Maahantuomme ravintolisiä USA: sta, FDA: n tiukasti valvomilta markkinoilta.
Visionamme on tuottaa oikeaa tietoa terveyden uhkatekijöistä.
Suurimpana ongelmana länsimaissa on jatkuva, yksipuolisesti liian hapan ruokavalio, jota elimistö ei kykene riittävästi puskuroimaan, vaan koko aineenvaihdunta -järjestelmä joutuu tekemään työtä happamuutta vastaan.
Lopulta elimistö alkaa tulehtua ja saavuttaa potilaan huomaamatta, jatkuvan tulehduksellisen tilan.
The Ebola virus can be destroyed naturally – despite what you’ve been told
To
date, not a single virus has been tested that is not inactivated
(killed) by a large enough dose of vitamin C (ascorbic acid).
Many
other antioxidants have similar virucidal effects, but vitamin C
appears uniquely to be of greatest potency and clinical efficacy, as its
simple chemical structure allows for it to be disseminated throughout
the body with little restriction.
As such, it is able to effectively address viral populations present in both the intracellular and extracellular spaces.
Other
antioxidants have been found to have higher ORAC (Oxygen Radical
Absorbance Capacity) values – measurements which are used to quantify
the antioxidant capacity of supplements (or foods). However, a virus can
never be incapacitated by a potent antioxidant if the chemical
structure of that antioxidant does not permit direct contact between the
virus and the antioxidant.
Why is vitamin C so effective in killing viruses?
A primary way in which vitamin C destroys viruses, or sets them up for destruction by the immune system, is by activating the ‘Fenton reaction’. In a nutshell, this reaction can proceed inside the virus,
inside cells in which viruses are replicating, and on the surfaces of
the viruses themselves. The result of this reaction that is stimulated
by the presence of vitamin C, one or more transition metal cations, and the local presence of peroxide is the immediate production of hydroxyl radicals.These radicals are the most reactive oxidizing agents ever identified.
As such, they radically upregulate oxidative stress and end up destroying whatever is in their immediate environment.
The
effects of vitamin C in “mopping up” after it inflicts its viral damage
are further supported by its potent and multifaceted support of the
immune system.
There is no other substance that
singularly does as much to promote increased and strong immune function
as vitamin C. Among many other effects, vitamin C directly stimulates interferon and antibody production,
while effectively supercharging the functions of the white blood cells
by becoming very concentrated inside those cells. To be balanced, it is
also important to note that the effects of vitamin C on chronic viral
infections, such as chronic hepatitis, AIDS, or HIV-positive states are
less profound, as the virus works its way into physical locations much
less accessible by vitamin C than when the viral infections are acute.
Nevertheless, long-term, highly-dosed protocols of vitamin C often
completely control and even occasionally cure these diseases.
World Trade Center’s Infamous 91st-Floor Israeli ‘Art Student’ Project
GELATIN & E-TEAM
The head of the family, Mel Simon, has had regular business
dealings with Jews Larry Silverstein, and Frank Lowy, the two criminal
WTC landlords who benefited tremendously from 9/11.
Missing Links Movie: The Definitive Truth About 9/11
From
its very inception, the so called 9/11 truth movement, otherwise known
as the people who say that George Bush and his cronies did 9/11, has
been ultimately led and controlled by the same people that perpetrated
the dastardly attacks.
Of course after the Mossad/Jews blew up the twin towers and building
7, they allocated their controlled mainstream media the task of pinning
all the blame on some rag tag, cave-dwelling, box cutter wielding Arabs
known as Al Qaeda (i.e. the toilet). When even the uber brainwashed cattle, known as American citizens,
started to have their doubts about this mindless fiction, the Jews
panicked and reverted back to their tried and true method of
“controlling the dissent”. The Jews launched a massive “9/11 conspiracy
theory” campaign, with their operatives positioned firmly at the helm of
the movement, ready to shift the blame onto anybody but Israel, Mossad,
and the Jews.
Let us review several of the key figures in this ‘movement’ that are
known disinformation agents who are intentionally or unintentionally,
willingly or unwillingly, working for the Jews to further cover up the
truth about who was really behind 9/11. Alex Jones - Probably the most prominent figure in the so called 9/11
truth movement. Jones has produced many kosher certified, bottom
feeding disinformation films such as: Terrorstorm, Endgame, and 9/11
road to Tyranny.
These worthless films are kosher-approved because they never mention the Jews. On a radio broadcast he made in 2006, Alex Jones stated “folks, I’ve
done the research, Israel could not carry out these [9/11] attacks.” Jones has several established connections that clearly illustrate
whose side he is really on. First we have the accusation that his wife
is indeed Jewish. This alone would explain his ferocious denial of the
existence of the Jews and its machinations. Second, is the overwhelming
fact that a majority of his sponsors are also Jews. Third is a startling discovery that he shares the same lawyer as
Holly Bronfman Lev, the younger sister of Edgar Bronfman Jr, one of the
most prominent Jew families in the world.
Couple this with the self admission that he has “many Jewish friends
in Hollywood”, alongside his heavy promotion by the mainstream media,
he’s made appearances on Jewish controlled media outlets.
It’s pretty much set in stone, Alex Jones is an agent of the Jews. One of the more outspoken and prominent members of the Kosher 911 truth movement is so called “infowarrior” Jason Bermas. This clown is a Jew and vehemently denies the existence of the Jews. Apparently it’s the “globalists” or the “Bilderberg Group”. Bermas is
the pathetic pet protege of Alex Jones and was even given his own show
by Alex Jones on GCN. Bermas is also the co-producer and researcher for
the Loose Change Films which are blatant Jewish propaganda that don’t
mention Israel, Mossad, or the Jews even once in any of the three films.
These three films, which were made by Bermas in conjunction with the
Jew Dylan Avery, were associated and promoted by a Jewess named Deborah
Simon, who married into the billionaire Jewish Simon family of
Minneapolis.
The head of the family, Mel Simon, has had regular business
dealings with Jews Larry Silverstein, and Frank Lowy, the two criminal
WTC landlords who benefited tremendously from 9/11.
Bermas and his kosher mentor, Alex Jones, have been exposed multiple
times for running false or hoax stories on their websites and at no time
did they attempt to confirm or validate the story. “Buy these new ring tones to help defeat the New World Order!” - Jason Bermas Webster Tarpley has been a central figure in the Kosher truth
movement, and wrote a book called 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in the
USA. Tarpley is a firm supporter of the Kosher version of the truth
which is that Bush & Cheney orchestrated 9/11; nary a mention does
he make to Israel and the Jews in his work and writings. Tarpley has made numerous appearances on Jewish controlled mainsteam
media networks CNN, FOX, and NBC. Getting on mainstream media is a clear
sign that the Jews approve of his message.
Luke Rudkowski & We Are Change One of the most publicized figures in the 9/11 truth movement has
been Luke Rudkowski and his organization We Are Change, Rudkowski is a
Jew who was one of the key figures that distracted the world for the
past 4-5 years, by bull horning “9/11 was an inside job” all day long.
Harrassing politicians about their attendance at Bilderberg Group
meetings, this clown is known to ban people from his website who dare
mention the Jews, and is a close associate of Alex Jones and
Loosechange, both disinfo agents of the Jews, he fits right in.
This Jewish controlled dissent power structure is composed of Alex
Jones at the head with Loose Change & We Are Change as the two
wings. Below them are the hordes of brainwashed fanboy minions who
absorb anything the aforementioned shills can conjure, and then parrot
this contrived malarkey to unsuspecting cattle. They will surely keep people distracted and transfixed on non-issues for years to come.
Mike Berger - This so called 9/11 truth activist is one of the key
Jews who tried controlling the dissent from the very beginning. He is a
member of the steering committee of the kosher 911truth.org website.
Berger and his cronies have tried to steer people away from the
evidence of Israeli/Jewish involvement in the attacks as well as the
demolitions of the twin towers & Building 7. Berger was the guest on the Alex Jones show when Alex stated that
Israel could not have carried out the attacks. Berger was heard
chuckling in the background as this was being said. Berger was also a
guest on the same CNN Showbiz Tonight episode as Webster Tarpley, and
Alex Jones, discussing Charlie Sheen’s statements about 9/11.
Jon Gold This Jewish so called “truth” activist is a member of the advisory
board of the aforementioned 911truth.org and was also the co-founder of
another kosher site — 911blogger.com. Jon Gold has been controlling the dissent for quite some time,
drafting rules on what 9/11 truth should look like, as well as denying
any role of Israel/Jews in 9/11. He announced his departure from 911blogger.com amidst ”too much
discussion” of controlled demolitions being the cause of the collapse of
the twin towers and building 7. He later silently returned under the the admin name “reprehenser” and
later went on to attack this film vehemently on 911blogger.
Here is one other incident in history Jon ‘Gold’ and his Jewish cohorts don’t want you knowing about: theholohoax.com/
Jonathan Elinoff - This WeAreChange Colorado activist is the creator
of a series of films called Core Of Corruption, so called documenting
the global conspiracy. These films severely underplay the role of Israel/Jews in the 9/11
attacks, and don’t even mention 1/10th of the evidence documented on
this website. This stuppering idiot admittedly comes from a Jewish
family, and attacking anyone who targets the Jews as the criminal
culprits of world crimes. Elinoff also went on to attack Missing Links and it’s creators with a
barrage of nasty language to an unwitting supporter of his who started
to ask why the evidence presented in Missing Links wasn’t mentioned in
Core Of Corruption. He also writes pathetic damage control articles attacking Michael
Collins Piper and his excellent book, Final Judgment, that proves the
JFK assassination was a Jew/Mossad hit. He has strong associations with
Alex Jones, and the Loose Change clan; at one time being the webmaster
of their site.
Jim Marrs Long time figure in “conspiracy” movement and popular author of
numerous conspiracy books about everything from the JFK assassination to
UFOs, secret societies, to 9/11. He is heavily promoted by operative
Alex Jones, appearing on his radio show dozens of times to control the
dissent. He also has made numerous appearnces on Coast to Coast AM with George
Noory. Marrs doesn’t dare veer off the 9/11 was an “inside job”
narrative, and suffers from amnesia when it comes to the Jews. Nowhere
in any of his work has he dedicated any time to discussing the issue. Marrs is the author of a ridiculous Jewish propaganda book called The
Rise of the Fourth Reich, which promotes the ludicrous idea that the
Nazis were not destroyed during WW II, but have been slowly gaining
control of America since the wars end, by means of prominent families,
secret societies, and financial institutions, with the goal of
converting the world into their fascist empire. This book is the nail in the coffin for Marrs, clearly he is a tool helping to conceal the machinations of the Jews.
Dave Von Kleist A somewhat prominent member of the 9/11 “truth” movement for the last 7-8 years, Von Kleist is completely and utterly kosher. His claim to fame is a 9/11 movie called In Plane Sight, which
promotes the theory that President George Bush and his cronies are
responsible for the attacks. His denial of the Jews achieves him the
honor of being called an unwitting tool of the Jews.
Of course there are dozens more people who are wittingly or
unwittingly working for or otherwise aiding the Jews to cover up the
Israeli/Jewish 9/11 attack, but there are just too many to cover here.
I want to call your attention to the artist groups (GELATIN & E-TEAM) who were selected to be part of the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council (LMCC) World Views / Studioscape programs that allowed them and other artists to work and live in the WTC in the four years leading up to 9/11 on different floors, including 91 and 92 of the North Tower.
Additionally,
they were given seven day a week construction access to the WTC that
allowed them to freely move all sorts of materials in and out of the
complex.
World Trade Center’s Infamous 91st-Floor Israeli ‘Art Student’ Project
In
the period leading up to 9/11, a group of Israelis (non-U.S. citizens)
managed to secure “temporary construction” passes to perform work on the
91st floor of Larry “pull it” Silverstein’s leased WTC 1. These passes gave them access to the entire WTC complex. The pretense was an art project called the “B-Thing” and the group is called Gelatin.
After
securing their passes, Gelatin proceeded to remove the heavy WTC
windows of an office space on the 91st floor and reportedly constructed a
prefab balcony outside of the building. Then they stretched “putty”
around the windows and filmed it by helicopter as a stunt. The New York Times even felt strangely compelled to cover this story and considered it newsworthy, or a backstory. On the right is the photo of the balcony as shown in the newspaper article.
This may sound innocent enough for the dumb dumbs except for the fact that photos — taken from the artists’ book called the “B-Thing” AND used in the Times’ article
— from inside the 91st floor camp out revealed boxes stacked to the
ceiling with the letters and numbering “BB 18” on the side. BB 18 is the
model number for a fuse-holder accessory, as described:
Pro-Clinton bias in search results have shifted votes to Mrs. Clinton
The researchers found “ evidence of demographic targeting.”
Google insiders like Gregory Coppola and Zach Vorhies breaking rank and revealing various political biases in Google search.
Google rebel engineer reveals search engine bias
Is Google a cult?
Google Critic Killed in “Ironic” Car Accident: Struck by Google Street View Vehicle
Prof: Google Must Not Choose the Next President
Robert Epstein, a Clinton supporter in 2016, thinks Big Tech meddling is a risk. And, he says, he isn’t planning on suicide
Denyse O'Leary | August 24, 2019
It’s not every day that we hear a prominent academic announce that he isnot suicidal. But human behavior specialist Robert Epstein lives in unusual times and faces two awkward dilemmas.
Okay, this is sort of funny…. It’s
been suggested that I remind people that I AM NOT SUICIDAL!!! I love my
life, wife, 3 awesome sons, 2 awesome daughters, my research, etc. etc.
Everyone got that??? Thanks to @Pumped_4_Trump for the suggestion. pic.twitter.com/TDBztmO3ZN— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 21, 2019
Bear with us; this is academia at its messiest.
A strong supporter of Hillary Clinton
for U.S. President in 2016, Epstein came into possession of information
that led him to conclude that Google had been manipulating search
results in her favor. In a public-access 2017 paper, Epstein and Ronald E. Robertson detailed some interesting findings on Google’s alleged manipulation of search engines to affect political outcomes:
3) Was the bias the same for all search engines? No. The level of pro-Clinton bias we
found on Google (0.19) was more than twice as high as the level of pro-Clinton bias we found on
Yahoo (0.09). The difference between these values was highly statistically significant (p <
0.001).
…
9) Issue: Could the pro-Clinton bias in search results have shifted votes to Mrs. Clinton? A
comprehensive study published in 2015 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
found that biased search rankings can easily shift the voting preferences of undecided voters by
20% or more – up to 80% in some demographic groups. Extrapolating from the mathematics
introduced in this report, in articles published in February 2016 and thereafter, the lead author of
the PNAS study predicted that a pro-Clinton bias in Google’s search results would, over time,
shift at least 2.6 million votes to Clinton. She won the popular vote in the November election by
2,864,974 votes. Without the pro-Clinton bias in Google’s search results, her win margin in the
popular vote might have been negligible.
The researchers also found “evidence of demographic targeting.” For
example, search results seen by men were twice as likely to be
pro-Clinton as those seen by women. Their paper has attracted attention recently, probably due to Google insiders like Gregory Coppola and Zach Vorhies breaking rank and revealing various political biases in Google search. Google claims it ain’t so but in any event, US President Donald Trump got hold of and responded to the expert and insider claims that Google would try to tamper with his reelection bid in 2020:
Wow, Report Just Out! Google
manipulated from 2.6 million to 16 million votes for Hillary Clinton in
2016 Election! This was put out by a Clinton supporter, not a Trump
Supporter! Google should be sued. My victory was even bigger than
thought! @JudicialWatch— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 19, 2019
Mr. Trump’s numbers are off but his news sense is on target. And Hillary Clinton hit back:
The debunked study you’re
referring to was based on 21 undecided voters. For context that’s about
half the number of people associated with your campaign who have been
indicted. https://t.co/0zHnWvGjSv— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) August 19, 2019
Dr. Epstein was, of course, put out when he heard that his study had been “debunked” and he responded,
@HillaryClinton,
whom I have strongly supported for many years, told blatant lies about
me today. As a result, I have been subjected to widespread condemnation
by mainstream media. I’m going to fight this. Stay tuned tomorrow for my
first-ever twitter storm. pic.twitter.com/CrPHMycVBu— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 20, 2019
“Debunked” is a problematic word, when used of an academic paper. It certainly doesn’t mean anything like “retracted.”
In a political
context, it most often means that ideological opponents have found a way
to blunt the force of the findings, chiefly among their own supporters
and perhaps for many “undecideds.” Robert Epstein has made clear recently that his concern is whether
Silicon Valley should use its near-monopoly power over search engines
and social media to ensure Donald Trump’s defeat in 2020 (or any other
political outcome) by manipulating the information available to the lone
voter in the booth:
“This is not a problem for
conservatives. This is a problem for humanity,” the psychologist told PJ
Media. “Who gave a handful of executives in Silicon Valley the right to
decide what billions of people around the world can see and cannot see?
Who gave them that power?” Tyler O’Neil, “‘I AM NOT SUICIDAL,’ Says Man Who Exposed Hillary’s Ties to Google” at PJ Media (August 22, 2019)
Epstein’s “suicide” theme stems, as readers may well have guessed,
from the coincidence that he has the same surname as accused child sex
trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, whose recent death while in federal custody has been ruled a suicide. Robert
Epstein has no plans for joining him and plans to press on, trying to
draw attention to the power of Big Tech and what it might mean for
politics in democracies. Along those lines, an article Epstein wrote last year at Hacker Noon is worth a read, to understand how Big Tech could affect an election and what he thinks could be done to prevent it:
What if, early in the morning on
Election Day in 2016, Mark Zuckerberg had used Facebook to broadcast
“go-out-and-vote” reminders just to supporters of Hillary Clinton?
Extrapolating from Facebook’s own published data, that might have given
Mrs. Clinton a boost of 450,000 votes or more, with no one but Mr.
Zuckerberg and a few cronies knowing about the manipulation. Because,
like most Democrats, Mr. Zuckerberg was overconfident that day, I don’t
believe he sent that message, but there is no way to know for sure, and
there is certainly nothing to stop him from broadcasting
election-tilting messages like that in the future — and not just in the
U.S. but in countries around the world. Do we have to wait for
whistleblowers or warrants to learn, belatedly, about shenanigans of
this sort, or is there a way to detect them as they occur? What kind of
monitoring system would it take? Is there a way to look over the
shoulders of internet users to see what overzealous tech companies are
showing them on their screens?
This is the story of how my
colleagues and I, working in the shadows of the internet, developed such
a system and used it to monitor what Google, Bing and Yahoo were
showing users in the months leading up to the 2016 election — a working
prototype for a large-scale monitoring system that we hope will soon be
protecting all of us 24 hours a day from the unfettered power of Big
Tech. Robert Epstein, “Taming Big Tech: The Case for Monitoring” at Hacker Noon (May 13, 2018)
One interesting facet of the controversy is that, at one time, the
claims about Google’s political preferences were not even especially controversial:
An under-the-radar startup funded
by billionaire Eric Schmidt has become a major technology vendor for
Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, underscoring the bonds between
Silicon Valley and Democratic politics. The Groundwork, according
to Democratic campaign operatives and technologists, is part of efforts
by Schmidt—the executive chairman of Google parent-company Alphabet—to
ensure that Clinton has the engineering talent needed to win the
election. And it is one of a series of quiet investments by Schmidt that
recognize how modern political campaigns are run, with data analytics
and digital outreach as vital ingredients that allow candidates to find,
court, and turn out critical voter blocs. But campaigns—lacking
stock options and long-term job security—find it hard to attract the
elite engineering talent that Facebook, Google, and countless startups
rely on. That’s also part of the problem that Schmidt and the Groundwork
are helping Clinton’s team to solve.
Pasick and Fernholz go on to speak about the “shrinking distance
between Google and the Democratic Party” and the “technology that helped
re-elect Obama.” Ah, a story lies in that last bit! As Gary Smith explained in a recent podcast at Mind Matters News,
“When Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump gave speeches, tens of thousands
of people showed up and yelled and screamed and were excited. And when
Hillary Clinton gave a speech, a couple of hundred people would show up
and sit politely. And you couldn’t put that in a computer.” Barack Obama
had, of course, been a charismatic candidate too—but one suspects that
the computer hadn’t even noticed that element in the two-time winner’s
success. The results of the US 2016 election were a surprise to many pundits
because technologies they had deemed very reliable, including trademark polling techniques,
failed to predict the results. As another election looms, we can be
sure of charges and counter-charges of Big Tech manipulation, some of
which may prove well-founded. Note: Prof. Epstein kindly noted our Mind Matters News article and tweeted:
Fabulous article by @itsdesign: “Prof [that’s me]: #Google
Must Not Choose the Next President.” 1 problem: I never claimed that
Google “manipulated” the 2016 election. I’ve simply reported the
significant level of pro-Clinton bias in their search results. https://t.co/dnfKoHSOLq— Dr. Robert Epstein (@DrREpstein) August 25, 2019
We apologize for any misunderstanding as to how to characterize search engine policies. It is a new area. Further reading on search engine manipulation: Whistleblower says Google called police to do a “wellness check” on
him. He can be seen doing a perp walk on the sidewalk in front of his
house on the video (some portions transcribed here). In the documents
Vorhies unearthed, Google seemed to be “intending to scope the
information landscape so that they could create their own version of
what was objectively true.” What others are saying about the new Google insider’s revelations. The documents’ authenticity is not in dispute. What to do about them is another matter (Zach Vorhies) Is Google a cult? Or does it just act that way?
Project
Veritas announces that a new rebel Googler has sent nearly 1000
documents on algorithm bias to the DOJ. While we prepare a news story on
Zach Vorhies’ revelations, it may be worth asking why one of the
world’s largest companies has developed what appears to be the
atmosphere of a political cult. and Google engineer reveals search engine bias. He found Google pretty neutral in 2014; the bias started with the US 2016 election (Gregory Coppola)See also: The US 2016 election: Why Big Data failed . In the aftermath, a Democratic pollster considered it “malpractice” to rely more on the machine than on Electoral College numbers. Bill Clinton reportedly threw his phone out a window in frustration over this tendency. __ https://twitter.com/itsdesign
Dr. Robert Epstein on Google's ability to affect the outcome of elections Sep. 09, 2019 - 11:46 - Senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology Dr. Robert Epstein joins Mark Levin to discuss bias in Google's search results.
My beautiful wife Misti, a published poet, succumbed last night to injuries sustained in a car accident. I was supposed to die in your arms some day, but a slippery road has ruined everything. You were not just my love, you were my greatest adventure. https://t.co/re3BCddZEMpic.twitter.com/kofjSGi2j2
'My beautiful wife Misti, a published poet, succumbed last night to injuries sustained in a car accident. I was supposed to die in your arms some day, but a slippery road has ruined everything. You were not just my love, you were my greatest adventure.'
R.I.P. - Misti Dawn Vaughn
___
Vista woman, 29, seriously injured in I-15 crash in Escondido
It happened around 8:05 a.m. on a rain-slick northbound I-15 near state Route 78
ESCONDIDO — A 29-year-old Vista woman was seriously injured Monday morning when her pickup spun out across a rain-slick Escondido freeway and into the path of an oncoming big rig, authorities said.
It happened around 8:05 a.m. on north Interstate 15 near state Route 78, California Highway Patrol spokesman Officer Mark Latulippe said in a statement.
It was unclear why the woman lost control of her Ford Ranger, but the truck “slid out of control ... and slid across the lanes into the path” of a Freightliner semi hauling two dump trailers, Latulippe said.
The trucker was unable to avoid hitting the Ranger and struck the passenger side of the pickup, Latulippe said. A 19-year-old Santee woman in a Toyota 4Runner was unable to avoid the nearby collision in front of her and struck the Ranger. Medics treated the Vista woman at the scene before Escondido Fire Department personnel took her to Palomar Medical Center with major injuries, Latulippe said. The 50-year-old Murrieta man driving the big rig and the Santee woman in the 4Runner were both uninjured.
A Sig Alert was issued around 8:50 a.m. shutting down the left two lanes, but the lanes were reopened around 9:45 a.m.
Monday, December 23, 2019 - 7:50 AM / 9:08 PM - Rain, again! A rather heavy band moved through here
(San Diego) in the past couple hours/ -
7:30 AM - My gauge was at a very
impressive .65". The second main band of this storm is approaching,
should easy get an inch total. NWS continues to predict widespread rain
Christmas night into Thursday. NWS posted storm totals as of 7AM: SD
Airport .50", Encinitas .74", Escondido .33", La Mesa .08". The calendar
year for San Diego is already the wettest in eight years!
- 11:10 AM - Edit: lost the data here.
- 12:30 PM - Gauge slightly more, now at
1.02" here in Bankers Hill. NWS updated storm totals as of 12:01 PM: SD
Airport .99", Encinitas 1.07", Elfin Forest .88", Escondido. 64", La
Mesa .41". Coast areas rather uniform and doing much better than SD
inland valleys and mountains.
- 9:00 PM - Recent fairly robust and
continuing local showers have brought my Bankers Hill gauge to 1.23" for
the day. Impressive. NWS storm totals haven't been updated since 7:16
PM: SD Airport 1:02", Encinitas 1.11", Elfin Forest .92", Escondido
.72", La Mesa .42". The latest forecast as of just a few minutes ago at
8:50 PM is calling for a "MAJOR and IMPACTFUL winter storm possible by
Christmas night". The capital letters are the NWS's! Precip amounts of
1" or more along the coast, although, ahem, this storm has already done
this. The main thrust is that there could be heavy snow the SD county
I-8 mountain passes.
Google Whistleblower and Hillary Clinton Critic
Dr. Robert Epstein Suggests Wife’s Fatal Car Crash Not an Accident, ‘I’m
Not Suicidal, Hear That, Hillary?’
by Cristina Laila
January 20, 2020
Photo of his wife Misti’s Ford Ranger after it was broadsided by a freight liner semi truck towing cement.
A 29-year-old Vista woman who suffered serious injuries Monday when her pickup spun out and was struck by a big rig and SUV on - rain-slick ? - Interstate 15 in Escondido has died, authorities reported Friday.
Misti Dawn Vaughn was driving on the transition ramp from eastbound state Route 78 to northbound I-15 around 8 a.m. Monday when her Ford Ranger spun out and veered to the left across freeway lanes, according to information from the California Highway Patrol and the San Diego County Medical Examiner’s Office.
The pickup was then struck on the passenger side by a big rig and subsequently struck by a Toyota 4Runner, according to the CHP.
Vaughn was taken to Palomar Medical Center in Escondido, where she was admitted to the intensive care unit and was given “poor prognosis for recovery,” the Medical Examiner’s Office reported. She was pronounced dead at the hospital at 10:12 p.m. Thursday.
The big rig driver, a 50-year-old Murrieta man, and the Toyota driver, a 19-year-old Santee woman, both remained at the scene and were unhurt, according to the CHP.
Drugs or alcohol were not believed to have been factors in the crash, the CHP said.–City News Service
Epstein is a research psychologist, editor, and author.
Google Critic Killed in “Ironic” Car Accident: Struck by Google Street View Vehicle
05/20/2014 12:30 pm ETUpdated
Jul 20, 2014
By Camille Johnson, San Diego Union-Tribune
San Diego, CA. Prominent research psychologist and author Dr. Robert Epstein, age 60, was killed yesterday afternoon by a Google Street View vehicle while crossing Front Street in San Diego, where he has long resided. Although foul play is not suspected, Epstein’s friends are calling the accident “ironic.”
According to Daryn Thompson, a 30-year friend of Epstein’s who also lives in San Diego, “We all know that Google isn’t evil, so there’s no chance this was deliberate, but it’s troubling and ironic that it just happened to be an outspoken critic of Google who was hit. I’m sure it was just a coincidence, though.”
Google Street View vehicles routinely drive up and down streets in countries around the world taking photographs of homes, businesses, and playgrounds.
For several years, they also secretly recorded unencrypted Wi-Fi signals in more than 30 countries, collecting massive amounts of personal data.
According to the company’s promotional materials, “The Street View vehicles provide an invaluable service to consumers, who really like having their homes, businesses, and playgrounds photographed. If they didn’t want them photographed, they wouldn’t have put them there in the first place.”
Epstein was a Ph.D. of Harvard University, the author of fifteen books, and the former editor-in-chief of Psychology Today magazine. In recent years, he published a series of essays criticizing various aspects of Google’s operations and ethics - Google’s Dance, published by TIME, Google’s Gotcha, published by U.S. News & World Report, Google’s Snoops, published by Dissent, and others.
Most recently, he conducted a series of experiments that prompted media coverage worldwide which appear to show that Google can determine the outcome of close elections by biasing search rankings to favor certain candidates. Based on those experiments, Epstein claimed that to protect voters from undue influence, Google’s ubiquitous search engine would need to be regulated and monitored, with political candidates guaranteed equal time in search rankings, just as they are guaranteed equal time on radio and television.
Earlier this year, stock analyst Susan William Gates - no relation to Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft - estimated that regulating Google’s search engine would reduce the value of Google’s stock by 95 percent. “Basically,” she said while giggling for some reason, “they’d be fucked.”
The driver of the vehicle, Eric Schmidt Jr. - no relation to Google’s outspoken executive chairman, Eric Schmidt - remained on the scene and was not arrested or charged. Said Schmidt - uh, junior, that is - “I’m really, really, really sorry. No kidding.”
The deputy sheriff on the scene, Lawrence Page - no relation to Google CEO Larry Page - said there was no evidence that Schmidt - uh, junior - had broken any laws. “A video kindly provided to us by a passerby wearing Google Glass,” said Page - uh, Lawrence - “shows clearly that Dr. Epstein was looking straight ahead when he crossed the street. - That was the problem. If he had looked to his right, he would have seen the Google Street View vehicle coming toward him at high speed, but he never turned his ahead. In other words, the real culprit here was Dr. Epstein’s poor peripheral vision. With better peripheral vision, he could easily have avoided being hit simply by running very fast.”
Asked to comment on the tragic accident, a Google spokesperson said, “We didn’t do it. We believe the accident occurred because of an impartial algorithm. All bad, illegal, or suspicious things having to do with our company are usually attributable to an impartial algorithm.”
[Comment by Dr. Epstein, not written from a hospital bed, where he is not on life support: “Every time I publish a satire, a few people turn up who take what I wrote literally. That is as it should be. Satire was invented to make fools of people, after all. In any case, for the record, and for the benefit of people who cannot understand satire (or, no doubt, good jokes), I am quite alive. Please hold off on the eulogies, and please do not boycott Google. You do not want to piss them off.”]
