torstai 12. maaliskuuta 2026

Ali Larijani Warns Trump of Elimination

.


  • TEHRAN (Tasnim) - Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Ali Larijani cautioned US President Donald Trump about his potential elimination, stressing that the resilient Iranian nation is unafraid of hollow threats.
  • The US and the Zionist regime launched a large-scale military campaign against Iran following the assassination of Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei, along with several senior military commanders and civilians on February 28.


T=1773278563 / Human Date and time (GMT): Thursday 12 March 2026 at 1:22:43

___


Larijani Warns Trump of Elimination

March, 10, 2026 - 15:27  Politics news


TEHRAN (Tasnim) - Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Ali Larijani cautioned US President Donald Trump about his potential elimination, stressing that the resilient Iranian nation is unafraid of hollow threats.


In a post on his X account on Tuesday, Larijani hit back at Donald Trump for threatening Iran.

He made it clear that the courageous nation of Iran, inspired by the teachings of Ashura, is not afraid of the US president’s hollow threats.

“Even those greater than you have failed to eliminate the Iranian nation," Larijani told Trump.

"Be careful not to be eliminated yourself!" the Iranian official warned the US president.

His comments came after Trump said in a post on Truth Social that Iran would be hit "twenty times harder" if it stops the oil flow through the Strait of Hormuz.

"If Iran does anything that stops the flow of Oil within the Strait of Hormuz, they will be hit by the United States of America TWENTY TIMES HARDER than they have been hit thus far. Additionally, we will take out easily destroyable targets that will make it virtually impossible for Iran to ever be built back, as a Nation, again — Death, Fire, and Fury will reign upon them — But I hope, and pray, that it does not happen!" Trump claimed.

The US and the Zionist regime launched a large-scale military campaign against Iran following the assassination of Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei, along with several senior military commanders and civilians on February 28.

The attacks have involved extensive aerial strikes on both military and civilian locations across Iran, causing significant casualties and widespread damage to infrastructure.

In response, the Iranian Armed Forces have carried out retaliatory operations, targeting American and Israeli positions in the occupied territories and at regional bases with waves of missiles and drones.

SOURCE:
Larijani Warns Trump of Elimination - Politics news - Tasnim News Agency


___

Read more


___

Most Visited in Politics

___

Top Stories



___


Wednesday 16th October 2019



“You gotta remember, establishment, it’s just a name for evil. 
The monster doesn’t care whether it kills all the students or whether there’s a revolution. It’s not thinking logically, it’s out of control.”—John Lennon (1969)

__


John Lennon vs. the Deep State:
One Man Against the ‘Monster’ 
By John W. Whitehead
October 7, 2019 
ICH



John Lennon, born 79 years ago on October 9, 1940, was a musical genius and pop cultural icon. He was also a vocal peace protester and anti-war activist and a high-profile example of the lengths to which the Deep State will go to persecute those who dare to challenge its authority.
Long before Julian AssangeEdward Snowden and Chelsea Manning were being castigated for blowing the whistle on the government’s war crimes and the National Security Agency’s abuse of its surveillance powers, it was Lennon who was being singled out for daring to speak truth to power about the government’s warmongering, his phone calls monitored and data files illegally collected on his activities and associations.
For a while, at least, Lennon became enemy number one in the eyes of the U.S. government.
Years after Lennon’s assassination it would be revealed that the FBI had collected 281 pages of files on him, including song lyrics. J. Edgar Hoover, head of the FBI at the time, directed the agency to spy on the musician. There were also various written orders calling on government agents to frame Lennon for a drug bust. “The FBI’s files on Lennon … read like the writings of a paranoid goody-two-shoes,” observed reporter Jonathan Curiel.
As the New York Times notes, “Critics of today’s domestic surveillance object largely on privacy grounds. They have focused far less on how easily government surveillance can become an instrument for the people in power to try to hold on to power. ‘The U.S. vs. John Lennon’ … is the story not only of one man being harassed, but of a democracy being undermined.”
Indeed, all of the many complaints we have about government today—surveillance, militarism, corruption, harassment, SWAT team raids, political persecution, spying, over-criminalization, etc.—were present in Lennon’s day and formed the basis of his call for social justice, peace and a populist revolution.
For all of these reasons, the U.S. government was obsessed with Lennon, who had learned early on that rock music could serve a political end by proclaiming a radical message. More importantly, Lennon saw that his music could mobilize the public and help to bring about change. Lennon believed in the power of the people. Unfortunately, as Lennon recognized: “The trouble with government as it is, is that it doesn’t represent the people. It controls them.”
However, as Martin Lewis writing for Time notes:
“John Lennon was not God. But he earned the love and admiration of his generation by creating a huge body of work that inspired and led. The appreciation for him deepened because he then instinctively decided to use his celebrity as a bully pulpit for causes greater than his own enrichment or self-aggrandizement.”
For instance, in December 1971 at a concert in Ann Arbor, Mich., Lennon took to the stage and in his usual confrontational style belted out “John Sinclair,” a song he had written about a man sentenced to 10 years in prison for possessing two marijuana cigarettes. Within days of Lennon’s call for action, the Michigan Supreme Court ordered Sinclair released.
What Lennon did not know at the time was that government officials had been keeping strict tabs on the ex-Beatle they referred to as “Mr. Lennon.” Incredibly, FBI agents were in the audience at the Ann Arbor concert, “taking notes on everything from the attendance (15,000) to the artistic merits of his new song.”
The U.S. government, steeped in paranoia, was spying on Lennon.
By March 1971, when his “Power to the People” single was released, it was clear where Lennon stood. Having moved to New York City that same year, Lennon was ready to participate in political activism against the U. S. government, the “monster” that was financing the war in Vietnam.
The release of Lennon’s Sometime in New York City album, which contained a radical anti-government message in virtually every song and depicted President Richard Nixon and Chinese Chairman Mao Tse-tung dancing together nude on the cover, only fanned the flames of the conflict to come.
The official U.S. war against Lennon began in earnest in 1972 after rumors surfaced that Lennon planned to embark on a U.S. concert tour that would combine rock music with antiwar organizing and voter registration. Nixon, fearing Lennon’s influence on about 11 million new voters (1972 was the first year that 18-year-olds could vote), had the ex-Beatle served with deportation orders “in an effort to silence him as a voice of the peace movement.”
Then again, the FBI has had a long history of persecuting, prosecuting and generally harassing activists, politicians, and cultural figures.
Most notably among the latter are such celebrated names as folk singer Pete Seeger, painter Pablo Picasso, comic actor and filmmaker Charlie Chaplin, comedian Lenny Bruce and poet Allen Ginsberg.
Among those most closely watched by the FBI was Martin Luther King Jr., a man labeled by the FBI as “the most dangerous and effective Negro leader in the country.”
With wiretaps and electronic bugs planted in his home and office, King was kept under constant surveillance by the FBI with the aim of “neutralizing” him. He even received letters written by FBI agents suggesting that he either commit suicide or the details of his private life would be revealed to the public. The FBI kept up its pursuit of King until he was felled by a hollow-point bullet to the head in 1968.
While Lennon was not—as far as we know—being blackmailed into suicide, he was the subject of a four-year campaign of surveillance and harassment by the U.S. government (spearheaded by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover), an attempt by President Richard Nixon to have him “neutralized” and deported.
As Adam Cohen of the New York Times points out,
“The F.B.I.’s surveillance of Lennon is a reminder of how easily domestic spying can become unmoored from any legitimate law enforcement purpose. What is more surprising, and ultimately more unsettling, is the degree to which the surveillance turns out to have been intertwined with electoral politics.”
As Lennon’s FBI file shows, memos and reports about the FBI’s surveillance of the anti-war activist had been flying back and forth between Hoover, the Nixon White House, various senators, the FBI and the U.S. Immigration Office.
Nixon’s pursuit of Lennon was relentless and in large part based on the misperception that Lennon and his comrades were planning to disrupt the 1972 Republican National Convention. The government’s paranoia, however, was misplaced.
Left-wing activists who were on government watch lists and who shared an interest in bringing down the Nixon Administration had been congregating at Lennon’s New York apartment. But when they revealed that they were planning to cause a riot, Lennon balked. As he recounted in a 1980 interview,
“We said, We ain’t buying this. We’re not going to draw children into a situation to create violence so you can overthrow what? And replace it with what? . . . It was all based on this illusion, that you can create violence and overthrow what is, and get communism or get some right-wing lunatic or a left-wing lunatic. They’re all lunatics.”
Despite the fact that Lennon was not part of the “lunatic” plot, the government persisted in its efforts to have him deported. Equally determined to resist, Lennon dug in and fought back. Every time he was ordered out of the country, his lawyers delayed the process by filing an appeal. Finally, in 1976, Lennon won the battle to stay in the country when he was granted a green card. As he said afterwards, “I have a love for this country…. This is where the action is. I think we’ll just go home, open a tea bag, and look at each other.”
Lennon’s time of repose didn’t last long, however. By 1980, he had re-emerged with a new album and plans to become politically active again.
The old radical was back and ready to cause trouble. In his final interview on Dec. 8, 1980, Lennon mused, “The whole map’s changed and we’re going into an unknown future, but we’re still all here, and while there’s life there’s hope.”
The Deep State has a way of dealing with troublemakers, unfortunately.
On Dec. 8, 1980, 
Mark David Chapman was waiting in the shadows when Lennon returned to his New York apartment building. As Lennon stepped outside the car to greet the fans congregating outside, Chapman, in an eerie echo of the FBI’s moniker for Lennon, called out, “Mr. Lennon!”
Lennon turned and was met with a barrage of gunfire as Chapman—dropping into a two-handed combat stance—emptied his .38-caliber pistol and pumped four hollow-point bullets into his back and left arm.
Lennon stumbled, staggered forward and, with blood pouring from his mouth and chest, collapsed to the ground.

John Lennon was pronounced dead on arrival at the hospital. He had finally been “neutralized.”
Yet where those who neutralized the likes of John Lennon, Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, Malcolm X, Robert Kennedy and others go wrong is in believing that you can murder a movement with a bullet and a madman.
Thankfully, Lennon’s legacy lives on in his words, his music and his efforts to speak truth to power. As Yoko Ono shared in a 2014 letter to the parole board tasked with determining whether Chapman should be released:
“A man of humble origin, [John Lennon] brought light and hope to the whole world with his words and music. He tried to be a good power for the world, and he was. He gave encouragement, inspiration and dreams to people regardless of their race, creed and gender.”
Sadly, not much has changed for the better in the world since Lennon walked among us.
Peace remains out of reach. Activism and whistleblowers continue to be prosecuted for challenging the government’s authority. Militarism is on the rise, with local police dressed like the military, all the while the governmental war machine continues to wreak havoc on innocent lives across the globe. Just recently, for example, U.S. military forces carried out drone strikes in Afghanistan that killed 30 pine nut farmers.
For those of us who joined with John Lennon to imagine a world of peace, it’s getting harder to reconcile that dream with the reality of the American police state.
Meanwhile, as I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, those who dare to speak up are labeled dissidents, troublemakers, terrorists, lunatics, or mentally ill and tagged for surveillance, censorship, involuntary detention or, worse, even shot and killed in their own homes by militarized police.
As Lennon shared in a 1968 interview:
“I think all our society is run by insane people for insane objectives… I think we’re being run by maniacs for maniacal means. If anybody can put on paper what our government and the American government and the Russian… Chinese… what they are actually trying to do, and what they think they’re doing, I’d be very pleased to know what they think they’re doing. I think they’re all insane. But I’m liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That’s what’s insane about it.”
So what’s the answer?
Lennon had a multitude of suggestions.
“If everyone demanded peace instead of another television set, then there’d be peace.”
“War is over if you want it.”
“Produce your own dream…. It’s quite possible to do anything, but not to put it on the leaders…. You have to do it yourself. That’s what the great masters and mistresses have been saying ever since time began. They can point the way, leave signposts and little instructions in various books that are now called holy and worshipped for the cover of the book and not for what it says, but the instructions are all there for all to see, have always been and always will be. There’s nothing new under the sun. All the roads lead to Rome. And people cannot provide it for you. I can’t wake you up. You can wake you up. I can’t cure you. You can cure you.”
“Peace is not something you wish for; It’s something you make, Something you do, Something you are, And something you give away.”
“If you want peace, you won’t get it with violence.”
JOHN  LENNON  and  YOKO  ONO

“I think they’re all insane. But I’m liable to be put away as insane for expressing that.  That’s what’s insane about it.” — John Lennon


VIDEO   :   3.14 mins

https://www.darkmoon.me/2019/john-lennon-vs-the-deep-state-one-man-against-the-monster/


__



Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will be as one

Imagine no possessions
I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger
A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people
Sharing all the world

You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one

-
Written by: Yoko Ono / John Lennon.

__


Imagina que no hay cielo
Es fácil si lo intentas
No hay infierno debajo de nosotros
Sobre nosotros solo cielo
Imagina a toda la gente
Viviendo el presente

Imagina que no hay países
No es difícil de hacer
Nada por lo que matar o morir
Y tampoco religión
Imagina a toda la gente
Viviendo la vida en paz

Puedes decir que soy un soñador
Pero no soy el único
Espero que algún día te unas a nosotros
Y el mundo será uno solo

Imagina que no hay posesiones
Me pregunto si puedes
Sin necesidad de avaricia ni hambre
Una hermandad de hombres
Imagina a toda la gente
Compartiendo todo el mundo

Puedes decir que soy un soñador
Pero no soy el único
Espero que algún día te unas a nosotros
Y el mundo vivirá como uno solo

-
Escrito por: Yoko Ono / John Lennon.


SOURCE:
https://www.letras.com/john-lennon/90/




__
eof


keskiviikko 11. maaliskuuta 2026

Identifying AI-Generated YouTube Videos vs. Real Ones - Leo, Alice, Anyone

 .


  • As AI-generated content becomes more sophisticated, it can be tricky to spot.
  • Here are the key signs to look for.
  • AI detection tools like Hive Moderation or Illuminarty can analyze images/video frames.
  • ScreenApp checks videos for synthetic faces, lip sync manipulation, and biometric mismatches.
  • DetectVideo AI analyzes frames, motion, audio patterns, and compression artifacts, returning a probability score and an explanation of the results.
  • Hive AI Detector, AI Content Shield, Hiya’s Deepfake Voice Detector are browser extensions that can scan content.


T=
1773251290 / Human Date and time (GMT): Wednesday 11 March 2026 at 17:48:10

___



 
Leo:


Identifying AI-Generated YouTube Videos vs. Real Ones

As AI-generated content becomes more sophisticated, it can be tricky to spot.

Here are the key signs to look for:

🎙️ Audio & Voice

  • Unnatural speech patterns — robotic pacing, odd emphasis, or lack of genuine emotion
  • Perfect pronunciation with no stumbles, "ums," or natural hesitations
  • Voice doesn't match lip movements precisely

👤 Visual & On-Screen People

  • Uncanny faces — overly smooth skin, strange blinking, or slightly "off" expressions
  • Inconsistent details — hair, teeth, or background elements that shift between frames
  • Hands and fingers often look distorted or have too many/few fingers
  • Unnatural eye movement — staring too directly or blinking oddly

🎬 Content & Style

  • Generic, vague talking points with little personal anecdote or lived experience
  • No real-world references like specific dates, locations, or personal stories
  • Repetitive sentence structures or overly formal language
  • Lack of genuine reactions — no laughing, surprise, or off-the-cuff moments

🖼️ Background & Environment

  • Blurry or shifting backgrounds, especially around edges of the subject
  • Lighting inconsistencies that don't match the environment
  • Objects in the background that look warped or unrealistic

📋 Channel & Metadata Clues

  • Very new channel with a high volume of polished videos uploaded quickly
  • No community engagement — no replies to comments, no personal interaction
  • Generic channel name and no real "About" section with verifiable info
  • AI-generated thumbnails (look for distorted text or faces)

🛠️ Tools You Can Use

  • AI detection tools like Hive Moderation or Illuminarty can analyze images/video frames
  • Reverse image search thumbnails to check for stock or AI-generated imagery
  • Check the description — AI channels often have templated, keyword-stuffed descriptions

The best overall approach is to trust your instincts — if something feels slightly "off" about the person or content, it's worth investigating further.


___




Alice:

Distinguishing AI-generated YouTube videos from real ones can be done using a combination of methods:

Visual analysis, metadata verification, and using detection tools and context evaluation. However, no method is completely reliable, as content generation technologies are constantly evolving. 

Visual and audio features

Microexpressions and movements. Modern AI models sometimes struggle to reproduce subtle biological details, such as unnatural microexpressions, distorted hand movements, twitching eyes, or imperfect lip synchronization with speech (lipsync). For example, in AI videos, the lips may not move in sync with the speech or appear blurry, and the teeth may be unevenly positioned. factually.co +1

Image and background quality. AI-generated videos sometimes have reduced resolution, overly smooth backgrounds, or lack the texture that is typically present in real-life footage. Artifacts may also appear when the camera moves or the focus changes. 

Object behavior. It is worth paying attention to objects that change shape between frames, or elements that distort when the camera moves. In complex deepfake videos, the focus is often on the realism of the main character's face or voice, while the background may contain minor imperfections. 

Unnatural scenarios. If a video depicts impossible or highly unlikely situations (such as a person surrounded by crocodiles in a pool), it may be a sign of generation. 

Audio anomalies. Strange intonation, artifacts of a resynthesized voice, or contextual errors in the voiceover are another indicator. 

Metadata and context

Checking the description and title. Sometimes creators explicitly mention in the description or title that the content was created using AI. According to YouTube's policies, this disclosure is required if the video may be mistakenly perceived as a real image of a person, place, scene, or event. factually.co +2

Studying the channel and download history. It's worth checking the channel's history: if it's a new or lesser-known account, and the video contains incredible or shocking claims, it's a cause for concern. You can also search for the original video on other platforms - if it appears first in another location with a different publication date, it may be suspicious. medium.com +2

Reverse image search. You can take a screenshot of a frame from a video and perform a reverse search on the internet. If the image does not match any real sources, this may be a red flag. 

Detection Tools

There are online services and browser extensions that analyze videos for AI generation. For example:

  • ScreenApp checks videos for synthetic faces, lip sync manipulation, and biometric mismatches. 
  • DetectVideo AI analyzes frames, motion, audio patterns, and compression artifacts, returning a probability score and an explanation of the results. 
  • Hive AI DetectorAI Content ShieldHiya’s Deepfake Voice Detector are browser extensions that can scan content. 

However, it is important to be skeptical of the results of such tools, as they are not perfect and may produce false positives or negatives, and they may not always account for the latest updates in generation technologies. factually.co +2

YouTube Policy

YouTube has implemented a labeling system for AI-generated content that may be perceived as real. Such videos must have a special label that informs viewers about the synthetic origin of the content. However, the presence or absence of this label does not always guarantee the authenticity or artificiality of the video, as not all creators follow the rules, and the platform may not always be able to detect violations promptly. contentgrip.com +1

Recommendations

To make a more accurate assessment, it is recommended to combine several methods:

  1. Perform visual and audio analysis.
  2. Check the metadata and context.
  3. Use one or more detection tools.
  4. For critical cases, conduct an independent fact-check by referring to reliable sources. 

It is important to remember that technology is evolving rapidly, and detection methods are constantly being improved, but they are still not universal. 


__


___





___



https://vk.com/video-225209192_456303415



Video from group_PRAVDA BG_slow_0.5_20260113


___
eof