Did You Know Candida Produces Carcinogens and Promotes Cancer?

Did You Know Candida Produces Carcinogens and
Promotes Cancer?

Up to 97% of cancer patients have candida

by Alexandra Preston

For many years, the only known link between Candida spp. infections, and cancer
was that it is an opportunistic pathogen taking advantage of the immune system
damage caused by chemo. 

Recently, new research has found that Candida albicans can actually also promote
cancer by producing carcinogens, causing inflammation, increasing the response of
Th17 cells, and molecular mimicry of our own immune cells.

Candida produces the carcinogens known as nitrosamines and acetaldehyde.
Nitrosamines activate specific pro-cancer genes, while acetaldehyde is a
DNA-damaging carcinogen with many downstream effects.

Inflammation promotes cancer by causing tissue damage and production of chemicals that
promote angiogenesis, proliferation, migration, and adhesion while inhibiting apoptosis of
damaged cells.

Th17 cells, which are dominant in the response to Candida infections, are also responsible
for production of chemicals that can increase angiogenesis and tumor growth.

On top of this, antibodies produced against Candida albicans can mimic a receptor on
white blood cells, possibly causing antibodies to be formed against our own immune cells. 

This is another strike against sugar and alcohol consumption in relation to cancer risk, as
both alcohol metabolism and sugar fermentation lead to acetaldehyde production.

One real-life report of cancer being in association with fungal infections comes from
Meinolf Karthaus, who observed three children with leukemia suddenly go into remission
after antifungal treatment for “secondary” infections.

Additionally, one doctor had found fungal spores in every tissue sample of cancer that he
studied, as he used saline instead of formaldehyde to transport the samples in order to
preserve any possible fungi.

Natural Anti-Fungal Solutions for Candida 

While pharmaceutical antifungals can cause even more damage to patients’ liver and
kidneys,curcumin, the “main” medicinal compound in turmeric, may be an
alternative.

On top of exhibiting potent antifungal activity against Candida, curcumin also has
anticancer properties, such as the ability to destroy cancer stem cells. Curcumin has
antifungal effects against other species as well. 

Cryptococcus, Aspergillus, Trichosporon, and Paracoccidioides strains have been shown
to be vulnerable to its effects.

Additionally, curcumin can prevent resistance of Candida to the antifungal drug
fluconazole. It appeared to be that resistant Candida were able to pump fluconazole
out of the cell bodies. 

Despite curcumin’s poor water solubility and thus bioavailability, nanoparticles and
 fat soluble delivery methods can overcome this limitation. More traditionally, golden milk is
a beverage that increases availability of turmeric to the body, and can be made at home.

Besides curcumin, clove oil may also be effective against Candida infections. In one study,
even the vapour of clove essential oil was able to inhibit several species of fungi, though
the  oil vapor was only strong enough to temporarily stop Candida growth without killing
the cells.

However, direct application was much stronger. Using direct application, the Minimum
Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of clove oil was 2.5%, meaning that clove oil at 2.5%
concentration was enough to completely prevent fungal growth, which is an indicator
of living cells.

So in conclusion, natural fungicides and fungistatics such as curcumin and
clove oil must gain more recognition, particularly in cancer treatment, whether
the goal is full remission or “quality of life”. 

Reducing sugar and alcohol intake is also seen as increasingly necessary in order to
prevent fungal infections and cancer growth.
_
http://humansarefree.com/2016/01/did-you-know-candida-produces.html

__

Orthodox Cancer Treatments Don’t Treat Cancer

Posted by Dr Sircus on October 8, 2012
| Filed under Cancer, Medicine

http://drsircus.com/medicine/cancer/orthodox-cancer-treatments-dont-treat-cancer

Lääkärit puhuvat harvoin syövän ”parantamisesta”.
Sen sijaan hoidon onnistumisen mittarina käytetään
potilaan selviytymistä hengissä 5, 10 tai 15 vuoden
kuluttua diagnoosista.
 

Hämmästyttävää on se, että kaiken syöpälääkäreiden "silvo, polta ja myrkytä"
-hoitojen jälkeen syövästä selviytymisaste on parantunut hiukan.

Esimerkiksi vuosikymmenen vaihteessa Englannin ja Walesin tilastot
osoittivat, että 5 vuoden selviytymisaste miesten kaikissa syövissä oli 31 % ja
naisilla 43 %. Lukemat Skotlannin osalta ovat samankaltaiset.
Tänä päivänä, vaikka edelleen synkät, niin luvut ovat hiukan paremmat.

Mutta ovatko luvut todella paremmat? Varmasti he haluaisivat meidän uskovan
niin, mutta suurimpana tekijänä ovat tilastot.
Tilastoja voidaan vääristellä ja nyt tilastot näyttävät paremmilta, sillä tekijänä
ovat tilastot. Tilastoja voidaan vääristellä ja nyt tilastot näyttävät paremmilta,
sillä potilaan kuollessa kemoterapian ja säteilyhoitojen sivuvaikutuksiin häntä
ei merkitä syöpään kuolleeksi.

Eräs lukijoistani kirjoitti: ”Ystäväni kuoli äskettäin peräsuolisyöpään ja hänen
vaimonsa oli tyrmistynyt huomatessaan kuolintodistuksessa syövän olevan vasta
kolmas kuolinsyy infektion ja muiden hoidon aiheuttamien ongelmien jälkeen.”

Tätä tapausta ei siis laskettu syöpäkuolemaksi.
Lisäksi jos potilas on diagnosoitu rintasyövästä ja hän paranee osittain siitä ja
syöpä palaa metastasoituneena jollekin muulle alueelle, niin viiden vuoden
jälkeen häntä pidetään rintasyövästä selvinneenä (vaikka kuolisi siihen toiseen
syöpään myöhemmin).

Syöpähoidot vastaan Syöpäkuolemat

Alkuperäinen artikkeli

http://graviolateam.blogspot.fi/2016/03/perinteiset-syopahoidot-eivat-hoida.html

__

Up to 97% of cancer patients have candida

Candida Test (invasive)

Candida Test (invasive)

Detect Candida With The Candia5 Blood Test!

If you suffer from these signs and symptoms, you may have a candida yeast infection:
suffer from these signs and symptoms, you may have a candida yeast infection:
Vaginal Thrush/Oral Thrush, Discharge (cotton cheese), Smelly Down There,
Painful Intercourse, Constant Discomfort, Bloating/Gas, Adrenal Fatigue/CFS, Skin
Rashes, Burning/Soreness sensation Digestive problems, Brain Fog
The CanDia5 Candida Test Kit can help you find out if your symptoms are caused by
candida or some other infection/disease, all in the privacy of your own home.
Candida infections are notoriously difficult to diagnose and especially neglected in the
modern medical world. Symptoms are non-specific and neither self-diagnosis,
nor diagnosis from a physician is reliable without laboratory confirmation. Incorrect
diagnosis commonly leads to the overuse of anti-fungal agents and antibiotics which
subsequently leads to negligence of the root cause as well as the increased effectiveness
of the Candida albicans yeast.
CanDia5 believes in a safe method of testing with fast and accurate results. We believe
that the first step to recovering from Candidiasis is confirming the source of your health
issues. Our view has enabled us to provide the world’s first and only blood based
professional home test for candidiasis.
This accurate test requires just a small drop of blood to provide a diagnosis within
five minutes.  

 

This is a test we highly recommend for anyone who has or suspects they have Candida.
It is easy to use and will accurately detect not only the presence of Candida albicans,
but also the antibodies of the four common Candida species: C.albicans, C.glabrata,
C.tropicalisi and C.parapsiloiss.

https://www.google.fi/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=up%20to%2097%25%20oc%20cancerpatients%20have%20candida

__

More about Candida:

1. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/cancer-candida-and-sugar.html
2. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/surgical-pathology-and-breast-cancers.html
3. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/surgical-pathology-and-breast-cancers.html
4. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/candida-laboratories-working-on-candida_66.html
5. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/candida-albicans-infection-inhibits.html
6. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/candida-albicans-and-its-genome-candida.html
7. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_6.html
8. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/07/sugar-industry-paid-harvard-scientists.html
9. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/woman-cures-breast-cancer-with-black.html
10. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/02/candida-albicans-fungus-behaves-exactly_7.html
11. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/06/sugar-cause-of-candida-candida-cause-of.html
12. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/05/9-candida-symptoms-3-steps-to-treat-them.html
13. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2017/03/candida-albicans-alias-cancer-escapes.html
14. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2016/11/is-cancer-caused-by-candida.html
15. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2016/07/what-is-cancer-alias-candida.html
16. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2016/07/candida-misticismo-disipo.html
17. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2016/05/miksi-syopaa-ei-saa-parantaa-why-its.html
18. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2016/05/did-you-know-candida-produces.html
19. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2016/05/candida-mystiikka-halvennetty.html
20. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2016/04/did-you-know-candida-produces.html
21. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2015/12/candida-final-solution.html
22. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2015/02/candida-albicans-on-sieni-joka-elaa-ja.html
23. https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2014/12/what-is-candida-yeast-diet.html

___

Treat candida and inflammations yourself

• https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2014/11/kehon-ph-tasapaino-ja-ph-tasapainoteoria.html
• https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2014/11/sairauden-syy-cause-of-disease.html
• https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2014/10/maitohappobakteerit.html
• http://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2014/08/ruokasooda-ihmelaake-jun-5-2014-blogi.html
• https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2016/11/is-cancer-caused-by-candida.html
• http://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2014/12/candida-albicans-sieni-kayttaytyy.html
• https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2019/01/raymond-kirlew-cures-wifes-cancer-with.html
• https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2018/05/9-candida-symptoms-3-steps-to-treat-them.html
• http://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2014/12/what-is-candida-yeast-diet.html

__

eof

shop

cart

Luokittelupäätökset - Fimea vs Evira, farssi nimeltä Graviola

Luokittelupäätökset

 - Onko tämä lääkeaine tai lääkevalmiste?

Tämän hakuohjelman avulla selviää, onko haettava aine Lääkealan turvallisuus- ja kehittämiskeskuksen lääkeluettelosta antaman päätöksen (220/2013) liitteissä mainittu aine tai onko lääkeviranomainen yksittäisellä päätöksellä luokitellut aineen tai valmisteen lääkkeeksi.
Hakutulos voi siten olla viittaus lääkeluettelopäätöksen (220/2013) liitteeseen 1, 2 tai 1 A ja/tai viittaus aiempaan ainetta tai valmistetta koskevaan erilliseen luokittelupäätökseen. Erillisiä luokittelupäätöksiä on tehty vuodesta 2001 lähtien. Luokittelupäätökset ovat suomenkielisiä. Lääkeluettelon liitteessä 1 mainitut aineet ovat suomen-, ruotsin-, latinan- ja englanninkielisiä.

Mitä luokittelupäätös sisältää? - Luokittelupäätöksien hakuohje

Valmisteyhteenvedot (SPC) ja pakkausselosteet (PL) julkaistaan lyhentämättöminä erillisessä SPC- ja PL-palvelussa. Myyntiluvallisista lääkevalmisteista julkaistaan tietoa Lääkehaku (FimeaWeb) -palvelussa.

Lisätietoja lääkeaineen tai lääkevalmisteen henkilökohtaiseen maahantuontiin liittyvistä säännöistä löytyy Fimean ja Tullin verkkosivuilta:

Matkailijan lääkkeet

Tulli: Matkailijat ja muuttajat, Henkilökohtaiset lääkkeet

Luokittelu, ilveilyn tyyppiesimerkki

Koostumus: graviola, annona muricata

Valmisteen nimi: Graviola kapseli
Hakija: Hermann Aistrich - Kuvassa

Päätöspäivämäärä: 2006-01-03

Hermannin perustelu:
 "Valmisteen käyttötarkoitus on terveyden edistäminen ja vastustuskyvyn vahvistaminen." 


Fimean perustelut:
"Valmistetta on pidettävä lääkelain 3 §:n tarkoittamana lääkkeenä."
- (PÄÄTÖS PERUTTU ??!!)- "Hermann Aistrich:n lähettämän selvityksen mukaan Graviola valmiste tehostaa elimistön immuunipuolustusta. Valmistetta koskevien internet-sivujen (www.rain-tree.com/graviola.htm) mukaan; Annona muricata kasvin osat sisältävät aineita, joilla on mm. antibakteerisia, syöpäsolujen kasvua estäviä, sedatoivia ja verenpainetta alentavia vaikutuksia."

Lehtijauhetta on myyty ainakin vuodesta 2008 alkaen vapaasti 27: ssä EU -maassa ja USA: ssa, mutta ei Suomessa.

Yhtäkkiä, 28.04.2015, EVIRA päättikin, että Graviola -puun lehtijauhe onkin uuselintarvike, jota Suomessa myydäänkin nyt ilman hyväksyntää.

Kommentti:Herra Hermann Aistrich: in (eläkkeellä oleva lääkäri, (joka asuu Kaliforniassa, Sim City ja Kesälahdella) hakeman luokittelupäätöksen mukaan Graviola olisi "lääke".- TÄLLÖIN GRAVIOLA  -LEHTIJAUHETTA SAISI MYYDÄ VAIN APTEEKEISTA, RESEPTILLÄ, VAIN LÄÄKÄRIN MÄÄRÄYKSESTÄ.

SUOMESSA APTEEKIT EIVÄT OLE KOSKAAN MYYNEET GRAVIOLAA

PÄÄKAUPUNKISEUDULLA APTEEKIT EIVÄT OLE EDES KUULLEET GRAVIOLASTA

EIVÄTKÄ TIEDÄ MITÄÄN TÄSTÄ SYÖPÄSOLUJA ERITTÄIN TEHOKAASTI JA ILMAN SIVUVAIKUTUKSIA
TAPPAVASTA LEHTIJAUHEESTA.

Miksi syöpälääkärit Suomessa eivät halua tietää ja miksi asiantuntijat (onkologit) eivät määrää potilailleen Graviolaa, vaikka Fimea ilmoittaa sen parantavan syöpää? 

- Koska Graviola on luonnollinen, puun lehti, sen vaikuttavia aineosia ei osata valmistaa keinotekoisesti, eikä sitä siksi voida patentoida huippukalliiksi syöpälääkkeeksi jonka määräämisestä lääkärit saisivat provisioita, esim 25%..

- Lääketehtaat eivätkä syöpälääkärit yksinkertaisesti halua markkinoille edullista Graviola -lehtijauhetta, joka ei tuota heille mitään voittoja,
vaikka se poistaisi valtavasti kärsimyksiä ja säästäisi ihmishenkiä!

Graviola -hedelmän mehu-uutteen (GFE) vaikuttavista aineosasta (Annocaeus acetoncinis) on saatu jo 75 USA -patenttia, mutta sitä ei osata valmistaa laboratorioissa, miljardien dollarien uhrauksista huolimatta.

Patentoimattomana luonnontuotteena Graviolaa vähentää dramaattisesti lääketehtaiden omien, syöpää parantamattomien syöpälääkkeiden
(esim. Paklitakseli) voittoja , jos sen myyntiä ei saada estettyä, keinoja kaihtamatta! 

 
_________________________________

Ministeri Mäntylä haluaa Fimean heti takaisin Kuopiosta Helsinkiin

http://yle.fi/uutiset/ministeri_mantyla_haluaa_fimean_takaisin_kuopiosta_helsinkiin/8743598

__________________________________
 

Nyt Graviola onkin yhtäkkiä, EI LÄÄKE, vaan "hyväksymätön uuselintarvike"... 
 

28.04.2015 08:51 

Tuusulalainen Via Naturale Oy ilmoittaa vetäneensä Tšekissä valmistetun Via Naturale Graviolan Lehtijauheen (100 g) myynnistä.

Tuote sisältää Annona muricata -kasvin eli graviolan lehtiä, jotka katsotaan olevan EU:ssa uuselintarvike-

Graviolaa on käytetty Väli-Amerikassa, Espanjassa ja Aasiassa vuodesta 1525.

Uuselintarvikkeiden markkinoille saattaminen on luvanvaraista, ja luvan saanti edellyttää turvallisuusarvioinnin läpäisemistä. 

Annona muricata -kasvin lehdet eivät ole saaneet uuselintarvikkeita koskevan asetuksen mukaista hyväksyntää, joten ko. tuote on laittomasti markkinoilla.

Tuote on ollut markkinoilla päivittäistavara- sekä luontaistuotekaupoissa eri puolilla Suomea.
Maahantuoja neuvoo kuluttajia palauttamaan tuotteen ostopaikkaan.

Asiasta on tiedotettu jälleenmyyjiä ja kuluttajia viime viikolla.

Lisätietoja: Via Naturale Oy: p. (09) 8709 856, info@vianaturale.fi



Asiaa hoitaa Elintarviketurvallisuusvirasto Evirassa ylitarkastaja Sanna Viljakainen, p. 050 464 9354, etunimi.sukunimi@evira.fi

__________________________________________________________

 

 

VAI OLISIKO GRAVIOLA SITTENKIN ROHDOS ??? 

USA: n lääketeollisuuden käsikassaroilla Suomessa on kova hätä!


Suomessa traumaattinen virkamiesperinne velvoittaa käyttäytymäään tsaarillisemmin kuin tsaari (EU) itse:

- "Kansalaisten ylimielinen pompottaminen koetaan osoittavan hyvää virkamiestapaa."
- "Tämä johtaa virkatoimissa hallitsemattomiin ylilyönteihin ja korruptioon."

LÄÄKELUETTELON ROHDOKSET, LIITE 2

http://graviola.fi/Fimea-Rohdosliite/

_
http://graviola.fi/Elintarvike-rohdos-vai-l%C3%A4%C3%A4ke/

___________________________________________________________


NÄIN HELPPOA ON NYKYISIN "LÄÄKKEEN TEKO"  - á la Fimea!

"Lääkkeen" valmistus- ja tuotantolupia, tai mitään kliinisiä testauksia ei tarvita!  - Kaikki hoituu allekirjoitetulla hakemuksella!

Luokittelun hakeminen

http://www.fimea.fi/valvonta/luokittelu/luokittelun_hakeminen
__

Orthodox Cancer Treatments Don’t Treat Cancer

• 'This is a systematic flaw in the core of medicine.' ~Dr. Ben Goldacre.
•  Cancer Cures vs. Cancer Death.
•  Doctors rarely talk about “curing” cancer. Instead, the success of treatment is judged on whether a patient is alive five, 10 and 15 years after diagnosis.
• 21 Questions About Sodium Bicarbonate by Dr. Mark Sircus. 

As a doctor, Ben Goldacre likes to have all the available facts about a prescription drug before he even thinks about prescribing it. However, when it comes to medicines, it’s nearly impossible to find all the existing data.
As Goldacre described in this impassioned talk given at TEDMed 2012, there is a bias in medicine towards publishing studies that produce positive results. Meanwhile, studies with negative results often go unpublished, the information culled in the research all but disappearing.
“People will do lots and lots of studies and on the occasions that it works, they’ll publish. On the ones it doesn’t, they won’t,” says Goldacre in his talk. “This is a problem because it sends us all down blind alleys.”

You are probably asking yourself: how big is the problem?
https://blog.ted.com/5-prescription-drugs-doctors-had-no-idea-could-hurt-their-patients/

 

Orthodox Cancer Treatments Don’t Treat Cancer

Posted by Dr Sircus on October 8, 2012 | Filed under Cancer, Medicine

https://www.ted.com/talks/ben_goldacre_what_doctors_don_t_know_about_the_drugs_they_prescribe?awesm=on.ted.com_d0Pc2&utm_campaign=tedspread&utm_content=awesm-inlinelinkcreator&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=tedcomshare

5 prescription drugs doctors had no idea could hurt their patients

Most fine doctors like Dr. Ben Goldacre like to have all the available facts about a prescription drug before prescribing it. However, when it comes to pharmaceutical medicines, it’s nearly impossible to find real data, so doctors really never know the true dangers about the drugs they use.

Not only are they not sure about the side effects and the possibility of death but they are also not sure whether or not the drug will help the patient at all. In short, modern medicine is based on research fraud and we find doctors and medical officials, including the FDA, abandoning their public health mission by revolving everything they do and promote around pharmaceutical interests. Anything non-pharmaceutical in nature is patently condemned.

In a study published in Nature in March 2012, researchers tried to replicate the results of 53 basic preclinical cancer studies. Of those 53 studies, only six were replicable. In his new book, Bad Pharma, Dr. Goldacre sounds a warning bell on the fact that drug manufacturers are the ones who fund trials of their own products. One of the most widely recognized and true tests of scientific proof is when these studies showing positive results can be and are replicated by independent researchers (not researchers chosen or paid by the drug manufacturer providing the original finding).

“Drugs are tested by the people who manufacture them in poorly designed trials, on hopelessly small numbers of weird, unrepresentative patients, and analyzed using techniques that are flawed by design, in such a way that they exaggerate the benefits of treatments,” writes Goldacre in his book. “When trials throw up results that companies don’t like, they are perfectly entitled to hide them from doctors and patients, so we only ever see a distorted picture of any drug’s true effects.”

This dishonest, inaccurate and incomplete representation of many of the pharmaceutical drugs coming to market is what most doctors are basing their holy allopathic medical practices on. What kind of medical science do we have when negative scientific information is not published, not accessible to practitioners, denied, repressed and simply not included in medical conclusions?

This is a systematic flaw in the core of medicine.
Dr. Ben Goldacre

Erick Turner did a survey, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, of all the antidepressant trials filed with the United States Food and Drug Administration. There were 38 studies that produced positive results and 36 that produced negative results. Of the positive-result group, 37 of the studies were published. Of the negative results group, only three were published.

Almost every day we are hearing medical horror stories that should completely frighten the public away from their doctors’ offices. The latest scare was in October of 2012 where U.S. health officials ramped up warnings about a Massachusetts specialty pharmacy linked to a widening outbreak of a rare kind of meningitis, urging doctors and hospitals not to use any products from the company.

Investigators found contamination in a sealed vial of the steroid at the New England Compounding Center in Framingham, Mass., according to Food and Drug Administration officials. Tests are under way to determine if it is the same fungus blamed in the outbreak that has sickened 35 people in six states. Five of them have died. All received steroid shots for back pain. Almost everyday we hear another grim report of another death.

Medical and pharmaceutical science should be able to identify an appropriate mechanism and what the active ingredient might be for each drug that doctors are supposed to use. The problem is that they cannot do this without their fraudulent research, clinical trials and even FDA approval.

Orthodox Cancer Treatments Don’t Treat Cancer

I have always said that orthodox oncologists use treatments and diagnostic procedures that cause cancer to treat and diagnose cancer. A perfect example is mammography. Every mammogram a woman gets increases her risk of breast cancer by 5%[1],[2] due to the radiation involved and mammograms frequently lead to over-diagnosis and unnecessary treatment.

Most people sense that modern oncology is very dangerous. What is most terrible about it though is that treatments are in no way intended to target the cause or causes of cancer so even though the cancer industry is constantly talking about finding the “cure,” that’s the last thing on their agenda. The only treatments oncologists have to offer are therapies that do not treat cancer but rather make the person sicker and ultimately die a more horrible death.

Various analyses show that past media coverage often gave incorrect messages about the complexity of breast cancer, the age at which women are at highest risk, the progress made and the importance of early detection.

Fran Visco, the president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition, believes the solution lies in science—specifically, in studying how breast cancer develops and metastasizes. “We get sidetracked by efforts to focus on getting every woman a mammogram,” she recently told The Daily Beast. “We could screen every woman in the world, and we would not have stopped breast cancer. I am not saying to stop funding for screening; however, we cannot afford to make it a main focus.”

Recent research indicates that the cause of cancer has very little to do with genetics. We know some basic things about why cancer starts. We know it is initiated under low-oxygen conditions. We know that it is initiated also by trauma and especially by inflammation. We know with low-oxygen conditions and inflammation we have infectious agents running around out of control.

So we have low O2, low CO2, low pH (acidity) and low cellular energy; we have infection hordes fighting for their existence. Mix in some inflammation, heavy-metal and chemical contamination and nutritional deficiency (along with some genetic disruption) and we have the recipe for CANCER—a beast that is eating the human race alive starting with the old but now increasingly working its way down to the young and very young where death should not be lurking.

Does chemotherapy or radiation treat this condition? Does it treat cancer? Does it kill cancer when it provokes more of it? There is nothing real about orthodox oncology. How such inaccurate ideas like those of modern oncology could be born in an intelligent race of beings is beyond comprehension.

A new MIT study offers a comprehensive look at chemical and genetic changes that occur as inflammation progresses to cancer. One of the biggest risk factors for liver, colon or stomach cancer is chronic inflammation of those organs, often caused by viral or bacterial infections.

In 2008 researchers in France found that one in six cancers are caused by treatable infections.[3] Helicobacter pylori, hepatitis B and C viruses, and human papillomaviruses were responsible for 1.9 million cases, mainly gastric, liver, and cervix uteri cancers. In women, cervix uteri cancer accounted for about half of the infection-related burden of cancer; in men, liver and gastric cancers accounted for more than 80%. Around 30% of infection-attributable cases occur in people younger than 50 years.

The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine tells us that, “Tumor promotion and progression are dependent on ancillary processes provided by cells of the tumor environment but that are not necessarily cancerous themselves. Inflammation has long been associated with the development of cancer. This review will discuss the reflexive relationship between cancer and inflammation with particular focus on how considering the role of inflammation in physiologic processes such as the maintenance of tissue homeostasis and repair may provide a logical framework for understanding the connection between the inflammatory response and cancer.[4]”

“It is believed that cancer is caused by an accumulation of mutations in cells of the body,” says Dr. Carlo M. Croce, professor and chair of molecular virology, immunology and medical genetics. “Our study[5] suggests that miR-155, which is associated with inflammation, increases the mutation rate and might be a key player in inflammation-induced cancers generally.” This and many other studies show how inflammation can help cause cancer. Chronic inflammation due to infection or to conditions such as chronic inflammatory bowel disease is associated with up to 25% of all cancers.

Chemotherapy and radiation only make inflammation worse! These are not instruments of cancer treatment and everyone knows that they have nothing to do with cancer cures, which are illegal anyway. The best they can say is that these treatments can extend your life beyond their predictions of what would happen to you if you did not treat it in any coherent way.

“Pre-malignant tumors are ‘wound-like’. Such tumors are similar to healing or desmoplastic tissue in many ways, such as the presence of activated platelets. As described by Coussens and Hanahan, tumor growth may be ‘biphasic’. In the first phase, the body treats early tumors as wounds. This phase is characterized by tumor growth mediated by the actions of the stroma ‘indirect control’ as occurs in physiologic tissue repair.”[6]

Are chemotherapy and radiation appropriate treatments for wounds? The most amazing thing about these treatments is that many do survive these treatments, showing us how resilient the human body really is.

Cancer Cures vs. Cancer Death

Doctors rarely talk about “curing” cancer. Instead, the success of treatment is judged on whether a patient is alive five, 10 and 15 years after diagnosis.
It is amazing that, after all the slashing, burning and poisoning that oncologists do, survival rates are actually up a little. For instance at the turn of the decade the statistics for England and Wales show that the five-year survival rate for all cancers in men is 31%, while for women the survival rate is 43%. The figures are similar for Scotland. Today though still dismal, they are somewhat better.

But are they really better? Certainly they would like us to think so but one of the reasons for this is statistics. As Mark Twain said: “There lies, damned lies and statistics.” The statistics look better because they don’t put down that the person has died of cancer when they have died of the side effects of radiation and chemotherapy. “Recently a friend of mine died from rectal cancer and his wife was stunned to see that the cancer was the third cause of death on the death certificate after the infection and other problems caused by the treatment,” wrote one of my readers.

This would not have been counted as a cancer death. Also when a person is treated for breast cancer and it moves from the breast to another area, but they live five years after the breast cancer has been diagnosed, it is recorded as a survival from breast cancer.
_
http://drsircus.com/medicine/cancer/orthodox-cancer-treatments-dont-treat-cancer

[1] The Neoplastic Transformation Potential of Mammography X Rays and Atomic Bomb Spectrum Radiation; G. J. Heyes1 and A. J. Mill; RADIATION RESEARCH 162, 120–127 (2004)
http://iamtonline.org/pdfs/neoplastic.pdf

[2] One percent of American women carry a hard-to-detect oncogene, which is triggered by radiation; a single mammogram increases their risk of breast cancer by a factor of 4-6 times. “The usual dose of radiation during a mammographic x-ray is from 0.25 to1 rad with the very best equipment; that’s 1-4 rads per screening mammogram (two views each of two breasts). And, according to Samuel Epstein, M.D., of the University of Chicago’s School of Public Health, the dose can be ten times more than that. Sister Rosalie Bertell-one of the world’s most respected authorities on the dangers of radiation-says one rad increases breast cancer risk one percent and is the equivalent of one year’s natural aging. “If a woman has yearly mammograms from age 55 to age 75, she will receive a minimum of 20 rads of radiation. For comparison, women who survived the atomic bomb blasts in Hiroshima or Nagasaki absorbed 35 rads. Though one large dose of radiation can be more harmful than many small doses, it is important to remember that damage from radiation is cumulative.”
http://rense.com/general48/mam.htm

[3] Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: a review and synthetic analysis. Catherine de Martel MD,Jacques Ferlay ME,Silvia Franceschi MD,Jérôme Vignat MSc,Freddie Bray PhD,David Forman PhD,Dr Martyn Plummer PhD The Lancet Oncology – 1 June 2012 ( Vol. 13, Issue 6, Pages 607-615 )
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1994795/

[4] Why Cancer and Inflammation?
Seth Rakoff-Nahoum
Yale J Biol Med. 2006 December; 79(3-4): 123–130.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1994795/

[5] E. Tili, J.-J. Michaille, D. Wernicke, H. Alder, S. Costinean, S. Volinia, C. M. Croce. Mutator activity induced by microRNA-155 (miR-155) links inflammation and cancer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011; 108 (12): 4908 DOI:10.1073/pnas.1101795108

[6] Yale J Biol Med. 2006 December; 79(3-4): 123–130;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1994795/

__

Baking Soda is very useful for fighting viral infections. Sodium bicarbonate is a natural compound found throughout nature—in the ocean, in the soil, in our foods, and in our bodies. Baking soda is a neutralizer of many other compounds, which makes it extremely helpful as a medicine in this age of toxicity that we are all presently passing through. Its backbone characteristic is to maintain balance of carbon dioxide, bicarbonate and pH. Read More

https://drsircus.com/

__