torstai 26. joulukuuta 2024

Ukrainian Air Forces shot down MH17 - confirms conspiracy and guilt


Leaked documents: Ukrainian Air Forces shot down MH17 - confirms conspiracy and guilt

Wednesday, May 24, 2017 - 17:56





The documents are leaked by Ukrainian official to the Sovershenno Sekretno newspaper. Russian and English translations from the orginal articles are available with copies of the leaked documents, which show written orders given by Ukrainian top officials concerning concealing of the operation, shooting down the flight MH17.


Conclusions from the revealed Ukrainian SBU documents are as follows:

  • To carry out special measures to destroy the facts of a special operation
  • To carry out effective preventive measures among witnesses of special operations on July 17, 2014
  • Identify and detain witnesses of the civil aircraft explosion
  • To regroup the servicemen who discharged of their official duties on the territory of the village Grabovo, Donetsk region
  • As part of a special operation to destroy all the materials that indicate the presence of combat aircraft having carried out combat missions in the specified area on July 17, 2014.

Four photocopies which are first revealed from the SBU documents allow us to draw three preliminary and at the same time, crushing conclusions:

1. The new Kiev authorities are responsible for the shooting down of the Malaysian Airlines, Boeing 777, flight MH17 – President Poroshenko and his generals are hiding the truth and lying for 3 years already

2. Ukraine's military aviation is involved in the downing of flight MH17, causing the mass murder of almost 300 people

3. In order to cover the traces of a monstrous crime, from the end of July 2014 the Ukrainian SBU conducted special measures to destroy the facts of the special operation, and all materials that indicate the presence of combat aircraft having carried out combat missions on July 17, 2014.

We recommend you to read all four leaked documents with full English translations: Link to source.


Editorial comment: "New leaks confirm what we already knew"

Gravity of these leaked documents are huge, showing exactly something what was also seen and understood after the tragedy on the Donbass territory. Confirmation of the direct Ukrainian air force involvement in the bloody operation is a long waited trigger to redirect discussion back to the right track and toward most obvious target concerning most important question about responsibility of the mass murder: Kiev's leadership and involvement of the Ukrainian air forces.

We need to remember, that discussion of involvement of the BUK anti-aircraft missile has just no real credibility left, and there is still not a single factual evidence in public, what could even point this mentioned weapon system to be responsible for the explosion in the sky that day. So even that we know, that Ukrainian BUK-batteries were fully operational and placed at the striking distance at the day when MH17 was shot down.

All materials which were published to lead public attention towards accusations and claims, that it was "Donbass militants and Russian responsibility", provided mostly by the Ukrainian SBU right after the airplane crash, have been "debunked" already long time ago. In general, discussion about possible Russian involvement in the BUK-launch has been just a geopolitical blame game - empty accusations and claims without real evidence behind.

To this day the so-called "International Investigation Committee" of the plane crash, led by Netherland, hasn't been able to provide needed answers concerning the tragedy: With what weapon MH17 was shot down, from where and by whom? Soon three years have gone, and they still don't know basically nothing?

We haven't heard the recordings and seen actual data from the MH17 "Black Boxes", which were provided by the DPR People's Militia to the investigators. We haven't seen material from the most important Ukrainian radars, heard the communication of the air controllers - just nothing. At the same time the USA, NATO and their allies have not provided any information or data concerning the event, even that we know for sure, that US-NATO satellite and other military intelligence systems were operational in the area at the moment of the tragedy.


What we know is, and also what Ukrainian SBU-document leak confirms is:

1. Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko was personally heading the meeting of the Ukrainian Security Council. Meetings of this main administrational body took place twice on 17 July, 2014, before and right after the plane crash. If we seek main suspects and murderers for the act of state terrorism, they were all there and together

2. Russia almost immediately after the plane crash provided to the public factual intelligence materials, like radar data and satellite pictures, which also showed involvement of one or more Ukrainian military aircrafts near the flight MH17 at time of the explosion 

3. Number of witnesses have told about military jet or several military jets around the MH17. These testimonies have been also on TV and people have spoken to media with their own faces and names from what they witness that tragic day

4. When you observe the open and flat terrain around the crash site, and see that great amount of people living there, you will understand, that tens of thousands of people saw and heard what happened high in the afternoon sky. But still, there is no reliable pictures or videos available, masses of people to witness actual launch of BUK-missile. As we know, that strike would be heard, seen and witnessed by thousands of people, and traces of the missile and its impact in the sky, would been visible for several minutes after the launch

5. When Russian missile manufacturer made its tests of BUK missile systems hitting passenger aircraft and publiced its investigation results, they only proved that what has been claimed and accused, just could not be truth, and with kind of BUK-system Ukraine and the West have accused that MH17 was shot down, absolutely could not happen. Russian investigation on the other hand didn't say that some other kind of BUK missile was used to shot down MH17, leaving door wide open for involvement of air-to-air missiles

6. Ukraine shelled heavily and for a long time the crash site where MH17 was shot down (targetting pieces of the plane) and besides of that, Ukrainian officials have basically done everything they could to make proper investigation impossible on the MH17 crash site

7. Only motive what has been presented about "why Donbass defenders and Russia could have been involved in the shooting down of MH17" has been just because of mistake. Now, when you count how Ukraine, the West and its leaders have made military-political benefits from repeating how "Russia shot down the civilian airliner", and which happened just at the moment of devastating Ukrainian military defeat in the Ilovaisk cauldron against DPR forces - the list of Ukrainian motives is almost endless... We should remember that President Petro Poroshenko warned just weeks before about his mysterious "Plan B" - if events in the Donbass battlefield will not follow the way the Kiev would like to see, causing "a nasty surpise" for Donbass defenders - like shooting down a passenger jet and then blame them?

8. We even know the name of the Ukrainian pilot, who should be keep as suspect and possibly directly responsible for launching an air-to-air missile against the civilian airliner, flight MH17, on 07/17/2014.

So, what else you need to be convinced, that real suspects and responsible persons for the mass murder of civilians in the sky of Donbass, should not be sought in Donetsk, Lugansk or Russia, but instead in Ukraine, Kiev, Washington and most possibly, NATO headquarters as well?







Editorial article, Janus Putkonen, director
DONi News Agency


Article update on 05/26/2017 by author:

This article has once again raise to table old western backed claim, that Russian Su-25 jets could not operate in the altitude where MH17 was shot down. These claims has been debunked with lots of evidence and right answer to this question is a proven fact: Yes, Su-25 is capable to flight and operate up to 14 kilometers altitude.

tiistai 24. joulukuuta 2024

Am I Shadowbanned on Twitter? Here's How to Check

 

  • SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICES
  • TWITTER
  • Are you worried that you're shadowbanned on X (formerly known as Twitter)? When X downranks, hides, or blocks your content from search, you'll usually notice a dramatic decrease in engagement. If you think you've been shadowbanned by the platform X, this wikiHow article will teach you what to look for and simple tests to try. We'll also help you restore your account back to normal. 

    Things You Should Know

    • If you're shadowbanned on X, your account and posts may be hidden from other users.
    • To check if you're shadowbanned, use a web-based tool to detect the presence of specific bangs or deboosting methods.
    • Contact X support at @Support, or wait 24-72 hours to see if things change. Avoid spammy content and automated services.

    Try a Shadowban Checking Tool

    PDF downloadDownload Article
    1. There are three well-known web-based tools you can use to find out whether your content is limited by X.
      Trying a shadowban tool is a great way to get a quick "yes" or "no" answer about whether you're being shadowbanned by X.

    Look for Signs of a Shadowban

    PDF downloadDownload Article
    1. Step 1 Log out of...
      Log out of X and sign into another account.A hard shadowban occurs when X prevents your tweets from appearing in search. To find out if your tweets are blocked, you must be signed out of your account.[1]
    2. Step 2 Go to https://twitter.com/explore....
      Go to https://twitter.com/explore.This displays X's search page.
    3. Step 3 Search for from:username in the search bar.
      Replace username with your exact username on X (e.g., from:wikiHow). If you can't see your Tweets on the results (and your tweets are not protected), you're likely experiencing a hard shadowban by X.
    4. Step 4 Find out if your replies to other peoples' tweets are visible to non-followers.
      X may hide your replies to other peoples' tweets from anyone who isn't already following you. To find out, leave a comment on a public tweet, and then log into another account to see if your reply is visible.
      • X might resort to this type of shadowban even if you're able to find your tweets in search.
    5. Step 5 Look for signs of a soft shadowban.
      Because X is so secretive about its shadowban algorithm, the users of /r/Twitter on Reddit have been doing a lot of research on how their practices work.[3] The users of the forum have discovered a "soft" shadowban, which means some or all of your replies to other peoples' tweets are buried under a "Show more replies?" or "Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content" link.
      • This phenomenon is also known as "deboosting" or "downtiering."

    Why was I shadowbanned?

    PDF downloadDownload Article
    1. Step 1 X thinks you're manipulating the platform.
      X has strict rules about platform manipulation, including bulk or aggressive tweeting and following, purchasing or soliciting fake engagements, and artificial amplification of conversations.[4] While X ultimately blocks accounts that violate their rules, they may implement a shadowban before suspending an account.
    2. Step 2 You've been blocked...
      You've been blocked by a lot of users.If X detects that your account is something that others don't want to see, they will deprioritize your content. While they won't call this "shadowbanning" outright, it does limit your content's visibility.[5]
    3. Step 3 X believes your content jeopardizes its search quality.
      Even if you don't do something bad enough to warrant being banned by X, the content you share may go against X's general search rules.[6] X will hide your tweets from search (and avoid recommending them to others) if you do any of the following:
      • Repeatedly post the same links or tweets.
      • Use trending topics or hashtags to share irrelevant content.
      • Use automated bots to send tweets or post similar messages based on keywords.
      • Post the same content from multiple accounts.
      • Mass following and unfollowing of users.
    4. Step 4 Your tweets violate X's hateful conduct policy.
      X may not always ban you if you use hateful or violent language on the platform—sometimes they'll just downrank or exclude your tweets from searches and recommendations.[7]

    What should I do if I'm shadowbanned?

    PDF downloadDownload Article
    1. Step 1 Wait a few days.
      If you aren't deliberately manipulating the platform or spreading misinformation, take a 24-72 hour X break and see if things change. The symptoms of a shadow ban should only last a few days if you're not doing anything that violates X's policies.
    2. Step 2 Remove automated services and spammy content.
      If you've posted spammy content, used third-party services that track or add followers on your behalf, or run any sort of automated bot on your account, deactivate and delete all of this content as soon as possible.
    3. Step 3 Report the situation...
      Report the situation to X.If a few days pass and your content is still not visible to other X users, send a tweet to @Support (formerly @TwitterSupport) to let them know what's going on. X's support team will (hopefully) give you more insight into why your tweets are hidden or deprioritized.[8]

    Community Q&A

    • Question
      What are the loud 'popping' sounds I hear when I type text retweeting certain accounts?
      R2_d2000
      R2_d2000
      Top Answerer
      That's the sound that your keyboard makes when you touch the keys. The reason why you only hear it sometimes is probably because the sound won't play if your phone is muted.
    • Question
      How about if I can only see older tweets, not the most recent one?
      R2_d2000
      R2_d2000
      Top Answerer
      It's possible that your more recent tweets could be shadow-banned, but not your older ones.
    • Question
      Do you type in the first part of your user name or the @username? When I put in the first part of my username, nothing is found but when I put in the username after the @, I can see my posts.
      R2_d2000
      R2_d2000
      Top Answerer
      You have to put in your whole username. If you only put in part of your username, your results will not come up.
    See more answers
    Ask a Question

    Tips

    Submit a Tip
    All tip submissions are carefully reviewed before being published

    Warnings

    • Do not share spam links or violating or abusive content on X. Read the X rules to ensure you're following all guidelines.

    Expert Interview

    Thanks for reading our article! If you’d like to learn more about social media, check out our in-depth interview with Naveh Ben Dror.

    About This Article

    Naveh Ben Dror
    Co-authored by:
    Social Media Security Expert
    This article was co-authored by Naveh Ben Dror and by wikiHow staff writer, Rain Kengly. Naveh Ben Dror is a Social Media Security Expert and the CEO of Spikerz based in Tel Aviv, Israel. Naveh and his team provide social media protection for content creators, businesses, and enterprises. His professional background is in international brand marketing and e-commerce. Naveh received both his Bachelor of Law and MBA from Reichman University. This article has been viewed 906,996 times.
    How helpful is this?
    Co-authors: 12
    Updated: November 24, 2024
    Views: 906,996
    Categories: Twitter
    Thanks to all authors for creating a page that has been read 906,996 times.
    END