maanantai 23. toukokuuta 2016

Did You Know Candida Produces Carcinogens and Promotes Cancer?

Did You Know Candida Produces Carcinogens and Promotes Cancer?

, 



For many years, the only known link between Candida spp. infections, and
cancer was that it is an opportunistic pathogen taking advantage of the immune
system damage caused by chemo. 

Recently, new research has found that Candida albicans can actually also
promote cancer by producing carcinogens, causing inflammation, increasing the
response of Th17 cells, and molecular mimicry of our own immune cells.

Candida produces the carcinogens known as nitrosamines and acetaldehyde.
Nitrosamines activate specific pro-cancer genes, while acetaldehyde is a
DNA-damaging carcinogen with many downstream effects.

Inflammation promotes cancer by causing tissue damage and production of
chemicals that promote angiogenesis, proliferation, migration, and adhesion while
inhibiting apoptosis of damaged cells.

Th17 cells, which are dominant in the response to Candida infections, are also
responsible for production of chemicals that can increase angiogenesis and tumor
growth.

On top of this, antibodies produced against Candida albicans can mimic a receptor
on white blood cells, possibly causing antibodies to be formed against our own
immune cells. 

This is another strike against sugar and alcohol consumption in relation to cancer
risk, as both alcohol metabolism and sugar fermentation lead to acetaldehyde
production.

One real-life report of cancer being in association with fungal infections comes
from Meinolf Karthaus, who observed three children with leukemia suddenly go
into remission after antifungal treatment for “secondary” infections.

Additionally, one doctor had found fungal spores in every tissue sample of cancer
that he studied, as he used saline instead of formaldehyde to transport the
samples in order to preserve any possible fungi.

Natural Anti-Fungal Solutions for Candida

While pharmaceutical antifungals can cause even more damage to patients’
liver and kidneys, curcumin, the “main” medicinal compound in turmeric,
may be an alternative.

On top of exhibiting potent antifungal activity against Candida, curcumin also has
anticancer properties, such as the ability to destroy cancer stem cells.
Curcumin has antifungal effects against other species as well. 

Cryptococcus, Aspergillus, Trichosporon, and Paracoccidioides strains have
been shown to be vulnerable to its effects.

Additionally, curcumin can prevent resistance of Candida to the antifungal drug
fluconazole. It appeared to be that resistant Candida were able to pump fluconazole
out of the cell bodies. 

Despite curcumin’s poor water solubility and thus bioavailability, nanoparticles and
fat soluble delivery methods can overcome this limitation. More traditionally, golden
milk is a beverage that increases availability of turmeric to the body, and can be
made at home.

Besides curcumin, clove oil may also be effective against Candida infections.
In one study, even the vapour of clove essential oil was able to inhibit several
species of fungi, though the oil vapor was only strong enough to temporarily stop Candida growth without killing the cells.

However, direct application was much stronger. Using direct application, the
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of clove oil was 2.5%, meaning that
clove oil at 2.5% concentration was enough to completely prevent fungal growth,
which is an indicator of living cells.


So in conclusion, natural fungicides and fungistatics such as curcumin
and clove oil must gain more recognition, particularly in cancer treatment,
whether the goal is full remission or “quality of life”.

Reducing sugar and alcohol intake is also seen as increasingly necessary in
order to prevent fungal infections and cancer growth.

_____________










http://graviolaa.wix.com/graviolat

More about Candida:


___


Treat candida and inflammations yourself






___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
___
Lähettänyt klo Ei kommentteja:

sunnuntai 22. toukokuuta 2016

Why doesn't the CDC ever talk about natural SELF-IMMUNIZATION against viruses?

Why doesn't the CDC ever talk about natural SELF-IMMUNIZATION against viruses?
Tuesday, April 26, 2016 by: J. D. Heyes


(NaturalNews) Once upon a time, before the modern medical bureaucracy was built, Americans didn't have vaccine Nazis in government who forced them, at the barrel of a gun, and with the threat of fines and imprisonment, to take an injection of a foreign substance that might leave them "protected" from disease, but might also kill them in the process.

In fact, in those days, before the vaccine cult was formed, Americans managed to stay healthy with a different sort of herd immunity: Everyone was exposed to everything there was that could make them sick, and lo and behold, look at what happened – our species didn't die outand, in fact, flourished.

Now, the vaccine Nazis will tell you that that's because of vaccines. But think about it: If we weren't able to sort of self-immunize – that is, have our bodies exposed to bacteria and disease so our own natural defenses could produce their own antibodies, thereby "immunizing us" against said disease – would humankind have made it this far?

Something else to wonder about: How come the Centers for Disease Control and the medical establishment never talk about this?
Natural biological immunity
Before vaccines were introduced, millions of Americans and others around the world were not only exposed to diseases like measles, mumps and whooping cough, but they fully recovered from them. And once they had those diseases, they never got them again, because they retained the antibodies that fought off the infection and disease until they died.

Natural biological immunity is something that humans had developed over the course of evolution. From the earliest days, we've always been exposed to something, and yes, there have certainly been diseases that have killed a great many humans over the course of history. But most of those were new to the species – that is, humans had not faced or experienced them before, so there were no natural antibodies in our systems to fight those illnesses.

But even then, not everyone became sick, and in fact, the vast majority who lived had in fact been exposed to the same diseases; their bodies just happened to be stronger or better able to develop antibodies early on.

Today, however, while we may have achieved "herd immunity" through mass immunization, there are many who would argue that in the days without vaccines we had also developed herd immunity, since we were all exposed to the same things. Today, however, our bodies are actually weaker and less able to fend off common viruses and bacteria, because we have become so reliant on vaccines.
We have no choice in the matter of immunity
Think a moment about the recent outbreak of Ebola. This is a relatively new disease, and while many died, many more who were no doubt exposed did not. What can and should we learn from that? "Naturally acquired immunity" only occurs through contact with an agent that causes disease and when the contact was not made deliberately.

None of these theories are new. In the 9th century, Islamic physician Al-Razi wrote a treatise that described the clinical presentation of measles and smallpox, which went on to indicate that exposure to same gives a person lasting immunity, though he did not use the actual term "immunity."[1]

The first scientist to develop a full theory of immunity was Ilya Mechnikov after he publicized phagocytosis in 1882. Also, using Louis Pasteur's germ theory of disease, the science of immunology began to discover, and then explain, why and how, after disease and infection, the human body developed the ability to resist further infections.[2]

The point is, our modern medical establishment refuses to even discuss this, much less give Americans the option of allowing their own bodies to fight disease in their own way.

Sources:

[1] Silverstein, Arthur M. (1989) History of Immunology (Hardcover) Academic Press.

[2] Gherardi E. The Concept of Immunity. History and Applications. Immunology Course Medical School. University of Pavia.

Science.NaturalNews.com


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/053797_self-immunization_herd_immunity_vaccine_myths.html#ixzz49NIuA0zN
Lähettänyt klo Ei kommentteja:

keskiviikko 18. toukokuuta 2016

How cancer cells and infections get destroyed by vitamin C

How cancer cells and infections get destroyed by vitamin C

Posted by: Dena Schmidt, staff writer in Vitamin C Benefits May 4, 2016

(NaturalHealth365)
Much data has come out in recent years about the effectiveness of vitamin C against cancer.
The main driver of this is the important role of vitamin C in creating optimal immune system health.
Vitamin C has been studied intensely for almost a century, beginning with Albert Szent-Gyorgyi whose research won him the Nobel Prize in Physiology in 1937. The ability of vitamin C to greatly enhance immune functioning has been studied in more detail ever since.

Vitamin C provides multi-layered immune system support

Vitamin C energizes and supports the immune system through assisting cells’ inner workings. This is why during times when the body is fighting illness, vitamin C levels can become depleted. The result is a vicious cycle as just when the most vitamin C is required, the body’s reserves become drained. This is why supplementing with vitamin C is so important when healing from a wound as well as when fighting illnesses from the common cold to cancer.
A healthy immune system is comprised of multiple cell types and signaling molecules functioning optimally. Vitamin C is effective against cancer cells through its support of immune system components like NK cells, or natural killer cells. Vitamin C also benefits the functioning of neutrophils, lymphocytes and antibodies, which are all instrumental in the immune system’s ability to fight cancer cells and illness.
NK Cell Support
Natural killer cells (or NK cells) function as the “hit men” of the immune system, tracking and destroying tumor cells and other invaders. They also help to shield the effect of the blood clotting cell fragments known as platelets that would otherwise prevent the NK cells from doing their work. This assists in preventing cancers from metastasizing.
Neutrophil Energy and Cleanup
Neutrophils in the immune system fight bacterial infections by engulfing the bacteria and blasting it with oxygen free radicals. Vitamin C supports their functioning through helping them locate bacteria and destroy it and cleaning up their oxidizing molecules.
Enhancing Lymphocyte Production
Lymphocytes produce antibodies in the immune system and assist in guiding other immune cells toward threats. They then rapidly reproduce to do their job; this reproduction is greatly enhanced by vitamin C.
Raising Antibody Immunoglobulin Levels
Antibodies in the immune system assist in identifying and destroying invaders such as cancerous cells. The presence of vitamin C helps to raise antibody immunoglobulin levels to protect against infections.
Besides combating inflammation, the common cold and cancer, other illnesses fought by the presence of vitamin C include diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke, anemia, scurvy, periodontal disease and osteoporosis.

Nutrition and supplementation key in maintaining healthy C levels

Our human body system actually cannot create vitamin C on its own; it must be obtained externally. That is why proper nutrition and supplementation is so important to ensuring optimal amounts.
Natural health experts generally recommend taking about 1,000 – 3,000 mg of vitamin C per day (Linus Pauling suggested 6,000 – 10,000 mg per day for healthy people) and, in many cases, well over 10,000 mg per day – if dealing with a serious health issue like cancer.
Of course, there are many fruits and vegetables rich in vitamin C.  But, it’s important to keep in mind that relying on food sources (alone) for vitamin C are rarely sufficient to eliminate serious health problems.  With that in mind, some of the best vitamin C-rich foods include: citrus fruits, strawberries, kiwi, raspberries, papaya, pineapple, cantaloupe, bell peppers, broccoli, cauliflower and cabbage.
Editor’s note: The NaturalHealth365 Store offers the finest quality vitamin C powder on the market.  Click here to order today.

http://www.naturalhealth365.com/vitamin-c-cancer-cells-1831.html
References:
http://www.lifeextension.com/magazine/2015/11/the-link-between-vitamin-c-and-optimal-immunity/page-01
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK27118
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK27162

_________

________



Lähettänyt klo Ei kommentteja:

maanantai 16. toukokuuta 2016

US Federal Government Confirms: Marijuana Kills Certain Cancer Cells And Could Cure Brain Tumors

US Federal Government Confirms: Marijuana Kills Certain Cancer Cells And Could Cure Brain Tumors






It is easy to say that marijuana is close to being legalized by the United States Federal Government.

As it stands, marijuana is classified as a Schedule I drug by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). This means that marijuana is one of the most strictly regulated drugs, apparently because it is considered to have “no medicinal value” to the public.
But it has now emerged that the US federal government has admitted that marijuana may in fact serve as a useful treatment for brain tumors, one of the  most dangerous type of cancers. Brain tumors can occur at any age, and the exact cause of brain tumors is not clear to researchers. The most common symptoms of brain tumors include headaches, numbness or tingling in the arms or legs, seizures, memory problems, mood and personality changes, balance and walking problems, nausea and vomiting, changes in speech, vision, or hearing.

This new stand by the Federal Government is said to be based on a major study published in November 2014 by researchers at the St. George’s University of London, that found that marijuana can be an effective drug to fight brain tumors. The National Institute on Drug Abuse has said in its new revised guidelines that “recent animal studies have shown that marijuana can kill certain cancer cells and reduce the size of others. Evidence from one animal study suggests that extracts from whole-plant marijuana can shrink one of the most serious types of brain tumors. Research in mice showed that these extracts, when used with radiation, increased the cancer-killing effects of the radiation”.
One of the lead researchers of the study, who made the discovery, explained that it is refreshing news that the US government is taking a new stand on marijuana.

Meanwhile, the study has triggered many well-respected personalities across the US to publicly speak their mind about marijuana. In February this year, the new US’s Surgeon General, Dr Vivek Murthy, said that he is optimistic that the US government will stick to its current position on marijuana so that more research can be carried out to fully explore the drug’s benefits, for the benefit of all people.

“We have to see what the science tells us about the efficacy of marijuana. We have some preliminary data that for certain medical conditions and symptoms, marijuana can be helpful. We have to use that data to drive policy-making,” he told CBS This Morning show in an interview.
The American Academy of Pediatrics has also adjusted its official position on marijuana and called for the government to drop its Schedule I status in order to facilitate more research on its effects.
A bill was also recently introduced in the Senate by some senators- Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D.-N.Y.) that would reclassify marijuana as a Schedule II drug, to allow exploration of its medical benefits.


This means that the hard-line stand on marijuana is gradually becoming weakened.

The government’s acknowledgement of the study augurs well for advocates for medical marijuana usage. The drug’s Schedule I classification has stifled scientific inquiry into the effects of marijuana (both good and bad) and has resulted in a catch-22: Marijuana is labeled Schedule I because it’s assumed to have no medicinal benefits, but that prevents people from figuring out if it has medical benefits, which then causes it to continue to be classified as a Schedule I drug….
Critics say that because it is labeled as Schedule I, scientists generally cannot acquire funding from anywhere to determine if it has any medicinal benefits to human beings.
Hopefully, with the advent of this revelation, and the initiative taken by some lawmakers to change the traditional stand on marijuana, companies and individuals who can afford to will be willing to sponsor new research into marijuana to determine its efficacy. The government too should make a concerted effort to also sanction in-depth research, to clear the air for the usage of the drug in a well-regulated manner for the benefit of the entire world. After all, if we can turn a “deadly poison” into a boon to the society, why should we not do it?

http://anonhq.com/us-federal-government-confirms-marijuana-cure-brain-tumors/
Lähettänyt klo Ei kommentteja:

sunnuntai 15. toukokuuta 2016

FDA Propaganda - Frosted Flakes Healthier Than an Avocado





FDA: Frosted Flakes Healthier Than an Avocado

5/11/2016 6:00AM     

Under the FDA's current rules, some cereals and snacks are deemed healthier than fruits and nuts based on fat content. That is likely to change as the agency plans to modernize the definition of 'healthy' to keep up with changing eating habits in the U.S. Photo: iStock

Lähettänyt klo Ei kommentteja:

lauantai 14. toukokuuta 2016

PFIZER NOT OKAY WITH KILLING MURDERERS, ONLY PATIENTS

PFIZER NOT OKAY WITH KILLING MURDERERS, ONLY PATIENTS



May 14, 2016


Heroically moral pharmaceutical company Pfizer is not okay with using any of its drugs to execute murderers.
Pfizer Inc has taken steps to ensure that none of its products are used in lethal injections, the largest U.S. drugmaker said on Friday.
"We are enforcing a distribution restriction for specific products that have been part of, or considered by some states for, their lethal injection protocols," the New York-based drugmaker said on its website. "Pfizer strongly objects to the use of its products as lethal injections for capital punishment."
That's good. The only people who are supposed to be killed by Pfizer drugs are innocent people. Not murderers. Maybe children.
A former Pfizer (PFE) employee's letter to a federal judge alleging that the company put a courier on a KLM flight to Nigeria carrying bribes for local officials is a classic example of how hard it is to get away with corporate skullduggery: The letter cites 40 Pfizer executives, FDA officials and other witnesses who allegedly have inside knowledge of the scandal -- not very secret for a secret conspiracy.

The letter is by far the most detailed account yet from a Pfizer executive about what happened during Pfizer's test of a meningitis drug on 200 children in 1996. Pfizer failed to get proper consent for the trial. Eleven kids died and the drug was eventually nixed for meningitis because it had a risk of complications.
But that could happen to any company.
Pfizer Inc's antibacterial drug Tygacil increases the risk of death whether used as authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or for unapproved conditions, the agency warned on Friday. 
Pfizer Inc. said four patients died in a clinical trial of an experimental treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, but only one was determined by the investigators to be drug-related.
The New York company added that the death rate associated with the drug, across several studies, "is within the range of rates reported for biologic therapies" for rheumatoid arthritis.
The company needs successful new drugs to help offset an anticipated big revenue decline when its best-selling drug, cholesterol-lowering Lipitor, loses patent protection in November and becomes exposed to generic competition.
And apparently Pfizer kills dogs too.
Today, those TV spots are gone. The reason has to do with dogs like Montana. A six-year-old Siberian husky with stiff back legs, Montana hobbled out of a vet’s office in Brooklyn, N.Y., six months ago accompanied by his human, Angela Giglio, and a supply of Rimadyl pills. At first, the drug appeared to work. But then Montana lost his appetite. He went limp, wobbling instead of walking. Finally he didn’t walk at all. He ate leaves, vomited, had seizures and, eventually, was put to sleep. An autopsy showed the sort of liver damage associated with a bad drug reaction.
Pet drugs are big business — an estimated $3 billion world-wide — and Rimadyl is one of the bestsellers. It has been given to more than four million dogs in the U.S. and more abroad, brought Pfizer Inc. tens of millions of dollars in sales, and pleased many veterinarians and dog owners. But the drug has also stirred a controversy, with other pet owners complaining that nobody warned them of its risks.
Montana’s owner, Ms. Giglio, is among them. After she informed Pfizer and the Food and Drug Administration of her relatively youthful dog’s death, Pfizer offered her $440 “”as a gesture of good will”” and to cover part of the medical costs. Insulted by the offer and a stipulation that she agree to tell no one about the payment except her tax preparer, she refused to sign and didn’t take the money. “”There’s just no way in my conscience or heart I can release them from blame,”” she says.
Maybe Pfizer should just use its drugs for lethal injections and leave the Nigerian children and dogs alone.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/262845/pfizer-not-okay-killing-murderers-only-patients
Lähettänyt klo Ei kommentteja:
Tunnisteet: , , ,
Tilaa: Kommentit (Atom)