Graphene Oxide Nanotubes for 5G Mind Control - Activates By Cell Phone EMF

• Nanotubes of graphene oxide search and become attached to synapses.
• Studies say graphene nanoparticles are responsible for Covid associated symptoms and blood clots.
• Graphene nanoparticles find resonance in the frequency of 41,6 GHz microwaves of the 5G technology.
• Graphene Oxide Touches Blood: In Vivo Interactions of Bio-Coronated 2D Materials.
• Graphene Oxide The Vector For Covid-19 Democide.

Vaccines Deliver Graphene Oxide Nanotubes for 5G Mind Control

June 21, 2021 | UPDATE Oct 31, 2025

Spanish researchers say that graphene oxide nanoparticles found in covid vaccines are compatible with neurons and other brain cells.
Nanotubes of grapheneoxide search and become attached to synapses. 

by "A Marcher" (from Spain)

(henrymakow.com)

Building on last week's findings, two Spanish researchers believe that the "secret nanoparticles" found in covid vaccines are
nanotubes of graphene oxide. 

The Andalusian biostatistician Ricardo Delgado who hosts an online program called La Quinta Columna. (the fifth column) and his partner Dr. Jose Luis Sevillano (a family doctor) analyzed the undeniable magnetic phenomenon present in most vaccinated people.

They found that graphene oxide nano particles are actually compatible with neurons and other brain cells. Nanotubes of grapheneoxide search the synapses and attach to them. 

Graphene nanoparticles were excitable through frequencies-generating behavioral changes in the subjects. To be more exact: graphene nanoparticles find resonance in the frequency of 41,6 GHz microwaves of the 5G technology.

Subjects inoculated with graphene oxide nanoparticles can be manipulated mentally by tuning into different frequencies inside the 5G ranges. They can feel, think and see feelings, thoughts or things that don't actually exist. They could develop fake memories or delete real existing memories. 

Even without a fully-enabled 5G net, people have reported they feel strange after taking the jab. Other studies say graphene nanoparticles are responsible for covid associated symptoms and blood clots.

(See at the end of page: Graphene Oxide Touches Blood: In Vivo Interactions of Bio-Coronated 2D Materials | October 2018.DOI:10.1039/C8NH00318A )

The scientists maintain that the global vaccination program is an excuse to cage mankind in a dangerous covert global transhumanism program that will end in a catastrophe for the human race.

5G is supposed to be fully enabled in July-August 2021. In order to stop the whole inoculation program, they call the people who suffer from this magnetic disorder to report it to doctors and health authorities.

These conclusions are supported by other scientists and graphene producers (Graphenea Inc. and Nanografi) as well as research projects like Graphene Flagship, Project BrainSTORMS , the Obama Brain Initiative and DARPA. 

https://www.henrymakow.com/2021/06/vaccines-deliver-graphene-oxide.html
------

Related:

Graphene nano particles have been found in facemasks, and swabs too

Vaccines Deliver Nanoparticles for Mind Control

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20191120005616/en/Carbon-Nanotube-Technology-Exceeds-100GHz-for-First-Time-in-RF-Applications

https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2012/sc/c1sc00726b#!divAbstract

First Comment from Anon

No one is asking why people are becoming magnetic or even getting large iron build-ups post vaccines. I am making the connection which may be unpopular; here is another part of the puzzle. When the sh*t show started in March 2020, a lot of effort went into silencing, censoring the top of 5G, or written another way Penta-G which logically spells Pentagram. The agenda is a depopulation genocide, the bioweapon delivery system is these untested gene therapy vaxes. People are speculating about death by blood clots, and gradual degradation of health by top up vax shots leading to death within 5 years or more. 

The purpose of changing your metal ionic balance, hence magnetism is to alter the bodies electro chemical make up. Our bodies are transmitters and receivers of electro magnetic radiation. To alter the balance is to make us more or less susceptible to external energy inputs.

5G is not about the internet of things; it is a military grade weapons system. They are building a kill grid, when energy inputs have been targeted very specifically to a larger area such as town or city, then to smaller area of a district, even smaller area to specific streets or buildings, and with pin point accuracy to a building, exact locations of buildings and even a targeted individual in the building. 

The symptoms of radiation sickness from 5G is respiratory difficulty, flu symptoms, altitude sickness which fits covid19 symptoms. When an area has been mass vaccinated, the 5G frequency can be altered to kill frequency to cause mass deaths. 

The vaxed are walking targets for a mass culling with 5G weapon systems. The Wuhan area had mass vaccinations, then the 5G grid activated, then rapid deaths. In this information war disinformation has been spread to send you off scent or not to make the connection. A reliable estimate in Wuhan is 20M mobile phone numbers ceased to exist, unpaid bills or the owners were no longer alive.

I am not privy to the full agenda. 5G radiation deaths and the link between Covid19, 5G and the superconducting vaxes has not been expanded. So join the dots. The communist gulags and Nazi work camps have been replaced with "lockdowns" we imprison ourselves, mask obedience or defiance is the new star of Covid. 

The weapon delivery system is the vax shots; it will create many collateral deaths, but too slow for 90% depopulation by 2030. The mass gas chambers and incinerators are populations being purged with 5G radiation attacks, like a microwave gun killing people silently in the street or in their homes as they sleep. 

These evil Luciferian scum are in a race to deceive and enslave humanity, building the death grid to murder millions including their disposable order followers in Police, Military and Health mafia. In theory they have created a kill grid that in a single day could genocide 100M in the world by a flick of the switch.

I have followed different commentators including Mark Steele from North East in England, UK. 5G truth is the least discussed topic in mainstream and heavily censored in alternative media to stifle its discussion.

https://www.henrymakow.com/2021/06/vaccines-deliver-graphene-oxide.html

Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at henry@henrymakow.com

___

 

Graphene Oxide The Vector For Covid-19 Democide

 

JULY 28, 2021 BY ARIYANA LOVE

In recent years, GRAPHENE has been exploited in the biomedical field, particularly for DNA sequencing and the development of biosensors. It’s presently being used for gene delivery and to administer drugs into biological cells.

This article by Natural News contains links to the exact science papers describing two decades of research into all this: IT’S REAL: Science paper documents “self-assembled magnetic nanosystems” for cybernetic biocircuitry interface and control systems in humans, including “DNA hydrogel” tech.

Dr. Carrie Madej and I have been reporting on the GRAPHENE Oxide Hydrogels which allow for self-replication, disassembling, and reassembling, and ballistic drug delivery to cells. The programmable nanoparticles also pass through the blood/brain barrier, causing PRION (auto-immune disease).

WATCH! Graphene Oxide Activates By Cell Phone EMF Frequency Radiation

"feature=oembed"


https://www.bitchute.com/embed/KYhM255LALhM/?feature=oembed#?secret=8Bk5p0EsDX

The GRAPHENE Hydrogels literally grow a new neural network inside the human body and do so extremely rapidly. This was observed by a Slovakia team of researchers.

GRAPHENE’s thermal property and electrical conductivity make it a superconductor. The artificial neuron network can receive and transmit signals and can be externally controlled through 5G frequency and AI. GRAPHENE Family Nanoparticles contain drug-chemical payloads for mRNA “gene therapy” and it’s being deployed without Informed Consent. GRAPHENE OXIDE is the vector for Moderna’s “operating system” and the sad reality is that the vaxxed will transform into genetically modified humans rapidly after inoculation because the technology is very advanced.

MORE: https://graviolat.blogspot.com/2021/09/graphene-oxide-vector-for-covid-19.html

____


UPDATE Oct 31, 2025

Graphene Reacting To EM Field From A Cell Phone - This Is In The Covid Vax and in peoples blood

38812 Views - 4 years ago

Jim Crenshaw

Sensitivity - Normal (BBFC 12)

The so-called "Covid-Vaccine" was found to be 99% Graphene Oxide, which is known to be able to pass through the blood/brain barrier. These nanobots very well may be a new life form, and now they're swimming around inside the heads of the idiots that volunteered to get the Covid-Kill-Shot... What could possibly go wrong?

Source: SonOfEnosh

https://www.bitchute.com/video/KwKugDCb5vfb/

___

Graphene Oxide Activates By Cell Phone EMF Frequency Radiation

SOURCE: 
https://seed200.bitchute.com/NYZMjDr6JOG3/KwKugDCb5vfb.mp4

___

__
eof 

Nearly Half Of ‘CV Hospitalizations’ This Year Have Been Mild Or Asymptomatic Cases

• Our Most Reliable Pandemic Number Is Losing Meaning.
• The study “analyzed the electronic records for nearly 50,000 COVID hospital admissions at the more than 100 VA hospitals across the country”.

Narrative Nuked: Nearly Half Of ‘CV Hospitalizations’ This Year Have Been Mild Or Asymptomatic Cases

September 14, 2021 This article was posted by TLB Staff Analysis, COMMENTARY, GOVERNMENT, HEALTH 0

Narrative Nuked: Nearly Half Of ‘COVID Hospitalizations’ This Year Have Been Mild Or Asymptomatic Cases

Tyler Durden

A brand new study is calling into question how reliable and meaningful of a number of “patients hospitalized with Covid-19” in the U.S. is.

Covid hospitalizations – the most common metric heard when discussing the seriousness of the pandemic – may not be nearly as meaningful of a number as many once thought. And don’t take it from us: The Atlantic published a stunning piece on Tuesday citing a new study that suggests “almost half of those hospitalized with COVID-19 have mild or asymptomatic cases”.

The Atlantic had formerly called Covid hospitalizations “the most reliable pandemic number,” last winter. Now, after a nationwide study of hospitalization records was release, the publication is walking back its fervor on that statement.

Researchers from Harvard Medical School, Tufts Medical Center, and the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System took on the task of trying to figure out how serious Covid cases were in those hospitalized, and how many people counted as Covid hospitalizations were actually in the hospital for Covid, versus getting a Covid test after being admitted for something else.

The study “analyzed the electronic records for nearly 50,000 COVID hospital admissions at the more than 100 VA hospitals across the country,” The Atlantic wrote. It “checked to see whether each patient required supplemental oxygen or had a blood oxygen level below 94 percent” in order to try and determine if cases met the NIH’s threshold for “severe COVID”.

What the study found was that from March 2020 to January 2021, 36% of Covid cases in the hospital were mild or asymptomatic. From January 2021 to June 2021, during the Delta variant’s spread, that number rose all the way to 48%. For vaccinated hospital patients, the number rose to a stunning 57%.

As The Atlantic put it in their own words:

“The study suggests that roughly half of all the hospitalized patients showing up on COVID-data dashboards in 2021 may have been admitted for another reason entirely, or had only a mild presentation of disease.”

The limitations of the study obviously included the fact that the VA isn’t representative of the total U.S. population:

Among the limitations of the study is that patients in the VA system are not representative of the U.S. population as a whole, as they include few women and no children. (Still, the new findings echo those from the two pediatric-admissions studies.) Also, like many medical centers, the VA has a policy to test every inpatient for COVID, but this is not a universal practice. Lastly, most of the data—even from the patients admitted in 2021—derive from the phase of the pandemic before Delta became widespread, and it’s possible that the ratios have changed in recent months. The study did run through June 30, however, when the Delta wave was about to break, and it did not find that the proportion of patients with moderate to severe respiratory distress was trending upward at the end of the observation period.

Graham Snyder, the medical director of infection prevention and hospital epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, says the study buries the lede of how effective the vaccine is: “It’s underreported how well the vaccine makes your life better, how much less sick you are likely to be, and less sick even if hospitalized. That’s the gem in this study.”

Daniel Griffin, an infectious-disease specialist at Columbia University, concurred: “People ask me, ‘Why am I getting vaccinated if I just end up in the hospital anyway?’ But I say, ‘You’ll end up leaving the hospital.’”

“We should refine the definition of hospitalization,” said Shira Doron, an infectious-disease physician and hospital epidemiologist at Tufts Medical Center and co-author of the study. “Those patients who are there with rather than from COVID don’t belong in the metric.”

What does the study as a whole conclude? Again, in the words of The Atlantic: “…the study also demonstrates that hospitalization rates for COVID, as cited by journalists and policy makers, can be misleading, if not considered carefully.”

*********

(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as written and compiled by Tyler Durden

Header featured Image (edited) credit: Hospital/news.stknews.com

••••

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/narrative-nuked-nearly-half-of-cv-hospitalizations-this-year-have-been-mild-or-asymptomatic-cases/

 

___

 

Our Most Reliable Pandemic Number Is Losing Meaning

A new study suggests that almost half of those hospitalized with COVID-19 have mild or asymptomatic cases.

By David Zweig

Justin Paget / Getty; The Atlantic

SEPTEMBER 13, 2021

At least 12,000 Americans have already died from COVID-19 this month, as the country inches through its latest surge in cases. But another worrying statistic is often cited to depict the dangers of this moment: The number of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the United States right now is as high as it has been since the beginning of February. It’s even worse in certain places: Some states, including Arkansas and Oregon, recently saw their COVID hospitalizations rise to higher levels than at any prior stage of the pandemic. But how much do those latter figures really tell us?

From the start, COVID hospitalizations have served as a vital metric for tracking the risks posed by the disease. Last winter, this magazine described it as “the most reliable pandemic number,” while Vox quoted the cardiologist Eric Topol as saying that it’s “the best indicator of where we are.” On the one hand, death counts offer finality, but they’re a lagging signal and don’t account for people who suffered from significant illness but survived. Case counts, on the other hand, depend on which and how many people happen to get tested. Presumably, hospitalization numbers provide a more stable and reliable gauge of the pandemic’s true toll, in terms of severe disease. But a new, nationwide study of hospitalization records, released as a preprint today (and not yet formally peer reviewed), suggests that the meaning of this gauge can easily be misinterpreted—and that it has been shifting over time.

If you want to make sense of the number of COVID hospitalizations at any given time, you need to know how sick each patient actually is. Until now, that’s been almost impossible to suss out. The federal government requires hospitals to report every patient who tests positive for COVID, yet the overall tallies of COVID hospitalizations, made available on various state and federal dashboards and widely reported on by the media, do not differentiate based on severity of illness. Some patients need extensive medical intervention, such as getting intubated. Others require supplemental oxygen or administration of the steroid dexamethasone. But there are many COVID patients in the hospital with fairly mild symptoms, too, who have been admitted for further observation on account of their comorbidities, or because they reported feeling short of breath. Another portion of the patients in this tally are in the hospital for something unrelated to COVID, and discovered that they were infected only because they were tested upon admission. How many patients fall into each category has been a topic of much speculation. In August, researchers from Harvard Medical School, Tufts Medical Center, and the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System decided to find out.

Read: America’s entire understanding of the pandemic was shaped by messy data

Researchers have tried to get at similar questions before. For two separate studies published in May, doctors in California read through several hundred charts of pediatric patients, one by one, to figure out why, exactly, each COVID-positive child had been admitted to the hospital. Did they need treatment for COVID, or was there some other reason for admission, like cancer treatment or a psychiatric episode, and the COVID diagnosis was merely incidental? According to the researchers, 40 to 45 percent of the hospitalizations that they examined were for patients in the latter group.

The authors of the paper out this week took a different tack to answer a similar question, this time for adults. Instead of meticulously looking at why a few hundred patients were admitted to a pair of hospitals, they analyzed the electronic records for nearly 50,000 COVID hospital admissions at the more than 100 VA hospitals across the country. Then they checked to see whether each patient required supplemental oxygen or had a blood oxygen level below 94 percent. (The latter criterion is based on the National Institutes of Health definition of “severe COVID.”) If either of these conditions was met, the authors classified that patient as having moderate to severe disease; otherwise, the case was considered mild or asymptomatic.

The study found that from March 2020 through early January 2021—before vaccination was widespread, and before the Delta variant had arrived—the proportion of patients with mild or asymptomatic disease was 36 percent. From mid-January through the end of June 2021, however, that number rose to 48 percent. In other words, the study suggests that roughly half of all the hospitalized patients showing up on COVID-data dashboards in 2021 may have been admitted for another reason entirely, or had only a mild presentation of disease.

This increase was even bigger for vaccinated hospital patients, of whom 57 percent had mild or asymptomatic disease. But unvaccinated patients have also been showing up with less severe symptoms, on average, than earlier in the pandemic: The study found that 45 percent of their cases were mild or asymptomatic since January 21. According to Shira Doron, an infectious-disease physician and hospital epidemiologist at Tufts Medical Center, in Boston, and one of the study’s co-authors, the latter finding may be explained by the fact that unvaccinated patients in the vaccine era tend to be a younger cohort who are less vulnerable to COVID and may be more likely to have been infected in the past.

Read: Why the pandemic experts failed

Among the limitations of the study is that patients in the VA system are not representative of the U.S. population as a whole, as they include few women and no children. (Still, the new findings echo those from the two pediatric-admissions studies.) Also, like many medical centers, the VA has a policy to test every inpatient for COVID, but this is not a universal practice. Lastly, most of the data—even from the patients admitted in 2021—derive from the phase of the pandemic before Delta became widespread, and it’s possible that the ratios have changed in recent months. The study did run through June 30, however, when the Delta wave was about to break, and it did not find that the proportion of patients with moderate to severe respiratory distress was trending upward at the end of the observation period.

The idea behind the study and what it investigates is important, says Graham Snyder, the medical director of infection prevention and hospital epidemiology at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, though he told me that it would benefit from a little more detail and nuance beyond oxygenation status. But Daniel Griffin, an infectious-disease specialist at Columbia University, told me that using other metrics for severity of illness, such as intensive-care admissions, presents different limitations. For one thing, different hospitals use different criteria for admitting patients to the ICU.

One of the important implications of the study, these experts say, is that the introduction of vaccines strongly correlates with a greater share of COVID hospital patients having mild or asymptomatic disease. “It’s underreported how well the vaccine makes your life better, how much less sick you are likely to be, and less sick even if hospitalized,” Snyder said. “That’s the gem in this study.”

“People ask me, ‘Why am I getting vaccinated if I just end up in the hospital anyway?’” Griffin said. “But I say, ‘You’ll end up leaving the hospital.’” He explained that some COVID patients are in for “soft” hospitalizations, where they need only minimal treatment and leave relatively quickly; others may be on the antiviral drug remdesivir for five days, or with a tube down their throat. One of the values of this study, he said, is that it helps the public understand this distinction—and the fact that not all COVID hospitalizations are the same.

But the study also demonstrates that hospitalization rates for COVID, as cited by journalists and policy makers, can be misleading, if not considered carefully. Clearly many patients right now are seriously ill. We also know that overcrowding of hospitals by COVID patients with even mild illness can have negative implications for patients in need of other care. At the same time, this study suggests that COVID hospitalization tallies can’t be taken as a simple measure of the prevalence of severe or even moderate disease, because they might inflate the true numbers by a factor of two. “As we look to shift from cases to hospitalizations as a metric to drive policy and assess level of risk to a community or state or country,” Doron told me, referring to decisions about school closures, business restrictions, mask requirements, and so on, “we should refine the definition of hospitalization. Those patients who are there with rather than from COVID don’t belong in the metric.”

The Atlantic’s COVID-19 coverage is supported by grants from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

David Zweig is a writer based in New York. He is the author of the nonfiction book Invisibles and the novel Swimming Inside the Sun.

https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/09/covid-hospitalization-numbers-can-be-misleading/620062/ 

__