as well; but the places where they can reach will be much more saturated in EMF radiation.
The antennas that deliver 5G will also have to be much more plentiful and invasive in order for the network to function, requiring an estimated one million new base stations per carrier. This means that between Verizon, AT&T, T-Mobile, and Sprint, Americans can expect to be bombarded with at least four million additional EMF radiators plastered throughout their neighborhoods – the long-term exposure to which remains largely unknown.

It’s all happening in the name of “progress” – but if 5G is so wonderful as its purveyors claim, then why are some legislators pushing new laws that would make it difficult, if not impossible, for local communities to “opt out” of the program? Senator John Thune, a Republican from South Dakota, reportedly introduced a bill recently, known as the “Mobile Now Act,” or S.B. 19, that would eliminate community say in where new cellular antennas are placed.

This means that Verizon would be allowed to legally place a 5G antenna on the light pole right outside of your house, and you’d have no say in the matter. This is problematic as 5G technology has been scientifically shown to harm human life by causing things like insomnia, nosebleeds, and even stillbirths.

Is 5G really about “convenience” and “progress,” or is it about control and depopulation?

The goal is to connect every single “Smart” device in the world, including newfangled microwaves, refrigerators, and even toothbrushes equipped with Wi-Fi technology, to the 5G control grid. And the only way this is possible is to have 5G antennas everywhere – meaning humanity in the very near future won’t be able to avoid them.
Proponents of 5G claim that it’s all about improving energy efficiency and making people’s lives more convenient. But the truth is that it’s about collecting mass amounts of private data that can be sold to marketers for untold billions of dollars. Some say that 5G is also about depopulation, seeing as how it’s an absolute health nightmare.
The National Toxicology Program (NTP) invested $25 million to study the nature of EMF radiation with the aim of proving that all mobile phone radiation is safe. What it ended up finding is that even primitive technologies like 2G can cause DNA damage and brain cancer – suggesting that much stronger 5G emitted from far more towers will be exponentially worse.
“If you search ‘EMF science’ you will find abundant research that shows sperm damage and negative effects on immune, endocrine, cardiac, and nervous system functioning,” explains NaturalHealth365.com. “This is why many people are now experiencing symptoms, such as headaches, tinnitus, and sleep disturbance, when overexposed to wireless technology.”
Concerned citizens are encouraged to contact their local and state officials to urge better protections and more research into 5G technology. You can also warn others about the dangers of EMF radiation and encourage them to take action.
For more news about the dangers of EMF radiation, be sure to visit EMF.news.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-07-20-cities-of-the-future-that-use-5g-technology-increase-public-exposure-to-emf-pollution.htmlSources for this article include:


RF Safe Public Awareness. SAR levels - Cell Phone Radiation Warnings


Cancer From Cell Phone Level Radiation Exposure

RF Safe Publishes 10 Press Releases In 24 Hrs – Educating The Public Is Priority #1


RF Safe is launching a public awareness campaign to raise awareness about how to reduce exposure to cell phone radiation. RF Safe is making every effort to inform holiday shoppers that the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) has found “Clear Evidence” that cell phone level radiation exposure can cause cancer.
There has been significant coverage in the media on comments made by Dr. Otis Brawley, the chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society who resigned from an 11 year career after wrongfully downplaying a critical new scientific consensus which concludes that the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) study has found “clear evidence” that cell phone level radiation does cause cancer.
Smartphone radiation could be destroying the memory performance of a new generation of adolescents. Right-handed teens using cell phones are more prone to loss of figural memory which is mainly located in the right hemisphere of the brain and refers to our ability to make sense of objects including images, patterns, and shapes a troubling new study has warned
Over the last 20 years, RF Safe has continuously redesigned its protective products to maximize protection as devices have changed in the past and will continue to do so in the future. According to RF Safe, the screen protector industry is the next frontier of phone radiation safety using advanced nanomaterials.
RF Safe’s public awareness efforts for the 2018 holiday shopping brings attention a new research paper published in the journal Environmental Research by California Department of Public Health (CDPH) research scientists which finds that using cell phones in areas of weak reception can result in microwave radiation emissions 10,000-fold more intense than in areas with strong network signals.
RF Safe has warned consumers for over 20 years against using many of the anti-radiation accessories that are now commonly sold on Amazon. Including chips, diodes, neutralizers, pendants, amulets along with products that absorb handset radiation rather than deflect it. RF Safe stands firm in the belief that if you cannot see a noticeable difference with a hand-held RF meter, the product does nothing to reduce RF exposure.
RF Safe has been alerted to Google search advertising results published by Amazon that suggests an RF Safe case can be purchased from the Amazon website. Authentic RF Safe Cell Phone Radiation Accessories are only available on http://www.rfsafe.com
RF Safe’s 20 years of experience in RFR/EMF safety will be available for people in everytime zone in the world starting Black Friday 2018. In the USA or International, just dial 1-727-256-0022 for answers about any wireless radiation safety questions.
Wireless radiation safety innovator, RF Safe Cooperation has completed a brand new project to provide consumers with a tool to easily discover the microwave radiation level of nearly any Smartphone device.  RF Safe has made it very easy for consumers to check the radiation levels of most Smartphones with comparison features.
According to John Coates, Founder of RF Safe, Cell phone radiation safety accessories are the perfect stocking stuffer for any love-one to reduce health risk.”
RF Safe warns holiday shoppers that there is now “Clear Evidence of Cancer” that exposure to smartphone radiation is linked to cancer, and research suggests children are at greater risk because of thinner skulls and developing brains.
The Berkeley Right To Know ordinance is about the fact that cell phone manufacturers are hiding consumer warnings to never carry or use a cell phone directly against your body because you’ll risk being exposed to radio frequency energy that may exceed the federal “safety” limit.  RF Safe supports the Berkeley Warnings. The warning is included inside new RF Safe anti-radiation cases.


https://www.rfsafe.com/rf-safe-public-awareness-campaign-2018-shopping-holiday-cell-phone-radiation-warnings/

___

Apple iPhone XS vs Apple iPhone XS MAX

All SARs reported are averaged over one gram of body tissue corresponding to the US standard. The SARs may vary depending upon your specific cell phone network carrier (e.g., AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, or Verizon).
The minimum separation distance for head and body-worn testing was 5 mm (about two-tenths of an inch).
The SAR Levels for iPhone XS Model A1920, A2099 and A2100: FCC IDBCG-E3218A View offical FCC SAR Report 
Applicable For  USA, Canada, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands
According to test reports filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ID BCG-E3218A, the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for the iPhone XS FCC ID (GSM and CDMA) for cellular transmission is 1.19 watts per kilogram (W/kg) at the head, and 1.18 W/kg when worn on the body.  The highest reported Apple iPhone XS SAR levels during simultaneous transmission use conditions are 1.35 W/kg at the head and body 1.53 W/kg. A required minimum separation distance for head and body-worn testing is 5 mm (about two-tenths of an inch).
Apple-iPhone-XS-model-A1920-A2099-A2100-fcc-SAR-levels


SAR Levels for iPhone XS MAX Model A1921, A2104, A2103: FCC ID BCG-E3219A View offical FCC SAR Report
Applicable For  USA, Canada, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands
According to test reports filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ID BCG-E3219A, the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for the iPhone XS MAX FCC ID (GSM and CDMA) for cellular transmission is 1.16 watts per kilogram (W/kg) at the head, and 1.17 W/kg when worn on the body.  The highest reported Apple iPhone XS MAX SAR levels during simultaneous transmission use conditions are 1.39 W/kg at the head and body 1.52 W/kg. A required minimum separation distance for head and body-worn testing is 5 mm (about two-tenths of an inch).
Apple-iPhone-XS-MAX-model-A1921-A2104-A2103-fcc-SAR-levels-FCC-ID-BCG-E3219A
USA SAR Level for Apple iPhone XS vs Apple iPhone XS Max SAR Levels
https://www.rfsafe.com/sar-rating-comparison/apple-iphone-xs-sar-levels-vs-apple-iphone-xs-max-sar-levels/
__

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus

SAR Level Samsung S9 A3LSMG960U
samsung-galaxy-s9-sar-levels-model-SMG960U-fcc-id-A3LSMG960U
Click to enlarge SAR Report
Samsung Galaxy S9 SAR test reports filed with the Federal Communications Commission FCCID A3LSMG960U — the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for this Samsung Galaxy S9 is 0.35 watts per kilogram (w/kg) at your head, and 0.96 w/kg when worn on your body. The Samsung Galaxy S9 hotspot SAR is 0.95 w/kg and its SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular plus Wi-Fi) for this Samsung Galaxy S9 is 1.25 w/kg at your head, 1.59 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.59 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously with all other transmitters active.



  SAR Level Samsung S9 plus FCCID A3LSMG965U
samsung-galaxy-s9-plus-sar-levels-model-SMG965U-fcc-id-A3LSMG965U
Click to enlarge SAR report
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus SAR test reports filed with the Federal Communications Commission FCCID A3LSMG965U — the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for this Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus is 0.36 watts per kilogram (w/kg) at your head, and 0.79 w/kg when worn on your body. The Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus hotspot SAR is 1.04 w/kg and its SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular, Wi-Fi) for this Samsung Galaxy S9 is 1.14 w/kg at your head, 1.48 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.59 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously with all other transmitters active.

All SAR levels reported for the Samsung Galaxy S9 and Galaxy 9 Plus to the FCC are averaged over one gram of body tissue corresponding to the maximum allowable level of 1.6 w/kg.
SAR levels will vary depending upon your specific cell phone carrier (e.g., AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, or Verizon).
The Samsung Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus minimum separation distance for head and body-worn testing was 5 mm.  That means the phone should never be closer than 5mm to your body when in use to ensure SAR safety compliance.

Click here to compare full phone specs

USA SAR Level for Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
  • FCC Approval Date
    11 January 201811 January 2018
  • FCC ID
    A3LSMG960UA3LSMG965U
  • FCC Report Link
  • US SAR Ratings
    Minimum Separation Distance for Galaxy S9 is 15mm - USA Legal Limit is 1.6 W/kg - FCC SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over ONE gram of simulated biological tissue. It is a well known FACT SAR testing was not designed for protecting women or children from harmful radiation exposure, and SAR Test do not take into consideration health effects below thermal levelsMinimum Separation Distance for Galaxy S9 Plus is 15mm - USA Legal Limit is 1.6 W/kg - FCC SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over ONE gram of simulated biological tissue. It is a well known FACT SAR testing was not designed for protecting women or children from harmful radiation exposure, and SAR Test do not take into consideration health effects below thermal levels
  • Head SAR Level
    0.35 W/kg0.36 W/kg
  • Body SAR Level
    0.96 W/kg0.79 W/kg
  • Product Specific Use
  • Simultaneous Transmission
    1.59 W/kg - Hotspot Active1.59 W/kg - Hotspot Active
  • Simultaneous Head SAR
    1.25 W/kg1.14 W/kg
  • Simultaneous Body SAR
    1.59 W/kg1.48 W/kg
  • Hotspot SAR
    0.95 W/kg1.04 W/kg
EU SAR Level for Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
  • EU SAR Ratings
    European Legal Limit is 2.0 W/kg - EU SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over TEN grams of simulated biological tissue.European Legal Limit is 2.0 W/kg - EU SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over TEN grams of simulated biological tissue.
  • Head SAR Level
    0.32 W/kg0.27 W/kg
  • Body SAR Level
    1.27 W/kg1.00 W/kg
  • Simultaneous Head SAR
  • Simultaneous Body SAR
  • Hotspot SAR





https://www.rfsafe.com/sar-rating-comparison/samsung-galaxy-s9-sar-level-vs-samsung-galaxy-s9-plus-sar-level/

____

Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus

iPhone-8-SAR-Level-Model-A1863-FCCID-BCG-E3159AAccording to test reports filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for CDMA model A1863 iPhone 8 FCC ID BCG-E3159A is 1.14 watts per kilogram (w/kg) at your head, and 1.08 w/kg when worn on the body. The iPhone 8 hotspot/Airplay SAR is 1.08 w/kg. The SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular plus Wi-Fi) for the iPhone 8 is 1.51 w/kg at your head, 1.56 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.56 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously.
Click FCC Report to enlarge

iPhone-8-SAR-Level-Model-A1905-FCCID-BCG-E3172AThe SAR for GSM model A1905 iPhone 8 FCC ID BCG-E3172A is 1.09 watts per kilogram (w/kg) at your head, and 1.09 w/kg when worn on the body. The iPhone 8 hotspot/Airplay SAR is 1.09 w/kg. The SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular plus Wi-Fi) is 1.45 w/kg next to your head, 1.59 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.59 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously.
Click FCC Report to enlarge


iPhone-8-Plus-SAR-Level-Model-A1864-FCCID-BCG-E3160AThe SAR for CDMA model A1864 iPhone 8 Plus FCC ID BCG-E3160A is 1.09 watts per kilogram (w/kg) at your head, and 1.09 w/kg when worn on the body. The iPhone 8 Plus hotspot/Airplay SAR is 1.09 w/kg. The SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular plus Wi-Fi) iPhone 8 Plus is 1.48 w/kg at your head, 1.59 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.59 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously.
Click FCC Report to enlarge


iPhone-8-Plus-SAR-Level-Model-A1897-FCCID-BCG-E3174AThe SAR for GSM model A1897 iPhone 8 Plus FCC ID BCG-E3174A is 1.09 watts per kilogram (w/kg) next to your head, and 1.09 w/kg when worn on the body. The iPhone 8 Plus hotspot/Airplay SAR is 1.09 w/kg. The SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular plus Wi-Fi) iPhone 8 Plus is 1.59 w/kg next to your head, 1.45 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.59 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously.
Click FCC Report to enlarge

All SARs reported above are averaged over one gram of body tissue corresponding to the US standard. The SARs may vary depending upon your specific cell phone carrier (e.g., AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, or Verizon).
The minimum separation distance for body-worn testing was 5 mm (about two-tenths of an inch).

Click here to compare full phone specs

USA SAR Level for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
SAR AT&T Model for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
  • Carrier Variant
    Apple iPhone 8 GSM Model A1905iPhone 8 Plus GSM
  • Model Variant Number
    Model A1905 GSM, no CDMAModel A1897
  • FCC Approval Date
    11 September 201711 September 2017
  • FCC ID
    BCG-E3172ABCG-E3174A
  • FCC Report Link
  • US SAR Ratings
    USA Legal Limit is 1.6 W/kg - FCC SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over ONE gram of simulated biological tissue.USA Legal Limit is 1.6 W/kg - FCC SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over ONE gram of simulated biological tissue.
  • Head SAR Level
    1.09 w/kg1.09 w/kg
  • Body SAR Level
    1.09 w/kg1.09 w/kg
  • Product Specific Use
    1.09 w/kg1.09 w/kg
  • Simultaneous Transmission
    1.59 w/kg1.59 w/kg
  • Simultaneous Head SAR
    1.45 w/kg1.45 w/kg
  • Simultaneous Body SAR
    1.59 w/kg1.59 w/kg
  • Hotspot SAR
    1.59 w/kg1.59 w/kg
SAR Verizon Model for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
SAR Sprint Model for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
SAR T-Mobile Model for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
SAR Vodafone Model for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
SAR U.S. Cellular for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
EU SAR Level for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
  • EU SAR Ratings
    SAR limits within the EU, following IEC standards. For mobile phones, and other such hand-held devices, the SAR limit is 2 W/kg averaged over the 10 g of tissue absorbing the most signal (IEC 62209-1).
  • Head SAR Level
    0.99 W/kg
  • Body SAR Level
    0.99 W/kg
  • Simultaneous Head SAR
  • Simultaneous Body SAR
  • Hotspot SAR
__
https://www.rfsafe.com/sar-rating-comparison/apple-iphone-8-sar-rating-vs-apple-iphone-8-plus-sar-levels/

__