EU-johto tehtailee vääriä todisteita pakottaakseen palkkaleikkauksia

Brysselissä työskentelevä ay-liikkeen ekonomisti Ronald Janssen osoittaa Eurooppa-neuvoston eli ministerien huippukokouksen, Euroopan keskuspankki EKP:n, komission ja euroryhmän 'analyyttisen paperin' laskelmat vääriksi ja tarkoitushakuisiksi.

Toimittaja: Riikka Söyring
19.3.2015, Verkkomedia.org

EU-johto tehtailee vääriä todisteita pakottaakseen palkkaleikkauksia 

Eurooppa-neuvoston, EKP:n, komission ja euroryhmän puheenjohtajien analyyttiseksi mainitsema paperi esittelee ennakolta perusteluja sille, miksi tähän asti harjoitettua talouden tappavaa politiikkaa pitää jatkaa.

Paperin nimi on "Preparing for the next steps on better economic governance in the Euro Area, Analytical note"

("Valmistautuminen seuraaviin askeleiin euroalueen talouden hallinnan parantamiseksi, analyyttinen muistiinpano").

Paperi julkaistiin helmikuun puolivälissä keskustelun avaamiseksi siitä, miksi Euroopan talouden hallintaa pitäisi entisestään tiukentaa ja siirtää pois jäsenmailta itseltään Eu-tasolle. Alleviivatakseen vallansiirron tarvetta "analyyttinen paperi" kuvailee euroalueen kriisin juurisyitä. "Analyyttista paperia" rehellisempi nimitys olisi poliittinen paperi tai ohjelmajulistus.

"Analyyttinen ryhmä" eli Euroopan keskuspankki EKP:n johtaja Mario Draghi,
  

Euroryhmän puheenjohtaja Jeroen Djisselbloem, pääkomissaari Jean-Claude Juncker sekä Eurooppa-neuvoston puheenjohtaja Donald Tusk "ylittävät itsensä yrittäessään todistaa, että eurokriisi johtuu pohjimmiltaan jäykistä työ ja tuotemarkkinoista", kirjoittaa Janssen.

"Väite kuuluu: Jos  nämä markkinat olisivat olleet joustavammat, silloin tarjonta olisi kyennyt pysyttelemään kasvavan kysynnän tasolla. Alijäämämaissa ei olisi ollut ollut mitään kilpailukykyä heikentäviä palkankorotuksia", eivätkä alijäämämaat olisi kokeneet nykyisen kaltaisia tasevajeita saati että olisivat joutuneet velkaantumaan rahoittaakseen näitä ulkoisia alijäämiään, hahmottelee Janssen.
 

Todistellakseen asiaansa ryhmä esittelee jokusen epäilyttävän kaavion.

Kaavioilla pyritään osoittamaan että euroalueen alijäämämailla on jäykät työmarkkinat, ja että tästä jäykkyydestä johtuu kriisi sekä ennätyslukemissa oleva työttömyys. 

Ensimmäisessä "analyyttisesta paperista" löytyvässä kaaviossa esitellään vahva korrelaatio työ- ja tuotemarkkinoita koskevan sääntelyn tason (2008) sekä työttömyyden kasvun (2009-2013) välilä 14 euromaassa.

Lähemmin tarkasteltuna paljastuu syy sille, miksi "analyyttinen paperi" käyttää indikaattoria, joka yhdistää työ- ja tuotemarkkinoiden jäykkyyden, sanoo Janssen.  

Kun tarkastellaan erityistä kytköstä työmarkkinoiden jäykkyyksien ja työttömyydessä tapahtuneiden muutosten välillä, saadaan kokonaan erilainen kuva.

Ensimmäisessä kuviossa näkyvä vahva yhteenkytkeytyneisyys työmarkkinajäykkyyksien ja työttömyyden välillä katoaa ja korvaantuu tuskin havaittavissa olevalla korrelaatiolla.

Trendilinjaan tulee vaihtelua. Saksa on saanut työttömyytensä alas ja Espanja ylös, vaikka työtä koskeva sääntely (job protection) on samalla tasolla molemmissa maissa. Jos kerran työtä koskeva sääntely on niin merkittävä tekijä, miksi työttömyys on alentunut Saksassa huomattavasti, Janssen kysyy?

"Analyyttisesta paperista" löytyy edellistäkin epäilyttävämpi kaavio, huomauttaa Janssen. Toisen kaavion perusteella palkkakustannukset vaikuttavat suoraan työttömyyttä lisäävästi.
"Analyyttisen ryhmän" vihje kuuluu: Jos haluamme eroon työttömyydestä, meidän tulee polkea palkkoja "kilpailukykyiselle tasolle". 

Kuinka ollakaan, osoittaakseen palkkakustannusten ja työttömyyden välisen korrelaation, "analyyttinen ryhmä" käyttää kahta eri aikajaksoa.
Muutoksia finanssikriisin jälkeisessä työttömyydessä verrataan kriisiä edeltäneeseen työvoimakustannusten nousuun.

Ryhmä siis yhdistää todella  vapaasti assosioiden viimeaikaiset työttömyystrendit palkkakehitykseen, joka tapahtui yli 10 vuotta sitten.

Kun sama laskuharjoitus, havainnollistaa Janssen, tehdään samoilla tekijöillä saman aikajakson sisällä, kuva muuttuu aivan toisen näköiseksi. 

Nyt esiin piirtyy vahva negatiivinen korrelaatio!
Nyt palkkojen leikkaukset korreloivat kasvavan työttömyyden kanssa kun taas reippaat palkankorotukset kulkevat käsi kädessä työttömyyden vähenemisen kanssa.
 

Tämä kaavio osoittaa selvästi sen, mitä oikeassa elämässä tapahtuu. Se osoittaa, että sisäisesti tehty palkkojen alentamisen strategia ei tuonut talouden toipumista, sen sijaan strategia tuotti lisää taantumaa, Janssen alleviivaa.

Kaavio kertoo myös Saksan muuttaneen suuntaa kriisin alkamisen jälkeen, pois päin sääntelemättömyydestä ja palkkojen polkemisesta kohti Kurzarbeit-mallia, jossa työntekijät tekevät lyhennettyä työaikaa sen sijaan että heidät irtisanottaisiin.

Janssenin mukaan on nähtävissä että kolmas voima vaikuttaa taustalla. Rahaliiton ensimmäisten kymmenen vuoden aikana pääomien massiivinen sisäänvirtaus euroalueen ydinmaista - jolla on juurensa eurolaueen ytimen maiden kilpailukyky-disinflaatiostrategiassa - on ruokkinut velkavetoisia kuplia ja omaisuuserien hintoja muissa euroalueen maissa, ja siten kuumentanut näiden maiden taloutta sekä nostanut inflaatiota.

Inflaation noustessa nominaalisen palkkadynamiikan oli pakko seurata ostovoiman säilyttämiseksi, ja tämän takia palkkoja korotettiin 2001-2009, Janssen täsmentää. Velkamäärien ja omaisuuserien arvon kasvu eivät kuitenkaan voi jatkua ikuisesti.

Ennen pitkää finanssisyklissä seuraa romahdus. Tuo hetki koitti Euroopalle kun rahoitusmarkkinat alkoivat pelätä lainanneensa liikaa ja kieltäytyivät kierrättämästä enempää euroalueen ytimen säästöjä reunavaltioille.
 

Euroalueen kriisin syy ei ole holtiton palkkapolitiikka vaan irrationaaliset pääomavirtaukset, jotka ensin houkuttelivat maat velkaantumaan ja sitten pysäyttivät rahaliikenteen, jonka seurauksena taloudet syöksyivät taantumaan, Janssen hahmottelee.

Lukuisat tutkimukset, mukaan lukien Troikan -  kansainvälinen valuuttarahasto IMF, komissio ja EKP - omat tutkimukset, ovat tulleet siihen johtopäätökseen, että euroalueen ulkoisen epätasapainon takana on finanssisyyt eikä suinkaan palkat tai kilpailukyvyn menetys.

Janssen esittää yhteenvetona, että "analyyttisen ryhmän analyyttinen paperi" on luonteeltaan vapaata markkinatalousideologiaa tukemaan tarkoitettu höyhötys, joka pyrkii kokonaan hämärtämään tosiseikat; sen, että kriisin syynä on euron ensimmäisen vuosikymmenen aikana kokonaan lapasesta lähtenyt rahavirta luotottajamaista muualle euroalueelle.

"Analyyttisen ryhmän analyyttinen paperi" pyrkii siirtämään vastuun kokonaan työntekijöiden oikeuksia suojaaville työmarkkinainstituutioille, Janssen päättää.

Toimittajan kommentti:

Silmäilinpä itsekin hieman "analyyttisen ryhmän analyyttista paperia". Ryhmä tunkee friedmanilais-monetaristista teologiaansa kurkusta alas samalla hartaudella kuin Juhana Vartiainen (kok) Suomessa sivuuttaen täysin sellaisen kotitalouksille ja yrityksille itsestään selvän seikan kuin että Rahaton ei osta, yritys ei pyöri ilman asiakkaita.

Mitä enemmän Eu-eliitti "kasvattaa työvoiman tarjontaa" sen vähemmän on kysyntää. Kuka hullu nyt ottaisi yrityksen laajentamislainaa tai kulutusluottoa nykytilanteessa vapaaehtoisesti?

Joten siihen yritetään pakottaa. Mario Draghi käydessään Helsingissä 2014 teki tiettäväksi, että "Yhdentyneillä luottomarkkinoilla yritykset ja kuluttajat voivat pienentää häiriöiden tuloja heikentävää vaikutusta ylläpitämällä kulutustaan lainarahalla, mikä euroalueella tarkoittaa lainaamista maista, joissa häiriö ei vaikuta yhtä voimakkaasti. Finanssiunioni on siis yksi kiinteä osa rahaliittoa."

Selkokielellä: Joustojen ja sopeuttamisen aiheutettua sen, että palkka eikä eläke riitä perustarpeiden kattamiseen, on eurooppalaisten kotitalouksien otettava velkaa tullakseen toimeen. Yksityisten velkaantuminen vähentää julkisen sektorin velkaantumista ja lisää pankkisektorin tuottavuutta, onhan rahoitussektorin myyntituote velka.

Talouskuri-vaikutusten johtava asiantuntija Mark Blyth lyttää 7 minuutissa talouskurin siunauksellisista vaikutuksista kerrotut iltasadut: Leikkaukset kasvattavat velkaa.

___________

Euroopan ammattiliittojen yhteenliittymä ETUC lyttää Euroopan keskuspankin pääjohtajan Jean-Claude Trichet’n varoitukset palkka–hinta-kierteestä Euroopassa. Järjestön ekonomistiRonald Janssen sanoo Taloussanomille puhelinhaastattelussa, että eurooppalaisten palkankorotukset ovat olleet maltillisia.

– Mielestämme Trichet käyttää palkkoja vain alibina ja hänen pitäisi tehdä kunnollista analyysia eurooppalaisesta palkkaneuvottelujärjestelmästä, Janssen puhkuu.
_
http://www.taloussanomat.fi/tyomarkkinat/2008/06/26/palkat-eivat-ole-syypaa-inflaatioon/200817127/12

_______________

The Real News Network: Blyth devastates Congress´ approach to budget 

• http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=13439

About Ronald Janssen

Ronald Janssen is an economic adviser working in the trade union movement in Brussels.

On Spendthrift Governments And The European Central Bank

by Ronald Janssen on 24 March 2015

The other culprit for the crisis: Spendthrift governments In an earlier post, I analysed the new offensive launched by the four presidents of European institutions on the next step in economic governance and saw it as a flawed attempt to rewrite the fundamental narrative of the crisis. By making wages to blame for the crisis, the […

http://www.socialeurope.eu/author/ronald-janssen/

British Medical Journal: Milk Does NOT Do The Body Good (Massive New Study)

Royce Christyn   in  Health     4 months ago
"In fact, we are the only species on Earth that consumes the milk of another animal."

Is Milk Bad For You?

It’s something that is hammered into our heads by (most of the time) well meaning people from the time we are a child:  “Drink your milk… it’s good for you!”.  But, it it? Is milk bad for you?  That’s a question that has started to creep onto many people’s minds and it was the catalyst for a massive new study.  According to an article by The Collective Evolution:

Milk seems to be making its way through various stages of truth, especially within the past couple of years. Like many other examples, what we once thought to be healthy for us to consume is turning out to be the exact opposite.

A large study coming from researchers at the Uppsala University in Sweden found that drinking milk led to an increased mortality rate and actually made bones more prone to fracturing, not less.(1)

The study was recently published in the peer reviewed British Medical Journal, and was specifically conducted to examine whether high milk consumption is associated with mortality and fractures in both men and women. 
The study took place across three different counties in Sweden, and used data from two large Swedish cohorts, one with 61,433 women aged approximately 39-74 years old and one with 45, 339 men aged approximately 45-79 years old. They were all administered food frequency questionnaires. The study used “multivariable survival models” that were “applied to determine the association between milk consumption and time to mortality and fracture.

The results were as follows:

“During a mean follow-up of 20.1 years, 15 541 women died and 17 252 had a fracture, of whom 4259 had a hip fracture. In the male cohort with a mean follow-up of 11.2 years, 10 112 men died and 5066 had a fracture, with 1166 hip fracture cases.

In women the adjusted mortality hazard ratio for three or more glasses of milk a day compared with less than one glass a day was 1.93 (95% confidence interval 1.80 to 2.06). For every glass of milk, the adjusted hazard ratio of all cause mortality was 1.15 (1.13 to 1.17) in women and 1.03 (1.01 to 1.04) in men.

For every glass of milk in women no reduction was observed in fracture risk with higher milk consumption for any fracture (1.02, 1.00 to 1.04) or for hip fracture (1.09, 1.05 to 1.13).
The corresponding adjusted hazard ratios in men were 1.01 (0.99 to 1.03) and 1.03 (0.99 to 1.07). In subsamples of two additional cohorts, one in males and one in females, a positive association was seen between milk intake and both urine 8-iso-PGF2α (a biomarker of oxidative stress) and serum interleukin 6 (a main inflammatory biomarker).” (1)

The study concluded that high milk intake was associated with higher mortality in one cohort of women and in another cohort of men, and with higher fracture incidence in women. It also concluded: “Given the observational study designs with the inherent possibility of residual confounding and reverse causation phenomena, a cautious interpretation of the results is recommended.”(1)

This Is Not The Only Study That Suggests Milk Is Not Good For Our Body

In a paper published in the Journal of the American Medical Association Pediatrics, Harvard pediatrician David Ludwig emphasizes that bone fracture rates tend to be lower in countries that do not consume milk. compared to those that do, also noting that there are many other sources of calcium. (source)

Another study published in the American Journal of Public Health showed that dairy consumption might actually increase the risk of fractures by 50 percent. (2)

Studies have also shown that calcium isn’t as bone protective as we thought. Multiple studies on calcium supplementation have shown no benefit in reducing bone fracture risk. In fact, vitamin D appears to be more effective when it comes to reducing bone fracture risk. (3)

Studies have also shown that dairy products might increase a males risk of developing prostate cancer by 30 -50 percent. (4)

The list literally goes on and on.

It’s also interesting to note that approximately 65 to 75 percent of the total human population on our planet have a reduced ability to digest lactose after infancy. (5)(6) In some countries, over 90 percent of the adult population is lactose intolerant, think about that for a moment.

Lactose intolerance is an impaired ability to digest lactose, a sugar found in milk and other dairy products. Lactose is normally broken down by an enzyme called lactase, which is produced by cells in the lining of the small intestine.

Keep in mind that the milk we have so much trouble digesting after infancy is cows milk, not our mother’s natural breast milk.
In fact, we are the only species on Earth that consumes the milk of another animal.

Since lactase’s only function is the digestion of lactose in milk, most mammal species experience a dramatic reduction in the activity of the enzyme after weaning. Lactase persistence in humans has evolved as an adaptation to the consumption of non-human milk and dairy products consumed beyond infancy. Our diet has changed a lot, and as a result some of our genes have adapted, but it’s not an easy process. This is why most humans are lactose intolerant.

Every other species weans and then never drinks milk again for the rest of their lives, and because of that they don’t have an enzyme to break down the sugar in milk. But during human evolution, some humans experienced a mutation in the LTC gene, the lactase gene, these mutations allow us to process lactose as adults. With approximately 65- 75 percent percent of humans on the planet unable to properly process it, it is evidence enough that we are not doing what is natural and in accordance with our bodies.

Below is a video of Katherine S. Pollard, a PhD at the University of California, San Francisco going into more detail from the above paragraph.

Milk/Dairy Is Not The Only Source of Calcium

This list is extremely long, here is a very small list of non dairy/vegan sources of calcium, many of them out there provide a healthier source and even more of it. It’s important to do your research, there are so many foods out there that contain a healthy and abundant source of calcium.
Kale: One cup of raw kale is loaded with calcium, approximately 90 mg to be exact. This means that a 3.5 cup of kale salad provides more calcium than a one cup class of milk

Oranges: One Naval Orange contains approximately 60 mg of calcium
Beans
Green Peas
Chickpeas
Quinoa
Seeds
Hemp

Sources:

(1) http://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g6015

(2) Feskanich D, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA. Milk, dietary calcium, and bone fractures in women: a 12-year prospective study. Am J Public Health. 1997 Jun;87(6):992-7.

(3) Feskanich D, Willett WC, Colditz GA. Calcium, vitamin D, milk consumption, and hip fractures: a prospective study among postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Feb;77(2):504-11.

(4) Tseng M, Breslow RA, Graubard BI, Ziegler RG. Dairy, calcium, and vitamin D intakes and prostate cancer risk in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Epidemiologic Follow-up Study cohort. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 May;81(5):1147-54.

(5) http://consensus.nih.gov/2010/images/lactose/lactose_finalstatement.pdf

(6) http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/lactose-intolerance

- See more at: http://yournewswire.com/british-medical-journal-milk-does-not-do-the-body-good-massive-new-study/#sthash.CL1Q5p0y.dpuf

Natural Alzheimer’s Reversing Oil That is Beating Prescription Drugs

By Herw

Posted Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 12:44pm EDT

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a
degenerative brain disorder that
breaks down and eventually destroys
brain cells and the neurons  that
connect brain cells to one another.

This damage causes a decline in
memory, behavior, and mental
capabilities.



Every person experiences AD differently.
For some patients, the disease progresses slowly and leaves
mental function largely intact for several years.
For others, however, the disease is aggressive and quickly robs
people of their memory and mental capabilities.
In the end, AD eventually becomes severe enough to disrupt
daily life.
The potential health benefits of coconut oil have been celebrated
since ancient times by different cultures around the world.
It’s been used as an anti-fungal treatment, a hair-strengthener and a
skin softener.

Coconut oil, ketones and Alzheimer’s disease
What does all of this have to do with coconut oil helping people with Alzheimer’s disease?
Coconut oil advocates believe that the cognitive benefits experienced by people with
Alzheimer’s can be traced to so-called “ketone bodies,” the biological byproducts of the
coconut oil digestion process. Ketone bodies are one of the few things that can serve as
an alternate fuel source for brain cells when glucose isn’t available or cannot be absorbed
as efficiently (as is the case in people with Alzheimer’s).

The human body doesn’t typically produce many ketone bodies on its own, unless a person
is following a diet that is extremely low in carbohydrates. However, consuming coconut
oil can create a temporary state of hyperketonemia—where the number of ketone bodies
in a person’s blood stream is greatly elevated.

How Coconut Oil Affects the Body and Mind
For best results, experts suggest organic, cold-pressed, non-hydrogenated, virgin coconut oil
– and don’t let the word “oil” frighten you. Coconut oil is a heart-healthy oil that is free of
cholesterol and trans-fats, and provides many benefits in addition to improving brain health, including:

• 1.Improving the body’s use of insulin
• 2.Improving cholesterol by increasing HDL (good cholesterol)
• 3.Boosting thyroid function resulting in increased energy
• 4.Acting as an antioxidant and natural antibiotic
• 5.Improving overall health of skin and hair
• 
  

A recent University of Oxford study suggested that although the effects of coconut oil
may be temporary, Alzheimer’s and dementia patients have indeed seen short-term
benefits resulting from its use. This research supports Dr. Newport’s theory that ketones,
which are byproducts of the breakdown of fats in the body, play an important role in
brain health. The idea is that by boosting ketones, found in coconut oil, we can improve
cognitive function.

Adding Coconut Oil to Your Diet
If you decide to add this “super food” to your diet to promote brain health and prevent
dementia, the internet is a great source for coconut oil recipes.
_
http://www.healthyandnaturallife.com/natural-alzheimers-reversing-oil-that-is-beating-prescription-drugs/
_
http://coconutoil.com/coconut-oil-alzheimers/

Why flu shots are the greatest medical fraud in history

• Toxic mercury is present in influenza vaccines at a level that's literally 25,000 times higher than the EPA limit of mercury in drinking water.
• BREAKING: Mercury Level in Flu Vaccine 25,000 times higher than EPA limits
• Unethical medicine administered without informed consent (a violation of medical ethics)
• Why vaccines are the "anti-science" medical voodoo of the modern world

Vaccines are the one medicine where no scientific evidence of safety or efficacy is required by anyone: not the FDA, not the CDC and not the media. Congress even passed a law protecting the vaccine industry with absolute legal immunity, even when they manufacture and sell defective products that injure and kill people.

(NaturalNews) As one of the very few independent voices willing to stand up against the scientific dogma of our modern medical regime, I've long felt a need to communicate the dangers of flu shots to the public so that people can have better information to prevent vaccine injuries and save lives.

This doesn't mean I'm opposed to the theory of vaccination, by the way. In fact, I'm the author of A Blueprint for Safer Vaccines, an audio guide to saving lives and preventing vaccine injuries and deaths.

To my knowledge, I'm the only independent journalist in the world who is scientifically trained to run an atomic mass spectrometry laboratory, which I've been running for nearly a year now and testing the heavy metals content of organic superfoods like cacao, common vaccines as well as the ability of water filers to remove toxic heavy metals. I'm the creator of the Low Heavy Metals Verified standard and I'm the inventor of patent-pending nutritional formulas for capturing heavy metals during digestion and binding with the radioactive isotopes of cesium (such as Cesium-137) to eliminate them from the digestive tract. Both of these patents are on file with the U.S. patent office awaiting a decision.

My independent atomic elemental analysis of flu vaccines, published in the summer of 2014, proved that flu vaccines contain over 50 ppm mercury, an extremely toxic heavy metal linked to kidney failure, birth defects, spontaneous abortions and neurological damage. This finding has never been refuted by anyone. In fact, it was affirmed by vaccine proponents who insisted that it is perfectly safe to inject pregnant women, young children and senior citizens with mercury even though the flu vaccine insert itself readily admits there is no scientific evidence whatsoever to support the safety and efficacy of the vaccine in such groups.

Believe it or not, there are still millions of people, doctors, pharmacists and even journalists who do not yet realize there is a very high concentration of mercury in influenza vaccines given to pregnant women, children and senior citizens. Most people, you see, have been lied to by the media which has stated over and over again that mercury was removed from all vaccines.

That's simply not true.

It's still there. And toxic mercury is present in influenza vaccines at a level that's literally 25,000 times higher than the EPA limit of mercury in drinking water. [7] It's 100 times higher than the highest level of mercury contamination I've ever tested in ocean fish.

See the evidence for yourself

To prove the presence of mercury in influenza vaccines, I'm going to show you four irrefutable pieces of evidence:

1) Photographs of a 2013 / 2014 influenza vaccine box admitting, in very small print, to the addition of mercury to the vaccine as a preservative.

2) Photographs of the influenza vaccine insert once again repeating the admission that the vaccine contains mercury.

3) A screen shot from the Centers for Disease Control website which admits that vaccines still contain the following ingredients: Aluminum, Antibiotics, Egg Protein, Formaldehyde, Monosodium Glutamate (MSG) and Thimerosal, a mercury-containing chemical compound.

4) Lab results from the Natural News Forensic Food Lab which confirmed almost precisely the same level of mercury claimed by the manufacturer (GlaxoSmithKline).

Before I show you the irrefutable evidence, there is some good news in all this testing. As part of this Natural News investigation, I tested several different vaccines, including an HPV vaccine. Mercury levels were extremely low in these other vaccines. Only the flu shot contained extremely high mercury levels.

Influenza vaccine box admits safety never established for pregnant women

As you can see below, the box for this Flulaval Influenza Virus Vaccine readily admits the use of thimerosal which contains mercury. (Of course, you have to use a magnifying glass to see this.) In microscopic text on the package insert, it says straight out, "Register women who receive Flulaval while pregnant in the pregnancy registry by calling 1-888-452-9622."

Yet, at the same time, the insert also admits that "safety and efficacy have not been established in pregnant women."

In other words, this vaccine containing mercury is being promoted for use in pregnant women even when no safety in pregnant women has ever been established.

It's also important to note that when people are being given flu shots, they are never handed the package or the insert, so they have no opportunity to read any of this information unless they specifically ask for it.

It's not like a food item with a "Nutrition Facts" label. Vaccines are sold in "stealth" mode where patients have no idea what's in them and no opportunity to read possible warnings.



As further proof of this point, consider the fact that this flu vaccine comes with only one insert, yet it's a 10-dose vial intended to be injected into 10 different people. Clearly, if there's only one insert but 10 people, then 9 out of 10 people can't possibly be handed the insert.

Unethical medicine administered without informed consent (a violation of medical ethics)

In fact, from a legal perspective, vaccines are routinely injected into people without informed consent. Virtually no one administering vaccines ever explains the risks vs. benefits of vaccines as is required under medical ethics and state medical law. In nearly all cases, patients are simply hoodwinked and told there are no risks at all.

The second piece of evidence to reveal here is the package insert for the influenza vaccine, a document printed in microscopic text that's almost impossible to read without a magnifying glass.

Of course, the intention is that no one ever read this document, because it contains shocking admissions of the total quackery and marketing deception behind flu shots.

As you can see from this snapshot, the package insert readily admits that each vaccine dose "contains 50 mcg thimerosal (<25 mcg mercury)."

In case you're wondering, "mcg" means micrograms. A microgram is 1/1000th of a milligram. Mercury is toxic at any dose when injected into the body, even in micrograms. There is no such thing as a "safe" form of mercury when injected. In fact, the ethyl form of mercury used in vaccines is many times more toxic than methyl form once it enters human cells. Click here for a fascinating interview with mercury toxicity expert Dr. Chris Shade who explains this extremely important concept.

The same paragraph shown above also admits the vaccine contains formaldehyde, a potent neurotoxic chemical.

Vaccine insert admits safety and effectiveness have never been established

What's even more astonishing about this insert is that it openly admits the flu shot is a complete medical hoax, backed by nothing but voodoo woo woo faith-based dogma (and clever marketing).

Here are actual words from the insert (which is much more lengthy than the snapshot shown above):

"There have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with Flulaval."

"Safety and effectiveness of Flulaval have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers or children."

"Safety and effectiveness of Flulaval in pediatric patients have not been established."

"Flulaval has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility."

"Do not administer Flulaval to anyone... following previous administration of any influenza vaccine."

CDC admits use of mercury, MSG, formaldehyde

For those "mercury denialists" who still can't believe flu shots given to pregnant women contain high concentrations of toxic mercury, even the CDC reluctantly admits this fact on its own website.


Here's a screen shot from the CDC's vaccine additives page, which miraculously hasn't yet been removed from their site:

Laboratory results from the Natural News Forensic Food Lab

The final piece of irrefutable evidence on all this comes from my own scientific laboratory, where I run ICP-MS instrumentation to test foods, beverages, dietary supplements and other items for heavy metals contamination.

I was the first food researcher to document high levels of tungsten in brown rice protein, and I've exposed alarming levels of lead in pet treats. I've also exposed high lead in ginkgo biloba herbal supplements imported from China. 

When I finally got around to testing vaccines, I was shocked to find over 51,000 ppb mercury in the Influenza Virus Vaccine.

Why was I shocked? Because I don't recall ever seeing anything run through my ICP-MS instrument with that high a concentration of mercury. The mercury in this flu vaccine was the HIGHEST concentration of mercury I've ever seen in anything, period!

And this is a product that's injected directly into the bodies of pregnant women, where mercury goes right into the developing fetus.

What's even more interesting is that this finding once again confirms the accuracy of my lab instrumentation because it's almost in perfect agreement with the level of mercury detailed on the vaccine package insert.

Let's do the math:

* Each dose of an influenza vaccine is 0.5 mL in volume
* My lab found just over 50 ppm of mercury in the vaccine liquid.
* 50 ppm (concentration) x 0.5 mL (volume) equals 25 mcg of mercury.

Guess what the package insert says? (Up to) 25 mcg of mercury per dose. Near-perfect agreement, in other words. My finding of 51 ppm rather than 50 ppm either means my own tests were off by about 2% (which is still considered very accurate for ICP-MS testing) or that GSK put 2% extra mercury into the vaccine.

And just so you know I actually did the tests, here's what else we found with other analytes:

Aluminum: 0.4 ppm
Arsenic: zero
Cadmium: zero
Lead: zero

So, I can confidently say that the flu vaccine won't poison you with lead, cadmium or arsenic because it contains none of those things. Even the aluminum level is quite low and not a concern at this very low level. The real problem is just the mercury, at least as far as elements go.

Why won't vaccine makers remove the mercury?

Good question. Everybody knows mercury is toxic to inject into the human body. That's not debated except by irrational anti-science denialists who refuse to acknowledge the Table of Elements.

You have to wonder: why choose mercury as a preservative? And why do both the CDC and FDA continue to look the other way as an entire branch of modern medicine poisons our women and children with a neurotoxic heavy metal?

And if vaccine promoters, propagandists and patent holders want the world to accept all their vaccines, why don't they just remove the mercury and be done with it? If they take out all the toxic elements, resistance to vaccines would all but evaporate.

Why vaccines are the "anti-science" medical voodoo of the modern world

Ever wonder why they don't conduct legitimate clinical trials on flu vaccine efficacy? Probably because they know the results would have to be faked to show any efficacy at all. That's what Merck did with its mumps vaccines, according to two former virologists who worked there. They spiked human blood samples with animal antibodies to fabricate positive results. Yep, vaccines work so poorly that even the manufacturers have to fake their own results to show any efficacy.

Vaccines are the one medicine where no scientific evidence of safety or efficacy is required by anyone: not the FDA, not the CDC and not the media. Congress even passed a law protecting the vaccine industry with absolute legal immunity, even when they manufacture and sell defective products that injure and kill people.



How's that for medicine we can all trust? Think about it: this is a product that contains multiple neurotoxins in very high concentrations; a product backed by no safety trials or efficacy data; a product linked to numerous serious adverse reactions; and yet a product that enjoys absolute legal immunity thanks to the U.S. government.

If that's not outright medical quackery, I don't know what is.

For the record, I'm not an opponent of all vaccines. But I do believe -- as do a rapidly increasing number of other clear-thinking people -- that medicine should not poison our women and children. It's time for mercury to be removed from all vaccines, once and for all. Anything less is medical negligence.

New video interview about flu shot failures
- More videos below

Ultimately, We the People will be victorious in the removal of mercury from all vaccines -- an idea that's already well accepted across much of Europe. And when that day comes, it will be yet another victory for the Natural News fan base, an amazing community of millions of remarkable people working together for the protection of our children, our health and our world.

See my recent video interview with Next News Network's Gary Franchi on why flu shots are failures:



Sources for this article include:
[1] https://www.naturalnews.com/046679_safer_vacc...
[2] http://www.waterfilterlabs.com
[3] http://www.heavymetalsdefense.com
[4] http://www.cesiumeliminator.com
[5] http://www.lowheavymetalsverified.org
[6] https://www.naturalnews.com/045418_flu_shots_...
[7] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basi...


http://www.naturalnews.com/047942_flu_shots_medical_fraud_vaccine_quackery.html#ixzz3USbIKCtK


Wednesday, December 10, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Tags: flu shots, medical fraud, vaccine quackery

BREAKING: Mercury Level in Flu Vaccine 25,000 times higher than EPA limits

#CDCWhistleblower New Details Emerge

There's a new whistle-blower at the Center for Disease Control who is coming forward with suppressed evidence of a link between the MMR Vaccine and Autism. Dr. William W. Thompson is his name and he works with the Immunization Safety Branch at the CDC. Thompson broke his silence after Dr. Brian Hooker from the Focus Autism Foundation issued a FOIA request about a recent autism study.

___

Utah teenager taken off of life support after spending month in a coma following first flu vaccination

Posted: November 25, 2013 | Comments

(http://www.sltrib.com) 19-year-old Chandler Webb of Utah passed away on November 19, 2013, after being hospitalized for nearly a month while in a coma. His mother, Lori Webb, claims that her son's death was caused by the influenza vaccine.

On October 15, Chandler received his first flu shot ever as part of a routine physical prior to going on a mission trip for his church. The next day, Chandler began suffering from headaches and severe vomiting. The teenager, who had only just recently graduated from Brighton High school, was then hospitalized in Salt Lake City, where he subsequently fell into a coma.

After being in a coma for about a month, Chandler was taken off of life support, and he died on November 19, 2013, after spending 28 days in the hospital. Though doctors have yet to discuss the case, his mother says that the direct cause of death was swelling of the brain. Public health officials continue to emphasize the safety of the vaccine, despite serious side effects having been reported.

Lori has declined an autopsy for her son, considering that a pending brain biopsy will likely be sufficient to determine the cause of death. She said that neurologists at Intermountain Medical Center in Murray performed numerous tests on her son, but they were unable to find any cause or cure for his condition.

"Like with other medical procedures, there can be side effects and adverse reactions," Tom Hudachko, a spokesman for the Utah Department of Health, said. "In the vast majority of those cases the side effects are not very severe - soreness at the injection site, low fever, achiness. Occasionally, yes, there are more severe side effects from receiving the vaccine."

Sankar Swaminathan, chief of the division of infectious diseases at the University of Utah School of Medicine, says that, out of approximately 130 million people who get the flu vaccine nationwide per year, about 1,000 people report an adverse reaction, and 140 people report serious side effects. However, those numbers are likely under-representative, as many reactions go unreported.

Prior to receiving the flu shot, Chandler Webb was a healthy, active teenager who visited the gym five days a week. His sudden, unprecedented death has yet to be explained by the medical industry, but his mother is certain that the flu shot is to blame. "We're angry because we believe it's the flu shot that [caused] it," Lori said to the Salt Lake Tribune.

When he was taken off of life support, Chandler's last moments involved his mother cutting his hair for the last time and telling him the story of "The Three Billy Goats Gruff," which she would read to him as a child. "I can't describe how hard it is to lose a child," Lori said.
http://buzz.naturalnews.com/001080-flu_vaccine-life_support-Utah_teenager.html

___

__

Infektiotautien torjunta ja rokotukset

Infektiotautien torjunta ja rokotukset -yksikkö

• ohjaa, tukee ja kehittää infektiotautien kansallisia seurantajärjestelmiä sekä kansallista rokotusohjelmaa
• seuraa ja arvioi infektiotautien esiintyvyyttä ja infektiouhkia sekä rokotteiden väestötason vaikutuksia
• tukee ja tarvittaessa tekee epidemiaselvityksiä sekä laatii infektiotautien kansallisia torjuntaohjeita
• hankkii ja jakelee kansallisen rokotusohjelman rokotteet
• järjestää kansallista ja kansainvälistä koulutusta infektiotautien seurannasta ja torjunnasta sekä rokotuksista
• toimii osana kansainvälistä infektiotautien seurannan ja torjunnan viranomaisverkostoa (Euroopan tautikeskus ECDC, Maailman terveysjärjestö WHO).

Yhteystiedot

Taneli Puumalainen
yksikönpäällikkö, ylilääkäri
puh. 029 524 6080
sähköposti: etunimi.sukunimi@thl.fi

Postiosoite
Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos (THL)
Infektiotautien torjunta ja rokotukset -yksikkö
PL 30
00271 Helsinki

https://thl.fi/fi/thl/organisaatio/osastot-ja-yksikot/terveysturvallisuus/infektiotautien-torjunta-ja-rokotukset
_

Mia Kontio

Nimi: Mia Kontio
Virkanimike: erityisasiantuntija
Puh: 029 524 8365 
Sähköposti: etunimi.sukunimi@thl.fi

Asiantuntemus

• Virusten, erityisesti tuhkarokko-, sikotauti-, vihurirokko- ja hepatiitti A -viruksen molekyyliepidemiologia
• Tuhkarokon, sikotaudin ja vihurirokon vasta-ainetutkimukset

Päätehtävät

• Tuhkarokon, sikotaudin ja vihurirokon (MPR-taudit) seuranta ja torjunta
• Virusepidemioiden, erityisesti tuhkarokko-  ja hepatiitti A -epidemioiden selvitys
• Virologisten laboratoriotutkimusten menetelmäkehitys

Koulutus

• 2004 FM (perinnöllisyystiede), Helsingin yliopisto
• 1996 B.Sc. with Honours (biologia), Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Käynnissä olevat projektit

• Tuhkarokon, sikotaudin ja vihurirokon seuranta (MPR-seuranta)
• Labquality-laatunäyteyhteistyö
• Hepatiitti E -diagnostiikan menetelmäkehitys
• Rokottein torjuttavien virustautien seurannan kehittäminen
• VirusFight-käsihygieniatutkimus
• THL:n Infektiotaudit-verkkopalvelu  

Lisätietoa verkossa

• LinkedIn: Mia Kontio

___