- A massive, coordinated fraud.
- CHILLY TEMPERATURES DURING THE MAUNDER MINIMUM
Science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures
The climate change hoax has collapsed.
A devastating series of research papers has just been published, revealing that human activity can account for no more than a .01°C rise in global temperatures, meaning that all the human activity targeted by radical climate change alarmists — combustion engines, airplane flights, diesel tractors — has virtually no measurable impact on the temperature of the planet.
The paper explains that IPCC analysis of global temperatures suffers from a glaring error — namely, failure to account for “influences of low cloud cover” and how it impacts global temperatures.
Natural variations in low cloud cover, which are strongly influenced by cosmic radiation’s ability to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere due to variations in the strength of our planet’s magnetosphere, account for nearly all changes in global temperature, the researchers explain.
As this chart reveals, more cloud cover is inversely related to temperature. In other words, clouds shield the surface of the Earth from the sun, providing shade cover cooling, while a lack of clouds results in more warming:
Cloud cover accounts for the real changes in global temperatures
This is further supported by researchers at Kobe University in Japan who published a nearly simultaneous paper that reveals how changes in our planet’s magnetic field govern the intensity of solar radiation that reaches the lower atmosphere, causing cloud formation that alters global temperatures.
Get more news like this without being censored: Get the Natural News app for your mobile devices. Enjoy uncensored news, lab test results, videos, podcasts and more. Bypass all the unfair censorship by Google, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. Get your daily news and videos directly from the source! Download here.
That study, published in Nature, is called, “Intensified East Asian winter monsoon during the last geomagnetic reversal transition.”
It states:
It states:
Records of suborbital-scale climate variation during the last glacial and Holocene periods can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of rapid climate changes… At least one event was associated with a decrease in the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field. Thus, climate records from the MIS 19 interglacial can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of a variety of climate changes, including testing the effect of changes in geomagnetic dipole field strength on climate through galactic cosmic ray (GCR)-induced cloud formation…
In effect, cosmic rays which are normally deflected via the magnetosphere are, in times of weak or changing magnetic fields emanating from Earth itself, able to penetrate further into Earth’s atmosphere, causing the formation of low-level clouds which cover the land in a kind of “umbrella effect” that shades the land from the sun, allowing cooling to take place. But a lack of clouds makes the surface hotter, as would be expected. This natural phenomenon is now documented to be the primary driver of global temperatures and climate, not human activity.
Burn all the oil you want, in other words, and it’s still just a drop in the bucket compared to the power of the sun and other cosmic influences.
All the fossil fuel consumption in the world barely contributes anything to actual global temperatures, the researchers confirmed.
All the fossil fuel consumption in the world barely contributes anything to actual global temperatures, the researchers confirmed.
As they explain, the IPCC’s climate models are wildly overestimating the influence of carbon dioxide on global temperatures:
…the [IPCC] models fail to derive the influences of low cloud cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. That is why J. KAUPPINEN AND P. MALMI IPCC represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in the increased CO2 is less than 10%, we have practically no anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global temperature.
The entire “climate change” hoax is a fraud
Carbon dioxide, in other words, isn’t the “pollutant” that climate change alarmists have long claimed it to be. CO2 won’t destroy the planet and barely has any effect on global temperatures (the IPCC’s estimate of its effect is, according to Finnish researchers, about one order of magnitude too large, or ten times the actual amount).
In fact, NASA was forced to recently admit that carbon dioxide is re-greening the Earth on a massive scale by supporting the growth of rainforests, trees and grasslands.
See these maps showing the increase in green plant life, thanks to rising CO2:
See these maps showing the increase in green plant life, thanks to rising CO2:
Importantly, reducing our global consumption of fossil fuels will have virtually no impact on global temperatures.
The far bigger governor of climate and temperatures is the strength and configuration of Earth’s magnetosphere, which has always been in flux since the formation of the planet billions of years ago. The weaker the magnetosphere, the more cosmic rays penetrate the atmosphere, resulting in the generation of clouds, which shield the planet’s surface from the sun. Thus, a weaker magnetosphere causes global cooling, while a stronger magnetosphere results in global warming, according to this research. This phenomenon is called the “Svensmark Effect.”
The far bigger governor of climate and temperatures is the strength and configuration of Earth’s magnetosphere, which has always been in flux since the formation of the planet billions of years ago. The weaker the magnetosphere, the more cosmic rays penetrate the atmosphere, resulting in the generation of clouds, which shield the planet’s surface from the sun. Thus, a weaker magnetosphere causes global cooling, while a stronger magnetosphere results in global warming, according to this research. This phenomenon is called the “Svensmark Effect.”
This suggests that the increase in cosmic rays was accompanied by an increase in low-cloud cover, the umbrella effect of the clouds cooled the continent, and Siberian high atmospheric pressure became stronger. Added to other phenomena during the geomagnetic reversal — evidence of an annual average temperature drop of 2-3 degrees Celsius, and an increase in annual temperature ranges from the sediment in Osaka Bay — this new discovery about winter monsoons provides further proof that the climate changes are caused by the cloud umbrella effect.
Carbon Dioxide revealed as the “Miracle Molecule
of Life” for re-greening the planet
The “war on carbon” is derived from sheer stupidity, arrogance and scientific illiteracy
The extreme alarmism of climate change lunatics — best personified by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ insistence that humanity will be destroyed in 12 years if we don’t stop burning fossil fuels — is all based on nothing but fearmongering media propaganda and faked science. (The IPCC and NOAA both routinely fudge temperature data to try to create a warming “trend” where none exists.)
It’s all a massive, coordinated fraud, and the mainstream media deliberately lies to the public about climate change to push anti-free market schemes that would destroy the U.S. economy while transferring literally trillions of dollars into the pockets of wealthy globalists as part of a “carbon tax” scheme.
Yet carbon isn’t the problem at all. And the “war on carbon” is a stupid, senseless policy created by idiots, given that humans are carbon-based lifeforms, meaning that any “war on carbon” is a war on humanity.
See more research papers from Jyrki Kauppinen at this link on Researchgate.net. And stay informed by reading Climate.news.
See more research papers from Jyrki Kauppinen at this link on Researchgate.net. And stay informed by reading Climate.news.
Why Carbon Dioxide is the "Miracle Molecule of Life"
for GREENING our planet
for GREENING our planet
___
Scientists Find Earth is Cooling, Not Warming; NASA Predicts Mini-Ice Age
‘Solar minimum’ low point in 2019 or 2020
November 19, 2018 | Baxter Dmitry
Humanity could soon face a long, cold winter which could see temperatures around the globe plunge to record lows that will herald a “mini-Ice Age”, according to new scientific research by NASA.
‘We see a cooling trend,’ Martin Mlynczak of NASA’s Langley Research Center told Space Weather, directly contradicting decades of global warming hysteria and false science promoted by conflicted scientists, politicians and mainstream media.
‘High above Earth’s surface, near the edge of space, our atmosphere is losing heat energy. If current trends continue, it could soon set a Space Age record for cold.’
Brace yourselves, because it could be about to get very, very cold.
Metro reports: Sunspot activity follows a cycle which is believed to last 11 years as the number of patches peaks and drops.
There have been very few spots on the sun for most of this year. This could mean that it will get very cold, very quickly.
However, it’s difficult to predict the impact of solar activity on the Earth and scientists are stil debating how sunspots affect our weather.
‘It could happen in a matter of months,’ Mlynczak added.
‘It could happen in a matter of months,’ Mlynczak added.
Earlier this year, NASA released a picture showing the blank face of the sun looking more like a snooker ball than the roiling surface of a super-hot star.
The sun is predicted to reach its ‘solar minimum’ low point in 2019 or 2020, according to Nasa’s calculations.
Perhaps the most famous period of low sunspot activity was the Maunder Minimum of the 17th century.
During that time, there was a ‘little ice age’ when London’s Thames River froze over, although researchers believe that global warming will stop this happening again. Solar minimum may enhance the effects of space weather, disrupt communications and navigation, and even cause space junk to ‘hang around’, Nasa said.
Last year, a scientist claimed the chilling effect on the lack of sunspots could actually save us from global warming – although her claims were hotly disputed.
Valentina Zharkova, a professor of mathematics at Northumbria University, published a paper which contains ‘the first serious prediction of a reduction of solar activity that might affect human lives’.
https://newspunch.com/scientists-find-earth-is-cooling-not-warming-nasa-predicts-mini-ice-age/
Valentina Zharkova, a professor of mathematics at Northumbria University, published a paper which contains ‘the first serious prediction of a reduction of solar activity that might affect human lives’.
‘I hope global warming will be overridden by this effect, giving humankind and the Earth 30 years to sort out our pollution,’ she said.
_____
PROFESSOR VALENTINA ZHARKOVA BREAKS HER SILENCE AND CONFIRMS “SUPER” GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM
Professor Valentina Zharkova gave a presentation of her Climate and the Solar Magnetic Field hypothesis at the Global Warming Policy Foundation in October, 2018. The information she unveiled should shake/wake you up.
Zharkova was one of the few that correctly predicted solar cycle 24 would be weaker than cycle 23 — only 2 out of 150 models predicted this.
Her models have run at a 93% accuracy and her findings suggest a Super Grand Solar Minimum is on the cards beginning 2020 and running for 350-400 years.
The last time we had a little ice age only two magnetic fields of the sun went out of phase. This time, all four magnetic fields are going out of phase.
Here’s a great (and relatively brief) video explanation of Zharkova’s presentation from Diamond and Lee Wheelbarger:
And here’s the presentation in full:
If the world was looking for an Epiphany moment, this should be it.
Even if you believe the IPCC’s worst case scenario, Zharkova’s analysis blows any ‘warming’ out of the water.
Lee Wheelbarger sums it up: even if the IPCC’s worst case scenarios are seen, that’s only a 1.5 watts per square meter increase. Zharkova’s analysis shows a 8 watts per square meter decrease in TSI to the planet.
Forget the arguments, debates and attempts to win over AGW alarmists — and just prepare.
Time is almost up.
Solar Minimum is Coming
Jun 27. 2017
High up in the clear blue noontime sky, the sun appears to be much thesame day-in, day-out, year after year.
But astronomers have long known that this is not true. The sun does change.
Properly-filtered telescopes reveal a fiery disk often speckled with dark sunspots. Sunspots are strongly magnetized, and they crackle with solar flares — magnetic explosions that illuminate Earth with flashes of X-rays and extreme ultraviolet radiation. The sun is a seething mass of activity.
Until it’s not. Every 11 years or so, sunspots fade away, bringing a period of
relative calm. “This is called solar minimum,” says Dean Pesnell of NASA's Goddard
Space Flight. Center in Greenbelt, MD. “And it’s a regular part of the sunspot cycle.”
The sun is heading toward solar minimum now. Sunspot counts were relatively high
in 2014, and now they are sliding toward a low point expected in 2019 - 2020.
While intense activity such as sunspots and solar flares subside during solar
minimum, that doesn’t mean the sun becomes dull. Solar activity simply changes form.
relative calm. “This is called solar minimum,” says Dean Pesnell of NASA's Goddard
Space Flight. Center in Greenbelt, MD. “And it’s a regular part of the sunspot cycle.”
The sun is heading toward solar minimum now. Sunspot counts were relatively high
in 2014, and now they are sliding toward a low point expected in 2019 - 2020.
While intense activity such as sunspots and solar flares subside during solar
minimum, that doesn’t mean the sun becomes dull. Solar activity simply changes form.
For instance, says Pesnell, “during solar minimum we can see the development of
long-lived coronal holes.” Coronal holes are vast regions in the sun’s atmosphere
where the sun’s magnetic field opens up and allows streams of solar particles to
escape the sun as the fast solar wind.
The solar wind is a stream of charged particles released from the upper atmosphere
of the Sun, called the corona. This plasma consists of mostly electrons, protons and
alpha particles withkinetic energy between 0.5 and 10 keV.
Embedded within the solar-wind plasma is theinterplanetary magnetic field.[2]
The solar wind varies in density, temperature and speed over time and over solar
latitude and longitude. Its particles can escape the Sun's gravity because of their
high energy resulting from the high temperature of the corona, which in turn is a
result of the coronal magnetic field. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_wind
Pesnell says “We see these holes throughout the solar cycle, but during solar
minimum, they can last for a long time - six months or more.” Streams of solar wind
flowing from coronal holes can cause space weather effects near Earth when they
hit Earth’s magnetic field. These effects can include temporary disturbances of the
Earth’s magnetosphere, called geomagnetic storms, auroras, and disruptions to
communications and navigation systems.
During solar minimum, the effects of Earth’s upper atmosphere on satellites in low
Earth orbit changes too.
Normally Earth’s upper atmosphere is heated and puffed up by ultraviolet radiation
from the sun. Satellites in low Earth orbit experience friction as they skim through
the outskirts of our atmosphere. This friction creates drag, causing satellites to
lose speed over time and eventually fall back to Earth.
Drag is a good thing, for space junk; natural and man-made particles floating in
orbit around Earth.
orbit around Earth.
Drag helps keep low Earth orbit clear of debris.
But during solar minimum, this natural heating mechanism subsides.
Earth’s upper atmosphere cools and, to some degree, can collapse.
Without a normal amount of drag, space junk tends to hang around.
There are unique space weather effects that get stronger during solar minimum.
For example, the number of galactic cosmic rays that reach Earth’s upper
atmosphere increases during solar minimum. Galactic cosmic rays are high energy particles
accelerated toward the solar system by distant supernova explosions and other
violent events in the galaxy.
Pesnell says that “During solar minimum, the sun’s magnetic field weakens and
provides less shielding from these cosmic rays. This can pose an increased threat
(and totally prevents) to astronauts traveling through space.”
A Van Allen radiation belt is a zone of energetic charged particles, most of which
originate from the solar wind, that are captured by and held around a planet by that
planet's magnetic field. Earth has two such belts and sometimes others may be
temporarily created.
The discovery of the belts is credited to James Van Allen, and as a result, Earth's
belts are known as the Van Allen belts.
Earth's two main belts extend from an altitude of about 640 to 58,000 km (400 to
36,040 mi)[1] above the surface in which region radiation levels vary. Most of the
particles that form the belts are thought to come from solar windand other particles
by cosmic rays.[2] By trapping the solar wind, the magnetic field deflects those
energetic particles and protects the atmosphere from destruction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt
Many things can change temperatures on Earth: a volcano erupts, swathing the Earth with bright haze that blocks sunlight, and temperatures drop;
- greenhouse gases trap heat in the atmosphere, and temperatures climb.
From 1650 to 1710, temperatures across much of the Northern Hemisphere plunged when the Sun entered a quiet phase now called the Maunder Minimum.
The Maunder Minimum, also known as the "prolonged sunspot minimum", is the name used for the period around 1645 to 1715 during which sunspots became exceedingly rare, as was then noted by solar observers.
The term was introduced after John A. Eddy[1]published a landmark 1976 paper in Science.[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum
During this period, very few sunspots appeared on the surface of the Sun, and the overall brightness of the Sun decreased slightly. Already in the midst of a colder-than-average period called the Little Ice Age, Europe and North America went into a deep freeze:
alpine glaciers extended over valley farmland; sea ice crept south from the Arctic; and the famous canals in the Netherlands froze regularly— an event that is rare today.
The impact of the solar minimum is clear in this image, which shows the temperature difference between 1680, a year at the center of the Maunder Minimum, and 1780, a year of normal solar activity, as calculated by a general circulation model.
Deep blue across eastern and central North America and northern Eurasia illustrates where the drop in temperature was the greatest. Nearly all other land areas were also cooler in 1680, as indicated by the varying shades of blue. The few regions that appear to have been warmer in 1680 are Alaska and the eastern Pacific Ocean (left), the North Atlantic Ocean south of Greenland (left of center), and north of Iceland (top center).
https://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view.php?id=7122
https://twitter.com/GraviolaDOTfi/status/1149792187187683329
__
EOF
But during solar minimum, this natural heating mechanism subsides.
Earth’s upper atmosphere cools and, to some degree, can collapse.
Without a normal amount of drag, space junk tends to hang around.
There are unique space weather effects that get stronger during solar minimum.
For example, the number of galactic cosmic rays that reach Earth’s upper
atmosphere increases during solar minimum. Galactic cosmic rays are high energy particles
accelerated toward the solar system by distant supernova explosions and other
violent events in the galaxy.
provides less shielding from these cosmic rays. This can pose an increased threat
(and totally prevents) to astronauts traveling through space.”
A Van Allen radiation belt is a zone of energetic charged particles, most of which
originate from the solar wind, that are captured by and held around a planet by that
planet's magnetic field. Earth has two such belts and sometimes others may be
temporarily created.
The discovery of the belts is credited to James Van Allen, and as a result, Earth's
belts are known as the Van Allen belts.
Earth's two main belts extend from an altitude of about 640 to 58,000 km (400 to
36,040 mi)[1] above the surface in which region radiation levels vary. Most of the
particles that form the belts are thought to come from solar windand other particles
by cosmic rays.[2] By trapping the solar wind, the magnetic field deflects those
energetic particles and protects the atmosphere from destruction.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt
Solar minimum brings about many changes to our sun, but less solar activity doesn’t
make the sun and our space environment any less interesting.
make the sun and our space environment any less interesting.
For more news about the changes ahead, stay tuned to science.nasa.gov
__
CHILLY TEMPERATURES DURING THE MAUNDER MINIMUM
Many things can change temperatures on Earth: a volcano erupts, swathing the Earth with bright haze that blocks sunlight, and temperatures drop;
From 1650 to 1710, temperatures across much of the Northern Hemisphere plunged when the Sun entered a quiet phase now called the Maunder Minimum.
The Maunder Minimum, also known as the "prolonged sunspot minimum", is the name used for the period around 1645 to 1715 during which sunspots became exceedingly rare, as was then noted by solar observers.
The term was introduced after John A. Eddy[1]published a landmark 1976 paper in Science.[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum
During this period, very few sunspots appeared on the surface of the Sun, and the overall brightness of the Sun decreased slightly. Already in the midst of a colder-than-average period called the Little Ice Age, Europe and North America went into a deep freeze:
alpine glaciers extended over valley farmland; sea ice crept south from the Arctic; and the famous canals in the Netherlands froze regularly— an event that is rare today.
The impact of the solar minimum is clear in this image, which shows the temperature difference between 1680, a year at the center of the Maunder Minimum, and 1780, a year of normal solar activity, as calculated by a general circulation model.
Deep blue across eastern and central North America and northern Eurasia illustrates where the drop in temperature was the greatest. Nearly all other land areas were also cooler in 1680, as indicated by the varying shades of blue. The few regions that appear to have been warmer in 1680 are Alaska and the eastern Pacific Ocean (left), the North Atlantic Ocean south of Greenland (left of center), and north of Iceland (top center).
If energy from the Sun decreased only slightly, why did temperatures drop so severely in the Northern Hemisphere?
Climate scientist Drew Shindell and colleagues at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies tackled that question by combining temperature records gleaned from tree rings, ice cores, corals, and the few measurements recorded in the historical record, with an advanced computer model of the Earth’s climate. The group first calculated the amount of energy coming from the Sun during the Maunder Minimum and entered the information into a general circulation model. The model is a mathematical representation of the way various Earth systems—ocean surface temperatures, different layers of the atmosphere, energy reflected and absorbed from land, and so forth—interact to produce the climate.
Climate scientist Drew Shindell and colleagues at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies tackled that question by combining temperature records gleaned from tree rings, ice cores, corals, and the few measurements recorded in the historical record, with an advanced computer model of the Earth’s climate. The group first calculated the amount of energy coming from the Sun during the Maunder Minimum and entered the information into a general circulation model. The model is a mathematical representation of the way various Earth systems—ocean surface temperatures, different layers of the atmosphere, energy reflected and absorbed from land, and so forth—interact to produce the climate.
When the model started with the decreased solar energy and returned temperatures that matched the paleoclimate record, Shindell and his colleagues knew that the model was showing how the Maunder Minimum could have caused the extreme drop in temperatures. The model showed that the drop in temperature was related to ozone in the stratosphere, the layer of the atmosphere that is between 10 and 50 kilometers from the Earth’s surface. Ozone is created when high-energy ultraviolet light from the Sun interacts with oxygen. During the Maunder Minimum, the Sun emitted less strong ultraviolet light, and so less ozone formed. The decrease in ozone affected planetary waves, the giant wiggles in the jet stream that we are used to seeing on television weather reports.
The change to the planetary waves kicked the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) — the balance between a permanent low-pressure system near Greenland and a permanent high-pressure system to its south — into a negative phase. When the NAO is negative, both pressure systems are relatively weak. Under these conditions, winter storms crossing the Atlantic generally head eastward toward Europe, which experiences a more severe winter. (When the NAO is positive, winter storms track farther north, making winters in Europe milder.)
The model results, shown above, illustrate that the NAO was more negative on average during the Maunder Minimum, and Europe remained unusually cold. These results matched the paleoclimate record.
The model results, shown above, illustrate that the NAO was more negative on average during the Maunder Minimum, and Europe remained unusually cold. These results matched the paleoclimate record.
By creating a model that could reproduce temperatures recorded in paleoclimate records, Shindell and colleagues reached a better understanding of how changes in the stratosphere influence weather patterns. With such an understanding, scientists are better poised to understand what factors could influence Earth’s climate in the future. To read more about how ancient temperature records are used to improve climate models, see Paleoclimatology: Understanding the Past to Predict the Future, the final installment of a series of articles about paleoclimatology on the Earth Observatory.
- Further Reading:
- Glaciers, Old Masters, and Galileo: The Puzzle of the Chilly 17th Century, by Drew Shindell at NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
https://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view.php?id=7122
New Finnish Study Finds No Evidence For Man-Made Climate Change | JULY 11, 2019. - There goes the “consensus”— Graviola Finland (@GraviolaDOTfi) 12. heinäkuuta 2019
“During the last hundred years the temperature is increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C.”https://t.co/fK0bvp0kQo pic.twitter.com/GwrNcB5rpF
https://twitter.com/GraviolaDOTfi/status/1149792187187683329
__
EOF
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti
You are welcome to show your opinion here!