Näytetään tekstit, joissa on tunniste Sugar. Näytä kaikki tekstit
Näytetään tekstit, joissa on tunniste Sugar. Näytä kaikki tekstit

sunnuntai 3. kesäkuuta 2018

Sugar - cause of Candida - Candida cause of Cancer - This video saved my Life

Sugar - cause of Candida - Candida cause of Cancer


Click for video
Explanation... Origin of your problems





























































_________


Do You Have Candida? Take The "Spit Test"!
Candidiasis is a very common infection caused by the Candida fungus,
and can affect your skin, nails, organs, genitals, throat, bloodstream and mouth.
This infection can affect both men and women, but it's more commonly found in women.


_________

If you need help breaking free from sugar, keep reading!



By Vani Hari, New York Times Best Selling Author and Healthy Food Activist
Sugar is toxic. Plain and simple.
It wreaks havoc on our bodies. Makes us age faster than we should. Destroys our skin. Makes it easy to carry a spare tire around our bellies and taxes our organs.
Pretty much everyone can agree that processed food and sugar are diet killers, and do nothing good for the body. Yet, sugar seems to control our lives and many of us struggle with uncontrollable cravings and mood swings that make it seem impossible to stop.
When you eat sugar, you light up the reward center in your brain that makes you feel euphoric - it's like being on a drug! But it quickly wears off and your brain wants more of that feeling and tells you to eat more sugar... This is a cycle that is really hard to stop.
I sat down with my team and we brainstormed how to solve this issue once and for all. We spent months creating something amazing that I know you are going to want to be a part of... a groundbreaking 7-Day Sugar Detox Program to finally rid your diet of refined sugar that won't leave you feeling deprived.
GET THE FOOD BABE 7-DAY SUGAR DETOX PROGRAM NOW
I read your emails every day and listen to the problems you're having trying to eliminate processed food from your life - and the NUMBER ONE issue you've expressed to me is your struggle to tame cravings and avoid SUGAR... .
"This is absolutely one of my biggest struggles and it's so frustrating because I spend so much time working out, eating well, avoiding chemicals, etc. But still get sucked into the sugar treats!" - Julie
"I can eat healthy all day, but at night, I get a huge sugar craving." - Sarah
"As I am writing to you weighing nearly 300 pounds. I'm the heaviest I've ever been. I have not been able to do so with any long-term success." - Dawn
"When I am stressed at work I grab whatever I can if it has chocolate in it. I have absolutely no willpower and fill myself with self loathing..." - Mary

I have been in your shoes. I know the pain and struggle that you are going through is heartbreaking because I've been there.

I'm human, just like you, and I love sweets! For most of my life, I was addicted to sugar. As a result, my health suffered a lot too. My teeth were awful, my skin was a mess, my body was inflamed, my energy was low and I was overweight. I never want to feel that way again and I know from personal experience how changing your diet can transform your life. Let me help you too!

GET THE FOOD BABE 7-DAY SUGAR DETOX PROGRAM NOW

On this program you'll cut out sugar, feel great, and start to take control of those cravings once and for all.

You’ll feel more energetic, your skin will glow, and you’ll get healthier in just 7 days. I've conducted a lot of research into why it's so hard to break the sugar habit and strategies that really work... If you really want to get sugar out of your life, it won't be easy, but I can help!
Do you think you can do it? I know you can. The entire Food Babe Team completed the program and let me tell you, the results were astonishing! Now YOU can effortlessly ditch refined sugar like we did!
You'll be given instant exclusive access to our Food Babe 7-Day Sugar Detox Program , full of instructional videos, downloadable easy-to-follow guides, and a private detox group where we will answer questions and share our success stories.
GET THE FOOD BABE 7-DAY SUGAR DETOX PROGRAM NOW
"My sugar intake was out of control! My worst time of day was from 8PM to 10PM, when I couldn't inhale enough cookies and/or dark chocolate truffles and/or ice cream. Every night I had to have something sweet. Then when I saw the Food Babe's message about the Sugar Detox, I knew that it was time to make another healthy change to my diet. The best part was getting on the scale and finding that I had lost 4 pounds! I am extremely motivated now, and even started to exercise. All in all, I am trying to maintain a healthy lifestyle and have confidence that I'll be able to continue to eat good foods! Thank you!!" -Lesli

https://foodbabe.com/app/plugins/foodbabe-sugardetox/img/testimonials/lesli.png

"I completed the 7 day detox with my husband, lost 2 pounds and started taking morning walks. I feel much more energized and focused. I started out with the vegetarian menu but added some of the meat recipes in to encourage my husband to continue. All the recipes were good and filling. I did not feel hungry. My husband was able to take leftovers to work each day because the portions were large enough. Following the detox, I am focused on eating more fresh vegetables and fruits, and continuing to make variations of the recipes provided for the detox. I love the sunny scramble and the coconut chia pudding! I'm also shopping more at the local farmers market. Note that it is helpful to have a blender and food processor in advance of the detox to assist with prep. Thanks Food Babe team for the encouragement and easy to follow instructions. I recommend that everyone try this detox!" -Sheila

https://foodbabe.com/app/plugins/foodbabe-sugardetox/img/testimonials/sheila.png

"I started the detox last Sunday, and I must admit, it was especially hard the first few days to keep pushing forward. I experienced typical withdrawal symptoms, like the nausea, headaches, cravings, etc. But, I powered through, and as of yesterday, I am proud to say, I feel SO much better. I already notice a difference in feeling so much less inflamed, bloated, sluggish, etc. It definitely motivates me to want to keep going. And it was definitely an eye-opener in realizing how many misconceptions are written into labels. So, for now, I'm sticking to as much fresh, organic food as possible! 🙂 Thanks Food Babe!" -Christie

https://foodbabe.com/app/plugins/foodbabe-sugardetox/img/testimonials/christie.png

"I am a firefighter. Between my schedule and sleep habits I've been in a rut for a long time with choosing convenience over quality. I also have a horrible sweet tooth. One that causes me to have regular binges on the worst of the worst types of candy. My wife has been trying to get me to reduce my sugar intake, but it has had such a hold on me for so long; I didn't know where to start. I'm happy to say, I just completed the 7 day sugar detox. It was a great experience! The biggest difference was the food. I was surprised at how much I enjoyed it all. The other thing that was noteworthy was, upon completion, I didn't have much of a desire for sugar. At least not in mass quantities. I am only a have few days removed from it, but I still desire to eat healthy. My wife has been a huge help. She prepared everything and all I had to do was show up to the table and eat. And for that, I am exceedingly grateful.I think my relationship with food is taking a much needed positive turn. For me it is less about the weight loss and more about good health for me and my family. Thank you food babe! (I lost 14 lbs and I feel great)." -Matt

https://foodbabe.com/app/plugins/foodbabe-sugardetox/img/testimonials/matt.png

"I feel great! I have more energy, don't have the energy drop in the afternoon and overall just feel healthier. I am still doing the 7 day detox and I'm currently on day 6. I plan to use what I've learned here to consume less sugar overall. I do plan to introduce back in some of the foods that weren't allowed during the detox....brown rice, whole grain bread and I'll of course have the special occasion treat but I plan to use this detox as the starting point to pay closer attention to added sugars and to make better food choices." -Leslie
https://foodbabe.com/app/plugins/foodbabe-sugardetox/img/testimonials/leslie.png

"My husband and I have finished the sugar detox on Monday 03/21/2016! I thought it would be impossible but it wasn't and we succeeded! The first 3 days were hard for myself and after that it was just a part of the routine. Don't get me wrong, yes I wanted a cheeseburger but it wasn't a must have at the time. My husband really struggled on the last day, probably because he knew he could have pasta the next day. I lost 5 lbs through the detox and i didn't workout through the detox because I didn't have that many carbs in my body besides the carbs from the vegetables. We feel so much better after doing the detox and now know that we have self control and that sugar does not run our lives. Thank you for the push with the 7- day sugar detox, it was worth the money! Keep encouraging others to be healthy, you are doing a great thing in our communities! Organic and Non GMO is the way to go!" -Lia

https://foodbabe.com/app/plugins/foodbabe-sugardetox/img/testimonials/lia.png

"We did the sugar detox in September 2016 and got lots of compliments on how it changed our shapes. We basically keep on it for the most part except we left for a vacation and was hard to stick with it. I like a lot of the recipes and they are easy to prepare." -Lynn
https://foodbabe.com/app/plugins/foodbabe-sugardetox/img/testimonials/lynn.png

"We completed the detox about 6 weeks ago and we thoroughly enjoyed the experience. We're still off sugar, for the most part. I lost 10 lbs and am feeling great. The recipes are excellent! In addition to benefiting from quitting sugar, we also gained an appreciation for cooking meals from scratch and being more engaged in the kitchen. Thanks for your help Vani and team!" -William
https://foodbabe.com/app/plugins/foodbabe-sugardetox/img/testimonials/william_r.png

"I am 85 and my husband is 87 and we have both just completed our 7-day Sugar Detox. To date he has lost 5-lbs. and I have lost 2.5-lbs., although I have more to lose than he, proportionately. We have both noticed our desire for sweets has pretty well disappeared and I in particular, have been addicted to sugar my entire life. Also, strangely enough, my arthritic hip seems to be much better. The best and most immediate result of the Sugar Detox Diet was instead of lying awake for hours during the night, I now get a full 8 hours sleep and it's wonderful. We intend keeping on with this way of eating and will report back later on with our results. We are so impressed with Vani's wonderful work and wish to express our appreciation of all the help that she offers." -Greta

https://foodbabe.com/sugardetox/

____________
More about Candida:

  23. ___

Treat candida and inflammations yourself
__
eof
shop
cart
Lähettänyt klo Ei kommentteja:
Tunnisteet: , ,

torstai 13. lokakuuta 2016

What do Sugar, Trans Fat, and Vaccines Have in Common?

What do Sugar, Trans Fat, and Vaccines Have in Common?

Posted on: 
Sunday, October 2nd 2016 at 3:00 pm
Written By: 
Zoey O'Toole



Far too many are still swooned by false promises from people
with initials like "Dr." and "CEO" in front of their names. 
I grew up in the 1960s, inundated by commercials for margarines made from hydrogenated vegetable oils that “promised” those margarines would keep my cholesterol levels low and protect me from heart disease.
Yet in 2015, nearly 50 years later, in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence of the harm they do, especially to the circulatory system and the heart, the Food and Drug Administration announced that artificial trans fats of the very sort that made up a good percentage of those margarines were no longer “generally recognized as safe,” and food manufacturers would have three years to remove these substances from their products altogether.

How did this happen? How could we get the science so wrong that it was
actually backward, and how did it take us 50 years to figure it out?
On September 12, 2016, The New York Times published a very illuminating
article by Anahad O’Connor entitled “How the Sugar Industry Shifted the
Blame to Fat.” According to O’Connor,

The sugar industry paid scientists in the 1960s to play down the link between sugar and heart disease and promote saturated fat as the culprit instead, newly released historical documents show.

The internal sugar industry documents, recently discovered by a researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, and published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine, suggest that five decades of research into the role of nutrition and heart disease, including many of today’s dietary recommendations, may have been largely shaped by the sugar industry.
“They were able to derail the discussion about sugar for decades,” said Stanton Glantz, a professor of medicine at U.C.S.F. and an author of the JAMA Internal Medicine paper. [emphases mine]

 As you may imagine from my past writings, I am not the least bit surprised that the sugar industry cynically and deliberately attempted to shape the science of nutrition and heart disease, nor even that their attempt to “derail the discussion about sugar” was so wildly successful for so long. What I do find shocking, however, is just how little money and how few people it took to completely divert the mainstream scientific understanding on the subject for more than 50 years, to the point where many conscientious cardiologists, as well as the American Heart Association, are still advocating low-fat/low-saturated-fat diets, while only recently acknowledging that sugar even plays a role. According to the article,

The documents show that a trade group called the Sugar Research Foundation, known today as the Sugar Association, paid three Harvard scientists the equivalent of about $50,000 in today’s dollars to publish a 1967 review of research on sugar, fat and heart disease. The studies used in the review were handpicked by the sugar group, and the article, which was published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, minimized the link between sugar and heart health and cast aspersions on the role of saturated fat. [emphasis mine]

 A mere $50,000 in today’s dollars – not even a year’s salary for one
scientist?
That’s all it took to get three Harvard scientists to completely eschew
scientific integrity and deliberately promulgate incorrect ideas that not
only “derailed the discussion” on nutrition and heart disease, but were
also directly responsible for destroying the health of generations of
Americans? 

 Way to go, Sugar Association!
High five! Even Big Tobacco can’t compete with that kind of bang for the buck.
One of the major objections people have when I tell them that our current vaccine schedule is ruining the health of our children (just as supposedly “heart-healthy” foods ruined the health of adults) is that it can’t be true because, if it were true, it would require a conspiracy on an international scale of such size and complexity that it would defy credulity. I always agree a conspiracy such as they describe, where very many people (including your garden-variety pediatrician) all know the truth and collude to delude the public, would defy credulity.

As Benjamin Franklin said, “Three people may keep a secret if two of them are
dead.” But is that sort of conspiracy truly necessary to create the outcome we’re seeing where up is down, and unhealthy is healthy?
I’ve never thought so. In fact, I’ve been saying for a long time that it doesn’t
require some huge, complex conspiracy, involving everyone at a couple of
government agencies, six major manufacturers, pediatricians’ offices all over the world, mainstream media reporters, and research labs at major universities, to achieve an entrenched backward understanding of the health implications of a one-size-fits-all, shoot-‘em-up vaccine schedule. And this New York Times article is the proof.


All that’s required are the following four elements:

1) Some individuals (not very many as it turns out) who put profit
before people: As we can see in the Sugar Association documents, our sugar
execs and Harvard researchers fit the bill perfectly. These people consciously and deliberately set out to misinform the scientific
community, the medical community, and the general public because
it was in their monetary interest to do so. And, regrettably, such people
abound in a society (like ours) which regards profit as its highest good.

How hard is it to imagine that vaccine manufacturers could and would
(in a heartbeat) do the exact same thing for a business sector that currently
brings in about $40 billion a year and is expected to be a major source of growth?
For a prize that big wouldn’t they be willing to throw around millions if it got
them what they wanted? What if I told you that back in 1986, pharmaceutical
companies were threatening to get out of the vaccine business altogether?
They were getting walloped by the press and in courtrooms all over the
country because so many children’s lives were destroyed by DPT vaccines,
and they told the U.S. government they were done unless they were absolved
them of all monetary responsibility for harm caused by their products.

What if I told you that Congress obliged and did remove financial liability with
the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and – shockingly – the defunct
vaccine industry was suddenly a gold mine.

In 1986, the average American kid got DPT, MMR, and polio vaccines, and
vaccine manufacturers were supposedly going broke from damages.
Today’s average kid gets hepatitis B, rotavirus, DTaP, Hib, pneumococcal, polio,
 influenza, MMR, varicella, hepatitis A, HPV, and meningococcal vaccines, with
many more anticipated, and the vaccine manufacturers are pulling money in
hand over fist, not paying a cent in damages, despite the fact that so many
more children are getting hurt.

2) True Believers who ignore the evidence in front of their faces.
Anyone want to hazard a guess as to how many people actually read, much
less critically, the review study these Harvard guys wrote and/or the studies
it was based on? I’d be willing to bet it was precious few. But many, many
heard the headlines and believed the study’s conclusions could be
taken at face value, even though they saw patients every day who defied its predictions.

From the perspective of the True Believer, these patients were either “lying,”
“deluded,” or “outliers” because “everybody knows” diets high in fat and saturated fat would clog your arteries and stop your heart. From reading way too many so-called science blogs in the last decade that do exactly the same thing these Harvard researchers did
– promote conclusions that are not supported by the scientific research and directly contradict the clinical data at hand – and noting that these conclusions go completely unquestioned by the vast majority of readers (who, ironically, tend to call themselves “skeptics”), who then turn around and ridicule anyone who actually doesquestion the conclusions,
I can attest that these people are everywhere.

And while being duped themselves, they are often utterly, if amusingly, convinced of their own intellectual superiority.
As a matter of fact, this phenomenon is so widely known and understood that it is enshrined in a fairy tale. In The Emperor’s New Clothes, a couple of con men convince an emperor to hire them to make him a fabulous new wardrobe. 

He does so only to be provided with . . . nothing. That “nothing” however is
talked up so well that all the lords and ladies of the land ignore the evidence
of their own eyes and convince themselves that their naked emperor is instead
sumptuously attired, until a child – their “intellectual inferior” – points out the
obvious, that the emperor is starkers. There are always truth-tellers in society.
When the “lords and ladies of the land” are ready to hear truth has much less to do with who is saying it or how it is said than how soon they exhaust their own ability to maintain cognitive dissonance and are finally ready to acknowledge what has been staring them in the face all along. For some, it happens early because they are less invested in the illusion. Others will stubbornly refuse to see The Matrix, continuing to invest all their energy in the illusion until it kills them.

3) People who have figured out at least some part of the truth, but keep quiet out of the need to preserve their incomes and/or their careers.

As Upton Sinclair said, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
Is it really credible that all the lords and ladies of the land can convince themselves that the emperor is wearing the ultimate designer outfit, despite the fact that he is so obviously naked? Surely not. There are many concrete thinkers among us who just don’t have that much imagination. So why don’t even one or two of them speak out? Chances are good they have or desire status, power, and position that are directly dependent upon staying in the good graces of the emperor. Psychological tests have repeatedly shown that when even marginal status is on the line, many will fall in with the crowd, and even more will do so if the task is somewhat difficult or involves a judgment call.
The film The Big Short, about the mortgage-backed securities debacle that led (or should have led), to the demise of a number of “important” banking institutions, contains a few very clear examples of this phenomenon. In the first example, one of the main characters, Mark Baum played by Steve Carrell, becomes convinced that the mortgage-backed securities market is based on fraud: the mortgages that underlie the securities are defaulting in large numbers and yet, illogically, the securities’ ratings do not drop. He goes to see the woman at Moody’s Investor Service (a supposedly independent organization that rates the quality of investment vehicles) who is responsible for the rating he’s interested in and asks her how such a situation is possible. 
She defends her actions by saying that if she doesn’t give the banks what they want, they’ll just go across the street to Standard & Poor’s and get it there. 

The second example happens when Baum takes the story to a journalist he respects who absolutely understands what he has been told and the gravity of it, but refuses to print it because he’s taken a long time to cultivate his industry sources and he doesn’t want to piss them off. After all, his wife is going to have a baby and he needs to keep his job. He asks, “What am I supposed to do? Write a piece called ‘We’re all fucked?’” As it turned out, when the housing bubble collapsed shortly thereafter, demolishing the savings and financial holdings of many, many people with it, that would have been entirely appropriate.

4) People at government agencies willing to put industry interests before the interests of the public. This element is necessary to allow for true message control, but is also inevitable in the absence of strict and enforced conflict-of-interest rules. After all, government agencies are populated with people, most of whom when left to their own devices will fall into one of the previous three categories. In our Sugar Association example, we find that one of the Harvard scientists, D. Mark Hegsted, went on to become the head of nutrition at the United States Department of Agriculture, where in 1977 he helped draft the forerunner to the federal government’s dietary guidelines. Awesome, huh? Talk about message control! As far as the article indicates, he wasn’t even being paid by the Sugar Association anymore, but he could hardly admit that his own work was fraudulent, could he?
In The Big Short, we get a similar glimpse of how conflicts of interest at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the watchdog agency that is supposed to be watching out for taxpayers’ interests, kept the agency from protecting consumers. One of Baum’s crew talks to his cousin, who works at the SEC, while at a conference in Vegas. The cousin confesses they aren’t doing much investigation at all since their budget was cut and she is in Vegas on her own dime to float her resume with a few investment banks. When her cousin is shocked by the conflict of interest inherent in such actions, she tells him there are no rules against it and it happens all the time. How could an SEC investigation of Goldman Sachs have any sort of integrity, if the person performing the investigation is free to seek a job with Goldman Sachs? Answer: it can’t. When it comes to vaccines, similar conflicts of interest are rampant at the CDC. Just a couple of examples: Julie Gerberding, head of the CDC when it recommended three doses of Gardasil for all teenaged girls and when it performed the studies that originally “exonerated” vaccines, especially the MMR, in the development of autism, went on to head the vaccine division of Merck, the maker of the MMR and Gardasil (where she made a heck of a lot more than $50,000). 
Dr. Paul Offit, the developer of a rotavirus vaccine, sat on a committee where he voted to recommend his own vaccine be added to the infant schedule. He too made a heck of a lot more than $50,000.

Corruption at the CDC is so widespread that it isn’t hard to find incontrovertible evidence (verified by Freedom of Information Act requests) that they are playing fast and loose with science. The Verstraeten study, that supposedly gets mercury off the hook in the etiology of autism, actually did the exact opposite before the data was massaged four separate times to make a strong dose-dependent relationship go away. Nearly three years ago, a senior scientist at the CDC, Dr. William Thompson, called Dr. Brian Hooker, an autism dad and advocate, and told him that he’d been tortured by guilt for nearly a decade because there were a number of irregularities with an MMR study published in 2004.
Thompson told Hooker exactly which data to request to prove those irregularities (i.e., research fraud of the same sort perpetrated by the Harvard researchers who’d been paid by the Sugar Association), data that Thompson’s co-authors literally threw away. According to Thompson, the CDC had compromised its own research on the subject for over a decade, and it had gotten to the point where Congress should just take the data and give it to an independent organization to analyze because the CDC can’t be trusted. In addition, many of the studies they paid for on vaccines and autism were coordinated by Poul Thorsen, a Danish researcher who is now wanted by the U.S. government for fraud.
You might think that the CDC might be concerned about a researcher who had evidently had no scruples about defrauding the government to the tune of over a million dollars, but not only does the CDC (and U.S. government) have so little concern about the actions of a man who would commit such fraud that they never called any of his studies into question, the man is still happily publishing scientific research in Denmark, apparently completely unconcerned about the possibility of extradition to stand trial.
Like so many other long-term injustices, I’m delighted that this evidence of the collusion between the sugar industry and Harvard researchers that has clouded the science of nutrition for so long is finally seeing the light of day. But it would have been so much better for the general public if this information had been in the mainstream media, 20, 30, or even 50 years ago, wouldn’t it?

The interesting thing to me is that the health information (if not the corruption angle) has been available to the public for quite a while. There have been real scientists doing real work all along, but only a small number of people were paying any attention at all, and they were labeled “quacks” by mainstream medicine because they challenged what “everybody knows.” I went to a doctor 29 years ago who put me on a low-sugar/low-carb hypoglycemia diet to lower my cholesterol (280 at the start). I was told it was fine to keep eating butter and egg yolks. I thought she was crazy, but I followed that advice for a month. My cholesterol dropped like a hot rock. I was shocked.
Anyone know someone whose cholesterol dropped like that with a low-saturated-fat diet? Yeah, didn’t think so. And don’t even get me started on all the weight my friends gained while on low-fat diets.

Guess what happened to that doctor? Her license to practice medicine was revoked.

Clearly, she, and anyone else paying attention to the evidence right in front of their faces (the emperor’s “free willy,” so to speak), could figure out the truth long before those clinging to the imaginary ideal of “scientific consensus.” Turns out it doesn’t require super brains to see the truth. It just requires curiosity, honesty, and bravery, three things that are not all that common unfortunately. This stuff isn’t true because the New York Times finally took notice and gave its stamp of approval. It was true all along, and good, curious, honest, and brave people lost their careers fighting for that truth and the right to help people get well.

If you’re thinking oh, thank God that’s over, think again. Industry forces are still labeling conscientious physicians and researchers who are brave enough to counter their lies with the truth, who want to help you get and stay well, as “quacks.” When Vioxx, a popular Merck painkiller, was killing a ridiculous number of the people who took it, what did Merck do? They attacked the doctors who raised questions as to its safety. Of course, the doctors were right, and Merck ended up paying over $6 billion in fines and settlements. But Merck made over $11 billion on Vioxx before it was withdrawn from the market, making the $6 billion a mere hand slap for the unethical behavior that cost the lives of many. And right now in California, we are seeing a popular physician, Dr. Robert Sears, who is an acknowledged expert on the subject of vaccines (he literally wrote the book), being investigated for writing a medical exemption for one of his patients. Despite the fact that he actually vaccinates kids every day, he represents enough of a threat that vaccine manufacturers would dearly love to get his medical license revoked.
Vaccines are by no means the only area where we can see the same sort of disconnect between reality and what we’re told by mainstream information sources. There are reputable scientists telling us that glyphosate, GMOs, fluoride, ultrasounds, aluminum, C-sections and even Tylenol present unacknowledged health hazards that officials and other scientists deny with the bureaucratic equivalent of “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain,” while at the same time ignoring the fact that people are getting sicker by virtually every standard, even as they obsessively follow official recommendations.
As my 10-year-old son said this morning, “The truth tends to come out, no matter how many dollar bills you throw on top of it.” (I was impressed with his profundity, but he was pretty sure he’d read it somewhere. If anyone knows where it came from, let me know.) The real question is when will the truth come out? Will it take another 50 years? I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m pretty sure my heart can’t take hearing about many more children who received nine vaccines in a day and either went to the hospital that night with their brains on fire or were found dead in their cribs the next morning. And how many people in the last 50 years had their lives cut short or their health trashed because they took the bogus messaging about saturated fats and sugar to heart – literally? Do we really have to wait another 50 years before we see the folly of what we’re doing now and stop it? Or can we use the example that’s right in front of our noses to finally get enough people talking about the many naked emperors in our midst?
It will take the bravery of a great many people to “take this sinking boat and point it home,” but the more of us there are, the less brave each of us has to be. And, unlike Glen Hansard and Marketa Irglova, we may not still have time.
Think about it.

Ask yourself who you are listening to when it comes to your health or that of your children? And, more importantly, who are they listening to? Do they truly have your best interests at heart, or do they owe their allegiance to some random corporation that stands to make a killing from your pain and suffering? Are you being told that all is well, even as you and yours get sicker and sicker?

Then ask yourself, isn’t it time you joined the revolution?

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/what-do-sugar-trans-fat-and-vaccines-have-common?page=2

zoeyo'toole
With a Physics degree, work experience in electrical engineering and IT, an Actors’ Equity card, and four years of writing and editing at the Thinking Moms’ Revolution, Zoey O’Toole has an equal affinity for science and the humanities.

 Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.
Internal Site Commenting is limited to users that have a Friend or Professional Membership.
Disqus commenting is available to everyone.

__
More
  1. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/06/doctor-blows-whistle-on-flu-shot-its.html
  2. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/06/us-government-statistics-reveal-that.html
  3. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/10/media-blackout-as-italian-court-rules.html
  4. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/11/court-ruling-confirms-gardasil-vaccine.html
  5. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/11/flu-vaccine-contains-25000-times-more.html
  6. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/11/flu-vaccine-bombshell-630-more.html
  7. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/multiple-strains-of-deadly-pig-virus.html
  8. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-facts-are-clear-infectious-disease.html
  9. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/05/cdc-document-bombshell-reveals-list-of.html
  10. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/07/germany-announces-mandatory.html
  11. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2015/04/teen-girl-kidnapped-by-state-forced-to.html
  12. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_80.html
  13. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/05/corrupt-fda-finally-releases-results-of.html
  14. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/the-20-most-frequent-objections-to.html
  15. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/merck-fighting-fraud-lawsuits-in-u.html
  16. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2015/12/elevated-nagalase-enzyme-found-in-most.html
  17. https://vaccineimpact.com/2017/international-study-an-honest-look-at-the-statistics-shows-that-the-hpv-vaccine-is-not-safe/
  18. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2016/04/government-directly-admits-vaccines.html
  19. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/05/measle-infected-baby-photos-faked-by.html
  20. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/12/vaccines-linked-to-autism-once-again.html
  21. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2017/02/biologist-proves-measles-isnt-virus.html
  22. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/merck-fighting-fraud-lawsuits-in-u.html
  23. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/doctors-claim-sspe-autism-disorder.html
  24. http://graviolateam.blogspot.fi/2017/02/mmr-measles-vaccine-clinical-trial.html
  25. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/to-vaccinate-or-not-to-vaccinate-no.html
  26. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/the-20-most-frequent-objections-to.html
  27. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2017/02/biologist-proves-measles-isnt-virus.html
  28. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/merck-fighting-fraud-lawsuits-in-u.html
  29. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/doctors-claim-sspe-autism-disorder.html
  30. http://graviolateam.blogspot.fi/2017/02/mmr-measles-vaccine-clinical-trial.html
  31. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/to-vaccinate-or-not-to-vaccinate-no.html
  32. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/the-20-most-frequent-objections-to.html
  33. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/duty-to-warn-and-cervical-cancer-are-we.html
  34. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/06/gardasil-is-destroying-young-girls.html
  35. http://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/07/doctors-kill-2450-more-americans-than.html
  36. http://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2017/03/dead-doctors-nagalase-and-vaccines.html
  37. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/led-by-nose-new-dangers-of-flu-vaccine.html
  38. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/rokoteasiantuntija-en-uskaltaisi-antaa.html
  39. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/monday-april-23-2018-homosexuality.html
  40. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2015/05/help-stop-forced-vaccinations-and.html

_
eof
Lähettänyt klo Ei kommentteja:
Tunnisteet: , , , , , , , , ,
Tilaa: Blogitekstit (Atom)