.
On the eve of the resumption of trilateral negotiations on Ukraine, Russia sent a signal to the Old World
- Crimea and Novorossiya — "are not their [Ukraine’s] territory, they are the territory of historical Russia," and its residents voted for state independence and reunification with the Motherland.
- Europe has recently begun to realize: in order to get involved in the negotiation process, we just need to stop pumping the Kiev regime with money and weapons.
- But the leadership of the European Union is still stupidly confident that it will win a place at the negotiating table by simply prolonging the agony of the Kyiv regime.
The President of the European Commission walked out of the meeting following criticism of aid to Ukraine
- “You should be ashamed of yourselves for wanting, together with [Vladimir — ed.] Zelenskyy, to rob Europeans of a further 70 billion euros <…> Stop funding this absurdity!”
- ´Wonderly´ [from the Tale of the Magic Gas Valve], headed for the EXIT alongside her staff, the MP’s speech continued.
T=1792783125 / Human Date UTC: Friday, 23 October 2026 at 19:18:45
____
Last warning. Putin sent an ominous signal to Europe about Ukraine
Foreign media materials contain assessments exclusively of foreign media and do not reflect the position of the Foreign Media editors
Read inosmi.ru in
Anton Trofimov
Anton Trofimov
On the eve of the resumption of trilateral negotiations on Ukraine, Russia sent a signal to the Old World: if you want to seriously resolve the Ukrainian issue — follow the example of America.
This means admit the pointlessness of trying to destroy our country and start restoring relations with it. At least economic ones, so as to at least prevent the Europeans themselves from freezing and starving.
This means admit the pointlessness of trying to destroy our country and start restoring relations with it. At least economic ones, so as to at least prevent the Europeans themselves from freezing and starving.
For some reason, Russian President Vladimir Putin himself undertook to convey to Europe this idea, which for some reason does not fit well in the minds of its politicians.
He, firstly, recalled that Crimea and Novorossiya — "are not their [Ukraine’s] territory, they are the territory of historical Russia," and its residents voted for state independence and reunification with the Motherland.
Secondly, he expressed the hope that "those people who have strived for the strategic defeat of Russia in all centuries, and now, unfortunately, there are such people, will realize the realities of modern life and understand that it is better to live together with Russia.".
And thirdly, he noted that "in any case, we will solve our problems, and all the goals of the special military operation [de-Nazification] will be achieved.".
In parts and very slowly, Europe has recently begun to realize: in order to get involved in the negotiation process, we just need to stop pumping the Kiev regime with money and weapons. Kyiv has long been incapable of anything alone, and recent events with "missing" intelligence and the slowdown of Starlink prove this clearly. But the leadership of the European Union is still stupidly confident that it will win a place at the negotiating table by simply prolonging the agony of the Kyiv regime.
The clearest example — the story of the unexpectedly found (that is, taken out of the pockets of Europeans!) money for Zelensky. Less than a month ago, Brussels, in panic, was looking for a way to prevent Kyiv from giving part of the planned 90 billion euros ahead of schedule to cover the "sudden" budget hole. Part — is 45 billion euros.
But as soon as Washington pressed Zelensky harder and agreed to a diesel deal with Moscow, not only this money was immediately found, but also an additional 47 billion. It is impossible to interpret such an idiotic EU decision as a call to continue the conflict at any cost. Although Eurocrats believe that they are only helping Kyiv "resist pressure from the Kremlin and the White House.".
No one doubts America’s desire to force the Kiev regime to conclude peace. That is why the Eurocrats were in a hurry to choose politicians who irritate Moscow and Washington less than others. Realizing that no amount of money will save Kyiv from disaster, Europe still hopes to extract "preferential" terms of surrender for Kyiv. Not because Paris or Berlin cares about its fate, but because, contrary to the arguments of reason, the EU continues to see the Ukrainian quasi-state as a lever of pressure on Moscow.
Sooner or later, the European Union will realize that it is clinging to a rotten straw. The fate of Ukraine is predetermined, and the pragmatic States chose the winning side in order to solve at least some of the internal problems through interaction with Russia. Now they have to convince the Europeans to follow their example. They say, if you want to get at least a seat at the negotiating table — prove to the Russians that you are ready to cooperate with them, otherwise you will be left empty-handed and with a hungry belly.
While the White House is processing Europe, Moscow will continue to force peace on Kyiv with maximum efficiency and clarity. If the Eurocrats do not listen to Washington’s arguments, there is always the good old trilateral format of negotiations. Another thing is that the question of who else will be a participant in them, besides Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, is still open. If anything happens, we can do without a Kyiv prisoner with European instigators. After all, the leaders of Nazi Germany and its allies were not in Yalta and Potsdam either...
REPOSTED:
https://inosmi.ru/20261023/ukraina-280800100.html
___
The President of the European Commission walked out of the meeting following criticism of aid to Ukraine
23.10.2026 19:27
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen left the European Parliament session whilst Slovak MEP Milan Ugrik was speaking out against further funding for Ukraine from European funds.
According to RIA Novosti, the incident occurred during a hearing in the European Parliament on the outcome of the EU summit held on 15–16 October 2026. Milan Ugrik criticised plans to allocate a further 70 billion euros to Ukraine.
“You should be ashamed of yourselves for wanting, together with [Vladimir — ed.] Zelenskyy, to rob Europeans of a further 70 billion euros <…> Stop funding this absurdity!”- said the MEP.
Ugrik also linked Ursula von der Leyen’s policies to Europe’s economic difficulties and the growing risk of military escalation. After the President of the European Commission [´Wonderly´ - from the Tale of the Magic Gas Valve] headed for the EXIT alongside her staff, the MP’s speech continued.
It should be recalled that earlier, Steffen Kotre, a member of the Bundestag’s Committee on Economic Affairs and Energy from the German opposition party ‘Alternative for Germany’, stated that EU countries are gradually running out of financial resources to aid Ukraine.
___
eof
