maanantai 17. kesäkuuta 2019

5G Super-Hotspots: You better know where the “kill zones” are located!

5G Super-Hotspots will soon be the most dangerous places on Earth

Posted on May 3, 2019

The deployment of 5G continues unabated across the USA in spite of zero mandatory health and safety testing being conducted.
This illegal roll-out is focusing on the largest urban centers and especially high-profile venues that can be used as an advertisement for how ‘awesome’ 5G is [NOT].
It will be these specially chosen venues where smartphone users can play with their own portable Internet of Things (IoT)… at the expense of everyone else in those 5G super-hotspots.

5G Super-Hotspots

KEY POINT: 5G super-hotspots are deliberately targeted venues throughout the largest cities in America where 5G has been amped up considerably. Not only will these hotspots be used to aggressively promote 5G-compatible IT devices, they will also be exploited to test detrimental variations of the technology such as crowd control and psychological manipulation.

There are other reasons why these same venues will be turned into extremely dangerous5G super-hotspots.
But the primary reason for this eventuality is because the level of 5G technology necessary for the Internet of Things to operate with any degree of success is completely off the charts.
Truly, it’s no small feat to power up the IoT to the point that it functions at the impractically high standards set by the IT, WiFi and Telecom Industries. While the IoT allows for advances in technology that give us things like Crestron automation systems in our homes, the wider implications of 5G technology could be very dangerous for people.
The IT scientists and electrical engineers who have designed these slowly evolving 5G networks know that they will not work as engineered.
That’s because of the unique environmental obstacles that exist in every locale where 5G is planned.
The many and diverse technological obstacles are such that a “one size fits all” approach WILL NOT WORK.
What this inevitable predicament translates to is that every locale will require its own customized 5G network configuration.
What this really means is that wherever the 5G hucksters choose to showcase 5G (and IoT), those locales and venues will be transformed into highly ‘radioactive’ 5G super-hotspots.

5G Oversold Like Nothing Else in History

Now here’s the critical point.
In its current form, 5G networks simply will not perform as falsely advertised.[1]

ROLL-OUT MISREPRESENTATION: 5G is simply not scalable beyond dense urban areas

Therefore, Big Telecom will have egg all over their faces unless they keep their promises; or at least appear to keep them.
The only practical way for these companies to save face is to fire up the 5G energy grid with a vengeance wherever its deployed. They know that user experience is crucial at the start of the 5G roll-out. If it fails — and it will — the ultra-hyped 5G rollout will go down as the biggest failure in corporate history.
Given this rapidly evolving context, it’s clear that strategically creating 5G super-hotspots is their only way out of the self-created mess (temporarily, that is).
It’s important to note that in order to deliver the necessary 5G energy to power up the IoT globally, the telecoms will have to transform the world into a veritable microwave oven interspersed by myriad EMF transmitters and receivers (while that’s a very simplistic depiction it’s not far from the truth).
However, it’s those geographic areas purposefully selected to illustrate the fake ‘miracle of 5G and IoT’ that have the most to be very concerned about.
There’s no stopping the selected venues from being morphed into 5G super-hotspots for show. Hence, it’s essential that folks everywhere know where to strictly avoid.
For it’s certain that these 5G super-hotspots will become slow motion-kill zones … … … and by purposeful design. As follows:

The Kill Zones USA

While constructing kill zones may not be the primary purpose of the ongoing military deployment of 5G, they are an unavoidable consequence.
Using totally untested technology with such raw power is an extremely perilous enterprise. Those who are prematurely pushing the 5G paradigm are cognizant of the extreme health risks/dangers and devastating impacts on the environment; yet they proceed anyway.
The uninformed public, then, must be made aware of the location of each and every kill zone (aka 5G super-hotspots) in the country. Not to do so would be similar to the Nazi experiments performed on humans during World War II where many died slow and painful deaths.
For anyone who doubts the sheer intensity of the unsafe and even lethal frequencies associated with an activated 5G energy grid, please view the following video.

5G WEAPONRY: Microwave Radiation Technology Being Deployed as Depopulation Warfare, Full Spectrum Dominance & Total Human Control (Video)

Kill Zones

Exactly where are these kill zones located as of May 2019?
The most dangerous kill zones will be located in those cities that have already seen the deployment of 5G full bore.
The following two links contain all the locations currently publicized by the Telecom companies as initial 5G roll-out sites:
As for the specific venues that will be super-hardwired with 5G technology, that is very difficult to pin down.
The only way for citizens to nail down the locations of the 5G super-hotspots is to contact the local Telecom companies and request the extent of the 5G and/or IoT build-out by location. The more operational the IoT is in any locale, the more intensive the 5G networking that has been installed by necessity.
As a practical way of determining the 5G super-hotspots, the quicker the download and upload speeds registering on a smartphone, the more fully functioning are the various 5G signal ranges. If latency and connection issues disappear where they previously occurred, this could also be an indication of an efficient 5G power grid in place.
The further residents are from the major metro areas listed in the preceding two links, the less 5G deployment has taken place.
Suburbia poses its own set of problems to a seamless deployment of 5G as do the rural areas where service will be quite spotty, if existent at all, for the foreseeable future.

KEY POINT: Even President Trump is highly challenged by the deployment
of 5G. The US government has gone on a literal crime spree in all 50 states in order to implement the illicit 5G roll-out. Some have even asserted that The 5G Roll-out is Trump’s 9/11.


There is a great likelihood that this patently unlawful deployment of 5G will be stopped dead in its tracks.
Communities across the nation are rising in protest — fierce protest — to shut it down. Many are organizing locally and nationally to confront the collusive law-breaking by government and corporations in the conduct of the roll-out. See 5G Roll-out Facing $1 Trillion Class Action Lawsuit.
However, in spite of these vital developments, it’s still imperative that each individual aggressively oppose the 5G roll-out wherever they live.
In the meantime, we can consider the current life-saving technological obstacles as a God-given grace period to shut down 5G once and for all.
Here’s a downloadable flyer that can be printed for mass distribution: STOP 5G Campaign Flyer
Bottom line: Anyone who understands the profound yet often subtle harm to bio-organisms inflicted by microwave radiation knows that each 5G microwave tower by itself constitutes a 5G super-hotspots. When you add the significantly higher electromagnetic frequency ranges that are utilized in the 5th generation of digital cellular networks, it’s evident that wherever the transmitting equipment is situated will become a slo-mo “kill zone”.

Let’s all terminate 5G, before it terminates US.

State of the Nation
May 3, 2019
Compilation of important articles and videos on the 5G roll-out:


5G networks will use the same frequencies as pain-inflicting crowd control weapons

(Washington's Blog) We previously noted that the Internet of Things (IoT) is a scam … being pushed so that Big Brother can spy on us.

Believe it or not, IoT may also pose health and safety risks.
Devra Lee Davis – Founding Director of the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Founding Director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, who has taught at the University of California, San Francisco and Berkeley, Dartmouth, Georgetown, Harvard, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and other major universities, and has had articles published in Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association to Scientific American, the New York Times and elsewhere

– says that the 5G wavelengths used in IoT have never been tested for health effects, and may adversely impact our skin and sweat glands:
Dr. Davis’ group – Environmental Health Trust – explains:
Israeli research studies presented at an international conference reveal that the same electromagnetic frequencies used for crowd control weapons form the foundation of the latest network – branded as 5G – that will tie together more than 50 billion devices as part of the Internet of Things.
Current investigations of wireless frequencies in the millimeter and submillimeter range confirm that these waves interact directly with human skin, specifically the sweat glands. Dr. Ben-Ishai of the Department of Physics, Hebrew University, Israel recently detailed how human sweat ducts act like an array of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths. Scientists cautioned that before rolling out 5G technologies that use these frequencies, research on human health effects needed to be done first to ensure the public and environment are protected.
[Dr. Davis notes] “This work shows that the same parts of the human skin that allow us to sweat also respond to 5G radiation much like an antenna that can receive signals. We need the potential adverse health impacts of 5G to be seriously evaluated before we blanket our children, ourselves and the environment with this radiation.”

Research studies from the Dielectric Spectroscopy Laboratory of the Department of Applied Physics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, headed by Dr. Yuri Feldman, indicate that millimeter and submillimeter waves may lead to preferential layer absorption. The number of sweat ducts within human skin varies from two million to four million. The researchers pointed to replicated peer research of these biological effects in laboratory research conducted in other countries and considered this mechanism of action well proven.
Today’s cellular and Wi-Fi networks rely on microwaves – a type of electromagnetic radiation utilizing frequencies up to 6 gigahertz (GHz) in order to wirelessly transmit voice or data.

However, 5 G applications will require unlocking of new spectrum bands in higher frequency ranges above 6 GHz to 100 GHz and beyond, utilizing submillimeter and millimeter waves – to allow ultra-high rates of data to be transmitted in the same amount of time as compared with previous deployments of microwave radiation. 
For years, the U.S., Russian and Chinese defense agencies have been developing weapons that rely on the capability of this electromagnetic technology to induce unpleasant burning sensations on the skin as a form of crowd control. Millimeter waves are utilized by the U.S. Army in crowd dispersal guns called Active Denial Systems. Dr. Paul Ben-Ishai pointed to research that was commissioned by the U.S. Army to find out why people ran away when the beam touched them. “If you are unlucky enough to be standing there when it hits you, you will feel like your body is on fire.” The U.S. Department of Defense explains how: “The sensation dissipates when the target moves out of the beam. The sensation is intense enough to cause a nearly instantaneous reflex action of the target to flee the beam.”
The conference at the Israel Institute for Advanced Studies at Hebrew University (IIAS) was organized in cooperation with the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and the Environmental Health Trust (EHT).

Verizon just announced that 5G networks will be tested in 11 U.S. cities. 5G Networks will involve the deployment of millions of antennas nationwide, thousands in each city, because millimeter waves cannot easily travel through buildings or other obstacles. Proposed installations have led to public outcry in residential areas where homeowners do not want antennas mounted at their yards or near schools.
“There is an urgent need to evaluate 5G health effects now before millions are exposed. We need to know if 5G increases the risk of skin diseases such as melanoma or other skin cancers,” stated Ron Melnick, the National Institutes of Health scientist, now retired, who led the design of the National Toxicology Program study on cell phone radiofrequency radiation.
Dariusz Leszczynski, PhD, Chief Editor of Radiation and Health, stated that the international organization – called ICNIRP – developing recommendations for public exposure limits of these higher frequencies was planning to classify all the skin in the human body as belonging to the limbs rather than to the head or torso. Leszczynski cautioned that, “If you classify skin as limbs – no matter where the skin is – you are permitted to expose it more than otherwise.”
“The use of sub-terahertz (Millimeter wave) communications technology (cell phones, Wi-Fi, network transmission antennas) could cause humans to feel physical pain via nociceptors, ” stated Dr. Yael Stein, MD, who wrote a letter to the Federal Communications Commission about 5G Spectrum Frontiers.
Source: Washington's Blog


Human Skin as Arrays of Helical Antennas in the Millimeter and Submillimeter Wave Range

Research Study Summaries at Hebrew University Department of Applied Physics

PDF of Abstract for January 24, 2017 IIAS Presentation

Letter from Dr. Yael Stein to Federal Communications Commission on Spectrum Frontiers


US Department of Defense Non-Lethal Weapons Program FAQS

A Narrative Summary and Independent Assessment of the Active Denial System The Human Effects Advisory Panel

Everything You Need to Know About 5G

Potential Risks to Human Health from Future Sub-MM Communication Systems: Paul Ben-Ishai, PhD Video Lecture Presentation



Top 20 Facts On 5G: What You Need To Know About 5G Wireless And “Small” Cells
What You Need To Know About 5G Wireless And “Small” Cells

Download a PDF of this information on a two page  EHT Factsheet on 5G and Health. The factsheet is hyperlinked (blue text) to research and sources. It is a great resource for policymakers. Read the research on 5G and health here.  
What is the alternative? A safe wired solution is the future. Read “Re-Inventing Wires: The Future of Landlines and Networks”. 
Read also two publications in the  Santa Clara Medical Association Magazine, “Wireless Silent Spring” and  “A 5G Wireless Future: Will it give us a Smart Future of Contribute to an Unhealthy One?” 
Nationwide, communities are being told by wireless companies that it is necessary to build “small cell” wireless facilities in neighborhoods ons street lights and utility poles in order to offer 5G, a new technology that will connect the Internet of Things (IoT).
At the local, state, and federal level, new legislation and new zoning aim to streamline the installation of these 5G “small cell” antennas in public rights-of-way.

Recent news coverage on the health effects of 5G:

1. 5G “small” cell antennas are to be placed in neighborhoods everywhere. 
  • Street lights
  • Trashcans
  • Utility poles
  • Bus stops
  • Sides of buildings

2. The radiation from small cells is not small.
Wireless antennas emit microwaves — non-ionizing radiofrequency radiation — and essentially function as cell towers. Each installation can have over a thousand antennas that are transmitting simultaneously. Examples of how small cells are not small include:  
  • They increase electromagnetic radiation near homes.
  • They have refrigerator-sized (and larger) equipment cabinets.
  • Property values drop after a cell tower is built near homes.
  • Taller and wider poles are needed for the antennas.
  • Fixtures weigh hundreds of pounds.

NO. Small cell installations are not the size of pizza boxes.
Each so called “small” cell installation has antennas on the top and electronics cabinets  at the bottom. The electronics are housed in metal boxes – called “street furniture” by industry to make it sound warm and cozy. These cabinets  can belarger than a refrigerator, so large people could fit into them. In addition, there will be various radio units, a smart meter, and potentially unseemly wires.  
These large ugly installations are being built on cities nationwide.  Yet at the same time industry is stating contradictory things. They say the installations are small as in the video below by Samsung engineer. In this video he shares the almost pizza box sized 5G equipment cabinet. So the question is: Why are ugly 20 cubic feet installations being installed in people’s front yards when one only needs this tiny box?
If the installations are so small then why aren’e communities getting the small boxes?

Most neighborhood light poles are not strong enough to hold the 5G equipment so they will be replaced by much taller wider poles with antennas and 6 ft buzzing boxes. This is called “hardening” the poles but basically it means the poles will be much wider and thicker metal.  In Montgomery County as an example, neighborhood, the slim 14 ft light poles will be replaced with hefty 24 ft towers with 300 pound antennas and 6 ft buzzing boxes.

3. Millions of small cells are to be built in front yards in the name of 5G.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) estimates and is supporting that millions of these wireless transmitters will be built in our rights-of-way, directly in front of our homes.

4. 5G will add an extra layer  — not replace — our current wireless technology.
5G will utilize current 3G and 4G wireless frequencies already in use and also add even more radiation. Higher frequency — submillimeter and millimeter waves — will be used in 5G in order to transmit data at superfast speeds.

5. Community authority is being overruled at every level.
Communities are being stripped of their right to make decisions about this new technology. ”Streamlining” means almost automatic approval. Public notice and public hearings are being eliminated. Even if every homeowner on the block opposes the antennas on their street, the opposition will be disregarded with new regulations moving forward at the federal and state level.  
Mayors, city officials and public officials are joining to call to halt the federal move to “streamline” the small cells rollout.
“The U.S. Conference of Mayors strongly opposes recent proposals by the Federal Communications Commission to grant communications service providers subsidized access to local public property and to dictate how local governments manage their own local rights-of-ways and public property.  This unprecedented federal intrusion into local (and state) government property rights will have substantial adverse impacts on cities and their taxpayers, including reduced funding for essential local government services, as well as an increased risk of right-of-way and other public safety hazards.”

6. Cell phone companies have confirmed that 5G “small” cell towers do not need to be placed every hundred feet (despite industry statements that densely placed small cells are needed in close vicinity to homes).
Verizon’s CEO, Lowell McAdam stated on camera that 4G and 5G antennas will work from 3,000 feet away on Macro Towers. This statement proves that Verizon DOES NOT need to place 5G small cells in residential areas every 500 to 1,000 feet.

“When [Verizon] went out in these 11 [5G test] markets, we tested for well over a year, so we could see every part of foliage and every storm that went through. We have now busted the myth that [5G frequencies] have to be line-of-sight — they do not. We busted the myth that foliage will shut [5G] down . . . that does not happen. And the 200 feet from a home? We are now designing the network for over 2,000 feet from transmitter to receiver, which has a huge impact on our capital need going forward. Those myths have disappeared.”
stated Lowell McAdam, CEO of Verizon
“[Verizon 5G] is really high frequency [28,000 MHz and 39,000 MHz], so everybody thinks it doesn’t go very far, but it’s a really big pipe and so that’s what allows you to gain the super fast speeds . . We’re 3,000 feet away from our radio node. the cool thing about this is that we did not move the radio node. . . here even 3,000 feet away, we’re still getting 1,000 [Megabits per second] speeds . . . So now we’ve driven about 1/3 of a mile away [1,760 feet] from the radio node. we are still getting very good speeds even though we have foliage in between [800 Megabits per second].”  – stated Jason L., Verizon Field Engineer

7. Scientists worldwide are calling for a halt to the 5G Roll-out.
The European  Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks  (SCHEER ) issued a statement identifying 14 emerging issues to bring to the attention of the Commission services including 5G, E-cigarette and chronic diseases,  They prioritized 5G impact as “high.”
  • The SCHEER  statement Potential effects on wildlife of increases in electromagnetic radiation  states, “On the horizon, a new generation of even shorter high frequency 5G wavelengths is being proposed to power the Internet of Things (IoT). The IoT promises us convenient and easy lifestyles with a massive 5G interconnected telecommunications network. However, the expansion of broadband with shorter wavelength radiofrequency radiation highlights the concern that health and safety issues remain unknown. Controversy continues with regard to harm from current 2G, 3G and 4G wireless technologies. 5G technologies are far less studied for human or environmental effects” (Russell, 2018).” and concludes, “5G networks will soon be rolled out for mobile phone and smart device users. How exposure to electromagnetic fields could affect humans remains a controversial area, and studies have not yielded clear evidence of the impact on mammals, birds or insects. The lack of clear evidence to inform the development of exposure guidelines to 5G technology leaves open the possibility of unintended biological consequences.”
Scientists from all over the world have issued a 2017 declaration called the 5G Appeal calling for a moratorium on the increase of 5G cell antennas citing human health effects and impacts to wildlife. This follows the EMF Scientists Appeal in 2015 calling for immediate action by the United Nations- now signed by over 240 scientists in 42 nations. 
“We recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry…RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.”
— The  5G Scientific Appeal (An Appeal signed by more than 250 scientists and doctors from 35 countries)

8. Cumulative daily radiation exposure is associated with serious health effects.
“Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being.” – EMF Scientific Appeal
The public is unaware that peer reviewed, published science indicates that exposures to wireless radiation can cause cancer,  alter brain development and damage sperm. Cell tower radiation is also associated with headaches, hormone changes, memory problems and sleep problems.
A review paper published in Environmental Research concludes that the current scientific evidence supports the conclusion that mobile phone and wireless radiofrequency radiation (RFR) is cancer-causing.
Most people are also unaware that wireless technology was never tested for long-term safety decades ago when the technology was first introduced. Children are more vulnerable to this radiation and that the accumulated scientific evidence shows harmful effects.

“There is a substantial body of evidence that this technology is harmful to humans and the environment. The 5G millimeter wave is known to heat the eyes, skin and testes… Of particular concern are the most vulnerable among us — the unborn, children, the infirm, the elderly and the disabled. It is also expected that populations of bees and birds will drastically decline.”
“A growing body of scientific literature documents evidence of nonthermal cellular damage from non-ionizing wireless radiation used in telecommunications. This RF EMR has been shown to cause an array of adverse effects on DNA integrity, cellular membranes, gene expression, protein synthesis, neuronal function, the blood brain barrier, melatonin production, sperm damage and immune dysfunction”. –Dr. Cindy Russell 2018 paper entitled “5 G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and environmental implications.” 

9. Scientists state that wireless radiation is a human carcinogen.
Several researchers have published their opinion in multiple papers that cellular radiation- radiofrequency radiation (the type that cell towers emit)  is a human carcinogen based on the current body of science. In 2018, the US National Toxicology Program study peer review scientists concluded “clear evidence of cancer” from cellular radiation exposure in the largest US animal study ever done on the issue. Examples of this published research includes:

10. Antennas near homes decrease property values.
Studies show property values drop up to 20% on homes near cell towers. Would you buy a home with a mini cell tower in the yard?

11. Experts state that 5G Small Cell Wireless streaming bills do not make financial sense.   
The California Department of Finance rejected California’s 5G small cell wireless  infrastructure bill S. 649 stating that, “Finance opposes this bill… this bill goes too far by usurping city and county zoning authority for infrastructure development, and it potentially imposes reimbursable, state-mandated costs on cities and counties.”

12. Microwave antennas in front yards present several worker and public safety issues.
Unions have already filed comments that workers were injured, unaware they were working near transmitting antennas. How will HVAC workers, window washers, and tree cutters be protected? The heavy large equipment cabinets mounted on poles along our sidewalks also present new hazards. Cars run into utility poles, often, what then? US Department of Labor letters and reports of cell tower health and safety issues.
13. Fiber is the solution and the safe alternative.
Worldwide, many regions are investing in wired fiber optic connections which are are safer, faster, more reliable, provide greater capacity, and are more cyber-secure. Read “Re-Inventing Wires: The Future of Landlines and Networks,” by the National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy

14. Wireless Companies warn investors of risks but neglect to inform consumers and neighbors living near towers.
Crown Castle (a company building small cell infrastructure throughout the USA) has a statement in their 2016 10-K Annual Report that says: “If radio frequency emissions from wireless handsets or equipment on our wireless infrastructure are demonstrated to cause negative health effects, potential future claims could adversely affect our operations, costs or revenues… We currently do not maintain any significant insurance with respect to these matters.”

15. Antennas near our homes will affect our sleep.
Wireless radiation alters sleep patterns in replicated research in both animals and humans. For example, an animal study found an hour of exposure to RFR caused a one-hour delay for rats to drift into REM or deep sleep. Human studies have found exposure reduces REM sleep, alters the EEG signal and results in altered performance.  

16. Cellular Radiation Negatively Impacts Birds and Bees
Published research finds the frequencies impact wildlife. For example studies have found that the radiation alter bird navigation and disturb honeybee colonies. Research also shows impacts on trees and plant.  Research on EMF and Bees.Research on Wildlife Research on Trees

17. US Cities and Entire Countries are voting to halt 5G
Cities in California such as Petaluma, Mill Valley, Monterey, Hillsborough, Ross, San Anselmo and Sebastopol and Doylestown in Pennsylvania have voted and passed policies to halt 5G and restrict the wireless rollout into neighborhoods.  Petaluma City Council voted to prohibited small cell installation on city-owned light poles and other city-owned street furniture and established a 500-foot setback from a small cell to any residence. In Mill Valley, schools are zoned  as a  Community Facility (which captures under the residential code) which prohibits cell towers. Thus schools are protected from 5G antennas in this City. After the Mayor said the 5G small cells would be an “aesthetic disaster” Palm Beach and other coastal communities got entirely carved out of legislation streamlining the 5G antennas.
Click here to go to EHTs webpage that lists more protective ordinances in cities.This page is important to share with policymakers.

Watch testimony against small cells cells across the USA here.

Many countries such as China, India, Poland, Russia, Italy and Switzerland have far more protective and stricter radiation limits than do we in the United States. According to industry reports, these countries more protective radiation limits will not allow the full deployment of 5G because the increased 5G radiation would exceed these governments allowable levels of radiation. 
The Report “The impact of RF-EMF exposure limits stricter than the ICNIRP or IEEE guidelines on 4G and 5G mobile network deployment” reviews how 5G deployment is “constrained” by these countries limits. In addition, more protective exposure limits also are problematic for the full rollout of 4G LTE as detailed in the GSMA report “Arbitrary Radio Frequency exposure limits: Impact on 4G network deployment.”
These countries are causing a lot  of a”critical concerns”for the global telecommunications industry, which has in response launched large-scale public relations efforts to do away with  these restrictions. However many countries are holding firm to their limits. For example, in 2018, the Swiss Parliament rejected (22 to 21 votes)  loosening the limits for non-ionizing radiation.
The U.S. Conference of Mayors stated that it would sue the FCC if the commission does not change a proposed policy that would preempt local control to streamline 5G.
The National Association of Counties is also opposing the proposal, telling POLITICO it would “effectively prevent local governments from properly examining the impact that construction, modification or installation of broadcasting facilities may have on public health, safety and welfare of the local community.”
Citizens are protesting 5G across the United States and across the world. Watch news videos and learn more about the US at this link on US Bills . News reports across Europe document the opposition to 5G and as an example, citizens protested 5G implementation in Spain with a human chain in Segovia in July 2018. Read “A Human Chain Against 5G.” 

18. The FCC is not monitoring radiation exposures from cell installations and many cell towers are in violation of the radiation limits.
The Wall Street Journal did an investigative report in 2014 examining over 5,000 cell antennas sites and found that 1 in 10 sites violated the rules during safety audits for carriers and local municipalities “underscoring a safety lapse,” yet the FCC has issued just two citations to cell carriers since 1996 because “the FCC says it lacks resources to monitor each antenna.” A CBS Atlanta investigation also found radiation excesses up to 400 percent of the limit close up to the antennas on rooftop posing serious health risks especially to any worker coming on the roof.  

19. The American Academy of Pediatrics is one of many medical organizations that is calling for federal action to protect children. For example, the American Academy of Pediatrics webpage on Cell Towers states: 
“An Egyptian study confirmed concerns that living nearby mobile phone base stations increased the risk for developing:
  • Headaches
  • Memory problems
  • Dizziness
  • Depression
  • Sleep problems”
In fact, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), our largest organization of children’s doctors, has repeatedly written the US  government that current regulations on cellular radiation are outdated and non protective for children and pregnant women.
“Children are not little adults and are disproportionately impacted by all environmental exposures, including cell phone radiation. Current FCC standards do not account for the unique vulnerability and use patterns specific to pregnant women and children. It is essential that any new standard for cell phones or other wireless devices be based on protecting the youngest and most vulnerable populations to ensure they are safeguarded throughout their lifetimes.”

20. Firefighters fought hard to oppose 5G small cells in California
The International Association of Firefighters has officially opposed cell towers on their stations since 2004 after a study found neurological damage in firefighters with antennas on their station.
In 2017, when 5G “small cells were coming to California via a 5G streamlining bill (SB649), firefighter organizations came out in strong opposition to the bill and cited the many peer-reviewed studies. They requested that 5G towers not be installed on firehouses. They were successful and SB649 was amended toexempt their stations from the deployment due to their health concerns.

5G Frequencies Are Absorbed Into the Skin
Physicists found that the higher millimeter frequencies intended for 5G use are preferentially absorbed into the sweat duct at much higher rates than other organ tissues. Read two published studies “The Modeling of the Absorbance of the Sub-THz Radiation by Human Skin.” The human skin as a sub-THz receiver – Does 5G pose a danger to it or not? Paul Ben-Ishai, PhD Lecture.

5G Frequencies Are Used As Weapons
Millimeter frequencies – used in 5G applications- have the capacity to cause a severe burning sensation in the skin and are used by the U.S. Department of Defense in crowd control guns called Active Denial Systems.  The frequencies are able to cause this burning sensation due to the way the radiation frequencies are absorbed into the sweat gland.

Landmark US National Toxicology Program (NTP) Study Finds “Clear Evidence of Cancer” and DNA Damage
The NTP studies found male rats exposed for two years to cell phone radiation developed significantly increased gliomas (brain cancer) and schwann cell tumors, the very same types of tumors increased in long-term human cell phone users. NIH/ NTP presentation on DNA results states “exposure to RFR has the potential to induce measurable DNA damage under certain exposure conditions.”Press Coverage, on Peer Review Report

Cell Tower Radiation is Linked To Damage in Human Blood
A published study compared people living close and far from cell antennas and found people living closer to cellular antennas had changes in blood that predicts cancer development. Read Zothansiama et al, 2017. Read a Compilation of Research on Cell Tower Radiation

Contact local, state and federal elected officials in person.
Share this information with your friends, family and community.
Ask for government policy that reduces RFR exposure to the public.
Citizens in all states must organize and take action to halt legislation that increases cell antennas in neighborhoods.
This EHT fact sheet has links to to scientific resources and key facts from this page. Please download it and send it to your elected officials and community.

Link to Federal Legislation You Can Take Action On
Link to US States With Streamlining Bills You Can Take Action On
Link to Protective City Ordinances that Attempt to Control the 5G Rollout and protect the public.

CRITICAL LINKS TO INFORMATION ON 5G on the human and environmental impact of 5G
My Street My Choice:  Critical information and links to help residents fight 5G Small Cells.
  • Link to 5G Frequencies Are Absorbed Into the Skin
  • Link to review study that states radiofrequency is a human carcinogen.
  • Link to 5G Frequencies Are Used As Weapons
  • Link to Landmark US National Toxicology Program (NTP) Study Finds “Clear Evidence of Cancer” and DNA Damage
  • Link to Cell Tower Radiation is Linked To Damage in Human Blood
  • Link to Published Scientific Review on 5G Finds Adverse Effects
  • Link to Cellular Radiation Negatively Impacts Birds
  • Link to Cellular Radiation Negatively Impacts Bees


  • Link to Overview of Cell Tower Health Effects
  • Link to Research on Cell Towers and Health Effects
  • Link to Bees, Butterflies and Wildlife
  • Link to Impact of Cell Towers on Property Values
  • Link to American Academy of Pediatrics on Cell Towers
  • Link to Letters from Doctors on Small Cell 5G in Neighborhoods
  • Link to Firefighters Oppose Cell Towers on Fire Stations
  • Link to Insurance White Papers on Impact of Wireless on Health
  • Link to Cell Towers at Schools
  • Link to Cell Tower Companies Warn Shareholders of Risk but not People Living Near Their Towers or Using Their Products
  • Link to Insurance Company Exclude Electromagnetic Fields as a Standard
  • Link to Study Found Damage in Human Blood
  • Link to FCC Limits are Non Protective
  • Link to 5G Technology
  • Link to Cell Tower Worker Safety Issues

  • Link to Research on 5G and Cell Tower Radiation
  • Link to A 5G Wireless Future: Will it give us a smart nation or contribute to an unhealthy one?” Santa Clara Medical Association Bulletin, Cindy Russell MD, 2017
  • Link to Letters by Scientists in Opposition To 5G Research on Cell Tower Radiation, 2017
  • Link to Biological Effects from Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation Emitted by Cell Tower Base Stations and Other Antenna  Arrays, Levitt and Lai, 2010
  • Link to Radiofrequency radiation injures trees around mobile phone base stations, Waldmann-Selsam et al., 2016
  • Link to Department of Interior Letter on the Impact of Cell Towers on Migratory Birds, Willie R. Taylor Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, 2014
  • Link to Anthropogenic radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as an emerging threat to wildlife orientation, Balmori, 2015
  • Link to Briefing Memorandum On The Impacts from Thermal and Non-thermal Non-ionizing Radiation to Birds and Other Wildlife, Manville, 2016
  • Link to Database of Worldwide International Policy To Reduce EMF
  • Link to Youtube Scientific Videos on 5G
More Resources from Physicians for Safe Technology
BioInitiative 2012: A Comprehensive Report by Independent Scientists on the Science of Electromagnetic Radiation
The Baby Safe Project: EPA Recognized Awareness Program on Pregnancy and Wireless

“This is a unique situation in the history of the human kind when the whole human population will be exposed to man-made devices emitting non-ionizing radiation that was insufficiently tested before deployment. What is and what will be the responsibility of the scientists, decision-makers and industry leaders who permit deployment of insufficiently tested technology that will affect us all? The answer is simple – no responsibility… because if any health problems will show up in the future, these will most likely take tens of years of time to manifest and, by then the persons that currently enable deployment of insufficiently tested radiation-emitting 5G technology will be retired or the proverbial ‘six feet under.’”
-Dr. Darius Leszczynski, July 18th, 2018 in Assumption of Safety for 5G by Government Agencies, No Science.




Ei kommentteja:

Lähetä kommentti

You are welcome to show your opinion here!