In situ breast cancer is contained in the area of original growth, but has potential to become invasive.
There will be an estimated 42,260 deaths from breast cancer in 2019.  All of these numbers are higher than stats for last year.
Because Wi-radiation has the potential to initiate and promote the growth of breast cancer, this picture should be on the packaging of all Wi-devices, along with adequate medical warnings.
2. Patient Two (21 years old) kept her phone in her bra eight hours a day for six years and developed multiple, large invasive lesions in her left breast. Doctors were forced to complete a mastectomy and her cancer was subsequently found to have spread to her lymph nodes and also to her bones.
3. Patient Three (39 years old) kept her cell phone in her bra for eight years, often using the GPS application while jogging. She developed six suspicious lesions in her breast. Mastectomy revealed metastasis to her lymph system.
4. Patient Four (39-year-old) kept her cell phone in her bra for ten years, often using a Bluetooth headset which kept the phone transmitting for hours each day. She developed four separate ductal carcinomas and mastectomy revealed lymph node metastatic disease.
And this wave pollution is documented to inflict DNA damage equivalent to that of ionizing X-radiation.  Therefore, these youngsters are continually "X-raying" their breast tissues along with their reproductive organs, which contain the primordial cells of their future offspring.
They state: “Children and young adults are now more likely to be using mobile devices and are among some of the heaviest users. This group is potentially at greatest risk of harm from EMR, as dividing tissue, such as that occurring in prepubertal breast buds, is more prone to the adverse effects of radiation." It is negligent and criminal that neither U.S. regulatory agencies, nor those who profit from wireless technologies, are warning young girls and their parents that addictive wireless toys increase future risk of expensive surgery/chemo, pain, disfigurement and even early death.
When not walking, she wears the tablet in front where she efficiently "nukes" her stomach, pancreas, liver, gall bladder, large and small intestines, uterus, ovaries and urinary bladder. One recent scientific study found that rats exposed to mobile phone radiation for 8 hours of talk time and 16 hours of standby time for 20 days suffered severe bladder inflammation. 
This brings to mind the epidemic of female bladder problems in the USA, including: overactive bladder, leakage and frequent infections (cystitis), as confirmed by continuous media ads regarding these conditions.
"The evidence to date shows clearly that men that have cell phones in their pocket or on their belt, leaving it on for long periods of time, suffer reduced sperm counts. Nobody has really done the study yet, but I will predict that men who wear their cell phone in the on mode on their belt are going to be found to have increased risk for GI cancers, prostate cancer and other pelvic cancers." 
The microwaved animals suffered shrunken ovarian cells and abnormal leukocyte infiltration within the egg follicles. Their biochemistry and hormone levels were skewed and their tissue oxidative stress was very high. Most importantly, the irradiated rats showed significantly lower numbers of secondary egg follicles than control rats.
The conclusion of this study:
"A total of 900-MHz EMF applied in middle and late adolescence may cause changes in the morphology and biochemistry of rat ovarium [Latin for ovaries]." 
Since medical science considers rat studies to be predictive of human outcomes, this report is additional evidence that relentless wireless radiation, aimed with precision at our entire female population, is a deliberate or inadvertent human population control mechanism.
She does not know that the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR 2.1091), which addresses radiofrequency radiation exposure, says this:"For purposes of this section, a mobile device is defined as a transmitting device designed to be used in other than fixed locations and to generally be used in such a way that a separation distance of at least 20 centimeters [about 8 inches] is normally maintained between the transmitter's radiating structure(s) and the body of the user or nearby persons." 
Breast cancer occurring in women under the age of 40 is uncommon in the absence of family history or genetic predisposition, and prompts the exploration of other possible exposures or environmental risks.
We report a case series of four young women-ages from 21 to 39-with multifocal invasive breast cancer that raises the concern of a possible association with nonionizing radiation of electromagnetic field exposures from cellular phones.
All patients regularly carried their smartphones directly against their breasts in their brassieres for up to 10 hours a day, for several years, and developed tumors in areas of their breasts immediately underlying the phones. All patients had no family history of breast cancer, tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2, and had no other known breast cancer risks. Their breast imaging is reviewed, showing clustering of multiple tumor foci in the breast directly under the area of phone contact.
Pathology of all four cases shows striking similarity; all tumors are hormone-positive, low-intermediate grade, having an extensive intraductal component, and all tumors have near identical morphology. These cases raise awareness to the lack of safety data of prolonged direct contact with cellular phones.
A Review of the Evidence
The majority of cancer of the breast cases (95%) is not hereditary. Can long-term cell phone use be linked to breast cancer? It is unlikely that electromagnetic radiation is involved, but it could possibly be due to the generated heat (cell phones only occasionally transmit when people are not talking on them). Therefore, is there any method or reported statistics that can be used to link the increasing breast cancer incidence with cell phone use and placement? Some young women who placed their mobile devices, including cell phones, in their bra believed that it caused their cancer because it was on the same side and in the same area their phone was adjacent to and came into contact with their skin for prolonged periods. This review highlights what is known about the link between cell phone use, which continues to increase rapidly, and breast cancer explores the association between prolonged exposure to non-ionizing radiation from cell phones and breast cancer. In conclusion, until more data areobtained concerning whether carrying a cell phone is associated with breast cancer, great care should be taken to avoid any potential risks. Strenuous efforts should be made to encourage users of cell phones to follow mobile device manufacturers’ recommendations, and if possible, to avoid skin contact until the potential risks, if there are any, are fully understood.
She believed it was because her breast cancer was diagnosed in the same breast and at the exact location where her mobile phone usually came into contact with the skin of her breast.
She said that for the past three to four years she usually had her mobile phone in contact with her breast and that her cancer was discovered right where the phone was kept all the time. To explain this event scientifically, a study was conducted by Schuz et al.  and they noted immediately that she carried her mobile phone as described, and that it roughly covered the upper outer quadrant of her breast, which is a common location for breast cancer to occur because of the presence of more breast tissue, in accordance with breast anatomy. They then concluded that this was only a coincidence.
and children increasingly carry all types of mobile devices, including cell phones and
tablets. They tend to be heavy users in terms of time spent in close contact with their
cell phone, even while sleeping. Until more data are obtained regarding inappropriate use
and carrying a cell phone, and their association with breast cancer risk, safety
measures should be heeded to avoid any possible risks from cell phone use.
Strenuous efforts should be made to encourage users of cell phone to follow mobile
device manufacturers’ recommendations and avoid skin contact.
Further research in this area is recommended.
A Review of the Evidence.Advances in Breast Cancer Research,
5, 136-141. doi: 10.4236/abcr.2016.54016.
|||American Cancer Society (2011) Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2011-2012. |
American Cancer Society, Atlanta.
|||Schüz, J., Jacobsen, R., Olsen, J.H., Boice Jr., J.D., McLaughlin, J.K. and Johansen, C. |
(2006) Cellular Telephone Use and Cancer Risk: Update of a Nationwide Danish Cohort.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 98, 1707-1713.
|||Volkow, N.D., Tomasi, D., Wang, G.-J., et al. (2011) Effects of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Signal Exposure on Brain Glucose Metabolism. Journal of the American Medical Association, 305, 808-813.|
|||Acar, G.O., Yener, H.M., Savrun, F.K., Kalkan, T., Bayrak, I. and Enver, O. (2009) Thermal Effects of Mobile Phones on Facial Nerves and Surrounding Soft Tissue. Laryngoscope, 119, 559-562.|
|||(2013) The World in 2011. ICT Facts and Figures, 6 June.|
|||Soderqvist, F., Hardell, L., Carlberg, M. and Hansson Mild, K. (2007) Ownership and Use of Wireless Telephones: A Population-Based Study of Swedish Children Aged 7 - 14 Years. BMC Public Health, 7, 105.|
|||Ng, A.K. and Travis, L.B. (2009) Radiation Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 7, 1121-1128.|
|||Cardis, E. (2010) Brain Tumour Risk in Relation to Mobile Telephone Use: Results of the INTERPHONE International Case-Control Study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39, 675-694.|
|||West, J.G., Kapoor, N.S., Liao, S.-Y., Chen, J.W., Bailey, L. and Nagourney, R.A. (2013) Multifocal Breast Cancer in Young Women with Prolonged Contact between Their Breasts and Their Cellular Phones Case Reports in Medicine. Case Reports in Medicine, 2013, Article ID: 354682.|
|||Hardell, L., Carlberg, M. and Mild, H.K. (2011) Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies on Malignant Brain Tumours and the Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones Including Living and Deceased Subjects. International Journal of Oncology, 38, 1465-1474.|
|||Hardell, L., Carlberg, M. and Hansson, K. (2013) Use of Mobile Phones and Cordless Phones Is Associated with Increased Risk for Glioma and Acoustic Neuroma. Pathophysiology, 20, 85-110.|
|||IARC (2011) IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part II: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic. Vol. 102, IARC Press, Lyon.|
|||Abdalla, S. and Jastaniah, S.D. (2008) Effect of Energy Carried by Radio-Frequency Radiation on the Weakest Bond in a DNA Molecule Proceedings i-TCE.|
|||Baan, R., Grosse, Y., Lauby-Secretan, B., et al. (2011) Carcinogenicity of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. The Lancet Oncology, 12, 624-626.|
|||Brenner, D., Doll, J., Goodhead, D.T., et al. (2003) Cancer Risks Attributable to Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation: Assessing What We Really Know. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 13761-13766.|
|||Roosli, M., Rapp, R. and Braun-Fahrlander, C. (2003) Radio and Microwave Frequency Radiation and Health: An Analysis of the Literature. Gesundheitswesen, 65, 378-392.|
|||(2013) I Phone 4 Important Product Information Guide. Safety and Product Information. Blackberry Bold 9900/9930 Smartphones, 7 June.|
|||Gandhi, O.P., Morgan, L.L., De Salles, A.A., Han, Y.-Y., Herberman, R.B. and Davis, D.L. (2012) Exposure Limits: The Underestimation of Absorbed Cell Phone Radiation, Especially in Children. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 31, 34-51.|