tiistai 19. helmikuuta 2019

RF Safe Public Awareness. SAR levels - Cell Phone Radiation Warnings



Cancer From Cell Phone Level Radiation Exposure

CELL PHONE RADIATION Tuesday, February 19, 2019

RF Safe Publishes 10 Press Releases In 24 Hrs – Educating The Public Is Priority #1


RF Safe is launching a public awareness campaign to raise awareness about how to reduce exposure to cell phone radiation. RF Safe is making every effort to inform holiday shoppers that the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) has found “Clear Evidence” that cell phone level radiation exposure can cause cancer.
There has been significant coverage in the media on comments made by Dr. Otis Brawley, the chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society who resigned from an 11 year career after wrongfully downplaying a critical new scientific consensus which concludes that the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) study has found “clear evidence” that cell phone level radiation does cause cancer.
Smartphone radiation could be destroying the memory performance of a new generation of adolescents. Right-handed teens using cell phones are more prone to loss of figural memory which is mainly located in the right hemisphere of the brain and refers to our ability to make sense of objects including images, patterns, and shapes a troubling new study has warned
Over the last 20 years, RF Safe has continuously redesigned its protective products to maximize protection as devices have changed in the past and will continue to do so in the future. According to RF Safe, the screen protector industry is the next frontier of phone radiation safety using advanced nanomaterials.
RF Safe’s public awareness efforts for the 2018 holiday shopping brings attention a new research paper published in the journal Environmental Research by California Department of Public Health (CDPH) research scientists which finds that using cell phones in areas of weak reception can result in microwave radiation emissions 10,000-fold more intense than in areas with strong network signals.
RF Safe has warned consumers for over 20 years against using many of the anti-radiation accessories that are now commonly sold on Amazon. Including chips, diodes, neutralizers, pendants, amulets along with products that absorb handset radiation rather than deflect it. RF Safe stands firm in the belief that if you cannot see a noticeable difference with a hand-held RF meter, the product does nothing to reduce RF exposure.
RF Safe has been alerted to Google search advertising results published by Amazon that suggests an RF Safe case can be purchased from the Amazon website. Authentic RF Safe Cell Phone Radiation Accessories are only available on http://www.rfsafe.com
RF Safe’s 20 years of experience in RFR/EMF safety will be available for people in everytime zone in the world starting Black Friday 2018. In the USA or International, just dial 1-727-256-0022 for answers about any wireless radiation safety questions.
Wireless radiation safety innovator, RF Safe Cooperation has completed a brand new project to provide consumers with a tool to easily discover the microwave radiation level of nearly any Smartphone device.  RF Safe has made it very easy for consumers to check the radiation levels of most Smartphones with comparison features.
According to John Coates, Founder of RF Safe, Cell phone radiation safety accessories are the perfect stocking stuffer for any love-one to reduce health risk.”
RF Safe warns holiday shoppers that there is now “Clear Evidence of Cancer” that exposure to smartphone radiation is linked to cancer, and research suggests children are at greater risk because of thinner skulls and developing brains.
The Berkeley Right To Know ordinance is about the fact that cell phone manufacturers are hiding consumer warnings to never carry or use a cell phone directly against your body because you’ll risk being exposed to radio frequency energy that may exceed the federal “safety” limit.  RF Safe supports the Berkeley Warnings. The warning is included inside new RF Safe anti-radiation cases.



https://www.rfsafe.com/rf-safe-public-awareness-campaign-2018-shopping-holiday-cell-phone-radiation-warnings/

___

Apple iPhone XS vs Apple iPhone XS MAX

All SARs reported are averaged over one gram of body tissue corresponding to the US standard. The SARs may vary depending upon your specific cell phone network carrier (e.g., AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, or Verizon).
The minimum separation distance for head and body-worn testing was 5 mm (about two-tenths of an inch).
The SAR Levels for iPhone XS Model A1920, A2099 and A2100: FCC IDBCG-E3218A View offical FCC SAR Report 
Applicable For  USA, Canada, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands
According to test reports filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ID BCG-E3218A, the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for the iPhone XS FCC ID (GSM and CDMA) for cellular transmission is 1.19 watts per kilogram (W/kg) at the head, and 1.18 W/kg when worn on the body.  The highest reported Apple iPhone XS SAR levels during simultaneous transmission use conditions are 1.35 W/kg at the head and body 1.53 W/kg. A required minimum separation distance for head and body-worn testing is 5 mm (about two-tenths of an inch).
Apple-iPhone-XS-model-A1920-A2099-A2100-fcc-SAR-levels

SAR Levels for iPhone XS MAX Model A1921, A2104, A2103: FCC ID BCG-E3219A View offical FCC SAR Report
Applicable For  USA, Canada, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin Islands
According to test reports filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ID BCG-E3219A, the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for the iPhone XS MAX FCC ID (GSM and CDMA) for cellular transmission is 1.16 watts per kilogram (W/kg) at the head, and 1.17 W/kg when worn on the body.  The highest reported Apple iPhone XS MAX SAR levels during simultaneous transmission use conditions are 1.39 W/kg at the head and body 1.52 W/kg. A required minimum separation distance for head and body-worn testing is 5 mm (about two-tenths of an inch).

Apple-iPhone-XS-MAX-model-A1921-A2104-A2103-fcc-SAR-levels-FCC-ID-BCG-E3219A
USA SAR Level for Apple iPhone XS vs Apple iPhone XS Max SAR Levels
https://www.rfsafe.com/sar-rating-comparison/apple-iphone-xs-sar-levels-vs-apple-iphone-xs-max-sar-levels/
__

Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus

SAR Level Samsung S9 A3LSMG960U
samsung-galaxy-s9-sar-levels-model-SMG960U-fcc-id-A3LSMG960U
Click to enlarge SAR Report
Samsung Galaxy S9 SAR test reports filed with the Federal Communications Commission FCCID A3LSMG960U — the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for this Samsung Galaxy S9 is 0.35 watts per kilogram (w/kg) at your head, and 0.96 w/kg when worn on your body. The Samsung Galaxy S9 hotspot SAR is 0.95 w/kg and its SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular plus Wi-Fi) for this Samsung Galaxy S9 is 1.25 w/kg at your head, 1.59 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.59 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously with all other transmitters active.



  SAR Level Samsung S9 plus FCCID A3LSMG965U
samsung-galaxy-s9-plus-sar-levels-model-SMG965U-fcc-id-A3LSMG965U
Click to enlarge SAR report
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus SAR test reports filed with the Federal Communications Commission FCCID A3LSMG965U — the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for this Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus is 0.36 watts per kilogram (w/kg) at your head, and 0.79 w/kg when worn on your body. The Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus hotspot SAR is 1.04 w/kg and its SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular, Wi-Fi) for this Samsung Galaxy S9 is 1.14 w/kg at your head, 1.48 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.59 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously with all other transmitters active.

All SAR levels reported for the Samsung Galaxy S9 and Galaxy 9 Plus to the FCC are averaged over one gram of body tissue corresponding to the maximum allowable level of 1.6 w/kg.
SAR levels will vary depending upon your specific cell phone carrier (e.g., AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, or Verizon).
The Samsung Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus minimum separation distance for head and body-worn testing was 5 mm.  That means the phone should never be closer than 5mm to your body when in use to ensure SAR safety compliance.

Click here to compare full phone specs

USA SAR Level for Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
  • FCC Approval Date
    11 January 201811 January 2018
  • FCC ID
    A3LSMG960UA3LSMG965U
  • FCC Report Link
    2018 FCC Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Report For Manufacturer Submitted Model Samsung Galaxy S92018 FCC Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Report For Manufacturer Submitted Model Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
  • US SAR Ratings
    Minimum Separation Distance for Galaxy S9 is 15mm - USA Legal Limit is 1.6 W/kg - FCC SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over ONE gram of simulated biological tissue. It is a well known FACT SAR testing was not designed for protecting women or children from harmful radiation exposure, and SAR Test do not take into consideration health effects below thermal levelsMinimum Separation Distance for Galaxy S9 Plus is 15mm - USA Legal Limit is 1.6 W/kg - FCC SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over ONE gram of simulated biological tissue. It is a well known FACT SAR testing was not designed for protecting women or children from harmful radiation exposure, and SAR Test do not take into consideration health effects below thermal levels
  • Head SAR Level
    0.35 W/kg0.36 W/kg
  • Body SAR Level
    0.96 W/kg0.79 W/kg
  • Product Specific Use
  • Simultaneous Transmission
    1.59 W/kg - Hotspot Active1.59 W/kg - Hotspot Active
  • Simultaneous Head SAR
    1.25 W/kg1.14 W/kg
  • Simultaneous Body SAR
    1.59 W/kg1.48 W/kg
  • Hotspot SAR
    0.95 W/kg1.04 W/kg
EU SAR Level for Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
  • EU SAR Ratings
    European Legal Limit is 2.0 W/kg - EU SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over TEN grams of simulated biological tissue.European Legal Limit is 2.0 W/kg - EU SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over TEN grams of simulated biological tissue.
  • Head SAR Level
    0.32 W/kg0.27 W/kg
  • Body SAR Level
    1.27 W/kg1.00 W/kg
  • Simultaneous Head SAR
  • Simultaneous Body SAR
  • Hotspot SAR




https://www.rfsafe.com/sar-rating-comparison/samsung-galaxy-s9-sar-level-vs-samsung-galaxy-s9-plus-sar-level/

____

Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus

iPhone-8-SAR-Level-Model-A1863-FCCID-BCG-E3159AAccording to test reports filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for CDMA model A1863 iPhone 8 FCC ID BCG-E3159A is 1.14 watts per kilogram (w/kg) at your head, and 1.08 w/kg when worn on the body. The iPhone 8 hotspot/Airplay SAR is 1.08 w/kg. The SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular plus Wi-Fi) for the iPhone 8 is 1.51 w/kg at your head, 1.56 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.56 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously.
Click FCC Report to enlarge

iPhone-8-SAR-Level-Model-A1905-FCCID-BCG-E3172AThe SAR for GSM model A1905 iPhone 8 FCC ID BCG-E3172A is 1.09 watts per kilogram (w/kg) at your head, and 1.09 w/kg when worn on the body. The iPhone 8 hotspot/Airplay SAR is 1.09 w/kg. The SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular plus Wi-Fi) is 1.45 w/kg next to your head, 1.59 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.59 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously.
Click FCC Report to enlarge


iPhone-8-Plus-SAR-Level-Model-A1864-FCCID-BCG-E3160AThe SAR for CDMA model A1864 iPhone 8 Plus FCC ID BCG-E3160A is 1.09 watts per kilogram (w/kg) at your head, and 1.09 w/kg when worn on the body. The iPhone 8 Plus hotspot/Airplay SAR is 1.09 w/kg. The SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular plus Wi-Fi) iPhone 8 Plus is 1.48 w/kg at your head, 1.59 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.59 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously.
Click FCC Report to enlarge


iPhone-8-Plus-SAR-Level-Model-A1897-FCCID-BCG-E3174AThe SAR for GSM model A1897 iPhone 8 Plus FCC ID BCG-E3174A is 1.09 watts per kilogram (w/kg) next to your head, and 1.09 w/kg when worn on the body. The iPhone 8 Plus hotspot/Airplay SAR is 1.09 w/kg. The SAR for simultaneous transmission (cellular plus Wi-Fi) iPhone 8 Plus is 1.59 w/kg next to your head, 1.45 w/kg when worn on the body, and 1.59 w/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously.
Click FCC Report to enlarge

All SARs reported above are averaged over one gram of body tissue corresponding to the US standard. The SARs may vary depending upon your specific cell phone carrier (e.g., AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, or Verizon).
The minimum separation distance for body-worn testing was 5 mm (about two-tenths of an inch).

Click here to compare full phone specs

USA SAR Level for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
SAR AT&T Model for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
  • Carrier Variant
    Apple iPhone 8 GSM Model A1905iPhone 8 Plus GSM
  • Model Variant Number
    Model A1905 GSM, no CDMAModel A1897
  • FCC Approval Date
    11 September 201711 September 2017
  • FCC ID
    BCG-E3172ABCG-E3174A
  • FCC Report Link
    FCC Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Report For Manufacturer Submitted Model A1905 Apple iPhone 8FCC Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Report For Manufacturer Submitted Model A1897 Apple iPhone 8 Plus
  • US SAR Ratings
    USA Legal Limit is 1.6 W/kg - FCC SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over ONE gram of simulated biological tissue.USA Legal Limit is 1.6 W/kg - FCC SAR testing is measured in watts per kilogram (or W/kg) averaged over ONE gram of simulated biological tissue.
  • Head SAR Level
    1.09 w/kg1.09 w/kg
  • Body SAR Level
    1.09 w/kg1.09 w/kg
  • Product Specific Use
    1.09 w/kg1.09 w/kg
  • Simultaneous Transmission
    1.59 w/kg1.59 w/kg
  • Simultaneous Head SAR
    1.45 w/kg1.45 w/kg
  • Simultaneous Body SAR
    1.59 w/kg1.59 w/kg
  • Hotspot SAR
    1.59 w/kg1.59 w/kg
SAR Verizon Model for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
SAR Sprint Model for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
SAR T-Mobile Model for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
SAR Vodafone Model for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
SAR U.S. Cellular for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
EU SAR Level for Apple iPhone 8 vs Apple iPhone 8 Plus
  • EU SAR Ratings
    SAR limits within the EU, following IEC standards. For mobile phones, and other such hand-held devices, the SAR limit is 2 W/kg averaged over the 10 g of tissue absorbing the most signal (IEC 62209-1).
  • Head SAR Level
    0.99 W/kg
  • Body SAR Level
    0.99 W/kg
  • Simultaneous Head SAR
  • Simultaneous Body SAR
  • Hotspot SAR
__
https://www.rfsafe.com/sar-rating-comparison/apple-iphone-8-sar-rating-vs-apple-iphone-8-plus-sar-levels/

__

More



  1. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/no-5g-for-israel-elimination-of-at.html
  2. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/microwave-frequency-electromagnetic.html
  3. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/how-to-measure-emf.html
  4. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/evidence-that-rfmicrowave-radiation.html
  5. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/10/scientists-and-doctors-call-for.html
  6. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/09/thirteen-good-reasons-to-switch-off.html
  7. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/06/5g-super-hotspots-you-better-know-where.html
  8. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/09/fcc-abandons-safety-pushes-untested-5g.html
  9. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/11/hundreds-of-birds-dead-during-5g.html
  10. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/www.html
  11. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/ultra-sos-5g-roll-out-seriously.html
  12. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/sa-har-vilseleder-stralsakerhetsmyndigh.html
  13. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/journal-of-chemical-neuroanatomy-volume.html
  14. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/emf-and-emr-conversion-formulas-by.html
  15. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_8.html
  16. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_64.html
  17. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_58.html
  18. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/best-emf-meters-to-measure-home.html
  19. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/bay-area-city-blocks-5g-deployments.html
  20. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/5g-telecommunications-science.html
  21. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/5g-is-already-linked-to-rising-health.html
  22. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/4-best-apps-for-detecting-emfs.html
  23. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/20-facts-about-5g-and-your-health.html
  24. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/04/5g-networks-will-use-same-frequencies.html
  25. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-us-breast-cancer-epidemic-2019.html
  26. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/tampereelle-avattiin-maailman.html
  27. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/stop-5g-network-on-earth-and-in-space.html
  28. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/rf-safe-public-awareness-sar-levels.html
Lähettänyt klo Ei kommentteja:
Tunnisteet:

How to Measure EMF

BY  /  THURSDAY, 30 MAY 2013 /  PUBLISHED IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING, HEALTHY BUILDING INSPECTIONS & TESTING









ElectroMagnetic EMF Spectrum

How to Measure EMF: The Art of Knowing What You Are Studying

There are a lot of people concerned about electromagnetic fields (EMF) and electromagnetic radiation (EMR or also known as radio frequency (RF)).  People want to know how to measure EMF. So much so, that they purchase detectors and meters for themselves and attempt to study their own property and homes.  It is great to take responsibility for your own concerns! However, there are likely many things that could be confusing your personal emf testing and rf testing assessments.

Electromagnetic EMF Spectrum chart - Healthy Building Science - emf testing - rf testing
ElectroMagnetic EMF Spectrum

The electromagnetic spectrum is organized by frequency. Generally, lower frequency radiation is on the left, and higher frequency radiation is on the right. See the above graphic.
The properties of electromagnetism change at different frequencies and electric and magnetic fields behave differently along the spectrum.  A material that is transparent to visible light can be opaque to infrared light, but then again transparent to radio frequency radiation (e.g., glass).  Chrome is highly reflective to all of these frequencies, but nearly invisible to IR cameras because it reflects much more heat energy than it emits.  So how do you measure the temperature of a chromed device if you cannot attach temperature sensors (thermocouples) to it?

EMF Meter near an electrical panel - Healthy Building Science - environmental consultants
EMF Meter Should Detect Hot Spots – Magnetic Fields Near Electrical Panel. [Measuring 157 milliGauss (mG)]

Measuring Magnetic Fields

Meters measuring magnetic fields strength analyze the flux (changing field properties) of the magnetic field.  A meter in motion will not measure this accurately, because measurements will be artificially elevated as you move through a magnetic field.   While an accurate quantitative measurement cannot be made while moving, a qualitative measurement can be made to show places where more investigation is recommended. Walking through a building with a magnetic field meter taking real-time measurements is still an effective strategy of finding “hot spots.”

Measuring Radio Frequency (RF) Radiation

Higher than expected radio frequency (RF) power density can be just as confusing. RF can act sort of like X-rays, penetrating through many materials, reflecting off others.  This can produce apparently high power densities in certain areas and make finding the source of those RF radiations more difficult. Using separate RF meters or antennas with the capability of omnidirectional AND more focused targeting can be useful in RF testing.

man using Directional RF Antenna at Smart Meter - Healthy Building Science - RF Testing
David Sasse using Directional RF Antenna at Smart Meter
Using Omni Directional RF Antenna - Healthy Building Science - environmental consultants
Alex Stadtner Using Omni Directional RF Antenna at PV Inverter w: Wireless Signal
If you find areas that raise your concerns it is best to refer to an expert in the field – much like a medical generalist refers to a specialist.  A qualified EMF specialist is trained specifically in the use of high-quality equipment, has area-specific knowledge, and has experience with many different buildings and situations.

EMF Testing Services

If you bring your EMF concerns to Healthy Building Science, it usually makes our jobs easier by giving us a heads-up as to where to start our investigation and EMF testing.  Don’t be surprised if our investigation brings unforeseen conclusions! Often we deliver better than expected news and peace of mind, and no additional measures are recommended or the fix is more simple than you think.

man testing emf in electrical panel - Healthy Building Science - emf testing - rf testing
Author (Cameron Das) Performing Diagnostics for EMF Wiring Errors – DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME

Healthy Building Science is an environmental consulting firm which provides EMF testing, emf surveys, emf consultations and RF testing for the greater San Francisco Bay Area and all of Northern California.
TAGGED UNDER: , 

https://healthybuildingscience.com/2013/05/30/how-to-measure-emf/

____

Best EMF Meters to Measure Home & Wireless Radiation

August 8, 2018
A comprehensive tutorial and buyers guide with product reviews, prices and other advice on choosing the right EMF meter. Includes recommended exposure limits and links to manufacturers.
While your eyes may furnish the best (and cheapest) gauge for detecting sources of harmful EMF's around you, increasingly those sources are being hidden from view. Cell phone towers now sport a variety of different disguises in urban areas, while smaller-scale "minicells" look like ordinary electric boxes mounted on utility poles. Banks of Smart meters may be cloistered on the backside of apartment complexes or lurking behind locked doors on the first floor of your workplace. And inside your home, potent magnetic fields emanating from walls and appliances have been linked to leukemia for the past forty years. Consequently, you never really know anymore when you're walking into an electromagnetic minefield.


EMF emissions are generated by a myriad of electrical components, transmission equipment, machines and consumer electronics. Since these sources operate on a wide range of frequencies, finding a meter to measure all of them can be a daunting task.
This is why EMF meters, expensive as many of them are, should be regarded as a must-have survival tool for some people (though not everyone), much like one would use a docimeter when traveling through Fukushima or Chernobyl today. Certainly, if you plan to implement shielding solutions to block EMF radiation, or relocate your wireless devices and appliances, an EMF meter is necessary to test whether these strategies work, have no effect at all, or actually worsen your exposure. Fortunately, EMF meters tailored for consumer use are now available, and if you do homework you can usually find a good one at an affordable price.
Even though the better models come with a steep learning curve, these devices will help you identify hidden sources of non-ionizing radiation, both inside your house and several blocks away. Not only that, you'll be able to measure the strength of an EMF emission at various distances. That way you can determine the extent of any potential harm. 
And once you've identified the danger zones where strong EMF's are exceeding the safe exposure limits, you can brainstorm the best form of mitigation.
Of course, understanding EMF meter technology can be a search-and-rescue mission in itself. As you wade into its deep, nerdy waters, you'll discover a convoluted universe of techy terminology, poorly written user guides (some even leave out instructions for how to use the meter), and a price range that belongs in the Guinness Book of Records. A meter can be had for as cheaply as $32, or as costly as $2,700. So before you click the "Buy" button at an EMF safety store online, better cool your heels and take the time to learn all you can about these products.

The Electromagnetic Spectrum, part of which is shown above, divides various electrical applications according to the number of waves they generate per second, otherwise known as frequencies. The measuring unit of frequency is the hertz, and one hertz equals one complete wave.

For starters, there isn't just one type of radiation to measure, but three. Each focuses on a distinct type of physics and uses different measuring units to gauge the strength of an EMF:
    Magnetic fields are found around all powered-on appliances, electrical components, home wiring and basically every device or largescale installation that's hooked up to utility power, a generator or batteries. These fields are measured with a magnetic field meter or gauss meter, with operating frequencies in the lowest range of the electromagnetic spectrum, typically 3 hertz to 2000 hertz. Around your home, school or office, you'll find most magnetic fields oscillating in the 50-60 hertz range of the power grid. 
    Magnetism is measured in units of gauss or teslas.

    Electric fields     are generated by voltage. Voltage functions sort of like water pressure in your plumbing. Even when electronic devices and appliances are turned off, it persists, so long as the power connection is energized at the source and the equipment is plugged in. Electric trains, grid power lines and utility substations all generate potent electric fields that may be harmful. An electric field meter measures this type of EMF in units of volts per meter.

    Radiofrequency (RF) radiation     is emitted by radio and TV broadcasting antennas, cell phones and towers, computer equipment, Smart meters, radar and the myriad of other wireless products and equipment operating at freqencies between 3 kilohertz to 300 gigahertz. 
    An RF or HF (high frequency) meter measures these traveling microwaves, most often in watts or volts per meter.










Lähettänyt klo Ei kommentteja:
Tunnisteet: , ,

torstai 14. helmikuuta 2019

Multiple strains of deadly pig virus discovered in Rotavirus oral vaccines with no legitimate reason for their use

Popular childhood vaccine that’s highly recommended by the CDC contains two strains
of a rare and deadly virus that’s killing pigs by the thousands in China
Monday, February 11, 2019 by: S.D. Wells


(Natural News) Isn’t it bad enough that today’s vaccinations contain neurotoxins, extreme allergens, genetically modified organisms, and DNA from abortions? Do we really need to find out that a popular childhood vaccine that’s highly recommended by the CDC contains two strains of a rare and deadly virus that’s killing pigs by the thousands in China? 

Why the heck is some mad scientist allowed to infect and corrupt a childhood oral vaccine with a foreign virus that has NOTHING to do with the virus the vaccine is supposedly protecting the child against?
Just how corrupt is the vaccine industry, and why is the doctor who made the vaccine profiting by the millions as a pediatrician who treats the very children to whom he’s administering a rare and deadly pig virus?
“RotaTeq” and “Rotarix” vaccines are supposed to help prevent rotavirus infection in children, but do they? If a child gets rotavirus, the symptoms are diarrhea, vomiting, sore throat, runny nose, wheezing and coughing. Sounds like the flu. Auspiciously though, the exact same symptoms are the most common side effects listed for RotaTeq and Rotarix oral vaccines.
In addition to fetal bovine serum, RotaTeq vaccine contains 5 LIVE strains of rotavirus, polysorbate 80, and strangely types 1 and 2 of porcine circovirus (PCV) that infects pigs and kills them. The insidious creator of the vaccine, Dr. Paul “Vaccine Industry Puppet” Offit, claims that circovirus is “not known to cause disease in humans,” but he never provides any excuse at all, much less a logical or justifiably medical one, for including this pig virus in a vaccine for children.
100% organic essential oil sets now available for your home and personal care, including Rosemary, Oregano, Eucalyptus, Tea Tree, Clary Sage and more, all 100% organic and laboratory tested for safety. A multitude of uses, from stress reduction to topical first aid. See the complete listing here, and help support this news site.
And where’s the proof it doesn’t cause disease in humans? Did Paul Offit or the CDC run tests for this? Where are they? Is it peer reviewed? Because you know these vaccine-pushing shills swear by everything that’s “peer reviewed” and published in a medical journal.
Still, nobody seems to be able to figure out why the disease that killed a million piglets in China has spread to the United States. 
Really? It’s in the highly corrupted Rotavirus vaccines and it’s a scientific FACT that kids shed the viruses from vaccinations during the first few weeks after they receive them, so, you were saying?
Yes, porcine virus coincidentally causes diarrhea and vomiting in nursing pigs, according to the U.S. National Pork Board. Why do they know this? 

America’s pork industry was devastated by an outbreak of porcine virus in the fall of 2013, when over 700 different U.S. farmers reported cases, as the epidemic of the deadly diarrhea virus spread uncontrollably. Nearly every piglet that gets circovirus dies from it. Farmers reported filling countless wheelbarrows full of dead piglets.

Deadly side effects of Rotavirus and Rotarix vaccines include twisting in the gut, which is also very painful


Never, ever let your children take this insane oral vaccine, because the risks far outweigh the benefits, if there even are any.

After administering the oral vaccine that contains a deadly pig virus, many children suffer from severe stomach pain and blood in the stool.
Surprised? Rotarix brand Rotavirus vaccine, are known to cause intussusception, which is when the intestines become twisted and blocked, causing a bowel obstruction.
The human body has ways of reacting to foreign proteins and deadly viruses that are knee-jerk reactions intended to protect the immune system, the heart, the brain, and the vital organs. Intussusception, a side effect of the deadly Rotateq vaccine, occurs within weeks after being administered to a child. Infants need hospitalization, surgery on their intestines, and a special enema to treat this deadly “side effect.” Could it be the child’s body is trying to block circovirus from making it’s way into the bloodstream via the large intestine, especially since it’s delivered as an oral vaccine?
Dr. Paul Offit does not want ANYONE looking into this. He made millions off the patent and much more off his sick patients who suffer from the horrific side effects of his deadly invention. Symptoms of circovirus invasion include face and mouth swelling, difficulty breathing, wheezing, hives, rash, diarrhea, vomiting, and blood in the stool.
By the way, intussusception, which occurs when one portion of the bowel slides into the next (like pieces of a telescope), just so happens to be the most common abdominal emergencyaffecting children under 2 – and according to the vaccine package inserts, the maximum age for a dose of Rotateq is 32 weeks, and for Rotarix it’s 24 weeks. Coincidence? We think not.

Rotateq and Rotarix Rotavirus vaccines also cause Kawasaki Syndrome that affects the heart and can also result in a child’s death


Both brands of Rotavirus oral vaccination are known to literally cause Kawasaki syndrome, a deadly disease that creates large aneurysms in the blood vessels that feed blood to the heart. Symptoms include fever, swollen glands, swollen hands and feet, red mouth and red eyes, and if not treated, can lead to death.

Rotavirus vaccines also cause children to spread the disease to other household members or schoolmates by shedding the virus after dosing the child. So again, how does the benefit of these deadly oral vaccines outweigh the risks?
A thorough investigation needs to be conducted IMMEDIATELY on WHY the deadly pig virus circovirus is an ingredient in Rotavirus vaccines, and the vaccines need to be recalled and pulled from the market right now (and have circovirus removed from them entirely) until they’re proven to be safe and effective, where the benefits far outweigh the risks.
Tune in to Vaccines.news for more updates on deadly ingredients in today’s vaccines that you and your children should avoid like the plague. 

There is a disturbing link between vaccines and pediatric cancer that’s been uncovered recently, just so you know.

Sources for this article include:

___



_
EOF


Lähettänyt klo Ei kommentteja:
Tunnisteet: , , , , ,
Tilaa: Kommentit (Atom)