Näytetään tekstit, joissa on tunniste MKultra. Näytä kaikki tekstit
Näytetään tekstit, joissa on tunniste MKultra. Näytä kaikki tekstit

perjantai 12. joulukuuta 2025

Elina Valtonen — Another ignoramus of Finland - MKUltra Mind Control

.

  • MKUltra Mind Control - 'selected parts of students' memories can be erased and replaced with a new reality, such as manipulated military history.'
  • The project was headed by Sidney Gottlieb but began on the order of CIA director Allen Dulles on April 13, 1953.Its aim was to develop mind-controlling drugs for use against the Soviet bloc,
  • Operation Midnight Climax
    - In 1974, The New York Times journalist Seymour Hersh published a story exposing the CIA's illegal spying on U.S. citizens and how the CIA had conducted non-consensual drug experiments. His report started the lengthy process of bringing long-suppressed details about MKUltra to light.

T=1765538222 / Human Date and time (GMT): Friday, 12th Dec. 2025, 11.17.

___


___ 


@elinavaltonen
In the past 100 years, no neighboring country of Russia has attacked Russia.
During the same period, Russia has invaded 19 countries.
Putin has given no reason to believe that Russia would change its imperialistic course.
Thank you for the interview,
https://x.com/elinavaltonen/status/1998026889420779706


___

Elina Valtonen — Another ignoramus of Finland

Elina Valtonen — Another ignoramus of Finland Maria Zaharova continues to lecture the so-called "elites" of Finland:

️️️Already, the second EU-woman has distinguished herself.

Finland's Foreign Minister Elina Valtonen stated:
"Over the past 100 years, Russia has attacked 19 neighbouring states, and no one has attacked it".

At the age of nine, the Valtonen family moved to Germany, where her father worked at a diplomatic mission. In Germany, Elina studied in local schools and, after returning to Finland in 1995, continued her education at a German school in Helsinki. Therefore, bilingualism is common in her family: Finnish and German; she also educates her children in Finnish and German.

Bachelor of Technical Sciences in Information Security Technology, Helsinki University of Technology (2004); Master of Economics, Helsinki School of Economics (2005).

I have a question for the government... no, it's useless. I have a question for the people of Finland: the fact that your Foreign Minister doesn't know that in 1941, Nazi Germany, led by Hitler, attacked the USSR, is it due to the influence on her of the German school and the infiltration of foreign agents into the Finnish government, or to the degradation of local democratic institutions, which recruit ignoramuses and incompetents to the highest state posts?

The option of "they just handed out a NATO manual" is the closest to the truth, but it's not accepted.

Specially for the fake minister Valtonen - a brief history of hybrid aggression of "Great Suomi" against Soviet Russia starting from 1918.

The first Finnish units invaded Russia in March 1918, but the Finnish government only deemed it necessary to declare war on Russia in May. By that time, the Finnish authorities had revived the Union of White Sea Karelians, established in 1906. The revived union conducted anti-Russian and anti-Soviet propaganda among Russian Karelians to enlist their support for the North Karelian State with its capital in Ukhta — a puppet entity under Helsinki's auspices on the temporarily occupied by Finnish troops territory of Russian Karelia.

The successful actions of the Red Army forced Helsinki to return the annexed territories. In October 1920, the RSFSR and Finland signed the Tartu Peace Treaty. At the negotiations, the Finns hoped to draw the eastern border of Finland from Lake Ladoga to the White Sea, but Soviet diplomacy firmly stood on the position of preserving the territorial integrity of the RSFSR. According to the treaty, the ice-free port of Petsamo (Pechora) went to Finland.

However, a year later, in October 1921, Finland again invaded Russia without declaring war. The ideological character of Finnish politics at that time is reflected in the name of such an organisation as "Brothers in Hatred" — a Finnish nationalist group that advocated for the "liberation" of the Karelians from the "Soviet occupation" and their unification with the Finns. Hatred for everything Russian was in fashion in Finland at that time.

Finnish units carried out sabotage, destroyed food supplies, bridges and government institutions, attacked units of the Red Army, and dealt with pro-Russian-minded Karelians. In the occupied territories, local men were mobilised for war against Russia, but this did not save the Finns from defeat. In March 1922, the RSFSR and Finland signed a new agreement on the recognition of borders.

Thus, before the war 1939-1940, Finland twice attacked Soviet Russia, harboring plans to seize Russian border lands populated by Finno-Ugric peoples (Karelians, Vepsians, and others).

In the near future, we will hand over to Valtonen a Finnish translation of the Russian Military-Historical Society publication "Black Book. A Brief History of Swedish and Finnish Russophobia".

️️️

Read also “Kill the Russians.” 105 years ago, the Finnish army staged the massacre in Vyborg

@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden

Boost


___





And once again, she's not kidding
.

She's still the Finnish Foreign Minister and still agrees, and hasn't removed her own false perception.
(GMT): Sunday, 10 May 2026 at 19:08:37



Elina ´Panda´Valtonen



"Over the past 100 years, Russia has attacked 19
neighbouring states, and no one has attacked it"
. (Speed 0.25x)


@elinavaltonen

In the past 100 years, no neighboring country of Russia has attacked Russia.
During the same period, Russia has invaded 19 countries.
Putin has given no reason to believe that Russia would change its imperialistic course.
Thank you for the interview,
https://x.com/elinavaltonen/status/1998026889420779706

 



@ivan_8848_Not About NATO_VALTONEN: 0:31/0.59. 
The biggest threat in the world is NATO (.mp4/8.67MB).


___


1 Dec, 2025 16:38

The EU’s top diplomat casually rewrites WWII history on her way to WWIII

Kaja Kallas’ striking ignorance – or willful revisionism – is precisely why no one is taking the bloc seriously anymore


Kaja Kallas, High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission. © Omar Havana/Getty Images



Oops. Kaja Kallas, the de facto EU foreign minister already notorious for her chirpy incompetence, has done it again: displayed such elementary ignorance that you have to rub your eyes and double-check before you believe it’s true. But – as always with her – it is.
This time, she has informed the world that Russia has not been attacked
by anyone for a hundred years
.





Those Nazi generals who planned Operation Barbarossa – the 1941 attack on the Soviet Union (and thus very much Russia) that left 27 million Soviet citizens dead – are probably spinning in their graves. Yes, blinded by prejudice and ideology (“values”) they badly underestimated the Russians (sounds familiar?) and lost (catastrophically). But having your whole 3-million-men-150-division operation wiped out Orwell-style?

And what about the many other Europeans who joined the Nazis, either from the beginning or later, with official contingents or as volunteers?
The Romanians, Finns, Italians, Spanish, Croatians, Belgians, French, Norwegians, Slovaks, Bulgarians, Hungarians, and, last but not least, Balts, such as from Kallas’s native Estonia?

And let’s not even start about those prickly Japanese! They, too, got a drubbing at the 1939 Nomonhan/Khalkhin Gol clash (and yes, it took place on the edge of Mongolia, a Soviet client state), but, again, pretending they never even tried?

Being historically illiterate to such an extent seems almost pitiable. Where geometry has made former German Foreign Minister Annalena “360 degrees” Baerbock intellectually immortal, it is history where Kallas reaches peak benightedness.

That is especially disturbing because failing so badly, in particular in the history of last century’s great wars, makes Kallas a very dangerous person. The reason is as simple as 1,2,3: Together, the last two World Wars – both caused by Europeans – cost up to over 81 million lives. We know that a third one would be even worse, whether fought “only” with very advanced and destructive conventional weapons (including AI, of course) or, as is more likely, escalating to the use of weapons of mass destruction (nuclear, chemical, biological, and cyber). A Third World War is likely to literally be our last, either forever or for the exceedingly long time it would take the survivors to make their way back from their caves to civilizations sophisticated enough to blow each other up again.

The Ukraine war – in reality, a Western proxy war against Russia and the emerging multipolar order, executed through misled, betrayed, sold-out, and now almost used-up Ukraine – has had the real potential to turn into World War Three. This risk has diminished with the second Trump administration, but it will only be gone once the war ends.

The NATO-EU Europeans, meanwhile, are doing their best to keep this war, its destruction, and its apocalyptic escalation potential going: they provide ever more weapons, cannot stop looking for sleazy ways to steal frozen Russian assets and fleece their own tax payers, urge for more Ukrainians to be thrown into the futile meatgrinder, and, last but not least, embolden the Zelensky regime to continue, no matter how much of its ubiquitous corruption is exposed.

The Atlanticists, i.e., deranged European “elites” that are staying this insane course, are hard to understand, since they do not follow reason, as their suicidal and yet persistent sanctions policy proves; their ethics are also utterly perverse, as their equally persistent complicity in Israel’s ongoing Gaza genocide illustrates.

Yet we can observe facets of their madness. One is that, clearly, to work so obstinately toward World War Three requires never having understood World War Two. That’s the one that ended with the first and only use in wartime of the kind of weapon that may well play a main role in a world-ending World War Three, too: When the US deliberately and entirely without military necessity massacred the populations of the two large Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it did not simply end a war by an enormous, shameful, and never acknowledged crime. It also opened the door to a future we all must pray will never arrive.

Regarding World War Two, EU de facto foreign minister Kallas, as so often, embodies NATO-EU European group-non-think as few others, revealing carelessly what slightly less ham-fisted operators still try to conceal.

Currently, she is doing her very worst to prevent peace from breaking out. While many leaders of NATO-EU Europe display what the Germans now call “Friedensangst” (the fear of peace), Kallas is second-to-none in her denial of reality, Russophobia, and, last but not least, bizarre over-estimation of the EU’s and her own personal influence. Demanding a place in negotiations the EU has deliberately stonewalled and calling for “concessions” from Russia as if the West and Ukraine were winning the war, Kallas has been publicly snubbed by the US.

Yet there is a method to her madness. Kallas’s inability to adequately process the present reflects her unusually pronounced inability to learn from the past. Only recently, speaking at a conference on security studies, she shared her dumb surprise at the fact that Russia and China believe they are among the victors of World War Two. Ironically, for Kallas, this is a dangerous “narrative,” clearly factually false in her eyes, and only successful with those who read little and don’t remember history all that well. She has felt many question marks in her head, she has informed us. If only she could grasp why.

In reality, both Russia and China played key roles in defeating the global fascist offensive that was at the core of World War Two. This is not the place for details – Kallas should feel strongly invited to finally read up on them (if she can) – but a few key facts will be enough: In Asia, World War Two started even earlier than in Europe, with Japanese aggression against China; the war also lasted longer.

Kallas is displaying a narrow-minded provincialism and a lousy education by reducing the struggle to that, as she put it, against the “Nazis.” 
That was the main story in Europe, but not in Asia, where the fight against Japanese fascism cost China an estimated 35 million lives. Kallas’s English is infamously rudimentary. She may want to try to improve it by making her way through, at least, historian Rana Mitter’s 
Forgotten Ally: China’s World War II, 1937-1945’. 

I am not sure she has ever read a whole book. If not, this would be a good first time. If she has, a second one is clearly required. And, for once, not some neo-Noltean tract by American history mangler and Ukraine War booster Tim Snyder.

The Soviet Union, with Russia at its core, suffered 27 million deaths. And without its staggering sacrifice and equally stunning efforts, Nazi Germany would not have been defeated: the preponderant share of its military forces were destroyed by Soviet soldiers on what the Germans called the Eastern Front. If they had not been ground down there, only two outcomes would have been possible: a Nazi empire would have survived or the US would have dropped atomic bombs on Germany as well.

Germans especially, among whom hating as well as underestimating Russia is all too fashionable again, would do well to remember a simple, little understood fact: it is precisely the Soviet victory over Germany by conventional arms that spared them a continuation of Nazi rule (though many may, of course, have welcomed that) or the fate of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Kallas, in any case, is not one for learning. Clearly combining the worst of bigoted eastern European nationalism and Brussels’s simple-minded hubris, she can’t even sense when she has made a fool of herself. How do we know? Because when challenged, she made things worse again.

Kallas produced her display of incompetence and condescension on the occasion of China’s 80th victory celebrations. Unsurprisingly, its representatives have been clear. Beijing Foreign Ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun condemned Kallas’s inanities as “full of ideological bias,” “without historical common sense,” displaying “disrespect,” and, last but not least, “harm[ing] the EU’s own interests.” The latter, of course, has never stopped Estonia’s most embarrassing export.

German EU parliamentarian Fabio de Masi, now co-leader of the New-Left BSW party, requested a clarification. In her response, Kallas managed to dig her hole even deeper: She claimed – untruthfully – that on the occasion of the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in Asia, the EU paid tribute also to the courage of the people of China, who endured immense suffering in defending their homeland and contributing to the end of the war.” In reality, she – and therefore the EU – had just done exactly the opposite: insulted China by explicitly denying its contribution. Kallas’s official job title is, in case she cannot remember, “Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.” She speaks and mis-speaks for the EU, even if that is a catastrophe that should never have happened.

Regarding Russia, Kallas did not even make the effort to pretend. Instead, she simply continued her silly attempt to deny its key contribution to defeating Nazism. Accusing Russia of manipulating history, she felt this was also the right occasion to also once again repeat the absurdity that the West did not provoke the war in Ukraine.

Clearly, Kallas’s latest sally is shocking but not a surprise. It fits perfectly with her personal record of blithely chattering about breaking up Russia. It also fits with a widespread mood among NATO-EU Europe’s “elites,” where disparaging Russia and Russians is as much de rigueur as a stupid romanticization of Ukraine, its far right, and nationalism. Where Kallas can hold high office, normality is anything but.

The real question is when this nightmare of ignorance, war hysteria, and arrogance will finally end in Europe. Because if it does not, Europeans will only have themselves – or, to be precise, their “elites” – to blame when most of the world will write them off not only as the people who helped Israel commit genocide in Gaza but also as simply very unserious: yesterday’s privileged, now economic lightweights led by political lightweights who are too lazy to notice how silly they look.

https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2025/12/the-eus-top-diplomat-casually-rewrites.html

___
eof

keskiviikko 7. lokakuuta 2020

THE CIA'S APPALLING HUMAN EXPERIMENTS WITH MIND CONTROL

 

  • Operation Midnight Climax was an operation carried out by the CIA as a sub-project of Project MKUltra, the mind-control research program that began in the 1950s.
  • It was initially established in 1954 by Sidney Gottlieb and placed under the direction of the Federal Narcotics Bureau in Boston, Massachusetts with the officer George Hunter White under the pseudonym of 'Morgan Hall'.
  • Every one of these acts was blatantly illegal and several significant operational techniques were developed in this theater, including extensive research into sexual blackmail, surveillance technology, and the possible use of mind-altering drugs in field operations.
  • The Operation Midnight Climax program was soon expanded, and CIA operatives began dosing people in restaurants, bars and beaches.
  • Before the programs were shut down, hundreds of scientists would work on them.


+ 5 Real CIA Experiments from Project MKULTRA - Video
+ Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein's Little Black Book


THE CIA'S APPALLING HUMAN EXPERIMENTS WITH MIND CONTROL

By Brianna Nofil

 
Distorted view of CIA Director Allen Dulles.
(Credit: Weegee(Arthur Fellig)/International Center of Photography/Getty Images)


ON APRIL 10, 1953, ALLEN DULLES, THE NEWLY APPOINTED DIRECTOR OF THE CIA, delivered a speech to a gathering of Princeton alumni. Though the event was mundane, global tensions were running high.

The Korean War was coming to an end, and earlier that week, The New York Times had published a startling story asserting that American POWs returning from the country may have been “converted” by “Communist brain-washers.”


Some GI’s were confessing to war crimes, like carrying out germ warfare against the Communists–a charge the U.S. categorically denied. Others were reportedly so brainwashed that they had refused to return to the United States at all. As if that weren’t enough, the U.S. was weeks away from secretly sponsoring the overthrow of a democratically elected leader in Iran.

Dulles had just become the first civilian director of an agency growing more powerful by the day, and the speech provided an early glimpse into his priorities for the CIA.
“In the past few years we have become accustomed to hearing much about the battle for men’s minds–the war of ideologies,” he told the attendees. “I wonder, however, whether we clearly perceive the magnitude of the problem, whether we realize how sinister the battle for men’s minds has become in Soviet hands,” he continued.
“We might call it, in its new form, ‘brain warfare.’

Dulles proceeded to describe the “Soviet brain perversion techniques” as effective, but “abhorrent” and “nefarious.” He gestured to the American POWs returning from Korea, shells of the men they once were, parroting the Communist propaganda they
had heard cycled for weeks on end. He expressed fears and uncertainty–were they using chemical agents?
Hypnosis? Something else entirely? “We in the West,” the CIA Director conceded, “are somewhat handicapped in brain warfare.”

This sort of non-consensual experiment, even on one’s enemies, was antithetical to American values, Dulles insisted, as well as antithetical to what should be human values.




Allen W. Dulles, director of the Central Intelligence Agency at an executive session of the Joint Congressional Atomic Energy Committee. (Credit: Bettmann/Getty Images)


Fear of brainwashing and a new breed of “brain warfare” terrified and fascinated the American public throughout the 1950s, spurred both by the words of the CIA and the stories of “brainwashed” G.I.’s returning from China, Korea, and the Soviet Union.


Newspaper headlines like “New Evils Seen in Brainwashing” and “Brainwashing vs. Western Psychiatry” offered sensational accounts of new mind-control techniques and technologies that no man could fully resist.


The paranoia began to drift into American culture, with books like The Manchurian Candidate and The Naked Lunch playing on themes of unhinged scientists and vast political conspiracies.

The idea of brainwashing also provided many Americans with a compelling, almost comforting, explanation for communism’s swift rise–that Soviets used the tools of brainwashing not just on enemy combatants, but on their own people.
Why else would so many countries be embracing such an obviously backward ideology?
American freedom of the mind versus Soviet “mind control” became a dividing line as stark as the Iron Curtain.
How did a secret government mind control program inadvertently fuel the use of psychedelic drugs in the 1960s?


MK-ULTRA

Three days after his speech decrying Soviet tactics, Dulles approved the beginning of MK-Ultra, a top-secret CIA program for “covert use of biological and chemical materials.” “American values” made for good rhetoric, but Dulles had far grander plans for the agency’s Cold War agenda.

MK-Ultra’s “mind control” experiments generally centered around behavior modification via electro-shock therapy, hypnosis, polygraphs, radiation, and a variety of drugs, toxins, and chemicals.

These experiments relied on a range of test subjects:
some who freely volunteered, some who volunteered under coercion, and some who had absolutely no idea they were involved in a sweeping defense research program.

From mentally-impaired boys at a state school, to American soldiers, to “sexual psychopaths” at a state hospital, MK-Ultra’s programs often preyed on the most vulnerable members of society.

The CIA considered prisoners especially good subjects, as they were willing to give consent in exchange for extra recreation time or commuted sentences.

Whitey Bulger, a former organized crime boss, wrote of his experience as an inmate test subject in MK-Ultra. “Eight convicts in a panic and paranoid state,” Bulger said of the 1957 tests at the Atlanta penitentiary where he was serving time.
“Total loss of appetite. Hallucinating. The room would change shape. Hours of paranoia and feeling violent. We experienced horrible periods of living nightmares and even blood coming out of the walls. Guys turning to skeletons in front of me.

I saw a camera change into the head of a dog. I felt like I was going insane.”



Gangster James "Whitey" Bulger's 1959 mugshot.
(Credit: Donaldson Collection/Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images)

Bulger claimed he had been injected with LSD. Lysergic acid diethylamide, or acid,had become one of the CIA’s key interests for its “brain warfare” program, as the agency theorized it could be useful in interrogations.

In the late 1940s, the CIA received reports that the Soviet Union had engaged in “intensive efforts to produce LSD,” and that the Soviets had attempted to purchase the world’s supply of the chemical.
One CIA officer described the agency as “literally terrified” of the Soviets’ LSD program, largely because of the lack of knowledge about the drug in the United States.
“[This] was the one material that we had ever been able to locate that really had potential fantastic possibilities if used wrongly,” the officer testified.

With the advent of MK-Ultra, the government’s interest in LSD shifted from a defensiveto an offensive orientation.
Agency officials noted that LSD could be potentially usefulin “[gaining] control of bodies whether they were willing or not.” The CIA envisioned applications that ranged from removing people from Europe in the case of a Soviet attack to enabling assassinations of enemy leaders. On November 18, 1953, a group of ten scientists met at a cabin located deep in the forests of Maryland. After extended discussions, the participants agreed that to truly understand the value of the drug, “an unwitting experiment would be desirable.”



Doctors Harry Williams and Carl Pfeiffer conducting an LSD Experiment.
(Credit: Bettmann/Getty Images)

CIA remained keenly aware of how the public would react to any discovery of MK-Ultra; even if they believed these programs to be essential to national security, they must remain a tightly guarded secret. How would the CIA possibly explain
dosing unassuming Americans with LSD?

“Precautions must be taken not only to protect operations from exposure to enemy forces but also to conceal these activities from the American public in general,” wrote the CIA’s Inspector General in 1957. “The knowledge that the Agency is engaging in unethical and illicit activities would have serious repercussions in political and diplomatic circles and would be detrimental to the accomplishment of its mission.”
 

OPERATION MIDNIGHT CLIMAX

The CIA’s initial experiments with LSD were fairly simple, if shockingly unethical.
The agency generally dosed single targets, finding volunteers when they could, sometimes slipping the drug into the drinks of fellow CIA employees. Over time these LSD experiments grew increasingly elaborate. Perhaps the most notorious of these projects was Operation Midnight Climax.



A view of the old CIA building. (Credit: Ed Clark/The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images)

In 1955, on 225 Chestnut Street, San Francisco, the CIA was devoting substantial attention to decorating a bedroom. George White oversaw the interior renovations. Not much of a decorator, White had a storied career in the Federal Bureau of Narcotics. When the CIA moved into drug experiments, bringing White on board became a top priority.

White hung up pictures of French can-can dancers and flowers. He draped lush redbedroom curtains over the windows. He framed a series of Toulouse-Lautrec posterswith black silk mats. For a middle-aged drug bureaucrat, each item evoked sex andglamour.

George White wasn’t building a normal bedroom, he was building a trap.

White then hired a Berkeley engineering student to install bugging equipment and atwo-way mirror. White sat behind the mirror, martini in hand, and waited for the action to begin.

Prostitutes would lure unsuspecting johns to the bedroom, where the men would be dosed with LSD and their actions observed by White from beyond the mirror.

As payment for their services the sex workers receive small amounts of cash, as wellas a guarantee from White that he’d intercede when the women inevitably had run-inswith law enforcement in the future.



George Hunter White, supervisor for the New England area of the Federal Narcotics Bureau. (Credit: Evelyn Straus/NY Daily News via Getty Images)

Though the CIA piloted these safe houses as a stage for testing the effects of LSD, White’s interest shifted to another element of his observations: the sex.
The San Francisco house became the center of what one writer called “the CIA carnal operations,” as officials began asking new questions about how to work with prostitutes, how they could be trained, and how they would handle state secrets.

The agency also analyzed when in the course of a sexual encounter information could best be extracted from a source, eventually concluding that it was immediately after sex.

But perhaps unsurprisingly, much of White’s actions were driven by pure voyeurism:
“I toiled wholeheartedly in the vineyards because it was fun, fun, fun,” White later said. “Where else could a red-blooded American boy lie, kill, cheat, steal, rape, and pillage with the sanction and blessing of the All-Highest?"


THE DEMISE OF MK-ULTRA

The CIA’s experiments with LSD persisted until 1963 before coming to a fairly anticlimactic end. In the spring of 1963, John Vance, a member of the CIA Inspector General’s staff, learned about the project’s “surreptitious administration to unwitting nonvoluntary human subjects.”
Though the MK-Ultra directors tried to convince the CIA’s independent audit board that the research should continue, the Inspector General insisted the agency follow new research ethics guidelines and bring all the programs on non-consenting volunteers to an end.


President Gerald Ford meeting with the family of Dr. Frank Olson in 1975.
(Credit: Bettmann/Getty Images)

In 1977, Senator Edward Kennedy oversaw congressional hearings investigatingthe effects of MK-Ultra. Congress brought in a roster of ex-CIA employees for questioning, interrogating them about who oversaw these programs, how participants were identified, and if any of these programs had been continued.

The Hearings turned over a number of disturbing details, particularly about the 1953 suicide of Dr. Frank Olson, an Army scientist who jumped out of a hotel window several days after unwittingly consuming a drink spiked with LSD.

Amid growing criminalization of drug users, and just a few years after President Nixon declared drug abuse as “public enemy number one,” the ironies of the U.S.’s troubling experimentation with drugs appeared in sharp relief.

But throughout the hearings, Congress kept hitting roadblocks: CIA staffers claimed they “couldn’t remember” details about many of the human experimentation projects, or even the number of people involved. The obvious next step would be to consult the records, but that presented a small problem: in 1973, amid mounting inquiries, the director of MK-Ultra told workers “it would be a good idea if [the MK-Ultra] files were destroyed.” Citing vague concerns about the privacy and “embarrassment” of participants, the men who crafted MK-Ultra effectively eradicated the paper recordfor one of the United States’ most obviously illegal undertakings.

A program born in secrecy would hold onto many of its secrets forever.


https://web.archive.org/web/20200615082731/https://www.history.com/mkultra-operation-midnight-climax-cia-lsd-experiments


___

Operation Midnight Climax

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

Operation Midnight Climax was an operation carried out by the CIA as a sub-project of Project MKUltra, the mind-control research program that began in the 1950s. It was initially established in 1954 by Sidney Gottlieb and placed under the direction of the Federal Narcotics Bureau in Boston, Massachusetts with the officer George Hunter White under the pseudonym of Morgan Hall.[1] Before the programs were shut down, hundreds of scientists would work on them.

History[edit]

The project that started in 1954 consisted of a web of CIA-run safehouses in San Francisco, Marin County, California, and New York City. It was established in order to study the effects of LSD on unconsenting individuals. Prostitutes on the CIA payroll were instructed to lure clients back to the safehouses, where they were surreptitiously plied with a wide range of substances, including LSD, and monitored behind one-way glass.

Every one of these acts was blatantly illegal and several significant operational techniques were developed in this theater, including extensive research into sexual blackmail, surveillance technology, and the possible use of mind-altering drugs in field operations.[2] The Operation Midnight Climax program was soon expanded, and CIA operatives began dosing people in restaurants, bars and beaches.[2] The safehouses were dramatically scaled back in 1963, following a report by CIA Inspector General John Earman which strongly recommended closing the facility. The San Francisco safehouses were closed in 1965, and the New York City safehouse soon followed in 1966.[citation needed]

In 1974, the journalist Seymour Hersh exposed the CIA's illegal spying on U.S. citizens and how the CIA had conducted non-consensual drug experiments. His report started the lengthy process of bringing long-suppressed details about MKUltra to light.[2] Project MKUltra came to light in the spring of 1977 during a wide-ranging survey of the CIA's Technical Services Division. John K. Vance, a member of the CIA inspector general's staff, discovered that the agency was running a research project that included administering LSD and other drugs to unwilling human subjects.[3]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Ornes, Stephen (4 August 2008). "Whatever Happened to... Mind Control?". Discover. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  2. ^ Jump up to:a b c Kamiya, Gary (1 April 2016). "When the CIA Ran a LSD Sex-house in San Francisco". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 23 October 2019.
  3. ^ Holley, Joe (16 June 2005). "John K. Vance; Uncovered LSD Project at CIA". Obituaries. The Washington Post. Retrieved 23 October 2019.

External links[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Midnight_Climax


___

Every one of these acts was blatantly illegal and several significant operational techniques were developed in this theater, including extensive research into sexual blackmail, surveillance technology, and the possible use of mind-altering drugs in field operations.


Angela Kasner, 18, with frieds at a New Year's Eve party in Berlin in 1972.
- None of these MKUltra / Operation Midnight Climax students trained as leaders, have children. They were sterilized because abortions would have delayed the execution of the program.
 

__

Angela Dorothea Merkel

- She has no children, but Sauer has two adult sons from a previous marriage.

Theresa Mary May

May has expressed regret that she and her husband have not been able to have children.

Dalia Grybauskaitė, President of Lithuania

Grybauskaitė is unmarried and has no children.

More Than 4,000 New MKUltra Documents Requested From CIA After Crowdfunding Campaign



___

5 Real CIA Experiments from Project MKULTRA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ff24-xGrSI

___



Here Is Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein's Little Black Book


Filed to: JEFFREY EPSTEIN




Donald Trump, Courtney Love, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak,
and uber-lawyer Alan Dershowitz may have been identified by a butler
as potential "material witnesses" to pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein's crimes against young girls, according to a copy of Epstein's
little black book obtained by Gawker.



Flight Logs Put Clinton, Dershowitz on Pedophile Billionaire’s
Sex Jet

Bill Clinton took repeated trips on the " Lolita Express"—the private passenger jet owned …



An annotated copy of the address book, which also contains entries for
  • Alec Baldwin,
  • Ralph Fiennes,
  • Griffin Dunne,
  • New York Post gossip Richard Johnson,
  • Ted Kennedy,
  • David Koch,
  • filmmaker Andrew Jarecki,

and all manner of other people you might expect a billionaire to know, turned up in court proceedings after Epstein's former house manager Alfredo Rodriguez tried to sell it in 2009.

About 50 of the entries, including those of many of Epstein's suspected victims and accomplices as well as Trump, Love, Barak, Dershowitz, and others, were circled by Rodriguez. (The existence of the book has been previously reported by the Daily Mail.

Gawker is publishing it in full here for the first time; we have redacted addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, and the last names of individuals who may have been underage victims.)









 

 

According to an FBI affidavit, Rodriguez described the address
book and the information contained within it as the "Holy Grail"
or "Golden Nugget" to unraveling Epstein's sprawling child-sex
network.


But despite having been subpoenaed for everything he
had on his former boss, Rodriguez didn't share it with the FBI
or Palm Beach Police Department detectives investigating Epstein.

Instead, he tried to make a $50,000 score by covertly peddling
the black book to one of the attorneys launching lawsuits at
Epstein on behalf of his victims.

Who is Jeffrey Epstein?
Click here for our primer about the billionaire pedophile.


he plot backfired when the attorney reported Rodriguez to the
FBI, and he was promptly charged with obstruction of justice.
But not before he had, according to the FBI affidavit laying out
the crime, marked up the book and an accompanying notepad
with "handwritten notes" that contained "information material
to the underlying investigation that would have been extremely
useful in investigating and prosecuting the case, including the
names and contact information of material witnesses and
additional victims."

Rodriguez, who spent 18 months in prison, died in December
after a long illness and never spoke out about the address book,
so the precise significance of the names he circled remains fuzzy.

But the FBI's case against him makes clear that Rodriguez
regarded the address book as crucial to understanding Epstein's
crimes; during a conversation with an undercover FBI agent
posing as a potential buyer, he "discussed in detail the information
contained in the book, and identified important information" to
the agent.


In addition to the names above, as well as scores of apparent
underage victims in Florida, New Mexico, California, Paris, and
the United Kingdom listed under the rubric of "massage," the
circled entries include:

  • Billionaire Leslie Wexner
  • Former New Mexico Governor Bruce King
  • Former New Mexico Governor and Democratic presidential hopeful
    Bill Richardson
  • Peter Soros, the nephew of George Soros
  • Former Miss Sweden and socialite New York City doctor Eva
    Andersson Dubin

Some of the circled entries include additional notes—one address
in New York City, for instance, is marked as an "apt. for models,"
and two names bear the marking "witness."

Asked why Rodriguez might have circled his name, Alan
Dershowitz told Gawker, "I've never seen the book and I have no
idea what it means. I was neither a victim nor a material witness—
I never witnessed any crimes or participated in any crimes, and I
can prove it."

Virginia Roberts, one of Epstein's alleged victims, has claimed in
repeated court filings that Epstein instructed her to have sex with
Dershowitz on several occasions, charges that Dershowitz
categorically denies.

Trump, through a spokesperson, said, "Mr. Trump only knew
Mr. Epstein as Mr. Trump owns the hottest and most luxurious
club in Palm Beach, [redacted], and Mr. Epstein would go there
on occasion."
Although Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew have been mentioned
in connection with Epstein's sordid deeds, their names aren't circled
in the black book. But Epstein did have 21 contact numbers and
various email addresses for Clinton, as well as several contact
numbers for the prince.



Nick Bryant is the author of The Franklin Scandal, the true story of a nationwide
pedophile ring that pandered children to a cabal of the rich and powerful, and the
co-author of Confessions of a D.C. Madam: The Politics of Sex, Lies, and Blackmail,
which will be published in March.



Additional reporting by J.K. Trotter. If you have information to share about Epstein's activities,
please email tips@gawker.com

Top image by Jim Cooke, photos via AP.




___
eof