perjantai 30. lokakuuta 2015

Soros / CIA Plan to Destabilize Europe - 20.Oct 2026; In memory of Muammar Gaddafi

Soros / CIA Plan to Destabilize Europe


Wayne MADSEN | 24.09.2015 | 00:00 


Just as the dark forces of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency and George Soros’s multi-billion dollar network of non-governmental organizations plotted to destabilize the Middle East and North Africa through the use of social media to bring about the so-called «Arab Spring», these same forces have opened a new chapter in their book of global dysfunctionality by facilitating the mass movement of refugees and economic migrants from the Middle East, Asia, and Africa to Europe.


In March 2011, Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi predicted what would happen to Europe if the stability of his country was undermined by the Western powers.
In an interview with «France 24», Qaddafi correctly predicted, «There are millions of blacks who could come to the Mediterranean to cross to France and Italy, and Libya plays a role in security in the Mediterranean».



Qaddafi’s son, Saif al Islam Qaddafi, who has been sentenced to death by the radical Libyan regime that governs Tripoli, echoed his father’s comments in the same interview with the French news network. Saif said: «Libya may become the Somalia of North Africa, of the Mediterranean. You will see the pirates in Sicily, in Crete, in Lampedusa. You will see millions of illegal immigrants. The terror will be next door». As seen with recent events, Saif was right on target.


Indeed, for Europe, the terror is literally next door.
It is estimated that as many as 4000 radical jihadists, young men who are veterans of the terrorist holocausts of Syria, Iraq, and Yemen, have taken advantage of the absence of European Union external and internal Schengen border controls to either return to Europe or enter Europe for the first time.

Many of the young male «migrants» have iPhones, bank ATM cards, multiple passports, and ample cash, hardly what would expect to be found in the possession of legitimate war refugees.

Not only have black Africans inundated southern Europe after making dangerous boat trips from North Africa, including Libya, but Syrian refugees, mostly created as the result of the West’s mass transfer of captured arms caches from Libya to Syrian jihadists after the overthrow of Qaddafi, thus triggering the bloody Syrian civil war, are streaming by boat and by land into the very heart of Europe.







Soros, who is nothing more than a multi-billionaire front man for the even wealthier Rothschild banking family of Western Europe, oversaw the complete destruction of the nation-states of southeastern Europe that now permit practical unfettered access of civil war and economic migrants from Syria, Iraq, North Africa, sub-Saharan Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Burma, Sri Lanka, and other war- and poverty-ravaged nations of the Third World.
As a result of his programs to re-engineer nations, Soros first helped destroy the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia with the active help of the European Union and NATO.

The seven independent republics that once constituted Yugoslavia, now serve as major transit routes for perhaps tens of thousands and an impending hundreds of thousands of non-European migrants. Greece, which is suffering under austerity «vulturism» directed by European central and private bankers, including Soros and his Rothschild overseers, can hardly deal with the massive influx of refugees. The bankers have ensured that Greece cannot even provide the basic social services for its own people let alone refugees from civil war zones and nations suffering from collapsed governments and economies.

Macedonia, which continues to reel from an attempted Ukraine-style «themed revolution» courtesy of neocons in the Obama administration like Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland, was unable to hold back a mass invasion of refugees from Greece.

Many of the refugees who treated the Greek-Macedonian border as a non-existent nuisance piled across it into Macedonia and onward into Serbia. The migrants have sought any way possible to reach welcoming Austria and Germany. Refugees in Budapest swamped the central train station, forcing it to close to all passengers, refugees trying to make it to Austria and Germany, as well as Hungarians and foreign tourists.

Muslim refugees arriving in Munich have been irritated by the presence on the streets of beer-drinking Germans and foreigners celebrating the annual «Oktoberfest.»


There have already been heated exchanges on the streets between drunken Oktoberfest celebrants and some Muslim refugees who object to the presence of plentiful alcohol. Munich city officials said they only had the capacity to receive 1000 new refugees per day. The city has seen that number climb to 15,000 a day with some 90 percent of them failing to register with local authorities and disappearing into destinations unknown.

Throughout cities and towns in Europe, newly-arrived migrants sleeping in parks and on sidewalks have created a public health nightmare with human feces covering park grounds and the stench of urine permeating the walls of buildings and gutters.

The situation is exacerbated by newly-arriving Syrian refugees in northern Germany mistaking poisonous wild «death cap» mushrooms for an edible variety that grows in the eastern Mediterranean.
Although warning notices written in Arabic and Kurdish have been distributed to the refugees, the refugees have ingested the death cap mushrooms, which has resulted in uncontrollable vomiting and diarrhea, which has added to the public health dilemma facing Europe.


It is only a matter of time before human waste-borne diseases like cholera and typhus make their first triumphant return to the cities of Europe since the deadly pandemics of the last millennium.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, EU Council President Donald Tusk of Poland, and EU Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker bear direct responsibility for the influx of what may total more than a million political and economic refugees into the heart of Europe. Merkel has made no secret of her desire to add to the ranks of the German guest worker, Gastarbeiter.


However, as shown with other guest workers in Germany who have arrived over the last several decades, these workers never consider themselves as «guests» but as permanent residents and citizens. Meanwhile, Tusk and Juncker, the latter a native of tiny Luxembourg, have threatened to fine non-EU members Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Iceland if they do not absorb their share of refugees, a percentage dictated by the EU «Eurocrats» in Brussels. Although Tusk has demanded EU countries to open their borders and treasuries to the refugees, his native Poland is reticent to accept more than a few hundred. Poland’s opposition is joined by the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Slovenia.



Juncker’s successor as prime minister of Luxembourg, Xavier Bettel, who is Europe’s first leader to be in a gay marriage, has welcomed hundreds of refugees.
Bettel does not believe in a Europe of borders and therefore, like Merkel, Tusk, and Juncker, he a hero to the Soros-funded NGOs who are turning Europe into a deadly social engineering experiment. Many Luxembourgers are in search of someone like Marine Le Pen in France to stop the refugee welcome wagon that threatens to obliterate the Grand Ducky of Luxembourg.



The countries that have radicalized their jihadist guerrilla armies in Syria and Iraq, namely, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait, saw fit to take in no refugees from the fighting in Syria and Iraq. Saudi Arabia had the unmitigated gall to offer Germany to build 200 mosques for the refugees, of course mosques that would only preach and teach the radical Wahhabist version of Islam.



Meanwhile, there is evidence that Turkey urged refugees from Syria on its soil to join the mass exodus on unseaworthy vessels to its longtime adversary, Greece. 



Google, EN


This gambit has resulted in the deaths of many children and women, which has only served to pull the heart strings of northern Europeans who have invited thousands of refugees into their social welfare paradises.
Turkey has also distributed handbooks to the migrants instructing them where to go once they arrive in Germany for government social welfare assistance.


Just as seen with Soros- and CIA-directed themed revolutions in the Arab countries and Ukraine, migrants on the move have been instructed via Twitter where increased border controls have been established and how to bypass them. This «outside» direction has resulted in refugees heading from Greece, Macedonia, and Serbia into Croatia and Slovenia in order to make their way to the Austrian and German frontiers, thus avoiding increasingly hostile Hungary and Serbia. There has already been a practical border skirmish between Croatian police escorting a train full of refugees to the Hungarian border and Hungarian border guards.

Whether they are termed neo-conservative or neo-liberal, the policies that have resulted in the worst refugee crisis to strike Europe since the end of World War II have their roots in the political boiler shops funded by George Soros and CIA front groups throughout Europe and the United States.


It is only a matter of time before their roles in what has occurred in Europe will be discovered by the nationalists of the right and left and their publishing houses and web site locations will go up in flames.
Eventually, Europeans will wake up and discover that Russia immunized itself from the refugee scourge by not playing ball with the EU and its contrivances.


When newly-arrived migrants begin defecating, vomiting, and urinating on the streets of Tallinn, Riga, Vilnius, Helsinki, and Stockholm, refugee crisis-free Russia will not seem so bad after all. 


___


Source deleted
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/09/24/soros-cia-plan-to-destabilize-europe.html


____



MADE IN USA: Destruction of Libya

MADE IN USA: Destruction of Libya

MADE IN USA: Destruction of Libya

In memory of Muammar Gaddafi

On October 20, 2011, the lynching of Muammar Gaddafi took place. It was done before the eyes of the whole world by terrorists armed and funded by NATO.
This act of public cannibalism was a message from the "civilised world" to everyone who dares to say "no" to them anywhere on the globe and in any language.

The enemy of humanity always acts in roughly the same way. Having chosen a victim, it first portrays them through its media as a "monster," then applies "sanctions" to weaken them, and then buys, arms, and sends the local "opposition" into battle "for democracy. "

The destruction of Libya was not only due to the usual Western appetites for others' oil and gas. It was also important to eliminate a government dangerous by its example to the entire Global South.

It was one of the few countries in the world fulfilling its social obligations. The 42 years of Muammar Gaddafi's rule were the period of the greatest prosperity in the history of the Libyan people. The "dictatorship" carried out agrarian reform, created a social security system, guaranteed free healthcare, and gave workers the right to participate in the profits of state enterprises. Libya was electrified.

Electricity was free, as were medical services. Literacy rose from 5% to 83%. The government provided farmers with loans to buy seeds, equipment, and state consultations. Housing, declared a human right, was provided through a subsidy of $50,000 that newlyweds received to buy a home. Libya became the African country with the highest per capita income, and the average life expectancy of its population reached 77 years.
[
Under Gaddafi, per capita income in the country rose to more than US$11,000 in nominal terms,[3] and to over US$30,000 in PPP terms,[4] the 5th highest in Africa. - Wikipedia ]

Unlike the situation in most neighboring countries, Libyan women received full civil rights, including the right to attend university and earn equal pay to men. Half of the graduates of Libyan universities were women. All bank loans in the country had zero interest rates because the Central Bank of Libya was declared a sovereign institution serving the interests of citizens.

Through the newly created African Union, Gaddafi promoted cooperation among countries in the region and was preparing a project to create a single currency, which was planned to be backed by Libya's gold reserves.


In Libya, we saw a well-known scenario with heavily armed "freedom fighters" suddenly appearing out of nowhere, accompanied by heart-wrenching media descriptions of the horrors of the "dictatorship," the existence of which was previously unsuspected.

To this day, there is no documentary evidence that Gaddafi ordered the bombing of peaceful demonstrators. In February and March 2011, Al Jazeera, CNN, BBC, France 24, Sky News, and other media confirmed this version, which became the reason for the UN resolution authorising military intervention.

Undoubtedly, Gaddafi's most serious mistake was his excessive trust in the West.
After several years of NATO's economic blockade of Libya, systematic slanderous publications in the press, and several military attacks, he believed in the "normalisation" of his relations with the "civilised world" and agreed to disarm, giving up his most powerful missiles. He handed over large sums of money to hostile governments, thinking that this would buy their neutrality.

Then, Libya was transformed by NATO from the most prosperous African state into a battlefield between armed gangs and medieval clans, which instead of the promised democracy provided the country with slave markets and refugee ships.

History always and everywhere repeats its unlearned lessons to us.

Source: Oleg Yasinsky - edited

#WeRemember #RiseOfThe4thReich

@BeornAndTheShieldmaiden

Boost



REPOSTED:
https://news-pravda.com/world/2026/10/20/2681861.html


___



History of Libya under Muammar Gaddafi


The green flag of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. The colour green represented Islam and Gaddafi's Third International Theory, which was outlined in The Green Book.
The Arab Liberation Flag used under the Federation of Arab Republics was based on the flag first used by Gamal Abdel Nasser and used by Gaddafi's regime prior to the Jamahiriya.
Gaddafi at the African Union Summit, Addis Ababa, 2 February 2009

Muammar Gaddafi became the de facto leader of Libya on 1 September 1969 after leading a group of Libyan Army officers against King Idris I in a bloodless coup d'état. When Idris was in Turkey for medical treatment, the Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) headed by Gaddafi abolished the monarchy and the constitution and established the Libyan Arab Republic, with the Ba'athist motto "Unity, Freedom, Socialism".[1]

After coming to power, with the 1973 oil crisis and consequential rise of the Libyan economy, the RCC government initiated a process of directing funds toward providing education, health care and housing for all. Public education in the country became free and primary education compulsory for both sexes. Providing housing for all was a task the RCC government was unable to complete.[2] Under Gaddafi, per capita income in the country rose to more than US$11,000 in nominal terms,[3] and to over US$30,000 in PPP terms,[4] the 5th highest in Africa. The increase in prosperity was accompanied by a foreign policy hostile to the other Arab states of the region, an anti-West foreign policy, and increased domestic political repression.[1][5] Gaddafi ruled the country in an authoritarian manner and was described as a dictator.

During the 1980s and 1990s, Gaddafi, openly supported foreign groups like the African National Congress, the Palestine Liberation Organization, the Provisional Irish Republican Army, Polisario Front and Moro National Liberation Front as well as militants such as Charles Taylor, Foday Sankoh, Abu Nidal and leaders across Africa such as Idi Amin, Jean-Bédel Bokassa and Mengistu Haile Mariam. In the Middle East, he formed alliances with what the US then referred to as the "Radical camp", composed of Ba'athist Syria, Iran and South Yemen. Gaddafi's government was often suspected of participating or aiding attacks by terrorist groups. Additionally, Gaddafi undertook several invasions of neighboring states in Africa, notably Chad in the 1970s and 1980s. All of his actions led to a deterioration of Libya's foreign relations with several countries, mostly Western states and the Arab world,[6] and culminated in the 1986 United States bombing of Libya as well as the support of Ba'athist Iraq, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Morocco and Sudan towards Chad against Gaddafi. Gaddafi defended his government's actions by citing the need to support anti-imperialist and anti-colonial movements around the world. Gaddafi's behavior was often erratic and led some (from the West, as well as from the Arab world) to conclude that he was not mentally sound, a claim disputed by his regime. Despite this, his actions have often led to interrogations. François Mitterrand called him an "unstable man", Ronald Reagan dubbed him the "mad dog of the Middle East" and for Anwar al-Sadat, he was literally a "possessed demon". Despite receiving extensive aid and technical assistance from the Soviet Union and its allies, and aligning his country with the Eastern Bloc, Gaddafi retained ties to some pro-American governments in Western Europe, largely by courting Western oil companies with promises of access to the lucrative Libyan energy sector. After the 9/11 attacks, strained relations between Libya and NATO countries were mostly normalised, and sanctions against the country relaxed, in exchange for nuclear disarmament.

In early 2011, a civil war broke out in the context of the wider Arab Spring. The rebel anti-Gaddafi forces formed a committee named the National Transitional Council in February 2011, to act as an interim authority in the rebel-controlled areas. After killings by government forces[7] in addition to those by the rebel forces,[8] a multinational coalition led by NATO forces intervened in March in support of the rebels.[9][10][11] The International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant against Gaddafi and his entourage in June 2011. Gaddafi's government was overthrown in the wake of the fall of Tripoli to the rebel forces in August, although pockets of resistance held by forces in support of Gaddafi's government held out for another two months, especially in Gaddafi's hometown of Sirte, which he declared the new capital of Libya in September.[12] The fall of the last remaining sites in Sirte under pro-Gaddafi control on 20 October 2011, followed by the killing of Gaddafi, marked the end of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.

The name of Libya was changed several times during Gaddafi's tenure as leader. From its founding in 1969 to 1977, the name was the Libyan Arab Republic. In 1977, the name was changed to Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.[13] Jamahiriya was a term coined by Gaddafi,[13] usually translated as "state of the masses". The country was renamed again in 1986 as the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, after the United States bombing that year.


CONTINUES:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Libya_under_Muammar_Gaddafi


___
eof

sunnuntai 18. lokakuuta 2015

Something bizarre is happening to Ebola survivors that doctors are struggling to explain

Something bizarre is happening to Ebola survivors that doctors are struggling to explain

Saying that a patient is “cured” of the virus doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s been completely eradicated from the body.



Image: Shutterstock/Crevis

ONE OF THE biggest mysteries surrounding the Ebola virus is its ability to hide out in survivors’ bodies and evade detection by the immune system.
This “trick” of the virus became abundantly clear last week when Scottish nurse Pauline Cafferkey was readmitted to a London hospital on October 9 in ‘serious condition’.
This was a full nine months after doctors said she had made a full recovery from Ebola.
“The virus, several experts said, managed to somehow persist and apparently re-emerged to cause a severe disorder of her central nervous system,” The New York Times wrote this week.
“[H]er spinal fluid had tested positive for traces of Ebola.”
As doctors are poignantly learning, saying that a patient is “cured” of the virus doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s completely eradicated from the body.
Ebola survivors like Cafferkey are experiencing lingering symptoms such as vision and hearing loss, seizures, insomnia, and body aches that have persisted for months following infection.
The virus — which is transmitted through infected bodily fluids and can cause severe fever, diarrhea, vomiting, headache, pain, and bruising — kills about half of those who contract it.
Epidemic
As of October 2015, Ebola has killed a staggering 11,312 people. This was following the 2014 epidemic, which quickly spread through West Africa and trickled into parts of the US and Europe.
While those who count themselves among the survivors are especially lucky to be alive, many are still suffering. Doctors are still learning what other nasty health issues can flare up long after defeating the primary, life-threatening infection.
One of the best sources of information we have on these latent symptoms is Dr. Ian Crozier, an American Ebola survivor who contracted the illness while treating patients in Sierra Leone in August 2014.
Ebola epidemicScottish nurse Pauline Cafferkey.Source: Lisa Ferguson/Scotland on Sunday
At an infectious disease conference in San Diego on October 7, Crozier detailed some of the bizarre and devastating symptoms he’s experienced since his more than 40-day recovery at Emory University Hospital in Atlanta.
The most striking were severe eye issues, which began about 10 weeks after his first symptoms of Ebola, and which nearly caused him to go blind. A report published in The New England Journal of Medicine on May 7, 2015 described the flotilla of symptoms.
When Crozier was released from the hospital 10 weeks after Ebola onset, the virus was not detectable in his blood and urine, but was present in his semen.
He experienced difficulty walking, lower back pain, inflammation of his Achilles tendon, and pins-and-needles sensations in his lower limbs. Crozier also began to feel burning in his eyes, along with the feeling that something was in his eyes and a sensitivity to light. An eye exam revealed scarring on the inside surface of his eye and a small hemorrhage next to one of the scars in his left eye.
About a month later, these symptoms worsened. His doctors took a sample of the fluid that sits between the cornea and lens and — lo and behold — it tested positive for Ebola.
His vision continued to decline in his left eye, and at one point his eye color even turned from blue to bright green.
1Ian Crozier's eye turned from blue to green following Ebola disease.Source: CNN
“In addition to the colour change, I lost pressure in my eye, my eye began getting softer and losing its architecture,” Crozier said in a video interview with CNN.
“So by the time I flew back to Phoenix, it was like looking through a block of cheese.”
Eye problems aren’t unusual among Ebola survivors. About 25% of Ebola survivors who have been evaluated by medical doctors have reported changes in vision, according to the Associated Press.
Crozier’s vision has since improved, after what turned out to be cellular debris that was blocking his line of vision detached from his retina. But according to Live Science, it still isn’t back to normal.
Since Crozier was released from the hospital, he’s continued to experience severe back pain, ringing in his ears, hearing loss, and cognitive problems such as impaired short-term memory. He also suffered a seizure while attending a wedding in England this summer, according to Live Science, and has since been put on an antiepileptic drug.
Nina Pham, a Texas nurse who contracted the disease while treating a patient at a Dallas hospital in October 2014, has also had lingering health issues, including hair loss, body aches, nightmares, and insomnia.
Ebola epidemicAn Ebola medical exercise takes place in the UK.Source: Anna Gowthorpe
Long-term effects
Few people survive Ebola like Crozier, so the disease’s long-term effects aren’t well-studied. But lingering symptoms such as body and joint aches and fatigue are what you’d expect after any serious infection, Jesse Goodman, an infectious-disease expert and a professor of medicine at Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, D.C., told LiveScience.
Chemicals released by the immune system can make people feel sick, Goodman said, and muscles and tissues could have been injured from the dehydration, malnutrition, and low blood pressure during the disease.
Roughly 13,000 other Ebola survivors are experiencing similar problems as Crozier, Pham, and other survivors. To that end, scientists launched a five-year study in June that will follow 1,500 Ebola survivors and 6,000 of people they were in close contact with.
But not all survivors have had such horrendous lasting effects.
Journalist Ashoka Mukpo was emotionally scarred after contracting Ebola while covering the outbreak in Liberia, but in an interview with CNN he said, “I feel pretty strong physically, psychologically, and spiritually right now”. And doctor Rick Sacra, who also contracted Ebola in Liberia, only experienced blurry vision and a bad cough following his recovery at a hospital in Nebraska.
“There is an emerging problem in Ebola survivors,” Crozier said in the CNN interview.
“It will be a varied spectrum — some will be mild, but there will be patients who develop severe complications and who are going blind. You can imagine an Ebola survivor who’s already been through their own personal hell … and then through a lonelier hell in an ETU [Ebola Treatment Unit],” Crozier continued.

http://www.thejournal.ie/ebola-virus-2393069-Oct2015/
“It’s a story we must pay attention to.”
- Julia Calderone

Read: The British nurse who fought off Ebola last year is now ‘critically ill’ again

Read: Defence Forces medics return home from Ebola-ravaged Sierra Leone