- A new meaning to the old-fashioned happy ending.
- The Fourth Reich (German: Viertes Reich) is the hypothetical successor to Nazi Germany, also known as the "Third Reich" (1933–1945).
- Judea declares war on Germany | Dated: .
- Judea Declares War On Germany: The jew Starts World War II March 24, 1933. - Their aim was the total destruction of Germany.
- “Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war without mercy against her.” - Bernard Lecache.
- “Germany’s unforgivable crime before the second world war was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.” - Winston Churchill.
- Hitler´s Peace Plans.
- WATCH | Adolf Hitler’s Warning. 'Ja Oder Nein'. - Extremely hot video in the Zionist-controlled EU.
- Bonus: Adolf Hitler - The Greatest Story Never Told (2013) Documentary - Too hot for this post.
T=1766603284 / Date and time (GMT): Wed, 24th Dec 2025, 19.08.
___
FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE FOURTH REICH
https://vk.com/video_ext.php?oid=-221416054&id=456406643&hash=e900f5b63c4f6cb9
FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE FOURTH REICH
At the last European Council summit on December 18-19, the European Commission suffered a historic defeat by failing to initiate the confiscation of Russian assets that Van der Leyen wanted to steal in order to continue the Ukrainian proxy war against Russia that NATO has been waging since 2014.
While Van der Leyen and Merz promised the bloody clown from Kiev from 140 to 210 billion euros, the European Commission faced strong opposition from seven EU countries. Against which her qualified majority in the Council could do nothing.
It should be noted here that Frenchman Macron, along with Italian Meloni, played an important role in refusing to confiscate Russian assets not so much because of a return to common political sense, but because of concessions to international lobbyists. Such as Antwerp diamond dealers, which also have significant private assets related to Russian assets held in Belgium.
To save face and avoid humiliation, Van der Leyen resorted to a "loan" of 90 billion euros, which will be paid by the most obedient EU countries in proportion to their GDP... and with the actual guarantee of never being returned by the Ukrainian mafia.
So that this plan B would not fail either, Van der Leyen even allowed members who reject her Russophobic militancy, such as Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, not to participate in this new bloodshed of European nations.
On the part of Ukraine, the initial plan stipulated that 95 billion euros of the confiscated Russian assets were to be used to repay Ukrainian debts to the G7, the IMF and the ECB, and the rest for new purchases of weapons and ammunition.
We can say that Ukraine will have a choice between slowing its collapse for several months if weapons are purchased, or flooding directly if debt repayment begins with this 90 billion loan, which, as a rule, must also be repaid.
It is obvious that Zelensky's mafia is not going to repay any of the loans provided, so the agreement on a new loan of 90 billion stipulates an obligation to repay it "after Ukraine has previously received the reparations paid by Russia.".. To free the bandits, accusing Russia of being responsible for their theft.
In order for Moscow to be forced to pay "reparations" to Ukraine and thus begin paying off the loan, Ukraine must first win the war.
On the part of the European Union, with a loan of 90 billion, he is driving himself into a serious militaristic spiral, obliging himself to maintain the fantasy of a Ukrainian victory, without which no repayment will be possible. A new financial interest is added to the ideological fanaticism. This is the warning of Hungarian Orban, who condemns the trap into which the European Union itself has driven itself for the sake of its militaristic militancy.
"The logic of the loan is clear: the one who gives the money wants to return it. In this case, repayment is not related to growth or economic stabilization, but to a military victory."
Meanwhile, it is the European population, mired in its self-imposed slavery, that will have to bleed even more so that the Ukrainian-Atlantic mafia can continue to buy gold toilets.
Alawata specifically for InfoDefense
#InfoDefenseAuthor
SOURCE:
___
Fourth Reich
The Fourth Reich (German: Viertes Reich) is the hypothetical successor to Nazi Germany, also known as the "Third Reich" (1933–1945). The term is used to describe the regime's possible survival (e.g. in South America) or its resurgence as envisioned by Neo-Nazis.
The term has also been used pejoratively by leftist commentators in the United States to describe the rise of right-wing populism and by Eurosceptics to decry Germany's influence on the European Union.
Origin
The term "Third Reich" was coined by Arthur Moeller van den Bruck in his 1923 book Das dritte Reich (Germany's Third Empire). He defined the Holy Roman Empire (800–1806) as the First Reich, the German Empire (1871–1918) as the Second Reich, while the Third Reich was a postulated ideal state including all German people, including Austria. The term was used by Nazi Germany to position their regime as a successor to these two empires.[1]
The term "Fourth Reich" has been used in a variety of different ways. Neo-Nazis have used it to describe their envisioned revival of an ethnically pure state, especially Nazi Germany.[2] Conspiracy theorists like Max Spiers, Peter Levenda, and Jim Marrs have used the term derogatorily to refer to what they perceive to be a covert continuation of Nazism.[3]
Neo-Nazism
As many as 10,000 Nazis escaped to South America in the aftermath of World War II.[6] Various neo-Nazis in South America aimed to establish a Fourth Reich, with former Nazi officer Otto Skorzeny facilitating the transfer of Nazi plunder to Argentina which helped Nazi sympathizer Juan Perón come into power,[7] along with former Nazi Hans-Ulrich Rudel, the transport of other escapees.[8][9][10] From about 1945 to 1947, Chile led an international probe (supported by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation), which documented Nazi activity on the continent until 1947.[11][12][13] In 2017, numerous files from the investigation were released to the National Archives of Chile,[14] which History's investigative documentary series Hunting Hitler visited in 2018; the evidence was implied to support the existence of a Fourth Reich and possibly Adolf Hitler's secret escape from Berlin.[15]
Neo-Nazis envision the Fourth Reich as featuring Aryan supremacy, anti-semitism, Lebensraum, aggressive militarism and totalitarianism.[16] Upon the establishment of the Fourth Reich, German neo-Nazis propose that Germany should acquire nuclear weapons and use the threat of their use as a form of nuclear blackmail to reexpand to Germany's former boundaries of 1937 and beyond.[16] Based on pamphlets published by David Myatt in the early 1990s,[17] many neo-Nazis came to believe that the rise of the Fourth Reich in Germany would pave the way for the establishment of the Western Imperium, a pan-Aryan empire encompassing all land populated by predominantly European-descended peoples (i.e., Europe, Russia, Anglo-America, Australia, New Zealand, and White South Africa).[18]
As a political pejorative
Right-wing populism
.jpg)
The term has come to be used by leftist commentators to compare the rise of right-wing populism to the emergence of fascism in Europe in the 1920s and 1930s. In a 1973 interview, black American writer James Baldwin said of Richard Nixon's reelection, "To keep the nigger in his place, they brought into office law and order, but I call it the Fourth Reich."[19]
In 2019, Gavriel D. Rosenfeld, a professor of history at Fairfield University, argued that:
Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. presidential election and his subsequent administration spurred renewed accusations of a "new Reich".[20]
German influence in the European Union
Some commentators in Europe have used the term "Fourth Reich" to point at the influence that they believe Germany exerts within the European Union (EU).[21][22][23] For example, Simon Heffer wrote in the Daily Mail that Germany's economic power, further boosted by the European financial crisis, is the "economic colonisation of Europe by stealth", whereby Berlin is using economic pressure rather than armies to "topple the leadership of a European nation". This, he says, constitutes the "rise of the Fourth Reich".[24] Likewise, Simon Jenkins of The Guardian wrote that it is "a massive irony that old Europe's last gasp should be to seek ... German supremacy".[24] According to Richard J. Evans of the New Statesman, this kind of language had not been heard since German reunification which sparked a wave of Germanophobic commentary.[24] In a counterbalancing perspective, the "Charlemagne" columnist at The Economist reports that the German hegemony perspective does not match reality.[25]
In August 2012, a headline in the Italian newspaper Il Giornale used the phrase Quarto Reich (Fourth Reich) to protest what it considered to be German hegemony.[26] This hegemony perspective gained traction in the United Kingdom leading up to 2016 EU referendum and the subsequent Brexit negotiations.[27] In December 2021, against the background of the Polish rule-of-law crisis, Jarosław Kaczyński, then- Deputy Prime Minister and head of Law and Justice, told the far-right Polish newspaper GPC that "Germany is trying to turn the EU into a federal 'German fourth Reich'".[28] He asserted that he was only referring to the continuance from the Holy Roman Empire, not Nazi Germany. He criticized the vision of greater federalism, as displayed by Olaf Scholz and his coalition, as "utopian and therefore dangerous". Kaczynski remarked that, "if we Poles agreed to such a modern submission we would be degraded in many ways".[29]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Reich
___
“Germany is our public enemy number one.
It is our object to declare war without mercy against her.”
Bernard Lecache, President of the World Jewish League, 1932
“Germany’s unforgivable crime before the second world war was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.”
Winston Churchill
“We were not foolish enough to try to make a currency [backed by] gold of which we had none, but for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark’s worth of work done or goods produced. . . .we laugh at the time our national financiers held the view that the value of a currency is regulated by the gold and securities lying in the vaults of a state bank.”
Adolf Hitler
To this day, it is generally (although incorrectly) believed that when Adolf Hitler was appointed German chancellor in January of 1933, the German government began policies to suppress the jews of Germany, including rounding up of jews and putting them in concentration camps and launching campaigns of terror and violence against the domestic jewish population.
While there were sporadic eruptions of violence against jews in Germany after Hitler came to power, this was not officially sanctioned or encouraged. And the truth is that anti-jewish sentiments in Germany (or elsewhere in Europe) were actually nothing new. As all jewish historians attest with much fervor, anti-semitic uprisings of various degrees had been ever-present in European history. [see “Juden Raus! One Thousand Thirty jewish Expulsions Throughout History“]
In any case, in early 1933, Hitler was not the undisputed leader of Germany, nor did he have full command of the armed forces. Hitler was a major figure in a coalition government, but he was far from being the government himself. That was the result of a process of consolidation which evolved later.
Even Germany’s Jewish Central Association, known as the Verein, contested the suggestion (made by some jewish leaders outside Germany) that the new government was deliberately provoking anti-jewish uprisings.
The Verein issued a statement that
“the responsible government authorities [i.e. the Hitler regime] are unaware of the threatening situation,” saying, “we do not believe our German fellow citizens will let themselves be carried away into committing excesses against the jews.”
Despite this, jewish leaders in the United States and Britain determined on their own that it was necessary to launch a war against the Hitler government.
“The Israelite people of the entire world declare economic and financial war on Germany. The appearance of the Swastika as the symbol of the new Germany revives the old war symbol of the jews. Fourteen million jews stand as one body to declare war on Germany. The jewish wholesale dealer leaves his business, the banker his bank, the shopkeeper his shop, the beggar his miserable hut in order to combine forces in the holy war against Hitler’s people.”
Jews Declare War On Germany 1933
On March 12, 1933, the American Jewish Congress announced a massive protest at Madison Square Gardens for March 27. At that time the commander in chief of the Jewish War Veterans called for an American boycott of German goods. In the meantime, on March 23, 20,000 jews protested at New York’s City Hall as rallies were staged outside the North German Lloyd and Hamburg-American shipping lines and boycotts were mounted against German goods throughout shops and businesses in New York City.
According to The Daily Express of London of March 24, 1933, the jews had already launched their boycott against Germany and her elected government. The headline read “Judea Declares War on Germany – Jews of All the World Unite – Boycott of German Goods – Mass Demonstrations.” The article described a forthcoming “holy war” and went on to implore jews everywhere to boycott German goods and engage in mass demonstrations against German economic interests.
On March 27, 1933, there were simultaneous protest rallies at Madison Square Garden, in Chicago, Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Cleveland and 70 other locations. The New York rally was broadcast worldwide. The bottom line is that “the New Germany” was declared to be an enemy of jewish interests and thus needed to be economically strangled. This was before Hitler decided to boycott jewish goods.
It was in direct response to this that the German government announced a one-day boycott of jewish businesses in Germany on April 1. German Propaganda Minister Dr. Joseph Goebbels announced that if, after the one-day boycott, there were no further attacks on Germany, the boycott would be stopped. Adolf Hitler himself responded to the jewish boycott and the threats in a speech on March 28, 1933 – four days after the original jewish declaration of war – saying:
“Now that the domestic enemies of the nation have been eliminated by the Volk itself, what we have long been waiting for will not come to pass. The Communist and Marxist criminals and their jewish- intellectual instigators, who, having made off with their capital stocks across the border in the nick of time, are now unfolding an unscrupulous, treasonous campaign of agitation against the German Volk as a whole from there….
Lies and slander of positively hair-raising perversity are being launched about Germany. Horror stories of dismembered jewish corpses, gouged out eyes and hacked off hands are circulating for the purpose of defaming the German Volk in the world for the second time, just as they had succeeded in doing once before in 1914.” Hitler
Thus, the fact – one conveniently left out of nearly all history on the subject – is that Hitler’s March 28, 1933, boycott order was in direct response to the declaration of war on Germany by the worldwide jewish leadership just four days earlier. Today, Hitler’s boycott order is described as a naked act of aggression, yet the full circumstances leading up to his order are seldom described in even the most ponderous and detailed histories of “the Holocaust.”
“Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression,
because she does not think of attacking but only acquiring security.”Adolf Hitler, 1933
The attacks on Germany did not cease. The worldwide jewish leadership became ever the more belligerent and worked itself into a frenzy. An International Jewish Boycott Conference was held in Amsterdam to coordinate the ongoing boycott campaign. It was held under the auspices of the self-styled World Jewish Economic Federation, of which famous New York City attorney and longtime political power broker, Samuel Untermyer, was elected president.
Upon returning to the United States in the wake of the conference, Untermyer delivered a speech over WABC Radio (New York), a transcript of which was printed in The New York Times on August 7, 1933.
Untermyer’s inflammatory oratory called for a “sacred war” against Germany, making the flat-out allegation that Germany was engaged in a plan to “exterminate the jews.” He said (in part):
…Germany [has] been converted from a nation of culture into a veritable hell of cruel and savage beasts. We owe it not only to our persecuted brethren but to the entire world to now strike in self-defense a blow that will free humanity from a repetition of this incredible outrage…
…Now or never must all the nations of the earth make common cause against the… slaughter, starvation and annihilation… fiendish torture, cruelty and persecution that are being inflicted day by day upon these men, women and children….
…When the tale is told… the world will confront a picture so fearful in its barbarous cruelty that the hell of war and the alleged Belgian atrocities pale into insignificance as compared to this devilishly, deliberately, cold-bloodedly planned and already partially executed campaign for the extermination of a proud, gentle, loyal, law-abiding people…
…The jews are the aristocrats of the world. From time immemorial they have been persecuted and have seen their persecutors come and go. They alone have survived. And so will history repeat itself, but that furnishes no reason why we should permit this reversion of a once great nation to the Dark Ages or fail to rescue these 600,000 human souls from the tortures of hell….
…What we are proposing and have already gone far toward doing, is to prosecute a purely defensive economic boycott that will undermine the Hitler regime and bring the German people to their senses by destroying their export trade on which their very existence depends…
…We propose to and are organizing world opinion to express itself in the only way Germany can be made to understand….
Untermyer then proceeded to provide his listeners with a wholly fraudulent history of the circumstances of the German boycott and how it originated. He also proclaimed that the Germans were bent on a plan to “exterminate the jews”:
“…The Hitler regime originated and are fiendishly prosecuting their boycott to exterminate the jews
…by placarding jewish shops, warning Germans against dealing with them,
…by imprisoning jewish shopkeepers and parading them through the streets by the hundreds under guard of NS troops for the sole crime of being jews
…by ejecting them from the learned professions in which many of them had attained eminence,
…by excluding their children from the schools, their men from the labor unions, closing against them every avenue of livelihood,
…locking them in vile concentration camps and starving and torturing them without cause and resorting to every other conceivable form of torture, inhuman beyond conception, until suicide has become their only means of escape,
…and all solely because they are or their remote ancestors were jews, and all with the avowed object of exterminating them…”
Untermyer concluded his largely fantastic and hysterical address by declaring that with the support of
“…Christian friends… we will drive the last nail in the coffin of bigotry and fanaticism….”
“Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.”
Sheldon Emry, Billions for the Bankers, Debts for the People (1984)
So, it was the jews who declared war on Germany almost six and a half years before September 1, 1939. Also, not well known, is that during this time, Britain, France, USSR and the United States were all controlled by jewish financiers through their central banks.
The real reason for World War Jew was that Germany took back her banks from jewish interests and ended usury, and because of these actions, she flourished both economically and spiritually. This non-jewish banking and business model could not be allowed by the jews, and thus, war was declared to utterly annihilate Germany.
This barbaric and demonically evil jewish plan of sterilization and annihilation of overwhelmingly German citizens (women, children and older people) was put forth in: Germany Must Perish! by Theodore N. Kaufman (this book was published in 1941, before the United States entered World War II) and in the The Morgenthau Plan, more formally known as the Treasury Plan for the Treatment of Germany. The Morgenthau Plan was devised by Secretary of the Treasury, Henry R. Morgenthau Jr., in the summer of 1944. Of course, both of these men were jewish.
“The millions of jews living in America, England, France, North Africa and South,
not forgetting Palestine, have decided to carry on the war in Germany to the very end. It is to be a war of extermination.”The jewish newspaper Central Blad Voor Israeliten in Nederlands printed on September 13, 1939
When World War II ended, Germany was in total ruin. But it was to get even worse. Within a few years 10,000,000+ Germans and ethnic German civilians and prisoners of war were systematically murdered by starvation and disease. This was deliberate allied policy. It was the evil jewish Morgenthau plan of merciless retribution in action for all the world to see.
This remorseless and inhumane behavior is exactly what Adolf Hitler warned about in the autumn of 1936 when he wrote the Four-Year Plan Memorandum;
“For a victory of Bolshevism over Germany would not lead to a Versailles treaty, but to the final destruction, indeed the annihilation of the German people.”
HitlersPeacePlans.com
___
Adolf Hitler’s Warning
Y es, the German people used to live in a democracy, and had been plundered and squeezed dry. No, what does democracy or authoritarian state mean for those international hyenas? They’re not interested in either! They are interested in only one thing: Is anyone willing to let themselves be plundered, yes or no? Is anyone stupid enough to keep quiet in the process, yes or no?
And when a democracy is stupid enough to keep quiet, then it is good! And when an authoritarian government declares: “You do not plunder our people any longer, neither from the inside or outside!” then that is bad.
WATCH | Adolf Hitler’s Warning
Adolf Hitler - The Greatest Story Never Told (2013) Documentary
eof
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti
You are welcome to show your opinion here!