Islamic Sharia Law Legally Valid in Austrian Civil Disputes, Vienna Court Rules
A court in Vienna ruled this week that Islamic Sharia law can be legally upheld in Austria in civil disputes, sparking accusations that the nation’s Christian values are being undermined by multiculturalism.
The Vienna Regional Court for Civil Law Matters has upheld the findings of a Sharia arbitration tribunal concerning a civil dispute between two men in Austria, with the group of informal Islamic mediators ruling that one owed the other €320,000 ($372,000).
The man appealed to the Vienna court, arguing that Sharia diktats have no standing in Austria and that the Islamic code violated the constitutional rights of the European country.
Yet, according to Kronen Zeitung, Vienna judges found that it was permissible for private individuals to settle civil disputes through the manner they saw fit, and that Sharia arbitration did not violate the basic law of Austria.
However, the court noted that this would only apply to civil matters and that Sharia is not applicable in criminal cases. Nevertheless, critics warned that the ruling demonstrated an erosion of the Western liberties and Christian ethics upon which Austria was founded.
Upper Austrian deputy governor Manfred Haimbuchner of the populist Freedom Party said that “Sharia is incompatible with our core values,” and added that the case was “another example of how our legal system and our constitutional state have nothing to counter the gradual appropriation of Islam.”
Variously called Sharia courts, tribunals, and councils, the arbitration bodies have established a presence in many European countries with a Islamic migrant population, including in the United Kingdom where they have been operating at least since the 1980s. A 2018 report found the UK government doesn’t know how many so-called Sharia courts operate in the UK and identified women’s safety concerns.
The Austria case comes in the wake of a bombshell report from the French government earlier this year, which found that the radical Muslim Brotherhood network has spent decades engaging in a “Western conquest strategy” with the ultimate aim of instituting Sharia in European nations.
Austria was explicitly cited in the report as a central region of operation for the Muslim Brotherhood, given its history as one of the “first lands of establishment of the movement” in Europe.
The French intelligence found that the effective fifth column operations engaged in by the Islamist group specifically aimed to use Western liberal values to further their aims, infiltrating EU and other government institutions to push concepts such as “Islamophobia” — a term coined by the Muslim Brotherhood.
This week, Brussels attempted to defend its decision to hand out more than €17 million ($20m) for Islamic-related projects, including research into Sharia and the supposed rise of Islamophobia in Europe through grants from the European Research Council (ERC).
This included €2.5 million ($2.9m) given to the French National Centre for Scientific Research to study the supposed evolution of Sharia and €2.3 million ($2.7m) provided to Bilgi University in Istanbul, Turkey, to track rising populist sentiment and Islamophobia in European countries, according to Euronews.
Italian MEP Silvia Sardone and French MEP Jean-Paul Garraud, both of the populist-right Patriots for Europe group in the European Parliament, accused the Commission of wasting public funds and of demonstrating bias in favour of Islamic narratives.
EU Commissioner for research, Ekaterina Zaharieva, of the neo-liberal European People’s Party, defended the grants, claiming that they funded “world-class scholarly undertakings that advance the frontiers of knowledge” and said that the “sole criterion for funding is the scientific excellence of the proposal.”
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/08/22/islamic-sharia-law-legally-valid-in-austrian-civil-disputes-vienna-court-rules/
Follow Kurt Zindulka on X: Follow @KurtZindulka or e-mail to: kzindulka@breitbart.com
___
Sharia Law Now Legal in Austria – What Next For Europe?
Vienna Regional Court just upheld a contract based on Islamic sharia law, a decision which has sparked uproar across Austria, Europe, and the West. At face value a one-off exception, the precedent set by the ruling raises concerns that parallel legal systems are beginning to creep into the heart of Western democracies. The case centred around the enforcement of a €320,000 financial ruling under sharia contractual terms, and has been described as “deeply concerning” by politicians stating that it risks undermining the primacy of national law.
How Was Islamic Law Upheld in Austria?
A contract drawn up explicitly under Islamic law between two business partners was deemed valid and enforceable within Austria’s legal framework. And, while it’s true that Austrian law has occasionally recognised private religious agreements in specific cases in the past, this ruling appears to have gone much further. Effectively, the court endorsed the binding power of sharia principles in civil disputes.
For what seems like a majority of observers, it crossed a dangerous line.
And for the Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP), the ruling has been called “deeply concerning” pointing out that sharia law contains provisions that stand in direct contradiction with European values and legal equality – such as rules concerning women, inheritance and family rights. The ÖVP immediately announced new measures aimed at preventing similar cases, warning that Austria’s rule of law cannot be eroded by parallel systems.
Meanwhile, the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) said in a press statement that “the ruling elevates Islamic parallel societies in Austria and weakens those forces that do not want to submit to Islam. A sad day for the secular constitutional state“. A party member echoed the sentiment, writing that “sharia law is incompatible with the Austrian understanding of law and violates all moral standards that I am familiar with.”
And even the Turkish Cultural Community (TKG) protested the decision to recognise sharia law, highlighting that the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) had previously decided in 2003 that sharia law and the resulting introduction of parallel legal systems were in fact forbidden in Europe. The TKG’s general secretary wrote “the Vienna court’s decision is a major intervention, today in the secular economy, tomorrow perhaps in production, service, and sales regulations“
A Divided Reaction
Those who support the ruling argue that individuals should have the freedom to enter into contracts using whatever framework they wish, as long as it does not directly break Austrian law. They see this as a simple recognition of a contract while respecting multiculturalism and freedom of religion.
Opponents, including politicians and legal scholars, meanwhile warn of a slippery slope. If Austrian courts legitimise a business contract based on sharia law, then what other “agreements” made under sharia law will they enforce? What about divorce proceedings, inheritance disputes or custody battles? Once a parallel legal system gains recognition – which in this specific case, it has – critics worry that it could gradually expand beyond business contracts and begin challenging European law as a whole.
Case Study: What Happens When Laws Collide?
To understand the implications of this ruling, it’s important to understand an example of how the laws differ so vastly. For example, regarding inheritance:
- In Austrian law, children (sons and daughters equally) are entitled to equal shares of a parent’s estate. Spouses (male and female) also have protected rights.
- Under sharia law, however, daughters tend to only inherit half of what the sons do, and widows receive less than male relatives
So, if Austrian courts continue to recognise wills or contracts based on sharia values, families are likely to be drawn into bitter disputes where women are denied equal protection that Austrian law has guaranteed for decades. For many Europeans, this case study is just one example of how allowing sharia rulings to enter the legal system is a dangerous precedent, highlighting how the hard-won principles of equality are at risk of being replaced by religious codes imported from abroad.
Austria: A Country at the Crossroads
The country has long struggled trying to balance integration with cultural autonomy, especially given its growing Muslim population. Despite not being a new debate in terms of cultural differences and how best to manage them, the idea that Islamic law can be applied within a European court appears to have struck a nerve.
Other commentators have warned that this is not just about Austria. It’s easy for some to imagine this precedent rippling across the continent, given the EU’s interconnected legal systems. If it’s legally possible to uphold sharia-based contracts, then what’s stopping France, Belgium, or Germany from following suit?
European cities are already experiencing growing pressure from Islamist groups to gain local recognition for sharia arbitration in family or financial matters. The Austrian court ruling in this case is likely to embolden these efforts, and risks fragmenting legal standards within Europe’s borders.
Worries of a Growing Islamic Influence
At the heart of this single legal case is a deeper cultural anxiety: is Islam slowly reshaping European society, and its laws, from within?
For many critics, this ruling feels less like a one-off case and more like another piece of evidence of a quiet but growing influence over the West. Each legal victory is said to chip away at Europe’s secular, historic traditions, and begins to raise questions about who sets the rules. And the continuation of accommodating demands for Islamic traditions and laws to be recognised, is not easing minds worried about the cultural shift taking place.
So, What Next?
The Austrian government has promised legislative action to reaffirm the primacy of Austrian law over any religious code. However, for many, the damage may already be done, with Europe now forced to confront the question of how far multicultural accommodation should really be going.
This ruling may be solved by the government taking aforementioned action. But it also may prove to be a watershed moment, not just for Austria, but for Europe as a whole. Older generations say that this ruling represents an erosion of the legal certainty that has lingered their entire lives, and younger Europeans (particularly those worried about future freedoms) are asking: if national courts can validate sharia law today, what laws will govern our lives in future?
Is This a Warning for Europe?
The broader issue here goes far beyond the business contract. It asks the question about who makes the rules of a country – democratically elected parliaments, or imported religious codes? As critics point out, Europe’s legal systems were built over centuries to defend secular democracy and protect individual rights. Diluting that foundation, even in isolated cases, risks setting a precedent that could fundamentally change Europe’s society and character.
Final Thought
The Austrian ruling may appear like a technical decision, but the consequences of it could turn out profound and far-reaching. Whether Europe manages to draw a line here or not may well determine its cultural future, which many already fear looks bleak.
Join the Conversation
Where do we go from here? What do you think about Islamic law being upheld in a European court? Do you support or oppose this ruling? Tell us in the comments.
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help to keep the lights on with The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful and truthful journalism?
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
try to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuses to.
The government does not fund us
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the Mainstream Media.
Instead, we rely solely on your support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy.
Please choose your preferred method below to show your support.
.jpg)
