lauantai 14. helmikuuta 2015

Die Grundregulation nach Pischinger oder: Der Pischinger Raum


Dr. Alfred Pischinger war österreichischer Arzt und lebte von 1899 bis 1983.
Pischingers Lehre einer Grundregulation des Organismus über das Bindegewebe hatte revolutionäre Folgen. Pischinger zeigte mit seinen Studien und Theorien, das was bis dahin viele wussten, aber nicht exakt formulieren konnten, nämlich dass der Körper viel komplizierter ist als das aufwändigste Uhrwerk.
Pischinger belegte, dass der Körper aus vielen biologischen Systemen besteht, die alle miteinander vernetzt sind. Zwischen diesen Systemen besteht ein ständiger Austausch von Informationen in Form von Stoffen und Energie.
Die Zufuhr einer bestimmten „Energie“ – egal ob Medikamente, Wärme oder Strahlung wirkt demnach nicht nur an einer bestimmten Stelle, sondern deren Information breitet sich buchstäblich blitzschnell im gesamten Organismus aus.

Das „Problem“ Bindegewebe

Das wichtigste Medium für die Informationsausbreitung zwischen den System ist nach Pischinger die extrazelluläre Flüssigkeit im Bindegewebe. Dieser „Raum“ außerhalb der Zellen mit den Bindegewebszellen bezeichnet man heute auch als „Pischinger Raum“. Andere Namen dafür sind auch: Grundsubstanz, Zellmatrix, Gewebematrix oder auch einfach nur „Die Matrix“.
Diese Matrix besteht aus den unterschiedlichen Zellen, der strukturierten Zwischenzellsubstanz, außerdem umfasst sie Nervenenden, die offenen Lymphbahnen und die Endstrombahn des menschlichen Gefäßsystems.
Die von bestimmten Zellen gebildete Grundsubstanz ist das zentrale Regulationsorgan des menschlichen Organismus: hier werden alle Stoffe "gefiltert" jede Zelle zur Verarbeitung und zum Leben benötigen.


Bindegewebe mit zellulären und extrazellulären Anteilen:

Ausschnitt aus dem Bindegewebe mit fixen und mobilen Zellen. Alle Strukturen werden von Grundsubstanz umgeben














1.    Plasmazelle   
2.    Elastische Faser    
3.    Mastzelle    
4.    Makrophage    
   5.    Nervenfaser    
   6.    Grundsubstanz    
   7.    Kollagenfibrillen
   8.    Neutrophiler Granulozyt
   9.    Retikulinfasern
   10.  Fibroblast
   11.  Kapillare mit Endothelzellen
   12.  Fettzelle


Der Zustand bzw. die Struktur dieses Gewebes beeinflusst die Körperzellen und ihre Funktion, genauso wie die verschiedenen Funktionen der Zellen die Struktur des Bindegewebes verändern.
Das Bindegewebe hat neben der Transportfunktion auch die Fähigkeit, die verschiedensten Stoffwechselprodukte zu binden und vorzufiltern. Dieser Filterfunktion übernehmen die sog. Proteoglykane in der Grundregulation nach Pischinger.
Proteoglykane verbinden die Kollagenfasern in der Matrix (Grundsubstanz) miteinander. Diese Proteoglykane sind aufgefasert und hängen an einer zentralen Eiweißkette. Das Ganze können Sie sich ungefähr so vorstellen wie eine Flaschenbürste oder eine Toilettenbürste.
Und sicherlich kennen Sie das Problem, dass Sie Ihre Toilettenbürste nicht mehr dadurch sauber bekommen, indem Sie diese nur im Wasser der Toilette schwenken.


Abb.1: Die schwarzen länglichen "Striche" sind die Fasern des Bindegewebes. Die dunklen Punkte sind vor allem Mastzellen.

Für Nicht-Mediziner waren die bisherigen Ausführungen vielleicht etwas "medizinisch". Lassen Sie es mich nochmal etwas bildhafter ausdrücken - in einer Art Zusammenfassung:
Wir haben verschiedene Arten von Zellen im Körper. Jede Zelle muss mit Nährstoffen und Sauerstoff versorgt werden.

Wie kommen diese Nährstoffe aber in die Zelle? Antwort: Mittels der Blutgefäße.

Die Blutgefäße transportieren die Stoffe. Aber die Blutgefäße haben keine direkte Anbindung an jede einzelne Zelle. Die Gefäße geben Ihre Stoffe ab. Und dann? Dann müssen diese Stoffe zu den einzelnen Zellen "hinspazieren". Diesen Spaziergang treten die Stoffe im wesentlichen durch Bindegewebszellen an. Und die verbrauchten Stoffe und Zelltrümmer der Zellen müssen ja auch wieder abtransportiert werden. Diese "Reste" werden wieder von den Blutgefäßen aufgenommen (zum Beispiel Kohlendioxid was über die Lunge ausgeatmet wird), aber auch durch die Lymphgefäße.
Die Vorstellung von Pischinger war, dass sich im Laufe der Jahre und Jahrzehnte in diesem Bereich "Abfälle" anhäufen, die eben nicht mehr wie vorgesehen abtransportiert werden, sondern auf dem Weg zur Zelle und von der Zelle einfach "liegen bleiben".
Was da letztlich "liegen bleibt" bezeichnen wir in der Naturheilkunde alsVerschlackung bzw. Vergiftung. Somit wird die Transport- und Siebfunktion des Bindegewebes immer schlechter.

Und genau das meinte Pischinger, als er davor warnte, dass eine zunehmendeAbnahme dieser Siebfunktion der Grundsubstanz bedeutet, dass der Körper die Fähigkeit verliert sich selbst zu regulieren.

Damit stellt sich sofort wieder die Frage: Wodurch wird die Grundregulation nach Pischinger denn beeinträchtigt?

Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage müssen wir nicht lange überlegen:
Zu viel Eiweiß, falsches Eiweiß, zu viel Essen insgesamt, Umweltgifte, schwer abbaubare chemische Moleküle, Abgase, elektromagnetische Felder, aber auch z.B. Stress.
In Folge dessen können zahlreiche Krankheiten und Beschwerden bedingt werden.
Dazu gehören Schlafstörungen, körperliche und geistige Leistungsminderung, Verstimmungen, Angst und Depressionen die bis hin zu Schmerzen und weiteren chronischen Krankheiten führen können. Eine nachhaltige Veränderung kann sogar bis zur Entwicklung von Krebs beitragen - so jedenfalls die Theorie zalhreicher Ärzte und Heilpraktiker, die sich mit dieser Thematik eingehender beschäftigt haben.
Zu den möglichen Krankheiten zählen nicht nur die sichtbaren Auswirkungen wie dieCellulitis sondern zum Beispiel auch Allergien, Immunschwächen, Stoffwechselerkrankungen, Rheumatische Erkrankungen und viele andere.
Eine ausgezeichnete Möglichkeit die Grundregulation nach Pischinger zu verbessern ist das Heilfasten.
Auf dieser Webseite finden Sie zahlreiche Informationen zum Thema Fasten und Heilfasten, sowie zu allgemeinen Fragen die mit der Gesundheit zusammenhängen.


BindegewebeDas Bindegewebe ist ein dreidimensionales Netz, welches das Epithelgewebe und andere Gewebe stützt. Es besitzt normalerweise keine richtige Form und ist fast überall zwischen den Geweben, Organen und Gefäßen zu finden. Das Bindegewebe bildet das "Stroma" (Gerüst) aller Organe. Eine Ausnahme bilden die graue und weiße Substanz des zentralen Nervensystems, indem diese Aufgabe von den Gliazellen (die Neuroglia) übernommen wird.
  


Betrachtet man also sowohl die Größe des Bindegewebes als auch dessen umfassende Bedeutung für das Leben, wundert es einen kaum, dass das zusammenhängende und alles tragende Bindegewebe auch als "Grundsystem des Körpers" oder "System der Grundregulation" bezeichnet wird. Sämtliche grundlegenden, die Basis für das Funktionieren des Körpers nötigen Aufgaben werden dort durchgeführt und reguliert. Eine der allerwichtigsten Funktionen des Bindegewebes ist die Steuerung des Gleichgewichts zwischen Säuren und Basen.


Extrazelluläre Matrix

Die extrazelluläre Matrix (EZM) ist ein Sammelbegriff für alle Matrix-Komponenten im extrazellulären Raum aller Grundgewebstypen. Es handelt sich um Makromoleküle, die von Zellen sezerniert und im Extrazellulärraum durch Interaktion mit anderen Molekülen immobilisiert werden. Im Binde- und Stützgewebe ist der extrazelluläre Anteile am Gesamtvolumen relativ groß verglichen mit anderen Gewebstypen und daher die Funktionen der EZM auch entsprechend wichtig. Die Matrix des Binde- und Stützgewebes besteht grundsätzlich aus Fasern und Grundsubstanz:

Funktionen:
Alle Zellen (ausser Erythrozyten) treten aktiv in Beziehung zur umgebenden Extrazellulärmatrix (EZM). Dafür benutzen sie spezielle Bindungsstellen (EZM-Rezeptoren) an ihrer Zelloberfläche. Die Verbindung kommt entweder direkt durch Interaktion des Rezeptors mit bestimmten EZM-Komponenten oder durch Vermittlung zwischengeschalteter Adhäsionsproteine (z. Bsp. Fibronektin, Laminin und viele mehr) zustande. Die Zell-Matrix-Verbindungen dienen der mechanischen Verankerung der Zellen, sie haben darüber hinaus Einfluss auf zahlreiche Zellfunktionen wie Ernährung, Abwehr und Reparatur. 
Diese Zusammenhänge spielen in der Zellbiologie und Tumorbiologie eine wichtige Rolle.



_
http://www.gesund-heilfasten.de/Pischinger-Raum-Grundregulation.html
_
http://www.praxisbenner.de/1/persoenlicher_rat_Das_System_der_Grundregulation.html
_
http://www.agua-kangen.com/el-sistema-basico-de-pischinger/




__________



The Extracellular Matrix and Ground Regulation: Basis for a Holistic Biological Medicine Hardcover – July 17, 2007 


by Alfred Pischinger  (Author), Hartmut Heine (Editor), Ingeborg Eibl (Translator)

The workings of the suitable environment for cells—called the extracellular matrix (ECM) and ground regulation—has occupied the European medical tradition since the early part of the 20th century. As it has become more clear that the origin of disease and its first signals register in the connective tissue, or myofascia, cellular pathologists and biochemists have sought to circumscribe networks of cell communication and microcirculation in the ECM. 

Alfred Pischinger (1899-1982) continued this line of work by further studying, in work published from 1926 through the late seventies, the connections of the ECM to the hormonal and autonomic systems. In the last twenty years Professor and Doctor of Natural Sciences Hartmut Heine and his colleagues have carried on Pischinger’s work, here summarized in one volume. Part One encompasses theoretical underpinnings; Parts Two and Three address applications and directions for further research.

This updated English-language translation not only is an account of the work of Pischinger’s successors—Heine, Otto Bergsmann, and Felix Perger, (the three editors of this volume) and their many colleagues—but notes the positive development of complementary therapies based on this understanding of histology. Acupuncture is referenced directly. Both in Europe and the States the work of manual therapists, including Rolfers, cranio- sacral therapists, and other somatic disciplines have been informed for many years by Pischinger’s outsider model of how changes in the EMC register in the central nervous system and the brain, and are conveyed back to the periphery and connected organs. Heine’s exciting recent work shows that the regulation and construction of the ECM have relationships to cybernetic non-linear systems and phase transitions.
_
http://www.amazon.com/The-Extracellular-Matrix-Ground-Regulation/dp/1556436882


_________________








torstai 12. helmikuuta 2015

Turmeric Extract 100% Effective At Preventing Type 2 Diabetes, ADA Journal Study Finds

Posted on: Tuesday, August 6th 2013
Written By: Sayer Ji, Founder

A remarkable human clinical study published in the journal Diabetes Care, the journal of the American Diabetes Association, revealed that turmeric extract was 100% successful at preventing prediabetic patients from becoming diabetic over the course of a 9-month intervention.[1]
Performed by Thailand researchers, the study's primary object was to assess the efficacy of curcumin, the primary polyphenol in turmeric which gives the spice its golden hue, in delaying the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a prediabetic population.
The study design was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial including 240 subjects who met the American Diabetic Association's criteria for prediabetes. All subjects were randomly assigned to receive either 250 mg of curcuminoid or placebo capsules for 9 months.
Type 2 diabetes progression was assessed by measuring a wide range of parameters, including changes in the insulin-producing cells within the pancreas known as β-cells, insulin resistance, and the anti-inflammatory cytokine known as adiponectin, at four different times:  baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-month visits during the course of intervention.


The results were reported as follows:
"After 9 months of treatment, 16.4% of subjects in the placebo group were diagnosed with T2DM, whereas none were diagnosed with T2DM in the curcumin-treated group. In addition, the curcumin-treated group showed a better overall function of β-cells, with higher HOMA-β (61.58 vs. 48.72; P < 0.01) and lower C-peptide (1.7 vs. 2.17; P < 0.05).
The curcumin-treated group showed a lower level of HOMA-IR (3.22 vs. 4.04; P < 0.001) and higher adiponectin (22.46 vs. 18.45; P < 0.05) when compared with the placebo group." [emphasis added]

The researchers concluded:
"A 9-month curcumin intervention in a prediabetic population significantly lowered the number of prediabetic individuals who eventually developed T2DM.
In addition, the curcumin treatment appeared to improve overall function of β-cells, with very minor adverse effects. Therefore, this study demonstrated that the curcumin intervention in a prediabetic population may be beneficial."

The full study can be viewed for free on the American Diabetic Association's Diabetes Care website: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/35/11/2121.full

 

A remarkable human clinical study published in the journal Diabetes Care, the journal of the American Diabetes Association, revealed that turmeric extract was 100% successful at preventing prediabetic patients from becoming diabetic over the course of a 9-month intervention.[1]
Performed by Thailand researchers, the study's primary object was to assess the efficacy of curcumin, the primary polyphenol in turmeric which gives the spice its golden hue, in delaying the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a prediabetic population.
The study design was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial including 240 subjects who met the American Diabetic Association's criteria for prediabetes. All subjects were randomly assigned to receive either 250 mg of curcuminoid or placebo capsules for 9 months.
Type 2 diabetes progression was assessed by measuring a wide range of parameters, including changes in the insulin-producing cells within the pancreas known as β-cells, insulin resistance, and the anti-inflammatory cytokine known as adiponectin, at four different times:  baseline, 3-, 6-, and 9-month visits during the course of intervention.
The results were reported as follows:
"After 9 months of treatment, 16.4% of subjects in the placebo group were diagnosed with T2DM, whereas none were diagnosed with T2DM in the curcumin-treated group. In addition, the curcumin-treated group showed a better overall function of β-cells, with higher HOMA-β (61.58 vs. 48.72; P < 0.01) and lower C-peptide (1.7 vs. 2.17; P < 0.05). The curcumin-treated group showed a lower level of HOMA-IR (3.22 vs. 4.04; P < 0.001) and higher adiponectin (22.46 vs. 18.45; P < 0.05) when compared with the placebo group." [emphasis added]
The researchers concluded:
"A 9-month curcumin intervention in a prediabetic population significantly lowered the number of prediabetic individuals who eventually developed T2DM. In addition, the curcumin treatment appeared to improve overall function of β-cells, with very minor adverse effects. Therefore, this study demonstrated that the curcumin intervention in a prediabetic population may be beneficial."
The full study can be viewed for free on the American Diabetic Association's Diabetes Care website: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/35/11/2121.full


Discussion

Considering that at least 40% of the US population ages 40-74 are believed to have prediabetes, according to CDC statistics, [2] the health implications of this study are profound.
Curcumin, which constitutes approximately 3-4% of dry turmeric powder by weight, is affordable, safe and easily accessible.  Moreover, over 600 potential health benefits of curcumin (and/or turmeric) have been documented within the biomedical literature freely available to peruse on either the National Library of Medicine's open access database (pubmed.gov search: "curcumin"), or for your convenience, our intricately organized Curcumin database.
Recently, we highlighted research on curcumin's potential ability to heal the diabetic liver. (Read:Turmeric May Repair and Regenerate Diabetic Liver Function)  But this is really only the tip of the iceberg.  Below you will find the related sections on our 

Curcumin database indicating curcumin's value in a wide range of diabetic complications:
    Disease CategoryArticle Count
    Diabetes Insipidus
1
    Diabetes Mellitus: Type 1
9
    Diabetes Mellitus: Type 1: Prevention1
    Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2
13
    Diabetes: Bone Quality & Density
1
    Diabetes: Cardiovascular Illness
11
    Diabetes: Cataract
2
    Diabetes: Cognitive Dysfunction
6
    Diabetes: Glycation/A1C
2
    Diabetes: Kidney Function
4
    Diabetes: Liver Disease
1
    Diabetes: Oxidative Stress
2
    Diabetic Microangiopathy
1
    Diabetic Nephropathy
2
    Diabetic Neuropathies
2
    Diabetic Retinopathy
4

Considering the abject failure, if not also sometimes deadly nature of diabetic medications, turmeric (curcumin) provides an ideal alternative. We can only hope that medical professionals who treat prediabetics and diabetics will take seriously this study, especially considering that it was published in the American Diabetic Association's very own, highly respected journal.

[1] Somlak Chuengsamarn, Suthee Rattanamongkolgul, Rataya Luechapudiporn, Chada Phisalaphong, Siwanon Jirawatnotai. Curcumin extract for prevention of type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2012 Nov ;35(11):2121-7. Epub 2012 Jul 6. PMID: 22773702
[2] CDC: Diabetes. National Diabetes Fact Sheet; United States, 2003.
_
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/turmeric-extract-100-effective-preventing-type-2-diabetes-ada-journal-study-finds#_ftn1


__________






___




8 Reasons Monsanto is Defeating GMO Labeling Initiatives

1. Millions of Dollars in Propaganda.
2. Most People Just Don’t Know.
3. Anti-GMO Whistle Blowers are Subject to Character Attacks and Name-Calling.
4. Legal Shenanigans.
5. Straight up Lies.
6. Overwhelmed.
7. Confusing Ballots.
8. Money. Money. Money.

Agent Orange: 24 Haunting Photos Of The War Crime The U.S. Got Away With.
- Warning, extremely disturbing photos.

By Christina Sarich
Global Research, February 12, 2015
Natural Society 11 February 2015


The moneyed corporations running the GMO show certainly don’t make it easy. Now that they have won not one, but four different GMO labeling battles, what makes anyone think we can win against Monsanto, Dow, Syngenta, Bayer, Cargill, and the GMA, just to name a few Round-Up-Ready giants? 

Though a difficult food war to overcome, we do have the power and collective voice to win
– but we must all know what we’re up against.


“If you are going through hell, keep going.” ~ Winston Churchill
First, we were defeated in Washington and California, then came Oregon and Colorado. Not to mention Vermont and Maui County are still up to their necks in Monsanto fertilizer, trying to win their right to democratically voted-upon GMO labeling initiatives in drawn out court battles.
So what, besides ridiculous (and often illegal) campaign spending, still stands between us and knowing what is in our food?
Sure, Prop 37 in California was defeated by a slim margin using agro-chemical money to the tune of $47 million, but there must be something more. The proposition lost by less than 2%.
Indeed, GMO labeling supporters were outspent by 5 to 1, but what else allowed biotech to win in this and other labeling campaigns?
Without ignoring claims of vote-fixing and the illegal campaign contributions, biotech has an advantage in other areas we should all take account of.
Here are some more reasons we have lost the GMO-labeling (let alone simple banning) fight:


For people who pay attention to the GMO issue, they are torn between claims by scientists showing the dangers, and claims made by industry-supported ‘scientific’ studies which show GMOs cause little to no harm. The problem is that most of the American population doesn’t really know what GMOs are, so when biotech spends millions of dollars tapping the market, it generally becomes an overriding success. Just try telling a less uninformed person that the CDC is corrupt – their bias is so strong that they will label you a conspiracy theorist, even though CDC whistleblowers themselves have come out pointing to layers of lies and payouts within the agency.
Even those who are wary of GMOs don’t really understand why they are dangerous, and therefore chalk it up as an issue that simply doesn’t warrant concern. Even after early biotech creations like ‘golden rice’ were debunked, people still believe it can ‘feed the world.’
But we don’t need GMOs to feed the world.

2. Most People Just Don’t Know
Not everyone has seen the documentary GMO OMG or Bitter Seeds. When I lived at an apartment complex a few years ago and talked to college-educated, working-class folks in their late 20s and early 30s about GMOs, more than half of them had never heard of them, and those who did thought it was a ‘conspiracy’ theory. The fact is that even though millions don’t want to eat GMO foods, many people don’t even know what a genetically modified food is.


3. Anti-GMO Whistle Blowers are Subject to Character Attacks and Name-Calling
This article on Discover Magazine’s website completely tears Mike Adams of Natural News a new one. The title is: “GMO Worry Warts: This is Your Brain on Ignorance and Ideology.” While I’m not defending everything in Adams’ article, this Discovery piece is just one of thousands that are circulated to keep people afraid of even asking the question – are GMOs really safe?
A 14-Year veteran Reuters reporter was targeted by Monsanto in the same way. As long as people who bring GMO questions to the fore of conversation are demonized and ridiculed, the layperson won’t feel confident to ask questions, or demand labeling. Even though thousands of scientists, celebrities, and others have come forward on GMOs, the smear campaigns continue.
Remember, entire presidential elections have been won and lost using this Bernaisian tactic.

4. Legal Shenanigans
If there were truly a democratic process concerning GMO labeling, then why would anti-labeling advocates sue to try to get labeling off a bill? Wouldn’t the people’s decision be ample to tell food manufacturer’s what they want? While strange language has been used repeatedly to claim GMOs are safe, Citizens Against the Maui County Farming Ban filed suit against the county clerk and state chief elections officer to remove a GMO initiative from the ballot in Maui County.
Their claim was that the wording of the initiative is confusing, misleading, and is geared to deceive voters. Hmm, sounds like a tactic of biotech. Michael Hansen, Ph.D., Senior Scientist with the Consumers Union who has presented clear claims against biotech has been accused of the same thing. It reminds me of a playground bully tactic – utilizing the very same logical argument and then spinning it to use it in a ‘debate’ against the one who originally presented the idea.

5. Straight up Lies
Monsanto has stated, “The safety and benefits of these [GMO] ingredients are well established.”
Truthfully, the safety and benefits of these ingredients are NOT well established. No long-term study exists on either the safety or benefits of GMOs, so there is no basis for Monsanto to make this claim. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not even require safety studies of genetically engineered foods.
However, some independent studies raise questions about links to allergies and other potential health risks as severe as cancer, kidney failure, altered DNA, antibiotic resistance, and more. Monsanto also spouts claims by the American Medical Association, that GMOs are safe.
If you believe everything this corrupt establishment says, I’ve got a melting glacier to sell you. The AMA has lied about medical malpractice, carcinogenic cancer drugs, and more.

6. Overwhelmed
After the labeling initiative failed in California in 2012, there was some suggestion that voters just had too many items on their ballots that presidential election year to parse the competing GMO claims.

7. Confusing Ballots
It has also been stated that the Yes to Labeling vote was confusing on many ballots, as people could not determine if they were voting yes or no based on the verbiage on the ballot.
8. Money. Money. Money.
In a world that worships the almighty petro-dollar, I can’t go without mentioning money. I know I proposed a look at reasons biotech is winning without looking at the money trail, but the fact remains that money buys votes.

  • Money makes regular folks like farmers decide to buy GMO seed because they believe it will be cheaper to grow their crops using it (overlooking long term damage to the environment and human and animal health).
  • Money lines the pockets of legislators who pass laws that support Monsanto and Pepsi-Co, not people who are trying to feed their families nutritious, healthful food.

While raising more money for labeling campaigns will help, there are numerous other fronts that can be addressed when fighting the biotech bullies to get our food labeled, in the least 
– though an outright ban would be better.
As we continue to jump through hoops to get GMOs out of our food supply, we can look for new ways to reverse the labeling tide. 

Ultimately, I’m planting my own non-GMO garden, but until these Franken foods are eliminated completely, even that isn’t entirely safe due to cross-pollination.




___

Agent Orange:

24 Haunting Photos Of The War Crime The U.S. Got Away With

Published August 22, 2017
Updated November 14, 2018